Gastrointestinal System/Adomen/Abdomen Wall Flashcards
Page 489 - Page 592
In a small town in Sydney, suddenly a number of people fell sick with bloody diarrhea, severe abdominal pain, and oliguria. In the Emergency Department, most of them are severely dehydrated and confused. The panel of doctors recommended emergency blood tests. Which one of the following, if present on test results, is diagnostic of the condition?
A. Thrombocytopenia.
B. Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia.
C. High creatinine levels.
D. Severe ADAMTS 13 deficiency.
E. High LDH levels.
B. Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia.
Renal failure reflected by oliguria and abdominal pain following invasive diarrhea is classic presentation of hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS)
. Addition of CNS symptoms (confusion) to this constellation makes thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP)
another possibility if it is caused by ischemia because of thrombi and not sodium derangement caused by severe dehydration. The exact etiology of HUS and TTP is not clear, but the role of Shiga toxin in HUS and ADAMTS13 (a metalloproteinase) in TTP have been implicated.
HUS, and to some extent TTP, commonly occur following a diarrheal illness with enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Shigella dysenteriae serotype I. These bacteria, in addition to causing bloody diarrhea, are capable of secreting Shiga (Shigella) and Shiga-like toxin (E-coli). These toxins can bind to certain cell membrane receptors, which, depending on the cell type, can result in:
1. Chemokine or cytokine secretion (colonic and renal epithelial cells)
2. Cellular activation (monocytes and platelets)
3. Secretion of unusually large Von Willebrand multimers (glomerular endothelial cells)
Clinical differentiation of hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) and TTP can be problematic; however, central nervous system involvement is more common in TTP, and more severe renal involvement in HUS.
In HUS, an antecedent history of diarrheal illness is often present. In fact, some authors suggest a clinical classification of HUS based on the presence or absence of diarrhea.
In children, the distinction between HUS and TTP may be more important because general supportive measures (with dialysis as needed) are the standard therapy for HUS, while TTP is treated with plasma exchange. In adults, however, HUS is also often treated with plasma exchange; therefore, differentiating between HUS and TTP is not as important as it is in children.
There is not a single diagnostic test for HUS and TTP. These are diagnosed based on clinical presentation and presence of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia presenting with:1. Anemia, elevated bilirubin and LDH (often significantly high)
2. Presence of schistocytes on peripheral smear
In this case, presence of micro-angiopathic hemolysis, is the most important finding that suggests either HUS or TTP. The distinction between the two, however, neither is possible with certainty, nor is necessary as the therapeutic approach is almost the same for both HUS and TTP in adults.
Option A: Thrombocytopenia is almost always a feature of HUS and TTP, as it is in other conditions such as ITP; therefore, it is not diagnostic.
Option C: Renal function tests, including creatinine are part of workup for suspected HUS or TTP, but not diagnostic because high creatinine levels are seen in TTP and HUS as well as dehydration and many other conditions.
Option D: ADAMTS13 is a metalloproteinase that cleaves Von Willebrand factor (VWF). Its deficiency results in circulating large multimers of VWF. Large molecules of VWF multimers by adhering circulating platelets together leads to microthrombi in the organs, ischemia, and end organ damage. Majority of patients (>90%) with acquired TTP have circulating antibodies against ADAMTS13 making them ADAMTS13 deficient; however severe ADAMTS13 deficiency is more common in sporadic forms rather than outbreaks. As the test is time-consuming and more prognostic rather than diagnostic, it is not routinely ordered. Furthermore, ADAMTS13 deficiency alone does not seem to cause TTP, and a contributing factor such as pregnancy, infection, drugs, etc. is required to trigger TTP.
Option E: Regardless of the etiology, elevated LDH is seen in hemolysis. LDH is neither sensitive, nor specific for HUS/TTP.
Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP)
A 72-year-old man presents to the emergency department with complaint of perianal pain for the past 2 days. His anal area is illustrated in the accompanying photograph. Which one of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
A. Thrombosed internal hemorrhoid.
B. Thrombosed external hemorrhoid.
C. Rectal carcinoma.
D. Crohn’s disease of the anus.
E. Perianal abscess.
A. Thrombosed internal hemorrhoid.
Traditionally, hemorrhoids are classified as internal and external; however, some authors believe that since these two have different origins and mechanisms of development, they are better termed hemorrhoids (instead of internal hemorrhoids) and perianal hematoma (instead of external hemorrhoids). Perianal hematoma and external hemorrhoids are often interchangeably used.
Hemorrhoid (internal hemorrhoid):
The anus is mainly lined by discontinuous masses of spongy vascular tissue termed anal cushions, which contribute to anal closure and differentiating flatus from stool. Viewed from the lithotomy position, these cushions are located at 3, 7, and 11 o’clock. These cushions are attached together and to the surrounding structures by supporting fibromascular tissue. Hemorrhoids occur when these structures become bulky and protruded due to gravity, straining, or increased tone of anal sphincter (unlike the common belief, hemorrhoid is not a varicose anal vein).
Bulky and protruded cushion are at risk of trauma from hard stool and bright red bleeding from the capillaries of the underlying lamina propria.
Constipation and straining are the most common causes of hemorrhoids; however, bowel habit is normal in many patients. Congestion from a pelvic tumor, pregnancy, congestive heart failure, nephrosis, or portal hypertension plays a role in only a minority of patients.
Hemorrhoids are classified as following:
- 1st degree – remains in the rectum.
- 2nd degree – prolapses through the anus on defecation but reduces spontaneously afterwards.
- 3rd degree – like 2nd degree but needs digital reduction.
- 4th degree – remains prolapsed persistently.
Hemorrhoids are painless unless acute thrombosis superimposes, in which case it may become painful. Thrombosed hemorrhoids are managed conservatively with analgesics, stool softeners, bed rest (elevation of the bed foot) and ice packs for 2- 3 weeks. The drawback of this method is the long time off work. Hemorrhoidectomy is the second option if conservative management is not an option for any reason.
Perianal hematoma (external hemorrhoid)
Perianal hematoma is not hemorrhoid; however, it is usually called an external hemorrhoid. It presents as a painful tense blue swelling at the anal verge caused by a recent thrombosis of an anal vein, often after straining at stool.
The picture in the question shows a fleshy red lesion protruding out of the anus consistent with an (internal) hemorrhoid. Presence of pain suggests acute thrombosis.
Option B: External hemorrhoid has a different appearance.
