Gender Flashcards
Sex
Biological characteristics of a person (genes/chromosomes; reproductive anatomy) Male & female
Gender
Psychological or behavioural characteristics of a person relating to their sex (ways of thinking, feeling, acting) Masculine & feminine.
Sex-role stereotypes
Widely held beliefs about expected or appropriate ways of acting for men and women.
Gender identity
An individual’s perception of their own masculinity and or femininity.
Gender identity disorder
Strong, persistent feelings of identification with the opposite gender and discomfort with one’s own assigned sex.
Rubin et al - aim
To find out if new parents stereotype their babies
Rubin et al - procedure
Parents were asked to describe their new babies within 24 hours of the baby being born
Rubin et al - findings
> Found that parents of baby boys described their babies as being alert and strong
Whereas parents of baby girls described their babies as soft and delicate
Rubin et al - Conclusion
> Parents stereotype their children from a very early stage despite no stereotypical behaviour being shown.
For a lot of parents who know the sex of the baby before birth, this stereotyping behaviour starts before the baby is born by painting a room pink for a girl or blue for a boy
Seavey et al - aim
To see whether the gender label attached to a baby affected adult responses
Seavey et al - procedure
> A three-month-old infant was dressed in a yellow baby-suit.
One third of the participants were told that the infant was male, another third were told that the infant was female, and the other third were not given a gender label.
Participants were left to interact with the child for three minutes. Also in the room were some toys: a ball, a rag doll and a plastic ring.
Seavey et al - findings
> When the baby was labelled as female, participants were more likely to use the doll when playing with the child.
When the baby was labelled as male, the plastic ring was chosen most frequently as the plaything.
Where no gender was given, female participants interacted far more with the baby than the males did.
In the no-label condition almost all the participants spontaneously decided on a sex for the baby.
Their decision was often justified in terms of how the baby was perceived physically (e.g. ‘it’s a boy because he’s got a good grip, it’s a girl because she’s soft’)
Seavey et al - conclusion
Adults will interact differently with infants depending on whether they believe they are male or female
Batista boys
> A family in the Dominican Republic that highlight the importance of the presence or absence of testosterone.
Only known to be 23 families in the World that have this condition.
Rare genetic disorder occurs because of a missing enzyme which prevents the production of a specific form of the male sex hormone - dihydro-testosterone - in the womb.
All babies in the womb, whether male or female, have internal glands known as gonads and a small bump between their legs called a tubercle.
At around eight weeks, male babies who carry the Y chromosome start to produce dihydro-testosterone in large amounts, which turns the tubercle into a penis. For females, the tubercle becomes a clitoris.
But some male babies are missing the enzyme 5-α-reductase which triggers the hormone surge, so they appear to be born female with no testes and what appears to be a vagina.
It is not until puberty, when another huge surge of testosterone is produced, that the male reproductive organs emerge. What should have happened in the womb happens around 12 years later.
Nature/nurture debate
> Tends to suggest that there are only two explanations of how gender develops – your biology or your upbringing.
There are, in fact, a number of theories which have been put forward to explain gender development.
These theories tend to challenge each other since they look at gender from quite different perspectives .
However, many researchers would agree that they have their own strengths and limitations in terms of how well they explain gender development.
First six to eight weeks
> All foetuses have the same undeveloped sex organs.
The original system can develop into both male or female sex organs.
It is the presence or absence of a single gene (SRY gene) which will dictate the future development of the foetus as a male or a female.
Boy or girl?
> Everything develops as a female unless instructed otherwise.
The Y chromosome contains instructions for the body to produce androgens (male sex hormones). These cause the embryo to develop along the ‘male path’.
Male development
SRY gene produces a protein : Testes Determining Factor (TDF) -> TDF influences the development of the gonads, they become testes -> The testes produce testosterone -> Testosterone triggers the development of external male organs i.e. penis.
Female development
The absence of male hormone will result in the development of the Mullerian system into female sex organs.
Hormones
Once the testes and ovaries develop they begin to release their own sex hormones: Male hormones are known as androgens - the most widely known of which is testosterone. Female hormones are mostly oestrogen. Women also typically produce oxytocin in much larger amounts than men.
Puberty
After around 10 years, the hypothalamus releases a hormone which affects the anterior pituitary gland and this causes the gonads to become active. They control the development of secondary sexual characteristics.
