General Flashcards

1
Q

What is a paradigm?

A

Scientific practice founded on beliefs, standards and norms that are the consensus of a group of researchers, this determines the choice, the what of the object to study and the methods to find solutions

Kuhn; Willett G, 1996; Klee, 1997

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a theory

A

Statement with an chain of propositions from deductive reasoning that form hypotheses that are verifiable by observations

They are always partial. They focus on a specific aspect of reality to ignore the rest.

“It is more fruitful to ask whether a theory is useful than to ask whether it is true.”

Willet 1996

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The elemets that consitute human health according to Lalonde

A

Human Biology
Environment (external factors beyond our control)
Lifestyle
Health Care System

Lalonde, 1974

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Three different approaches in public health

A

Lalonde, 1974; Rose, 1985; Frohlich et Potvin, 2008

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Criteria of vulnerable population

A
  • Population at risk- those with highest risk because of biological factors
  • Vulnerable population- those at risk because of socioeconomic conditions, oppression such as racism, sexism, stigmatization

Les populations vulnérables - critères
1. Distinctes des groupes à risques : elles sont à risques des risques
2. Associées avec la position dans la hiérarchie sociale et pas à l’étiologie de la maladie
3. Concentrent de nombreux risques
4. Risques accumulent à travers le parcours de vie
5. Capacité moins grande de profiter des interventions populationnelles

Lalonde, 1974; Rose, 1985; Frohlich et Potvin, 2008

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

High-risk population

Defintion

A

Proportion of population contributing most to average risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What governs action?

A

Action can be utilitarian (based on individual interest) or normative (based on values and values)

Social also includes hierchies, capital (trust), and networks (support)

  • « Il n’est pas juste une question de déterminants sociaux, c’est aussi quels sont les parachutes institutionnels et culturels, quelles sont les structures de protection auxquels les gens ont accès »

“Policy is social resource (ie. social network, capital, hierarchy and values) creation” Hall &Lamont, 2009

Lamont 2011; Hall &Lamont, 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Solidarity

A

Mechanical solidarity: community imposes values and norms based on consensus / small group sharing the same values and norms

vs.

Organic solidarity: increasingly specialized functions enabling us to evolve as a society, solidarity based on the complementarity of individuals).

Individualism as a threat as people develop their own norms/values

Durkhein

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Social network vs social capital

A
  • Social networks – logistical support, emotional support
  • Social capital – associations and trust in others

Social resources include: social networks, capital, hierarchies and narratives

Hall et Lamont 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the main problem of current societies?

A

How to maintain social connections

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Public health functions

A
  • Surveillance
  • Protection
  • Promotion
  • Prevention

Other
* Santé au travail
* Emergency intervention (DiRuggeiro)
* Environment protection
* Develop Policy (Turnock)
* Services planning and management (systems and politiques publiques)

Turnock BJ, 2016
3 core functions: Assess, Policy development, Assure – linked to 10 essential services

Kindig 2007;Pommier 2007;Martin-Moreno, 2016

Variety of definitions depending on context, from 5 to 12 (Martin-Moreno JM et al. 2016)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Ethical challenges of core public health functions

A

Surveillance – autonomy, confidentiality

Protection – benevolence, responsibility, common good

Prevention – non-malfaisance (do not harm), solidarity

Promotion – auto-determination, usefulness

Massé R, 2003

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Types of evidence

A
  • Type 1 – disease relationship (setting, example, quantity?, action) – suggests something should be done
  • Type 2 – Effectiveness of public health intervention – intervention should be implemented
  • Type 3 – Adaptation and translation of an effective information - concerns How an intervention should be implemented

Evidence-based public health: Choices based on evidence, but the use of participation is key to make a decision. This is followed by HIA before implementation, then evaluation

Brownson 2009, 2022

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Public health in Quebec

A
  • Institute societal en santé publique: decisions and institutions
  • Politiques publiques
  • Système de service en santé publique: delivery
  • DRSP
  • INSPQ
  • INESS
  • La Loi sur la santé publique de 2001 établit le cadre législatif des fonctions de santé publique. L’orientation législative au Québec cadre avec une approche de type « Santé dans toutes les politiques ».
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is HiAP?

A

Systematically consider health implications of decisions

De Leeuw E et al. 2017; Smith et al. 2013; Baum F et al. 2013

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Synomyms of HiAP

A

Intersectorial approach and whole government approach

De Leeuw E et al. 2017; Smith et al. 2013; Baum F et al. 2013

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Adelaide statement

A

“Health is a political choice” –> Health sector should understand policies and health implications of such policies

De Leeuw E et al. 2017; Smith et al. 2013; Baum F et al. 2013

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Window of oportunity

A

Goverment agenda decided by:
1. Political stream (public and politicians)
2. Problem stream

  1. Policiy stream (experts) –> Policy entrepreneurs–> alternatives

When the 3 convert –> window of opportunity and then decision

Kingdom, 1984

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Health impact assessment

A
  • Procedures, methos, tools to judge policies and decisions regarding their impact on health
  • Done before the implementation
  • Allows intersectorial action and influence policies to increase health
20
Q

Health is created largely outside the health sector.