Option C: Although hemorrhoids can be associated with rectal carcinoma, the lesion itself is not a carcinoma. Moreover, a carcinoma this large would have been associated with more pronounced systemic and local symptoms.
Option D: It is important to note that for every anorectal lesion, thorough investigation should be conducted in an attempt to exclude serious underlying pathologies such as inflammatory bowel disease or malignancies.
Option E: Perianal abscesses present with painful and tender red perianal swelling and induration, not a lesion protruding out of the anus.
Hemorrhoids
Ten years ago, a 75-year-old man underwent a successful right hemicolectomy for colon cancer, followed by chemotherapy after the cancer was found to be Duke C stage. Now, he has presented for surveillance. He has no specific complaint and the physical examination is completely normal. Which one of the following would be the investigation of choice for him?
A. Abdominal CT scan.
B. Colonoscopy.
C. Liver function tests (LFT), renal function tests (RFT) and full blood exam (FBE).
D. Carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA).
E. Sigmoidoscopy.
B. Colonoscopy.
Colonoscopy should be performed one year after the resection of a sporadic cancer, unless a complete post-operative colonoscopy has been performed sooner. Recommendations for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancers (HNPCC) are different from sporadic cancers.
If a peri-operative colonoscopy performed at one year reveals advanced adenoma, next colonoscopy should be performed in 3 years. If the colonoscopy performed at one year is normal or identifies no advanced adenomas, the next colonoscopy should be performed in 5 years. Since this man has not have a colonoscopy in the past 10 years, he should undergo colonoscopy now.
Apart from colonoscopy according to the above recommendations, patients undergoing either local excision (including transanal endoscopic microsurgery) of rectal cancer or advanced adenomas or ultra-low anterior resection for rectal cancer should be considered for periodic examination of the rectum at 6-month intervals for 2-3 years with digital rectal examination, rigid proctoscopy, flexible proctoscopy, and/or rectal endoscopic ultrasound. These examinations are considered to be independent of the colonoscopic examination schedule described above.
Other tests that may be used during this period for early detection of metastases may include:
- Chest X-ray
- CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen) – diagnostically nonspecific but useful for monitoring recurrence.
- PET scan (distant metastases will light up on PET scan)
- Pelvic/abdominal CT scan
Option A and B: Abdominal CT scan and CEA are acceptable options for surveillance but not as crucial as colonoscopy.
Option E: Sigmoidoscopy cannot visualize beyond the sigmoid colon. Patients with the history of colon cancer need to have visualization of their entire colon for possible tumors or premalignant lesions by colonoscopy.
Which one of the following is the most common cardiac manifestation of hemochromatosis?
A. Supra ventricular tachyacardias.
B. Congestive heart failure.
C. Atrial fibrillation.
D. Atrial flutter.
E. Atrioventricular (AV) block.
B. Congestive heart failure.
The most common cardiac manifestation of hemochromatosis is congestive heart failure
. The underlying pathology is deposition of iron in the myocardium leading to restrictive cardiomyopathy. Other manifestations are supraventricular tachycardias , conductive disorders such as AV block, and atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. However, these are not as common as congestive heart failure.
Hemochromatosis
Which one of the following is not correct regarding hemochromatosis?
A. The incidence of hemochromatosis in Australia is 1:200.
B. C282Y homozygous accounts for approximately 90% of hemochromatosis cases in Australia.
C: The majority of patients with one copy of C282Y and H63D mutation never develop hemochromatosis.
D. Ninety percent of those with homozygous C282Y will develop symptoms at some stage of their lives.
E. Carriers of only one copy of the mutated HFE gene will not be affected clinically.
D. Ninety percent of those with homozygous C282Y will develop symptoms at some stage of their lives.
Option A: Correct - The incidence of hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) in Australia is 1 in 200-300.
Option B: Correct - Appromixately 80-90% of HH cases in Australia have homozygous C282Y mutations of their HFE gene.
Option C: Correct - Most of patients with heterozygous C282Y/H63D mutations never develop clinical symptoms or will have only mild symptoms.
Option D: Incorrect - Only 28.4% of males and 1.2% of the females with C282Y mutation will develop clinically significant presentation of iron overload some time in their lives.
TOPIC REVIEW
Hemochromatosis has two forms. It is either due a genetic condition, namely hereditary hemochromatosis (HH), or secondary to conditions leading to iron overload in the body such as chronic hemolysis and multiple transfusions. Secondary iron overload is referred to as hemosidrerosis.
HH is an autosomal recessive genetic disease with variable penetrance and delayed age of onset (rare before the age of 30 years), in which the body iron content exceeds enormously beyond the normal limit (20-60g compared to normal amount of 4g) due to increased absorption through gastrointestinal tract. HH is the result of a mutation in HFE gene, which is located on the short arm of chromosome 6.
The two most common mutations of HFE gene are termed C282Y and H63D. Different possible combinations of these mutations and their risk for development of clinical HH is summarized in the following table. (See photo)
Homozygous C282Y is the most common form of HH (80-90%), followed by heterozygous C282Y/H3D. 28.4% of males and 1.2% of the females with C282Y mutation will develop clinically significant presentation of iron overload some time in their lives, but rarely before the age of 30 years.
Those with homozygous H63D are very unlikely to develop clinical disease. Heterozygosity of C282Y and H63D leads to HH with milder clinical forms.
Epidemiology
The prevalence of hemochromatosis in the Australian of Northern Europe background is 1 in 200-300 (250). Every 1 in 8 is a silent carrier of one mutated HFE gene.
Clinical disease is seen more in men than women. The age of onset for women is more advanced. The age of onset is rarely before 30 years.
Pathophysiology
HH results in deposition of iron in different body organs leading to a multi-organ/multisystem involvement and presentation.
Presentation
Hemochromatosis, through iron overload and deposition of iron in several organ systems, can present with the following features:
- Chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis (most common cause of mortality)
- Abdominal pain
- Arthralgia – often MCPs and large joints, due to chondrocalcinosis and peusogout. The pain is similar to the pain associated with osteoarthritis.
- Skin darkening (tanned skin) – deposition of iron in the skin.
- Small testes, infertility, impotence and decreased libido –small testes are due to hypopituitarism and/or liver disease. Iron deposition in gonads occurs, but is not the cause hypogonadism.
- Damage to the pancreas and diabetes mellitus (known as bronze diabetes).
