Gender (Arguments) Flashcards
What major scholarly developments is the study by John Tosh - A Man’s Place: Masculinity and the Middle-Class Home in Victorian England (1999) grounded in?
1) the broadening of women’s history to embrace the history of gender - enabling an understanding of the family as a system “embracing all levels of power, dependence and intimacy”
2) the development of an economic and social history that views domesticity as an integral feature of modernity - an essentially nineteenth-century invention different from just domestic life
R. W. Connell - Gender and Power 1987 - key theory development
- Emphasised gender is a large-scale social structure not just a matter of personal identity
R.W. Connell - Masculinities 1995, 2005 - key theory
- Develops concept of hegemonic masculinity
- Hegemonic masculinity is defined as a practice that legitimizes men’s dominant position in society and justifies the subordination of the common male population and women, and other marginalized ways of being a man
- Conceptually, hegemonic masculinity proposes to explain how and why men maintain dominant social roles over women, and other gender identities, which are perceived as “feminine” in a given society
- Idea that there is a normative, peak man, that everyone aims to be
What influences R.W. Connell’s ideas and theory?
- She is a trans woman - impacts her view of gender
- Clearly rooted in Gramscian ideas of cultural hegemony
- Directly mapped from class onto culture
What are some critiques of Connell’s hegemonic masculinity concept?
- Some say it homogenises masculinity
- Some critique the absence of race in the original discussion
- If you remove the gender binary, do not need to be a “man” to adopt masculinity i.e. Thatcher - social constructs
What is the significance of Connell revisiting work on masculinity in 2005 10 years later?
- Addressing all the criticisms
- Shows still something which is being discussed and debated
Why does B Griffin critique Tosh’s work?
Says Tosh’s framework is outdated because gender is everywhere
Simone de Beauvoir (1949) The Second Sex - Key Ideas
- One is not born but becomes a woman
- Radical idea of gender as constructs
- Discusses how women have been treated throughout history and how socially imposed situational constraints
- Doesn’t consider that man is also a social construct
Significance of context de Beauvoir writing in
- Post-war France
- Women just been given the vote 1944
- WWII lots of gendered violence vs women in France reactionary
- Can’t see that masculinity is a construct because seems like from her perspective men are benefitting from patriarchy because of her middle-class privilege
How did women’s history emerge in the late 1960s and 1970s? (in Britain)
- 1968 revolutionary - students movements in Europe, sexual revolution, civil rights in the US - women becoming involved and organising but often marginalised
- Leads to development of and consolidation of second-wave feminism which peaks in 1970s
- Women’s history emerged from the 1960s/1970s women’s rights movement
- Firmly rooted in the political, sp. left-wing tradition
- Ties between feminist politics and women’s history in late 1960s and 1970s was esp. strong
What is the historical context of the emergence of women’s history in the 1970s? (4)
- C. this time women were beginning to get jobs in academic history depts, previously had been rare, e.g. Lincoln’s first woman fellow appointed in 1980
- Margaret Thatcher’s elected UK’s 1st woman PM in 1979
- Rowbotham and co also being pushed to sidelines of New Left movements by male ‘comrades.’
- Male social historians disparage suggestions to look at women’s history
Sheila Rowbotham (1974) Hidden From History - historical context and historiographical significance and content (5)
- Focused on rediscovery of lives of women in the past - set up Ruskin History Workshops after male social historians laughed at her suggestion to look at women’s histories
- At this point - inextricable link between commitment to women’s history and the women’s movements aims - not the same now
- Rowbotham and co also being pushed to sidelines of New Left movements by male ‘comrades.’
- Debt to Marxism focused the historical debate on certain issues more than others i.e. mostly looking at how class and sex, work and the family, personal life and social pressures hindered women’s struggles for equality
- In Hidden from History, she examined British women’s history from the 17th century to 1930 from a Marxist viewpoint. For Rowbotham, the history of British women could best be defined through class oppression, the Industrial Revolution, and sexism.
Historical and Historiographical context of the 1980s in European gender history field (6)
- Shift to gender history
- Fragmenting of Women’s Liberation Movement in Britain
- Critique of the inadequacies of the “add women and stir” supplementary approach to history
- Challenges of universality of womanhood
- Some scholars worried shift would result in abandonment of tangible experiences
- New emphasis on discourse, cultural construction, and gender systems undeniably threatened the emphatic, rigid categorisation of women’s history and accounts of their tangible experiences so central to 1960s/70s
bell hooks (1981) Ain’t I a Woman? Black Women and Feminism - THEORY AND ARGUMENT
- Examines the effect of racism and sexism on Black women, the civil rights movement, and feminist movements from suffrage to the 1970s
- Argues convergence of sexism and racism during slavery contributed to Black women having the lowest status and worst conditions of any group in American society
- White female abolitionists and suffragists often more comfortable with Black male abolitions such as Douglass
- Southern segregationist and stereotypes of black female promiscuity and immorality caused protests whenever Black women spoke
- Stereotypes set during slavery still affect Black women today
- Black nationalism was largely a patriarchal and misogynist movement, seeking to overcome racial divisions by strengthening sexist ones
- Readily latched onto idea of emasculating Black matriarch
- Feminist movement - largely white middle and upper class - did not articulate needs of poor and non-white women, thus reinforcing sexism, racism, and classism
- Doesn’t provide a bibliography for any of her work, doesn’t use footnotes, difficult to find citations listed under notes
- In later work she explains her lack of conventional academic practice is motivated by a desire to be inclusive and reach as many readers in as many diff locations as possible
Angela Davis (1981) Women, Race, and Class - CONTENT
- Similar to hooks looking at women, race, and class throughout American history
- Intersectional approach - highlight the issue with universal categories of womanhood and how lived experiences differed
- Looks both at masculinity and femininity as social constructs within black community and role of whites but also the layers of class dimensions too
Joan Scott (1986) ‘Gender: A Useful Category of Analysis’ - HISTORIOGRAPHICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF HER THEORY/WORK (5)
- Inaugurated shift away from women’s history to gender history - which used gender as a lens through which to view history
- Gender as a cultural rather than biological category, product of discourse rather than experience - i.e. a social construct
- Abandons biological determinism → discarding of search for a single universal account of women’s oppression
- History now tasked with understanding meanings that femininity/masculinity carried in the past and what it meant for wider social experience
- Relational dynamic of this femininity and masculinity constituted the fundamental self/other power paradigm - acted as a framework for explaining historical change and phenomena
Judith Butler (1989) Gender and the Subversion of Identity - KEY ARGUMENTS/THEORY (11)
- Concept of a female in our culture is unstable and relational
- Gender as a category is the creation of institution, practices and discourses
- Feminist aim should not be to construct a correct notion of identity based on gender, but move from critique already well underway in feminist theory
- Sets out to speculate on the possibility of a feminist politics which might be without a subject in the category of women
- Reconsiders the status of women as the subject of feminism and the sex/gender distinction
- Compulsory heterosexuality and phallogocentrism are understood as regimes of power/discourse within language
- Selective reading of structuralism, phychoanalytic and feminist accounts of the incest taboo as the mechanism that tries to enforce discrete and internally coherent gender identities
- Subverisve bodily acts - critical consideration of constructing the maternal body
- Shows implicit norms that govern cultural intelligibility of sex and sexuality in Kristeva’s work
- Performative subversions consider surface bodies are politically constructed
- AMONGST OTHERS, LOOKS AT Q POSED BY DE BEUAVOIR
Kimberlee Crenshaw coins term intersectionality for first time
1989