A

de Leeuw E 2017

21
Q

Causal description vs Causal explanation

A

Causal description – describing the consequences that we can attribute to varying a treatment – this is a unique strength of experiments

Causal explanation – clarify the mechanisms and conditions where the causal relationship works, eg. Lightbulbs and switches, sources of electricity

Shadish WR et al. 2002

22
Q

Conditions for causality

A
  • Echangegability: is people interchangeable (confounders)
  • Positivity: Each individual has the same chances to benefit from the intervention (this redefines the target population)
  • Coherence: The intervention is well defined and specific. The same for everyone

Sourial 2022

23
Q

Propensity score

A

Allows the creation of a sample in which individuals are interchangeables and have the same chances of being exposed to the intervention (positivity).

We need to include in the model all known confounders.

Reproduces randominzation

Sourial 2022

24
Q

Causal question

A

Would the result be the same in intervention group had they not been exposed?

Intervention - counterfactual ≠ 0 –> causality

Sourial 2022

25
Risk analysis steps
1. Hazard identification: is is a risk? --> in vitro, in vivo and epidemiological data 2. Dose-response evaluation: what is the threshold? --> modeling and experimental studies 3. Exposure evaluation: what is the source? --> water, aire, food, soil 4. Harm characterisation: what is the risk population? Literature review, biological sample | Recommendations done based on these steps ## Footnote Vener 2022; Faustmann 2015
26
Precaution/uncerainty principle
* Proportionality: of risks and benefits * Justice: risks and benefits are distributed equally in the population * Autonomy: capacity of individuals to make decisions and respect their values * Feasibility: resources * Adapatability: to new info for risks, benefits and other considerations | Ricci et al, 2003; Weed DL, 2004 ## Footnote "Precaution at its core is prevention" (Weed DL, 2004)
27
What is one health?
*Non antropocentric* apporach to understand the relationship between human health, animal health and evironmental health ## Footnote Kelly A et al. 2014; Rabinowitz P and Conti L, 2013
28
Bases of the one health apprach
* **Interdependence** of all health: not anthropocentric – humans, animals, environment * **Intersectoral** approach: collective needs, eg. Drinking water, climate change * Process of **collaboration**: reduce professional segregation between human and animal health (Rabinowitz, 2013), importance of veterinary medicine (Kelly, 2014)
29
Examples of health issues that benefit from one health approach
Eg. Fires – climate change impact weather patterns, drier, impacts animal health, human health (people leaving homes, people chronic conditions esp. respiratory) Eg. Lyme disease and ticks – dogs are sentinels, getting ticks more often, climate change extending the fall season, earlier spring Eg. Antibiotics in agriculture – antibiotic resistance to Ceftiofur which combats salmonella, ban in 2004, reduced antibiotic resistance in chickens and then subsequently in humans, demonstrated the interdependence of animal and human health (2005-2008) (Dutil et al., 2018)
30
Logical Positivism | Ontology, epistemology, methodology
Ontology: Realism * 1 reality outside of mind Epistemology: Objectivist/dualist * Researcher can be separated to produce objective knowledge * Matter exist independent to mind and has laws Methodology: * Scientific method to experiement on a external reality * Observation and verification to test hypothesis Teology (purpose): Determine the laws of the world to predict phenomena Axiology (values): Objectivity | "Exterior looking" ## Footnote Vienna circle
31
Post-positivism | Ontology, epistemology, methodology
Ontology: Critical vision on realism * 1 reality outside of mind which we can *partially* understand through observation and experimentation. Epistemology: Objectivist/dualist * Researcher can be separated to produce objective knowledge that is highly probable, but in the future can be falsified * Matter exist independent to mind and has laws Methodology: Falsification * Just because something happens many times doesn't mean ti will always happen (ex. humans not eating turkey from Jan to Sept) * Science is deductive: hypothesis --> deductions --> falsification --> Provisionaly true (until further falsification) * cimetière des idées Teology (purpose): Determine the laws of the world to predict phenomena Axiology (values): Objectivity | "Exterior looking" (Poupart J et al. 1997) ## Footnote Popper
32
(Social) Constructivism/Interpretivism | Ontology, epistemology, methodology
Ontology: Relativist * There are many relative context-specific reailities * Reality is socially created (Berger and Luckmann, 1966): Role of history, language and culture * Object have existance outside but not meaning outside of human world Epistemology: Relativist (but not 100%) * There is no on right or objective meaning *but* there are criteria to get to the truth * Nuance understandings from people enrich our understandings of the world Methodology: Qualitative to study the dialectical process of social construction of reality | "Interior looking" (Poupart J et al. 1997) ## Footnote Agonism between realist and antirealist perspectives have brought a more mature view of science where both perspectives of science are needed (Lehoux P, 2001)
33
# Steps Dialectical process of reality
1. Externalization – express subjective reality with language 2. Objectivation – subjective reality becomes part of institutions, norms, values (external to individual) 3. Internalization – incorporate into individual consciousness, entrenched values ## Footnote Berger and Luckmann, 1966