- Restrictive cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure (15% of patients). Other less common cardiac manifestations are supraventricular tachycardias, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter and varying degrees of atrioventricular block.
- Panhypopituitarism - caused by iron deposition in the pituitary
- Hepatocellular carcinoma (hepatoma) – in 10% of cases with liver involvement.
- Osteoporosis (25% of cases) and osteopenia (41% of case)
- Sparse body hair especially pubic hair (62% of patients)
- Spoon nails (50% of cases)
Diagnosis
The transferrin saturation (ratio of serum iron to iron binding capacity) reflects increased absorption of iron, which is the underlying biological defect in HH. A fasting transferrin saturation >45% is the most sensitive test for detecting early iron overload, but not diagnostic of HH. Ferritin can be used to assess iron overload, but it is not as accurate because it is an acute phase reactant and may be elevated in response to several physiologic stresses, alcohol consumption, and liver disease. Serum ferritin is abnormal when it is >250 μg/L in pre-menopausal women and >300 μg/L in men and post-menopausal women.
If fasting transferrin saturation or serum ferritin is increased on more than one occasion, HH should be suspected, even if there are no clinical symptoms or abnormal LFTs. In this situation, the HFE gene test should be considered as the next diagnostic tool.
Although liver biopsy is the most accurate test to diagnose hemochromatosis, an MRI of the liver in conjunction with HFE gene testing for mutations are diagnostic enough to eliminate the need for liver biopsy.
NOTE - Iron studies may be normal in individuals with a genetic predisposition to HH, who have not developed iron overload. Up to 40% of homozygotes have normal iron studies, which may be due to overt (blood donation) or covert (gynecological or gastrointestinal) blood loss.
A 45-year-old man presents with complaints of polyarthritis, impotence and decreased libido. Which one of the following investigations is the most appropriate step to consider?
A. Iron studies.
B. Fasting blood sugar.
C. HFE gene testing.
D. CT scan of the head.
E. Prolactin level.
A. Iron studies.
It is very important to consider hemochromatosis in patients with decreased libido and manifestations related to other sites of the body such as joints, liver, CNS, etc.
Hemochromatosis, through iron overload and deposition of iron in several organ systems, can present with the following features:
- Chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis (the most common cause of mortality).
- Abdominal pain.
- Arthralgia – often MCPs and large joints, due to chondrocalcinosis and pseudogout. The pain is like that of osteoarthritis.
- Skin darkening (tanned skin) – deposition of iron in the skin.
- Small testes, infertility, impotence, and decreased libido –small testes are due to hypopituitarism and/or liver disease. Iron deposition in gonads occurs but is not the cause hypogonadism.
- Damage to the pancreas and diabetes mellitus (known as bronze diabetes).
- Restrictive cardiomyopathy and ensued congestive heart failure (15% of patients). Other less common cardiac manifestations are supraventricular tachycardias, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter and varying degrees of atrioventricular block.
- Accumulation of iron in the pituitary and panhypopituitarism.
- Hepatocellular carcinoma (hepatoma) – in 10% of cases with liver involvement.
- Osteoporosis (25% of cases) and osteopenia (41% of case)
- Sparse body hair especially pubic hair (62% of patients)
- Spoon nails (50% of cases)
NOTE - the most common cause of death from haemochromatosis is liver cirrhosis, followed by cardiac disease, which affects approximately 15% of the patients.
When hemochromatosis is suspected clinically, iron studies are the most appropriate next step to make a diagnosis.
The transferrin saturation (ratio of serum iron to iron binding capacity) reflects increased absorption of iron, which is the underlying biological defect in hereditary hemochromatosis (HH). A fasting transferrin saturation >45% is the most sensitive test for detecting early iron overload, but not diagnostic of HH. Ferritin can be used to assess iron overload, but it is not as accurate because it is an acute phase reactant and may be elevated in response to several physiologic stresses, alcohol consumption, and liver disease. Serum ferritin is abnormal when it is >250 μg/L in pre-menopausal women and >300 μg/L in men and post-menopausal women.
If fasting transferrin saturation or serum ferritin is increased on more than one occasion, HH should be suspected, even if there are no clinical symptoms or abnormal liver function tests (LFT). In this situation, the HFE gene test (option C) should be considered as the next and also most diagnostic tool.
Option B: Fasting blood sugar is a good step for this patient because diabetes is a possible feature with hemochromatosis; however, it is not diagnostic for the condition.
Option D: CT scan of the head adds no diagnostic value in this patient.
Option E: Although hemochromatosis can cause panhypopituitarism and decreased pituitary hormone levels, measurement of prolactin level alone does not add any diagnostic value.
A 42-year-old woman comes to your clinic seeking advice on screening for hemochromatosis. Her 32-year-old brother has been recently diagnosed with hereditary hemochromatosis. She has two children, aged 9 and 18 years old. Which one of the following is the best action regarding screening for hemochromatosis and assessing the chance of her children developing the disease?
A. Screen her for hemochromatosis.
B. Screen both children for hemochromatosis.
C. Screen the 18-year-old child for hemochromatosis.
D. Screening is not needed at this stage.
E. Screen her and his husband.
A. Screen her for hemochromatosis.
The gene involved in hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is called the HFE gene. Mutations in the HFE gene can lead to impaired regulation of iron storage and clinical manifestations of hemochromatosis. There are two types of mutation in HFE gene: C282Y and H63D.
Terminology
- Those with only one copy of the mutated HFE (either C282Y or H63D) gene are called heterozygote.
- Those with two copies of C282Y mutation are called ‘homozygote’. Since those with two copies of H63D mutation never develop clinical hemochromatosis, homozygote, refers to a person with both copies of HFE with C282Y mutation only.
- Those with one copy of HFE gene with C282Y mutation and the other with H63D mutation are called ‘compound heterozygote’. These individuals are often asymptomatic and if symptoms are present they are mild.
About 90% of people of Northern European ancestry with symptoms of HH have the C282Y mutation in both copies of their HFE gene (homozygote). Two percent are compound heterozygote (see above).
Since HH follows an autosomal recessive pattern of inheritance, there is often no family history, or affected family members may appear to be scattered in generations. If both parents heterozygous (carriers for a mutation in the HFE gene), there is a 25% chance for their children to be affected and genetically predisposed to HH.
This woman’s brother is diagnosed with hereditary hemochromatosis; meaning that both their parents have been at least carriers of HFE gene mutation. She can be a heterozygote, homozygote or compound heterozygote. Genetic testing will reveal that.
