General Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Vicarious liability

A

Liability is imputed to one person or company on the basis of what another person did (or failed to do), even though the actors do not share a common purpose. Employer-employee, principal-agent, it does not arise at common law; conduct in the scope of employment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Corporate liability

A

It refers to situations where a corporate entity-generally a company, but sometimes another entity having a legal identity separate from its consistent members - has itself engaged in criminal conduct and is accordingly held criminal responsibility for it’s own acts or omissions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Controlling mind

A
Doctrine, which requires that a sufficiently senior person (or group of persons acting collectively) is identified as the mind behind the company's action.
Purcell Meats (Scotland) Ltd v McLeod 1987; Transco PLC v HM Advocate (No 1) 2004; Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass 1972
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

S.294 Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995

A

Any attempt to commit a crime is itself criminal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Coercion

A

The defence that the accused was forced to commit a crime against their will by another person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Theft

A

AR - appropriation of corporeal moveable property belonging to another without the owner’s consent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Embezzlement

A

The dishonest appropriation of property which is entrusted to the accused by the owner, where the accused has a power to administer that property and a duty to account.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Fraud

A

AR- the use of a false pretence that deceived another and causes a definite practical result; show that the deceived party would have otherwise acted differently
Aclock v Archibald 1925

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Uttering

A

Committed where a person (1) deliberately exposes a forged document to another person as if it was genuine; the exposure is to the prejudice of another; and the forged document passes beyond the control of the person uttering it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Extortion

A

Use of threat to obtain an advantage; Carmichael v Black

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Bribery

A

Bribing involves offering, promising or giving a financial or other advantage to another person, where the briber intends this to induce a person to perform improperly a relevant function or activity, or to reward a person for such improper performance, or where the briber knows or believes that the acceptance of the advantage would itself constitute such improper performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974

A

All employers have to comply with them; s2(1) “it shall be the duty of every employer to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees”; s2(3) employs more than 5 to prepare and keep updated written statement of his general policy;

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999

A

Employer self-employed person to undertake a suitable assessment risk; obligation to control, review their health and safety provision.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998

A

Suitable equipment for intended purpose, maintenance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992

A

Manual handling which involve a risk of being injured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992

A

Manual handling which involve a risk of being injured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

The Health and Safety (Display Screen Equipment) Regulations 1992

A

Assess suitability of work stations and train users

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007

A

S.1(1) the way in which its activities are managed or organised - (a) causes a person’s death, and (b) amounts to a gross breach of a relevant duty of care owed by the organisation to the deceased

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Competition law

A

Prohibit anti-competitive practices; the Competition Act 1998; EU law by arts 101 and 102 the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; CA and art 101 prohibit arrangements between businesses which have the capacity to affect trade in the UK or EU and have, as their object or effect, the restriction of competition in the UK or EU. Eg Price fixing, market sharing agreements. CA 1998 and art 102 prohibit conduct which amounts to abuse of a dominant position; and affects trade in the UK or EU. eg predatory pricing Aberdeen Journals Ltd v Director General of Fair Trading 2003 CAT 11; R v Whittle, Brammar and Allison 2008 EWCA Crim 2560

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Merger Control

A

Enterprise Act 2002 as amended by Regulatory Reform Act 2013

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Environmental law

A

Environmental Protection Act 1990; many regulations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Procedural regulation

A

Is where the law is not concerned with the outcome of a given regulatory process, but requires only that a particular process be gone through before a decision is reached.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Contract

A

An agreement which creates or is intended to create a legal obligation between the parties to it Gloag

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Agreement

A

The need for two or more parties; the general lack of need for particular formality; agreement which intended to create legal obligation will constitute a contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Unilateral gratuitous promise

A
  • formal writing or in the course of business, no acceptance, obligation on one person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Consensus in idem

A

Meeting of the minds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Muirhead and Turnbull v Dickson 1905

A

Piano, hire purchase, credit sale, although consensus in idem commercial contracts not in inmost minds but what people say

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Mathieson Gee Ltd v Quigly 1952

A

Pont equipment service what was agreed, no contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Invitation to treat

A

Is not an offer but merely an announcement that one would like others to come forward and make an offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company 1893

A

Advert. Influenza after 2 weeks of usage £100, deposit in bank, offer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Fisher v Bell 1961

A

Flick knife not guilty displaying was not an offer to sell but merely an invitation to treat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Wolf and wolf v Forfar potato co 1984

A

Potatoes, counter offer

33
Q

Continental Tyre and Rubber Co Ltd v Trunk Trailer co Ltd 1987

A

Battle of forms , fired last shot, tyres

34
Q

Verbatim

A

in exactly the same words as were used originally; word for word; letter for letter

35
Q

Ascertain

A

to fix; to render certain or definite; to estimate and determine; to clear of doubt or obscurity

36
Q

Proof before answer

A

Is a hearing on both factual and legal issues. A proof before answer is appropriate where the court need to hear the evidence before addressing the legal issue

37
Q

Faciliative

A

adj, helpful; providing assistance or serving a useful function

38
Q

sequestrate

/ˈsiːkwəstreɪt,ˈsiːkwɛstreɪt/

A

take forcible possession of (something); confiscate

39
Q

consign

/kənˈsʌɪn/

A

deliver (something) to a person’s keeping.