34
Pragmatism | Ontology, epistemology, methodology
Ontology of action * rather than representations of conceptualizations, it's our experiences the most important touch point with reality * Values action and impact on that reality rather than theory or philosophy * agonism between realism and relativism Epistemology of action * Kwoledge is built and modified through actions and interactions with people * There is a bidirectional relationship between knowledge and practice * Critical perspective on the usefulness: Knowledge is created by choosing the best tools to solve the problem * Explicit recognition of the limits of inquiry within time and context Methodology: mixed methods * Scientific inquiry and experimentation *but* recognizing its limitations and the influence of social structures * What is helpful and useful at the time * How to come up with better tools, less about understanding or describing the problem Teology (purpose): autonomy, skills, relationships Axiology (Values): usefulness, change, action "As scientists, we should not seek to mold the world to knowledge we have, but question ourselves if our understanding is helpful to the context" (Poupart J et al. 1997) ## Footnote Dewey; Willis JW et al. 2007; Creswell, 2007
35
Critical realism/critical theory
Ontology: realism Epistemology: Feminist * The knower is always influenced by her/his situation--> knowledge is situated * Looking up, view from oppressed Methodology: mixed methods Teology (purpose): Undercover and disengtangle power relationships and empower the oppressed Axiology (values): justice, equity | The view from the bottom (those who are oppressed) (Poupart J et al. 1997 ## Footnote Willis JW et al. 2007; Poupart, 1997; Freire, 1972
36
Precision public health
"emerging practice to more granularly **predict and understand** public health **risks** and **customize** treatments for more **specific and homogenous sub-populations**, often using new data, technologies and methods” * big data driven and epidemiology – roots in infectious disease * Outstanding issues – how to account for community values and resources ## Footnote Dobbins M & Buckeridge D, 2020
37
What is the new public health?
Concerned with SDoH, relationship with environment, political drivers of health, need to return to Indigenous perspectives ## Footnote Baum F, 2008
38
Agency vs structure
**Agency** * Social basis: Individualism * Principle: Autonomy * Ethics: Human rights approach * Consequence in public health: Victim blaming * Interventions in public health: Individual behaviour change **Structure** * Social basis: Collectivism * Principle: Paternalism * Ethics: The greatest good for the greatest number * Consequence in public health: Oversocialize, collective good – may accrue more benefits to those with more agency * Interventions in public health: Socio-structural influence on development of health or illness | Baum F, 2008 ## Footnote From dualism to **duality**, Agonism --> Easier to conceptualize the integrated, multi-level, multi-strategy approach (Carroll, 2017)
39
Domains for recommendations Healthy lives (Marmot M et al. 2010)
* Lifecourse perspective: Give children a good start * Everyone can maximise capabilities and have control of their lives (Ottawa Charter, 1986) * Fair employment and good work * Healthy standard of living * Sustainable communities: active travel, public transport * Ill health prevention
40
Inequality vs inequity
Inequalities in health describe the differences in health between groups independent of any assessment of their fairness. Inequities refer to a subset of inequalities that are deemed unfair (avoidable, justice). ## Footnote Evans T et al. 2001
41
Dimensions of empowerment
* Material (to live a decent life) * Psychosocial (have control of their lives) * Political (they need to be able to participate in decision making processes) ## Footnote Marmot 2007
42
Proportionate universalism
Refers to the concept that people across the whole population gradient are entitled to social benefits proportionate to their needs. | Blends whole population, at-risk, vulnerable – rooted in equity ## Footnote Marmot M, 2020
43
Example of a policy with unintended consequences
Ban the box – to restrict criminal records being available to employers, and favor social insertion after prison. Unintended consequence: this created an inequity in that employers used race as a proxy for criminality and were 6 times less likely to call people of color back for job opportunies ## Footnote Wiseman et al., 2021
44
Validity vs causality
Causality is about mechanism, the explanation * causal explanation Shadish, 2002 (causality - which answers the why and why not with a counter factual) * Causality authors - Pearl J, 2018; Sourial N et al., 2018 Validity is about the reproducibility * causal description (experiments and logical inference, where validity and reproducibility is key) * Validity - Rothman, 2014; Campbell, 1965 | Tubulchinsky, 2013; Rothman, 2008; Klee, 1997; Shadish, 2002
45
Public health principles
* Social justice:develop the ability of people to realize their potential in the society in which they live * Health equity: the absence of avoidable differences in health among groups * Social determinants of health: the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age * Ecological determinants of health: natural resources, ozone layer, fertile soil, stable climate * Evidence-based public health: surveillance, types of evidence (Brownson 2009), participation and consultations, health impact assessment * Intersectorial action | Canadian Public Helath Association, 2017