It is recommended that first-degree and second-degree relatives of individuals, who have HH or are homozygous for the C282Y gene mutation, are tested with iron studies and the HFE gene test. Based on the recommendation she needs testing. Further steps depend on her test results:
- If she does not have a faulty HFE gene, no further testing of the children would be indicated, because even if the father is homozygote, the children would only be carriers in the worst case scenario.
- If she is found to be homozygote, then the next step would be testing the father. If the father is found to have no HFE mutations the children are not at risk of HH and could only be carriers and not susceptible to HH.
Of the options, testing the mother for HH would be the next best step in management.
A 35-year-old woman presents to your practice with complaint of right upper quadrant discomfort for the past 3 months. She smokes 10 cigarettes a day and drink alcohol at weekends. On examination, she is otherwise healthy, with no palpable abdominal mass or tenderness. An abdominal CT scan is arranged and obtained, which is shown in the accompanying photograph. Which one of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
A. Liver abscess.
B. Simple hepatic cyst.
C. Hepatic hemangioma.
D. Hepatocellular carcinoma.
E. Hydatid cyst.
B. Simple hepatic cyst.
The homogenous hypoattenuating (darker than the surrounding liver parenchyma) oval-shaped lesion in the photograph is characteristic of a simple hepatic cyst. Simple hepatic cysts are common benign liver lesions and have no malignant potential. They can be diagnosed on ultrasound, CT, or MRI.
Simple hepatic cysts are one of the most common liver lesions, occurring in approximately 2-7% of the population. It is slightly more common in women. Hepatic cysts are typically discovered incidentally and are almost always asymptomatic, unless they are large enough to cause symptoms (such as in this patient).
Simple hepatic cysts may be isolated or multiple and may vary from a few millimeters to several centimeters in diameter. Simple hepatic cysts are benign developmental lesions that do not communicate with the biliary tree. They can occur anywhere in the liver, but there may be a greater predilection for the right lobe of the liver.
Certain diseases are associated with multiple hepatic cysts and include:
- Polycystic liver disease
- Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) - hepatic cysts may be seen in ~40% of those with ADPKD
- Von-Hippel-Lindau disease
Findings on ultrasonography include:
- Round or ovoid anechoic lesion (may be lobulated)
- Well-marginated with a thin or imperceptible wall and a clearly defined back wall
- May show posterior acoustic enhancement if large enough
- A few septa may be possible, but no wall thickening is present
- A small amount of layering debris is possible
- No internal vascularity on color Doppler
On CT scan, a hepatic cysts is characterized by its homogenous hypoattenuation (water attenuation). The wall is usually imperceptible, and the cyst is not enhanced after intravenous administration of contrast material.
Option A: Liver abscess is associated with fever, leukocytosis and more pronounced symptoms. They are solid and hyperattenuated on CT scan.
Option C: hemangiomas have less homogenocity and well-demarcation compared to hepatic simple cysts.
Option D: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) present with less demarcated hepatic lesions that are often hypoattenuated on CT and hypoechoic on ultrasonography. The radiologic findings are inconsistent with HCC as a possible diagnosis.
Option E: Hydatid cysts presents as a multiloculated cyst (daughter cysts within the main cyst)
Which one of the following is the most common cause of a hyperechoic mass on liver ultrasonography?
A. Hepatoma.
B. Simple cyst.
C. Hemangioma.
D. Echinococcal cyst.
E. Metastatic liver disease.
Hyperechoic: light gray on the ultrasound (air, fat, fluid)
C. Hemangioma.
Hemangiomas, benign proliferation of vascular tissue, are the most common cause of a hyperechoic liver mass on ultrasound.
Hepatic hemangiomas (also known as hepatic venous malformations) are benign non-neoplastic hypervascualr lesions. They are frequently diagnosed as an incidental finding on imaging in asymptomatic patients. It is very important to differentiate hemangiomas from hepatic neoplasms.
On ultrasound, they typically manifest as well-defined hyperechoic lesions; however, a small proportion (10%) are hypoechoic, which may be due to a background of hepatic steatosis, where liver parenchyma has increased echogenicity.
On CT scan, most hemangiomas are relatively well defined.
Features of typical lesions on three phasic CT scan include:
- Noncontrast: often hypoattenuating relative to liver parenchyma
- Arterial phase: typically show discontinuous, nodular, peripheral enhancement (small lesions may show uniform enhancement)
- Portal venous phase: progressive peripheral enhancement with more centripetal fill in
- Delayed phase further irregular fill in and therefore iso- or hyper-attenuating to liver parenchyma
Hepatic Hemangioma
A 28-year-old man presents with increasing dysphagia and odynophagia. Endoscopy reveals inflamed esophagus, which easily bleeds on contact. Several biopsies are taken showing eosinophilic infiltrations on histology. Which one of the following would be the most appropriate next step in management?
A. Proton pump inhibitors.
B. Swallowed fluticasone.
C. Oral prednisolone.
D. Albendazole.
E. Helicobacter pylori eradication.
A. Proton pump inhibitors.
Primary eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an increasingly recognized medical condition characterized clinically by symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction, and histologically by eosinophilic inflammation in the esophagus.
EoE is hypothesized to be an atopic inflammatory disease caused by an abnormal immune response to antigenic stimulation, mostly foods. Normally, eosinophils are normal component of mucosal infiltrates in all-length of the gastrointestinal tract except the esophagus. Eosinophils in the esophageal mucosa are always pathologic.
Generally, the clinical symptoms of EoE are nonspecific, and the patients are in good physical condition resulting in a delayed diagnosis (years) in some cases.
The presenting symptoms vary depending on the age of the onset:
Children - children tend to present with nausea and vomiting, weight loss, anemia, and failure to thrive. In neonates and infants, refusal of food is the most common presenting symptom.
Adults - the characteristic symptoms in adults include dysphagia for solid foods, retrosternal pain and food impaction. Some patients also present with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms unresponsive to medical anti-reflux therapy. A subset of patients have been recognized to have a typical clinical presentation of EoE in the absence of GERD who show a clinicopathologic response to PPIs. This condition is currently referred to as PPI-responsive EoE.
There is no Australian guidelines for diagnosis and management of EoE and current recommendation is based on the guidelines by the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG).
According to the ACG, diagnostic criteria for EoE include all of the following:
- Symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction.
