Gender Flashcards
Gender
Shorrocks (2018)
Data/Methodology
What is the Gender Gap in ideology/vote choice? (/and why?)
- The analysis combines waves 2–4 of the European Values Study (EVS) and waves 3–6 of the World Values Survey (WVS), producing a data set spanning from 1989 to 2014.
- 13 European Countries included: Austria, Belgium, Canada, France, Finland, West Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, and Sweden.
- Dependent variables are left-right self-placement, and left-wing vote intention, based on who respondents said they would vote for in a general election
- Independent variables are birth year and female.
Gender
Shorrocks (2018)
Findings
What is the Gender Gap in ideology/vote choice? (/and why?)
- There is a gender-generation gap in Europe and Canada; in older cohorts men are more to the left than women, whilst in younger cohorts, women are more to the left than men
- In all countries except Ireland and West Germany there is a gender generation gap in left-right self-placement, and in all countries except Ireland, Belgium, the Netherlands, and France there is a gender-generation gap in vote intention; there is no gender gap or a traditional gender gap among the older cohort, and a new, flipped gender gap among the younger cohorts
Gender
Shorrocks (2021)
Findings
What is the Gender Gap in ideology/vote choice? (/and why?)
- Women and men have differing policy positions on many issues; women, especially younger women, are more likely to be supportive of more social spending and redistribution and, policies to protect the environment, and men are more likely to vote for parties which adopt more militaristic stances
- Political parties that emphasize economically left-wing, pro- environmental, and internationalist policy positions seem the most likely to see gender vote gaps in support
Gender
Yildrim (2021)
Findings
What is the Gender Gap in ideology/vote choice? (/and why?)
- There are statistically significant gender differences in most individual policy categories, with the gender gap being larger for issues such as war, health policy, poverty, education, and children’s and family issues (in favour of women, and budget deficit, inflation, and foreign policy (in favour of men)
Gender
Sanders and Shorrocks (2019)
Argument
What is the Gender Gap in ideology/vote choice? (/and why?)
- The impact of policies enacted between 2010 and 2017 did have a gendered effect, but this effect was not the same for different generations; whilst younger women were more anti-austerity, more pessimistic about their economic position, and therefore less likely to be supportive of the conservative party than their male counterparts, this did not hold for older women, who were more protected by the coalitions policies on pensions and more similar to men in their assessment of their economic situation
- The way in which policy affects women does contribute towards the gender gap in political attitudes because the gender gap is most present in women who are most affected by these policies.
Gender
Sanders and Shorrocks (2019)
Data/Methodology
What is the Gender Gap in ideology/vote choice? (/and why?)
They examine the relationship between economic pessimism and vote choice for the 2015 and 2017 general elections.
Gender
Sanders and Shorrocks (2019)
Findings
What is the Gender Gap in ideology/vote choice? (/and why?)
- In both elections, men under 35 were more likely to vote conservative and less likely to vote labour than women under 35, and that once economic pessimism is included, these gender differences shrink significantly, showing that women’s larger financial pessimism than men play a role in accounting for gender gap in the vote.
- Different levels of economic insecurity also goes some way to explain gaps between older women’s voting and younger women’s voting; the age differences among women also shrink when economic pessimism is included in the model
However: Economic perceptions may be endogenous to party support; those who support the incumbent party (in this case, the conservatives) may be more likely to hold optimistic views on the economic situation.
Gender
Harteveld and Ivarsflaten (2018)
Argument
What is the Gender Gap in ideology/vote choice? (/and why?) (RRP)
Women are more likely to be motivated to control prejudice than men, and those who are highly motivated to control prejudice are less likely to support extreme right parties
Gender
Harteveld and Ivarsflaten (2018)
Methodology/Data
What is the Gender Gap in ideology/vote choice? (/and why?) (RRP)
Representative survey data from Europe
Gender
Harteveld and Ivarsflaten (2018)
Findings
What is the Gender Gap in ideology/vote choice? (/and why?) (RRP)
- Among virtually all European Radical right electorates, women are underrepresented, often constituting only around a third of their voters
- Whilst there is not a universally present or substantial gender gap in attitudes towards immigrants, women score significantly higher than men on the scales of motivation to control prejudice
- When respondent’s motivation to control prejudice is controlled for, the gender gap shrinks to insignificance
- For the Norwegian progress party, a right-wing populist party which is successful at diffusing charges of inciting prejudice, taking the motivational measure into account does not explain the gender gap in voting. This further supports their claim that for parties that do have a reputation of perpetuating prejudice, motivation to control prejudice affects their vote from women.
However: A gender gap still exists even when motivation to control prejudice doesn’t contribute significantly to it, such as in Norway, suggesting that this is not the only reason in the gender gap in the vote for radical right parties
Gender
Oshri et al (2022)
Argument
What is the Gender Gap in ideology/vote choice? (/and why?) (RRP)
- Women tend to vote for radical right parties less than men because women are more risk averse, and risk averse voters are less inclined to vote for radical right-wing parties.
- Voting for populist radical right parties is risky because they have a significantly smaller chance of winning seats in parliament, so voters will risk wasting their vote and because these parties have little parliament experiences and question and campaign against the political establishment.
Gender
Oshri et al (2022)
Data/Methodology
What is the Gender Gap in ideology/vote choice? (/and why?) (RRP)
- Data from the European Social Survey and Comparative Study of Electoral Systems
- To operationalize PRRPs’ electoral strength, they employed the following three measures: a dummy variable that takes the value of 1 if these parties had ever entered parliament in the past, PRRPs’ vote share in the last national election preceding the survey, the share of seats in the national legislature, determined at the last national election preceding the survey
Gender
Oshri et al (2022)
Findings
What is the Gender Gap in ideology/vote choice? (/and why?) (RRP)
- Risk averse voters are less likely to support the populist right and that women are more risk averse
- There is a smaller discrepancy in vote populist right parties which are deemed less risky to vote for; when parties had previously entered parliament, the probability for female voters to support them was more than double what it was when they had not previously entered parliament
**However: Different electoral systems have different levels of risk attached to voting for extreme parties – maybe should take this into consideration **
Gender
Edlund and Pande (2002)
Argument
Gender Differences in Political Attitudes - Change over time
- Decreased marriage rate and increased divorce rate has changed women’s economic position, leading them to now have preferences for left-wing parties over right-wing parties.
- Not being married makes men richer and women poorer, causing more unmarried than married women to support left wing policies and parties and vice versa for men, creating a change in the gender gap as marriage rate decreases over time.
Gender
Edlund and Pande (2002)
Data/Methodology
Gender Differences in Political Attitudes - Change over time
- Survey data from the biennial National Election Studies (1964-1996) to examine whether changes in aggregate divorce risk affected male and female political preferences differently
- Three waves of the Youth Parent Socialization Survey to directly examine how changes in marital status affect an individual’s party affiliation