Nature
> The extreme nature view would suggest that gender-related behaviour is entirely controlled by hormonal and genetic factors - gender differences result from innate differences between female and male.
This view assumes that women are biologically programmed to be nurturers and carers, while men are biologically programmed to be providers and protectors.
Nurture
> The extreme nurture view would suggest that gender related behaviour is entirely determined by social and cultural factors – our experiences and the environment in which we live.
Gender differences result from the different experiences that females and males have as they develop (learning from family, peers, society)
Nature or nurture?
> In the nurture argument a basic assumption is that babies are born without a gender identity (gender neutral) so can be socialised to be either male or female.
However, there are real-life cases where children have been unsuccessfully raised as the ‘opposite sex’ which support the nature argument.
Positive evaluation - David Reimer and Van Goozen (1995)
> The case of David Reimer shows that his chromosomes had outweighed attempts to socialise him as a girl – this shows that biology was the greater influence on gender.
Van Goozen (1995) studied transgender individuals who were undergoing hormone treatment and being injected with hormones of the opposite sex. Transgender women showed decreases in aggression and visuo-spatial skills whilst transgender men showed the opposite. This research indicates that sex hormones do exert some influence on gender-related behaviours
Positive evaluation - Gorski et al
Gorski et al discovered a structural difference in the brains of male and female rats. A region of the hypothalamus is known as the sexually dimorphic nucleus, and is larger in males than in females. Gorski attributed this to prenatal exposure to the male hormone testosterone. This might account for differences in behaviour between males and females.
Negative evaluation - Tricker (1996)
> There is contradictory evidence that shows that sex hormones have no consistent effect on gender-related behaviour. In a double-blind study (Tricker – 1996)
43 males were given either a weekly injection of testosterone or a placebo. No significant differences in aggression were found after the ten-week period between the two groups.
Many studies of biological factors in gender involve small samples of people, or are conducted on animals – this therefore limits the extent to which meaningful generalisations can be made.
If gender identity is purely down to biology then we would expect to find many more differences in male and female behaviour than there actually are.
The biological approach is reductionist - it reduces gender to the level of chromosomes and hormones and has been accused of ignoring alternative explanations.
Atypical Sex Chromosome Patterns
Not all individuals conform to the typical XX or XY chromosome pattern. Any sex chromosome pattern that deviates from the usual XX/XY formation is referred to as ‘atypical’. Psychologists are interested in studying atypical chromosome patterns as this contributes to our understanding of how gender develops.
Why study atypical sex chromosome patterns?
Psychologists can compare people with typical sex chromosome patterns to people with atypical sex chromosome patterns. Inferences may then be made as to whether or not differences in gender may be biological/chromosomal which helps to develop the argument about whether gender is as a result of nature or nurture
Turners syndrome
XO – only one X chromosome on 23rd pair. Characteristics: >Characteristic facial features. >Web of skin. >Constriction of aorta >Poor breast development >Underdeveloped ovaries.
What does Turners syndrome cause?
> Physical differences (neck, stature)
Underdeveloped ovaries, lack of menstruation at puberty
Poor spatial and mathematical abilities.
Poor social adjustment.
Klinefelter’s syndrome
XXY – additional X chromosome on 23rd pair Characteristics: >Poor beard growth >Breast development >Underdeveloped testes
What does Klinefelter’s syndrome cause?
> Physical differences (stature, limbs)
Underdeveloped genitalia
Gynecomastia (the abnormal development of large >mammary glands in males resulting in breast >enlargement) in some cases.
Poor language abilities, learning difficulties.
‘Shy and passive’ temperament.
Atypical Sex Chromosome Patterns positive evaluation - nature nurture
Studies of people with atypical sex chromosome patterns are useful as they contribute to our understanding of the nature-nurture debate. By comparing people who have these conditions with chromosome-typical individuals it becomes possible to see psychological and behavioural differences and how these influence gender.