- ≥15 eosinophils/hpf on esophageal biopsy
- Persistence of eosinophilia after a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) trial
- Secondary cause of esophageal eosinophilia excluded
This patient has symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction (dysphagia and odynophagia) and established eosinophilia on histological studies. In order for EoE to be the definite diagnosis, it is necessary that eosinophilia persists after an 8-week trial of a PPI as well and other causes of eosinophilia are excluced.
The rationale behind the trial of PPI is that GERD may mimic EoE, coexist with it, or contribute to it. Conversely, EoE may contribute to GERD; therefore, the diagnosis of EoE is generally made after the symptoms persist after an 8-week course of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) as the best initial step in management. PPIs may benefit patients with EoE either by reducing acid production in patients with co-existent GERD, or by other unknown anti-inflammatory mechanisms.
The main three components of treatment in established EoE are (1) dietary advice and alteration, (2) pharmacotherapy, and (3) surgical intervention. For pharmacological intervention topical swallowed steroids (e.g., fluticasone, budesonide) are considered the main treatment options, once the diagnosis of EoE is established either after failed PPI therapy or normal pH studies.
For patients unresponsive to the above measure, oral (systemic) predniso(lo)ne maybe indicated.
TOPIC REVIEW
Causes of esophageal eosinophilia:
- Eosinophilic esophagitis
- GERD
- PPI-responsive eosinophilic esophagitis
- Achalasia
- Crohn’s disease
- Parasitic infections
- Drug hypersensitivity
- Connective tissue disease (e.g., scleroderma, dermatomyositis)
- Celiac disease
- Hypereosinophilic syndrome
Eosinophilc esophagitis
A 65-year-old woman presents to your practice because she has been noting streaks of blood on her stool on different occasions in the past week. These occasions were preceded by a period of constipation. The only medication she is currently on is panadeine for a back pain started 3 weeks ago. She is otherwise healthy. Which one of the following would be the most likely diagnosis?
A. Ulcerative rectal cancer.
B. Colorectal cancer metastasizing to the lumbar spine.
C. Internal hemorrhoid.
D. External hemorrhoid.
E. Ulcerative colitis.
C. Internal hemorrhoid.
Blood on stool can be caused by several conditions, some being benign and others malignant. Colorectal cancer, particularly if arising from rectum, can cause blood covering the stool. The blood may be bright or dark red, depending on the site of the tumor. The darker the blood, the more proximal the tumor. Proximal colon cancers tend to present with lethargy and fatigue rather than blood-stained stool because blood mixes with the stool and is barely visible. Rectal bleeding may be the only symptom of colorectal cancer; however, weight loss, abdominal pain or discomfort, bloating, anorexia, and other symptoms may be seen.
By the time a colorectal is clinically evident, it has often already metastasized to the liver (the most common site) and lymph nodes most of the time. Lungs and bones are rarely involved several months after the tumor has metastasized to the liver and/or lymph nodes.
Internal hemorrhoids are one of the most common causes of benign rectal bleeding. Patients may notice blood covering the stool, as streaks on the stool, dripping in the toilet bowl, or staining the toilet paper. The most common predisposing factor for development of an internal hemorrhoid is chronic constipation. This woman has been on panadeine (paracetamol 500mg + codeine 8 mg). This can justify the constipation and internal hemorrhoid as the most likely cause of this presentation.
Ulcerative rectal cancer (option A) or colorectal cancer (option B) in general, can cause rectal bleeding (often painless), but a rectal tumor so large to cause constipation is expected to be associated with more pronounced presentation including weight loss, anemia, fatigue, or decreased stool caliber.
Ulcerative colitis (option E) is often diagnosed at an earlier age is associated with other manifestations such as bloody diarrhea, weight loss, join pain, uveitis, etc. With bloody stool as the mere complaint in a 65-year-old woman, ulcerative colitis is an unlikely diagnosis.
As a general rule external hemorrhoids (option D) do not bleed but are painful; therefore, less likely to be the diagnosis.
NOTE - Although internal hemorrhoid is the most likely diagnosis, colorectal cancer should be excluded by thorough investigation.
A 70-year-old man presents with difficulty in swallowing for the past 6 months and 4 kilogram weight loss in this period. He describes that the most difficult part of swallowing for him is when he tries to start getting the food down his mouth. He had been a smoker for most of his adult life but has quit 10 years ago. Which one of the following would be the most appropriate management option at this point?
A. Endoscopy.
B. Surgery.
C. Upper series barium study.
D. Helicobacter pylori testing.
E. Manometry.
C. Upper series barium study.
No matter what the clues point towards, every patient with dysphagia should undergo appropriate investigation. Just because of weight loss, the patient’s cannot be told to have esophageal cancer. Although the patient’s age is a red flag for dysphagia, the fact that it occurs at initiation of swallowing makes oropharyngeal dysphagia a more likely probability. On the other hand, every patient with dysphagia, regardless of the etiology, may have weight loss due to decreased calorie intake; nonetheless, a thorough and judicious assessment should be considered for every patient with dysphagia.
The best initial step in management of dysphagia depends on provisional diagnosis based on the history and clinical findings. When esophageal cancer is suspected, evaluation starts with upper endoscopy and biopsy
. With oropharyngeal and motility-related dysphagia, barium studies
should come first.
In this scenario, oropharyngeal dysphagia, probably caused by a retropharyngeal pouch (Zenker’s diverticulum), is the most likely diagnosing; therefore, barium swallow would be the best initial assessment tool. If a retropharyngeal pouch is diagnosed on barium studies, endoscopy should be avoided due to the significant risk of the scope perforating the pouch.
Option A: Endoscopy is the initial investigation when cancer is suspected based on history and clinical features.
Option B: Surgery is indicated if the cause of dysphagia is found to be cancer or Zenker’s diverticulum. Achalasia unresponsive to conservative measures may eventually need surgical intervention as well.
Option D: Helicobacter pylori can cause peptic ulcer and consequently strictures of the gastric outlet (more common) or inlet (less common). Stricture at the junction of the esophagus to the stomach may cause dysphagia, but difficulty in initiation of swallowing goes against this diagnosis.
Option E: Manometry can be used once barium meal study suggests a motility disorder such as achalasia.
Which one of the following is a sign of pyloric stenosis due to peptic ulcer?
