General Flashcards
What are the three requirements for a contract?
- Agreement
- Intended to be legally binding
- For consideration
What are three examples of contracts that require writing?
- Contract for the sale of land
- Consumer credit agreement
- Guarantee - eg where someone agrees to be guarantor for another.
NB - electronic contract is seen as contract in writing.
What contracts require a deed?
- Transfer of land (ie. conveyance), cf contract for the sale of land.
- When there is no consideration made by one of the parties.
What is the time limit for breach of contract formed by deed?
12 years
Cf all other contracts for which the limitation is 6 years
What are the three conditions of a valid offer?
- Undertaking, commitment or promise (cf invitation to treat)
- In certain terms (as to be enforceable)
- Communicated to the offeree
What 2 kinds of communications do no amount to an offer?
- Response to request for information
- Invitation to treat
What are examples of invitations to treat?
- advertisements;
- price lists;
- items on display in a shop
- auction
- tenders
Offer happens when person responds to the ad, price list, or display
What is a unilateral contract and when is it made and accepted?
A promise for A to do something if B does something in return and B actually does it.
A becomes bound ONLY when B performs.
eg. Please find my doggo. Reward £50
How can an offeror revoke their offer indirectly?
BY
- Correct information
- From a reliable source
- Of acts by the offeror which would indicate to a reasonable person that offeror no longer wishes to make the offer.
When can an offeror usually revoke their offer?
BEFORE acceptance of the offer
When can an offeror NOT revoke their offer pre acceptance? Three relevant circumstances
- There is a collateral contract to keep the offer open - Offeree MUST have provided consideration for this collateral contract. eg I’ll pay you £10 to keep the offer open for a week.
- In the case of a unilateral contract. Once communicated and offeree starts performance, it canot be revoked.
- In the case of a bilateral contract. Here IF offeror does not set out what amounts to acceptance, performance will amount to acceptance AND cannot be revoked.
NB - unilateral contract - performance does not amount to acceptance BUT does mean offeror can’t revoke.
How can an offeree reject an offer?
- Express rejection
- Counteroffer amounting to a rejection (cf mere enquiry which would render a reasonable person to believe that the original offer was still open)
- Lapse of time (w/in reasonable period) whatever amounts to a reasonable time - depends on goods (eg are they perishable?)
In what circumstances can an offer be revoked by operation of law?
- death
- illegality
- destruction
- failure of a condition contained in the offer
Who may accept an offer?
Usually only someone who the offer was made to.
However, note that could be accepted under agency rules as long as agent is accepting on behalf of the offeree.
What is a valid method of accepting an offer?
Usually any reasonable means to communicate.
IF specific method set out in the offer, usually NOT accepted if not in the stipulated way EXCEPT if no less advantageous
Can silence amount to acceptance?
Usually not! Must take positive step. V rare exceptions to this which are not covered.
What amounts to acceptance of offer of a unilateral contract?
ONLY when performance is complete is the offer accepted.
Does offeror of a unilateral contract need to notify offeree?
NOT to let them know that they have started performance
BUT should notify within reasoable period AFTER performance.
What is the postal rule and why is it relevant for acceptance?
Postal rule dictates that valid offer is made when received, valid rejection is made when received, and valid acceptance is made when posted.
When does the postal rule apply?
It applies unless
- The offeror stipulated a different method of acceptance
- The postal acceptance is incorrectly addressed/posted
- It was not reasonable for acceptance to be made by post.
What is the battle of the forms?
When parties send their own terms. the last set of terms sent before performance is deemed to have won the battle of the forms.
What is a prevail clause and when is it effective?
Prevail clause states that one party’s terms will prevail.
BUT rarely enforceable because of the battle of the forms - last word wins.
How is the presumption that friends do not intend to enter into legally binding contracts rebutted?
Courts have found that friends joining together to enter into a race/contest intend to be legally binding.
How is the presumption that commercial contract are inteded to be legally binding rebutted?
- By stating that is agreement in honour only OR
- By stating it is subject to contract - that is pending the written and signed agreement.
In what circumstances is a contract with a minor enforceable?
- When it is ratified at age 18
- When it is for acquisition of property
- When for ‘necessaries’
NB - for acquisition of property will be binding unless minor express repudiates the contract
What remedies are available for when minor renders contract void for intention?
Under the Minors Contract Act 1987 - can recover property transferred to minor under void contract, if it is just and equitable
When does intoxication render a contract void?
When NOT a contract for necessaries AND person entering into contract knew that the other party was intoxicated.
What is the difference between executed and executory consideration?
Executed - where consideration complete
Executory - where consideration is outstanding
What is enough consideration for a contract?
It must be sufficient but need not be adequate.
It should not be wholly illusory
ie doesn’t have to be market value, or a good deal
In what 2 circs will performance of an existing duty amount to good consideration?
EITHER
when it goes beyond the work agreed (eg complete the work in one week rather than two)
OR
When it provides a practical benefit to the other party - eg avoidance of monetary sanction
When will performance of an existing statutory duty amount to good consideration?
NEVER - eg paying police to maintain law and order. Police not providing good consideration.
HOWEVER - possible for police to go above and beyond their stat duty, that would amount to fresh consideration.
When will act previously performed amount to good consideration?
When there was implied agreement that paymnet would be made following performance.
THREE conditions:
- Act done at promisor’s request
- Both parties understood that the act would be remunerated, and
- payment/benefit must have been legally enforceable had the promise been made in advance
In what circumstances will an agreement to part payment of a debt amount to good consideration, and therefore be enforcable?
- Bone fide payment - honest belief that correct amount
- Some other benefit - ie paid at a different time, by different means, at a different place.
- Payment made by third party - who honestly believed it would satisfy the debt
- Uncertain what the debt was – uncertain amount
- Creditors agreement
What is promissory estoppel and when is it applicable?
When it would be unjust for promisor to go back on their promise. Shield NOT sword - cannot basis for a claim, only a defence.
Conditions:
- Unequivocal promise by promisor
- Relied up by promisee to their detriment
- It would be inequitable for promisor to go back on promise
When (4 circs) does the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 apply?
- When third party expressly granted right to enforce in the contract
- When contract purports benefit on third party AND reasonable that parties intended for third party to enforce?
- When the Act has not been contracted out
- When NOT an employment contract
In what 3 circs can contracts that benefit third party NOT be varied or rescinded to their detriment?
- If third party communicated agreement to the benefit
- If third party relied on the benefit and promisor knew OR
- Promisor reasonably expected to foresee that third party would rely AND third party has relied.
In what 5 circs will a third party be able to enforce a contract under the common law
- Agency (but not really by third party, just on behalf of one of the parties)
- Assignment - BUT can only assign benefit of a contract, not the burder
- Subrogation - eg where insurer steps into shoes of the policy holder
- Collateral contract - basically fresh contract
- Trust - A and B agree that B will hold on trust for C. C can enforce.
What 3 consideration will the court use to assess whether term or representation?
- Importance - would the party have entered into the contract but for the statement? If no, then likely a term.
- Timing - made at the time of the contract or during preliminary negotiations?
- Special knowledge? If statement of fact/based on special knowledge, it’s likely to be a term. IF based on belief then likely to be a representation.
What is a condition v a warranty?
Condition - goes to the root of the contract. Breach is often called repudiatory breach because the effect is repudiation of the entire contract. Innocent party can terminate contract and claim damages.
Warranty - Does not go to root of the contract. Cannot terminate contract as a result. May claim damages.