Atypical Sex Chromosome Patterns positive evaluation - continued research
Continued research into atypical sex chromosome patterns is likely to lead to earlier and more accurate diagnoses of Turner’s and Klinefelter’s as well as more positive outcomes in the future. An Australian study of 87 individuals with Klinefelter’s syndrome showed that those who had been identified and treated from a very young age had significant benefits compared to those who had been diagnosed in adulthood (Herlihy et al 2011). Early diagnosis and therapeutic interventions in children with KS could have a beneficial effect on their physical, academic, and social development, as well as their overall health. Unfortunately, only 10% of men affected by KS are diagnosed during preadolescence and adolescence, the time when treatment can be the most effective.
Atypical Sex Chromosome Patterns negative evaluation - differences in behaviour
The relationship between the chromosomal abnormalities associated with Turner’s and Klinefelter’s syndrome and the differences in behaviour seen in these individuals is not causal. Environmental and social influences may be more responsible for the behavioural differences e.g. acting immaturely due to being treated immaturely (Turner’s syndrome)
Atypical Sex Chromosome Patterns negative evaluation - generalisability
There is an issue with generalisability as conclusions are drawn from an unrepresentative sample (atypical individuals to the wider population – what is ‘typical’?). Also individuals with KS and TS may look different which in turn results in them being treated differently – therefore it can be difficult to assess the relative contribution of nature and nurture
Cognitive explanations for gender development
There are several explanations of gender development – two of these are cognitive explanations They are specifically cognitive-developmental explanations because they share the view that a child’s mental concept of gender becomes more sophisticated with age. The first cognitive-developmental explanation was proposed on Lawrence Kohlberg (1966) who suggested that a child’s understanding of gender develops in three stages.
Kohlberg - gender identity
2-3 years of age, first stage
>Children begin to think about gender at approx 2 years and are able to correctly identify themselves as a boy or a girl – this is gender identity.
>At 3, most children can respond to questions such as ‘Which one of these is like you?’ when shown a picture of a man or a woman.
>Children believe that their sex can change – a girl may want to be a daddy when she grows up.
>Believe that changing clothes can change a person’s sex i.e. a boy in a dress becomes a girl.
>Children may show a preference for playing with children of their own sex – this is only because they see themselves as belonging to that particular group.
Kohlberg - gender stability
3-4 years of age, stage two
>At the age of 4 (approx.) children begin to realise that their sex will not change over time – this shows they have acquired gender stability.
>Due to being egocentric they do not realise that this also applies to other people.
>Children still see certain characteristics as being masculine or feminine, and assume that someone doing a heavy labour job – like in a factory, must be a man.
Kohlberg - Gender constancy
6-7 years of age, stage three
>Children begin to appreciate that other people have a different point of view from their own – they are less egocentric – they de-centre.
>They realise that everyone’s gender is constant and that changes in outward appearances do not influence whether someone is male or female – this is known as conservation.
>A person’s sex is the same across time and different situations. They might, however, still regard a man in a dress as strange or unusual.
>Kohlberg believed that it was at this time that children actively seek out role models to imitate to help them develop their sense of gender.
Kohlberg - Gender appropriate role models
> Gender constancy is also significant in that children of this age begin to seek out gender-appropriate role models to identify with and imitate.
This connects with ideas presented by the social learning theory (although SLT argue that these processes can occur at any age rather than after the age of 6).
For Kohlberg, once the child has a fully developed and internalised concept of gender at the constancy stage, they embark upon an active search for evidence which confirms that concept
Kohlberg - Supporting evidence - Marcus and Overton
Marcus & Overton (1978) - Using a flip book, children were shown ‘muddled’ pictures where hairstyles and clothes of a male and female character could be changed. The children were then asked what sex they thought the character was. Younger children believed that changing clothes can change a person’s sex i.e. a boy in a dress becomes a girl. Older children understood that gender is constant and that changes in outward appearances do not influence whether someone is male or female.
Kohlberg - Evidence to support the sequence of stages - Slaby and Frey
> Slaby and Frey (1975) investigated the development of children’s understanding of gender in relation to the attention they give to the same-sex models.
Children between age of 2-5 , divided into high and low gender constancy groups, shown a silent film.
2 adult models, one male and one female carrying out stereotyped gender role activity (baking/changing a wheel), screen was split.
Children watched both films and eye movement and direction of gaze were recorded to assess which film they looked at most.
They found that the child that had reached high levels of gender constancy spent more time watching same sex models than those with low levels of gender constancy.
Supporting Kohlberg’s claims that children pay attention to same sex models after stage of constancy has been reached.