A. Vomiting within the first 1 hour of eating.
B. Vomiting immediately after eating.
C. Vomiting after 2 hours of eating.
D. Regurgitation.
E. Epigastric pain radiating to back.
A. Vomiting within the first 1 hour of eating.
Pyloric obstruction also known as gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is the consequence of any disease producing a mechanical barrier to gastric emptying. Clinical entities that can cause GOO are generally categorized into benign and malignant.
Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is among the benign causes of GOO. The incidence of ulcer-induced GOO has dramatically declined owing to the adequate and efficient treatment of PUD. The mechanism of obstruction by PUD can be either edema around the ulcer or scar formation after the ulcer heals.
The most common symptoms of GOO, regardless of the underlying etiology, are bloating, anorexia, nausea and vomiting. Vomiting is usually nonbilious, and characteristically contains undigested food particles.
Patients with gastric outlet obstruction from a duodenal ulcer or incomplete obstruction typically present with symptoms of gastric retention, including early satiety, bloating or epigastric fullness, indigestion, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, epigastric pain, and weight loss. They are frequently malnourished and dehydrated and have metabolic insufficiency. Weight loss is frequent when the condition is chronic and is most significant in patients with malignant disease. Abdominal pain is not frequent and usually relates to the underlying cause, e.g., PUD, pancreatic cancer.
The time of vomiting can suggest the site of obstruction. In pyloric obstruction (more proximal) the time of vomitus is usually within the first hour of eating, whereas in pyloric stenosis, or duodenal stenosis or obstruction (more distal) the vomiting occurs after one hour because normally it takes 1 hour for the food to reach the duodenum. Within 2-4 hours of eating the food is in the small intestine. Vomiting after 2-4 hours should raise suspicion against another cause.
Gastric Outlet Obstruction
Which one of the following is the most common cause of acute bile duct obstruction in tertiary care hospitals?
A. Choledocholithiasis.
B. Benign strictures.
C. Tumors.
D. Post-biliary access / manipulation by ERCP or PTC.
E. Acute Cholecystitis.
D. Post-biliary access / manipulation by ERCP or PTC.
The most common cause of bile duct obstruction in community is choledocholithiasis. Gallstones contribute to approximately 70% of cases presenting with biliary tree obstruction. Benign strictures and tumors are responsible for 15% of cases with obstructed bile passage. However, it should be noted that the question does not ask about the most contributing factor to obstruction in tertiary hospitals rather than the community.
The most common cause of bile duct obstruction in tertiary hospitals is biliary access/manipulation by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC).
Which one of the following is correct about hereditary hemochromatosis?
A. Venepuncture should not be performed when the patient is not symptomatic.
B. The incidence is around 1/500,000.
C. Ninety percent of patients are homozygous for C282Y.
D. The incidence is more common among Asians.
E. The life expectancy is reduced regardless of hepatic involvement.
C. Ninety percent of patients are homozygous for C282Y.
Hereditary haemochromatosis (HH) affects 1:200-300 people in Australia. Of the affected persons, approximately 90% are C282Y homozygotes.
HH is much more prevalent among those of Northern European descent and is rare in Asians and Africans. Screening of the population at risk is strongly recommended to identify those with the disease, who are not still clinically symptomatic for early intervention and preventing the progression of disease; therefore, venepuncture as the first-line therapy should be started in those with abnormal iron studies but no symptoms yet.
The most common cause of mortality in HH is liver involvement and liver cirrhosis. If treatment is started before liver is involved, those with HH can expect a normal lifespan.
Hereditary haemochromatosis
A mother of two children aged 9 and 18 years is concerned about her children developing hemochromatosis, as his husband has recently been diagnoses with the disease. Regarding screening for hemochromatosis, which one of the following is the next best in management?
A. Screen the 9-year-old boy.
B. Screen the18-year-old boy.
C. Screen both children.
D. Screen the mother.
E. No screening is needed as the disease becomes clinically evident between 30-60 years.
D. Screen the mother.
The gene involved in hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is called the HFE gene. Mutations in the HFE gene can lead to impaired regulation of iron storage and clinical manifestations of hemochromatosis. There are two types of mutation in HFE gene: C282Y and H63D.
Terminology
- Those with only one copy of the mutated HFE (either C282Y or H63D) gene are called heterozygote.
- Those with two copies of C282Y mutation are called ‘homozygote’. Since those with two copies of H63D mutation never develop clinical hemochromatosis, homozygote, refers to a person with both copies of HFE with C282Y mutation only.
- Those with one copy of HFE gene with C282Y mutation and the other with H63D mutation are called ‘compound heterozygote’. These individuals are often asymptomatic and if symptoms are present they are mild.
About 90% of people of Northern European ancestry with symptoms of HH have the C282Y mutation in both copies of their HFE gene (homozygote). Two percent are compound heterozygote (see above).
Since HH follows an autosomal recessive pattern of inheritance, there is often no family history, or affected family members may appear to be scattered in generations. If both parents heterozygous (carriers for a mutation in the HFE gene), there is a 25% chance for their children to be affected and genetically predisposed to HH.
Current guidelines advise that first-degree and second-degree relatives of individuals, who have HH or are homozygous for the C282Y gene mutation, are tested with iron studies and the HFE gene test. Based on this recommendation, both children should be considered for testing; however, in this case testing the mother would be more convenient and reasonable. If she does not have a faulty HFE gene, no further testing of the children would be indicated, because even if the father is homozygote, the children would only be carriers in the worst case scenario.
The photograph is one of a barium swallow series performed in a 78-year-old man. He has presented with symptoms of 12 months duration. Which one of the following could be the most likely presenting symptom?
A. Recurrent chest infection.
B. Progressive weight loss.
C. Retrosternal burning sensation.
D. Gurgling in the neck.
E. Food regurgitation.
E. Food regurgitation.
The photograph shows a pocket of contrast material at the root of the neck, as well as the contrast in the esophagus characteristic of retropharyngeal pouch (Zenker’s diverticulum). The condition is most commonly found in the elderly population.
Patients with Zenker’s diverticulum usually have dysphagia because the primary problem is an overactive upper esophageal sphincter, which fails to relax. Despite long-standing dysphagia, patients usually do not have significant weight loss.
When the pharyngeal pouch becomes large enough to retain contents such as mucus, pills, sputum and food, the patient may complain of pulmonary aspiration and recurrent chest infections, foul-smell breath, gurgling in the throat, appearance of a mass in the neck, or regurgitation of food into the mouth.
Of these symptoms, however, food regurgitation is the most distressing symptoms for which medical attention is usually sought.
