Gene Therapies in Neurological Disorders Flashcards
How can the viral delivery of gene-based therapies be beneficial in neurological diseases?
→ Conventional pharmacological approaches for treatment of various neurodegenerative diseases have been predominantly disappointing
- This is despite have a relatively good understanding of disease pathogenesis
- The novel targets are not readily “druggable”
There has been significant progress in the designing of viral vectors that now diffusely deliver genes throughout the CNS in addition to new genomic engineering tools that can subsequently alter disease pathways
Gene replacement allows for..
correction of a significant gene mutations which ultimately causes a disorder
- can be NB in correction of loss of function (as seen in SMN protein in spinal muscular atrophy)
What do gene based therapies offer?
- Ability to directly target disease pathogenesis
- Capacity to achieve a “permanent correction”
- A single long-lasting intervention (one and done) that provides sustainable pharmacology and efficacy is very attractive for CNS diseases
What are the essential components of gene therapy?
Vector, Promoter, Transgene
Why is a vector so NB?
responsible for tissue targeting and delivering the transgene and promoter to target cells, which can either increase or decrease expression of a certain gene
→ can include adenovirus, adeno-associated virus, retrovirus and lentivirus
Why is a promoter so NB?
responsible for selective gene expressions and driving transgene expression in intended tissue targets
Why is a transgene so NB?
responsible for producing a functioning version of the protein of interest
→ the genetic material introduced to targeted tissues by the vector and its expression is then driven by the promoter
How do these components in gene therapy work together?
the vector binds to a specific receptor, enters the nucleus where the transgene and promoter are released and form an episome, this generates RNA which is responsible for protein generation of the essential protein… depending on the pathogenesis of that specific condition
Why is the AAV Capsid so important?
It is NB in determining several key features of effective AAV gene therapy
- Tissue tropism: - viral purification methods can influence
- Distribution: - receptor interactions, anterograde and retrograde axonal transport
- Susceptibility to targeting by neutralising antibodies
→ Administration of AAV vectors to CNS via intraparenchymal route demonstrates sustained transduction of neurons
→ AAV serotypes from natural AAV can vary in terms of transduction efficiency, biodistribution if alternative modes of administration are used (intrathecal or IV)
→ AAV2 most frequently used in clinical trials, provides long term expression in CNS neurons but has limited restriction in biodistribution
→ Capsid properties can be engineered to increase their efficacy, mainly in preclinical models - none used in clinical trials
→ Biodistribution and homogeneity of cellular transduction - greatest challenges with AAV delivery for NG diseases
AAV uses a range of proteoglycans including
Heparin Sulphate, as a primary cell surface receptor
Secondary receptors have also been identified for several AAVs…
like fibroblast growth factor receptor, laminin receptor
Receptor interactions can influence…
the biodistribution and tropism of the AAV capsid
What does the route of administration and dosing paradigm determine?
The expression levels and homogeneity across cell types and tissue regions of interest in the brain
Also depends on which disease
What are the most commonly used routes of administration of AAV?
Intraparenchymal (IPa), as it bypasses the BBB and delivers genes directly to the brain region and neurons of interest
→ One and Done features is essential due to required surgical procedure
→ Well tolerated in clinical trials to date
→ Minimal biodistribution to peripheral organs
→ Reduced immunogenicity
→ Significantly lower vector doses required compared to other routes of administration
Other routes of administration:
Intrathecal (IT) - access via spinal cord cerebrospinal fluid via the space under the arachnoid membrane
Intracerebroventricular (ICV) - into the CSF via the lateral cerebral ventricles
Intracisternal (IC) – into the CSF via the cerebromedullary cistern
Currently mainly assessed in preclinical models, a small number of clinical trials have shown to be well tolerated, dosing regimes can be altered by varying volume delivered, rate of infusion & vector conc.
Compared to IPa, dosing via these routes results in lower tissue levels of vector genome and a more heterogeneous distribution, required doses are generally higher
IV administration - huge potential to transfer vector genes to entire CNS non-invasively with more uniform distribution
→ Some concerns to be addressed
IV injection exposes the virus to potential antibody neutralisation in subjects who have been pre-exposed to natural AAV infections
Approx. 90% of adults have been exposed to AAVs, and a smaller fraction harbour neutralising antibodies against AAV capsids profound negative impact on AAV vector transduction
IV administration typically requires higher total doses to achieve efficient transduction than IPa, IT or ICV administration- scale of manufacturing capacity must be sufficient