40
Q

conversion

/kənˈvəːʃ(ə)n/

A

the changing of real property into personalty, or of joint into separate property, or vice versa.;the action of wrongfully dealing with goods in a manner inconsistent with the owner’s rights

41
Q

approbation

/ˌaprəˈbeɪʃ(ə)n/

A

approval

42
Q

remuneration

/rɪˌmjuːnəˈreɪʃ(ə)n/

A

payment

43
Q

pledge

/plɛdʒ/

A

a solemn promise or undertaking.;a thing that is given as security for the fulfilment of a contract or the payment of a debt and is liable to forfeiture in the event of failure.

44
Q

endeavour

/ɪnˈdɛvə,ɛnˈdɛvə/

A

try hard to do or achieve something.

45
Q

seize

/siːz/

A

(of the police or another authority) take possession of (something) by warrant or legal right.

46
Q

topical

[ˈtɒpɪk(ə)l]

A

(of a subject) of immediate relevance, interest, or importance owing to its relation to current events

47
Q

Communication of acceptance

A

Instantenous, delayed,

48
Q

Entries Ltd v Miles Far East Corporation 1955

A

Communication of acceptance, acceptance must be received

49
Q

Dunlop v Higgins 1848

A

Delayed communication of acceptance

50
Q

Carmarthen Developments Ltd v Pennington 2008

A

Postal acceptance rule did not apply,

51
Q

The Requirements of Writing (Scotland) Act 1995

A

Writing is not required for the constitution of a contract, unilateral obligation or trust; require writing: interest in land, a gratuitous unilateral obligation (outside business), trust, will testamentary.

52
Q

Terms and conditions

A

Expressly, by agreement; by incorporation from an outside source ( by reference or through a prior course of dealings); and by implication

53
Q

Scots contractual interpretation

A

Contractual document to be read as a whole; determining what a reasonable person knowing what the parties knew at the time of contract formation would understand the words used to mean; different approaches for different types of contract;construction not reconstruction

54
Q

Exemption clauses

A

These are clauses by which one party seeks to exclude liability it would otherwise incur.; (common law) if ambiguous it would be interpreted in the way least favourable of the interest of the party who had imposed them.

55
Q

Exemption clause

A

These are clauses by which one party seeks to exclude liability it would otherwise incur

56
Q

The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977

A

No for consumer (here CRA) but business to business, reg attempts by business to exclude or limit their liabilities through the exemption clause., apply to broad range of contracts, excluded: contracts of insurance, contracts of the sale of land or relative to the formation or dissolution of any form of business organisation;state that exemption clauses which exclude or limit liability for other sorts of losses caused as a result of negligence or other breach of duty will only be enforceable if they satisfy a fair and reasonable test (16(1)(b); render enforceable exemption clauses which purport to exclude or limit liability for death or personal injury caused as a result of negligence or other breach of duty (16(1)(a); make all exemption clauses contained in standard-form contracts subject to a fair and reasonable test (s.17)

57
Q

The Consumer Rights Act 2015

A

Pt 2 - contractual terms - consumer contract;s.2 def trader and consumer, s.68 - consumer contract written is transparent - plain, intelligible language and be legible.

58
Q

Void

A

Absolute nullity, no legal effect, never came into being; lack of legal capacity

59
Q

Voidable

A

Does come to existence, but suffers from an underlying defect which means that either of the parties can go to court, asking for it to be annulled or reduced.; so tricked into entering by provision of false info; problem with legal capacity; restitutio in integrum

60
Q

Boyd and Forrest v Glasgow and South West Railway Company 1915 SC (HL) 20

A

BF entered into a contract with GSW to build a railway line. BF started the job, they found out that info from GSW about geological characteristics was incorrect. Contract voidable. But not reduced,, they job they’ve done could not be undone, restitutio in integrum impossible

61
Q

Unenforceable agreement

A

The court without giving consideration to whether the contract is void or voidable, simply say that the contract is of nature that they will not enforce it. Contrary to public policy, an immoral objective

62
Q

Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act 1991

A

3 period of young legal capacity contract

63
Q

Prejudicial transaction

A

One which a reasonably prudent adult would not have entered into, and which has caused or is likely to cause substantial prejudice to the young person ALCSA 1991 s. 3