Retrosternal burning sensation is a characteristic feature of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and is not an associated symptom in Zenker’s diverticulum.
AMC Handbook of Multiple Choice Questions – pages 449-450
A 69-year-old woman is diagnosed with carcinoma of the cecum. Which one of the following is more likely to have been her initial presenting symptoms?
A. Right iliac fossa (RIF) mass.
B. Altered bowel habit.
C. Weakness and fatigue.
D. Melena.
E. Bright rectal bleeding.
C. Weakness and fatigue.
Colorectal cancers may present with a wide variety of symptoms. The presenting symptoms, to a great extent, depends on the location of the tumor.
A change in bowel habits is a less common presenting symptom for right-sided tumors because feces is liquid in the proximal colon and the lumen caliber is larger. Right-sided tumors present with anemia and fatigue due to chronic blood loss, while tumors of the left side are associated with altered bowel habits and rectal bleeding.
Option A: If a right-sided tumor is large enough, a right iliac fossa mass may be palpated. But a tumor that large has already caused significant symptoms for which the patient has already sought medical attention.
Option B: Altered bowel habit is more commonly seen in left-sided colon cancers, including rectal tumors.
Option D: Melena is associated with upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding with prolonged passage time of the blood through the gastrointestinal tract. Colorectal tumors are very unlikely to cause melena.
Option E: Rectal bleeding is often caused by a rectal cancer or more distal left-sided colon cancers.
Which one of the following is the most useful investigation for detection of gallstones and dilatation of the common bile duct?
A. HIDA scintigraphy.
B. Ultrasound.
C. Endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography (ERCP).
D. X-ray.
E. Liver isotope scan.
B. Ultrasound.
Ultrasound is the most useful investigation for detection of gallstones and dilatation of common bile duct. It is also useful in detection of hepatic metastases and some liver diseases.
Option A: HIDA scan is used if sonographic studies are equivocal. On scan, the liver, CBD, and duodenum light up; the gallbladder will not if inflamed.
Option C: ERCP is used for visual detection and retrieval of stones in the CBD as well as other causes of obstructive jaundice.
Option D: Since only 10% of gallstones are radio-opaque, abdominal X-ray will be able to pick up gallstones in only up to 10% of cases; hence, not a preferred method.
Option E: Liver isotopic scan is useful for evaluation of hepatic cirrhosis.
A 48-year-old male presents to your practice for evaluation of his liver disease. He has the past medical history of chronic alcoholism, intravenous drug abuse and hepatic cirrhosis. Laboratory studies show deranged liver function tests. Which one of the following would be the best indicator of chronic liver disease?
A. Alkaline phosphatase.
B. Albumin.
C. Alanine amino transferase(ALT).
D. Aspartate amino transferase(AST).
E. Bilirubin.
B. Albumin.
Albumin is synthesized in the liver and has a half-life of around 20-22 days. Of the given options, albumin is the only indicator of chronic liver disease.
Option A: Alkaline phosphatase is NOT specific to the liver and can be elevated in the following conditions:
- Paget’s disease
- Fractures
- Cholestasis (bile duct obstruction, cirrhosis, etc)
- Malignant diseases with bony metastasis
Option C and D: Alanine aminotransferase is specific to the liver and is raised in metabolic syndrome, obesity, fatty liver and liver failure. ALT and AST are indicators of hepatocellular damage and can be elevated in both acute (e.g. viral hepatitis) and chronic liver disease. Interestingly, ALT and AST may be normal until the very last stages of chronic liver disease.
Option E: Bilirubin can be elevated in both acute and chronic liver diseases.
Which one of the following complications of acute diverticulitis carries the highest mortality rate?
A. Bleeding
B. Abscess formation.
C. Peritonitis.
D. Perforation.
E. Intestinal obstruction.
D. Perforation.
Diverticular disease carries a number of potential complications including:
- Bleeding, especially in the elderly
- Bowel perforation
- Intra-abdominal abscess formation
- Peritonitis
- Fistula formation
- Intestinal obstruction
Rupture of an inflamed diverticulum with fecal contamination of the peritoneum occurs in only 1 to 2% of cases but is associated with a 20% mortality rate, which is the highest when compared to other complications of diverticulitis.
Perforation of diverticula into the abdominal cavity presents with the following features:
- Abdominal distention
- Diffuse tenderness of the abdomen even to light palpation.
- Guarding
- Rigidity
- Rebound tenderness
- Absent bowel sounds
You are one of the senior residents in surgery. You are called to see Mr. Kingsley, a 67-year-old man, who has just been diagnosed with acute cholangitis. Which one of the following statements is not correct regarding the management of acute cholangitis?
A. Plan for immediate decompression if the patient does not respond to initial measures.
B. Plan for biliary decompression on semi-urgent basis (< 72 hours) if the patient is responding to initial resuscitation.
C. Plan for urgent decompression (within 24-48hrs) if the patient is older than 70 years.
D. The most appropriate method of biliary decompression is ERCP, sphincterectomy and stenting.
E. Initial aggressive resuscitation and antibiotics usually fail to get good response in majority of cases.
E. Initial aggressive resuscitation and antibiotics usually fail to get good response in majority of cases.
Acute ascending cholangitis is initially managed with aggressive fluid resuscitation and intravenous antibiotics followed by biliary decompression.
Since the infectious organisms responsible for acute ascending cholangitis are enteric gram negative bacteria, the selected antibiotic of choice should provide appropriate coverage against these germs.
All patients with ascending cholangitis require biliary drainage. In about 85-90% of patients, there is respond to medical therapy. In this group decompression may be performed semi-electively during the same admission (and ideally within 72 hours); however for the following patients urgent decompression may be considered:
- Patients older than 70 years
- Patients with diabetes
- Patients with other comorbid conditions
Approximately 10% to 15% of patients (not the majority) fail to respond within 12 to 24 hours or deteriorate after initial medical therapy and need urgent biliary decompression. Delay to do so increases the chance of an adverse outcomes.
A 71-year-old man presents with progressive jaundice, pale stool and dark urine. On examination, a mass is palpated in the right upper quadrant that moves with respiration. Ultrasonography shows a dilated common bile duct (CBD) and no masses in the head of the pancreas. Which one of the following could be the most likely diagnosis?