64
Q

Force and fear

A

Null void, Earl of Orkney v Vinfra 1606 more 16481,

65
Q

Facility and circumvention

A

Weakened state of mind, old age mind illness, insanity, or physical frailty

66
Q

misapprehension

A

error

67
Q

Pacta illicita (pactum illicitum)

A

[illegal contracts] certain contracts which the courts will not enforce, even if the parties themselves intend them to be enforceable. At comman law, at least, such contracts are not void or voidable; the courts take the view that they will not allow the parties to enforce them.; unlawful acts; contrary to public interest - promote immorality or is an unjustifiable restrain of free trade. (contracts to commit crimes; contracts to commit delicts egA into a contract with B compelling B to breach his pre-existing contract with C;contracts which promote immorality - Hammilton v Main (1823) 2 S 356; (6 days in inn with prostitute consume a lot of alcohol -M entitled for money for alcohol but not prostitute); contracts which are contrary to public policy; statutory eg s16(10) UCTA;in restrain of free trade

68
Q

Sponsiones ludicrae

A

contracts relating to gambling

69
Q

Restrictive covenants

A

Term by which one party to the contract agrees that for a period of time he will refrain from doing certain things which would involve him commercially competing with the other party - “ Seller hereby undertakes and covenants no to set up any business within [X] miles of [the location of the business sold] for a period of [Y] years from the date hereof” ( you at radio you could not work for a competition); Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt [1894] AC 535 - restrictive covenant test - conf info, reasonableness, public interest;

70
Q

Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt [1894] AC 535

A

N sell arm company, agreed that he stay as Managing director for next five years, and also entered into restrictive covenant - 25 years not engage in manufacturing of guns except for this company. N left MN started selling guns. HL upheld covenant, restrain reasonable. (M world wide tratder)

71
Q

Agri Energy v McCallion [2014] CSOH 14

A

M sold domestic oil supply and recycling business North East of Scotland to AE. M agreed to restrictive covenant - prevent competing against AE anywhere within Scotland for 5 years. M established rival business around three years later. Restrictive covenant upheld

72
Q

MacFarlane v Dumbarton Steamboat Co Ltd (1899) 1 F 993

A

a restrictive covenant which sought to prevent the seller of a business which carried goods between Dumbarton and Glasgow from operating as carriers anywhere within the UK - 10 years, the court relied upon the inherently local nature of the ferry buisness, nationwide restriction unreasonable.

73
Q

Associated Foreign Exchange Ltd v International Foreign Exchange (UK) Ltd and Abbassi [2010] EWHC (Ch) 1178

A

protect price info preventing the employee from working for competitor for year. held that in fast-moving market (currency market) it was too long.

74
Q

Solus agreements

A

a seller of goods agrees to sell only or predominantly the products of a particular supplier (must be reasonable)

75
Q

Significant breach of the contract

A

which “ goes to the roots of the contract” material breach

76
Q

Anticipatory breach

A

(repudiation). The party who is due to make performance under a contract informs the innocent party, before the time for performance, that he is not going to fulfil his side of the bargain. rescind contract or If cause a loss - innocent party action for damages; wait; carry out the contract

77
Q

Remedies for breach of contract

A

(where a contract has been breached, the innocent party will be able to pursue one or more remedies against the party who has breached the contract:
self-help remedies:
-rescission: material breach- innocent decides not to continue with the contract and brings it an end (rescind) - can be combined with a claim for damages if there was loss
- retention: innocent withholds payments or performance of its obligations until the party in breach performs its obligations. (e.g. rent)
-lien: innocent party happens to have lawfully within its possession goods or doc belonging to the party in breach, it may retain possession of that property until the party breach performs its obligations under the contract.
Judicial remedies )only by order of the court
- action for debt
-specific implement (not money e.g. delivery of item); to do something
-Interdict : the converse of a decree for specific implement; not to do something
-damages (compensate for losses - put in the state before the contract, requirement of causation, mitigating loss, remoteness of loss, liquidate damages (clauses) penalty?-true nature of the clause) available with conjunction of another remedy

78
Q

Balfour Beatty Construction v Scottish Power Plc 1994 SC (HL) 20

A

BB won a tender to build a length of road, needed provision of electricity (SP), BB needed continuous pour of concentrate for aqueduct. Electricity supply failed. BB sued SP for breach of contract. HL held not liable for loss, the consequence did not naturally flow from the failure, SP was also not aware of need of continous supplu and what damages would occur.

79
Q

Who may when a contract is breached

A
  • privity of contract ( parties of the contract, “not world at large”: an exception third party rights- the Contracts (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Act 2017)