A. Chronic pancreatitis.
B. Carcinoma of the tail of pancreas.
C. Peri-ampullary tumor.
D. Biliary cirrhosis.
E. Budd-Chiari syndrome.
C. Peri-ampullary tumor.
The clinical picture is highly suggestive of common bile duct obstruction (CBD). CBD obstruction presents with obstructive jaundice and often a palpable mass (distended gallbladder) in the right upper quadrant that can be tender or non-tender depending on the underlying etiology. The following are the most common causes of CBD obstruction:
- Stones – the most common cause
- Strictures
-
Periampullary tumors – these tumors arise within 2cm of the ampula of Vater in the duodenum and include the following:
— Pancreatic head / uncinate process tumors: includes pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma involving head and uncinate process of the pancreas.
— Lower common bile duct tumors: includes types of cholangiocarcinoma involving the intra-pancreatic distal bile duct.
— Ampullary tumors: those originating from the ampula of Vater.
— Periampullary duodenal carcinoma.
The pancreatic head tumors are the most common periampullary tumors, but not in this case, as sonography shows that the pancreatic head is clear; therefore, other types of periampullary tumors should be considered as the most likely diagnosis.
Option A: Chronic pancreatitis presents with abdominal pain, malabsorption and diarrhea. Obstructive jaundice is not a presentation.
Option B: Anatomically, tumors of pancreatic tail are far from biliary system and do not cause biliary obstruction.
Option D: Biliary cirrhosis does not cause CBD obstruction.
Option E: Budd-Chiari syndrome is thrombotic occlusion of hepatic veins, presenting with a different clinical picture.
A 34-year-old woman presents to your clinic complaining of abdominal pain and diarrhea one week after she returned from a trip to Thailand. While she was on the trip, she first noticed abdominal pain in the right iliac fossa which resolved subsequently. On examination, the abdomen is non-tender and soft with no rigidity or guarding. However, digital rectal exam is tender. Which one of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
A. Giardiasis.
B. Celiac disease.
C. Rota virus infection.
D. Urinary tract infection.
E. Appendicitis.
E. Appendicitis.
Although giardiasis, viral gastroenteritis and celiac disease can all present with diarrhea and abdominal pain, NO rectal tenderness on is elicited on rectal exam. Urinary tract infection is not associated with tenderness on rectal exam either.
Of the given options, the only one that can justify the clinical presentation is acute pelvic appendicitis.
Clinical features of pelvic appendicitis are:
- Absence of abdominal wall rigidity and tenderness
- Tenderness in the rectovesical pouch and/or pouch of Douglas on rectal examination
- Right-sided spasm of psoas muscle
- Diarrhea due to irritation of the rectum by the inflamed appendix
- Increased frequency of urination caused by irritation of bladder due to an inflamed appendix
- Hypogastric pain brought on by internal rotation of a flexed hip due to contact of the inflamed appendix with the obturator internus muscle
A 42-year-old man is admitted with a hematemesis. On examination he has a blood pressure of 95/60 mmHg and a pulse rate of 104 bpm. He has yellowish sclerae, scratch marks and bruises on his arms. Several spider nevi are noted on his chest and abdomen. His abdomen is distended and soft with evidence of shifting dullness. Dilated veins are easily visible in the subcutaneous tissue and the liver is palpable two finger-breadths below the costal margin. Which one of the following could be the most likely underlying cause of his problem?
A. Alcoholic liver disease.
B. Biliary cirrhosis.
C. Schistosomiasis.
D. Budd-Chiari syndrome.
E. Hepatitis C cirrhosis.
A. Alcoholic liver disease.
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding may have different causes, but I this man having the clinical features of liver disease and cirrhosis, bleeding from esophageal varices would be the most likely cause of bleeding. Cirrhosis results in portal vein hypertension.
When the portal vein is obstructed, shunting between the portal vein and systemic veins start to develop. This shunts lead to dilated veins around the umbilicus (caput medusa), in the lower gastrointestinal tract (hemorrhoids), or in the upper gastrointestinal tract (esophageal varices).
In Australia alcoholic liver disease is the most common cause of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis, followed by hepatitis C infection.
Biliary cirrhosis, schistosomiasis, and Budd-Chiari syndrome can all potentially lead to liver cirrhosis, but are much less common than alcoholic liver disease.
A 35-year-old woman is admitted with a hematemesis. On examination she has a blood pressure of 95/60 mmHg and a pulse rate of 100 bpm. She appears reasonably well-nourished, her sclerae are yellow and she has scratch marks and bruises on her arms. Two spider nevi are noted on her chest. Her abdomen is distended and soft with evidence of shifting dullness. Dilated veins are easily visible in the subcutaneous tissue and the liver is palpable three finger-breadths below the costal margin. Her hemoglobin is 85g/L (115-165), serum albumin 28g/L (32-45) and the serum alanine aminotransferase 50U/L (< 35). Which one of her clinical and biochemical findings is likely to have the greatest impact on her long-term prognosis?
A. Her blood pressure on admission.
B. The serum albumin concentration.
C. The number of spider nevi.
D. The size of the liver on admission.
E. The serum aminotransferases concentration.
B. The serum albumin concentration.
The clinical picture is suggestive of ascites in the background of chronic liver disease. The Child-Pugh system is used to assess the prognosis of patients with liver disease and cirrhosis by calculating 1-year survival rate. This system takes into account the following 5 parameters for determination of the prognosis:
1. The presence of ascites
2. Bilirubin level
3. Albumin level
4. Prothrombin time
5. Encephalopathy
The Child-Pugh score is then calculated according to the following table: (see photo)
Based on the Child-Puch score, the patients are categorized as follows:
- Class A (scores 5-6): well-compensated disease – one- and two-year survival are 100% and 85% respectively.
- Class B (scores 7-9): functional compromise – one- and two-year survival are 80% and 60% respectively.
- Class C (scores 10-15): decompensated disease - one- and two-year survival are 45% and 35% respectively.
Of the given options, the only one contributing to prognosis is serum albumin concentration.
A 55-year-old man presents with a 6-month history of increasing dysphagia for solid foods. He has a previous history of gastroesophageal reflux for many years. He has managed his reflux with antacids but since the dysphagia started, his reflux has not been so troublesome. Which one of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
A. Esophageal cancer.
B. Achalasia.
C. Gatro-esophageal junction stricture.
D. Para-esophageal hernia.
E. Ulcerative esophagitis.
C. Gatro-esophageal junction stricture.
Dysphagia to solid food is more likely to be caused by mechanical obstruction due to strictures, tumors, rings or webs.
With the history of protracted gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), the most likely cause of this presentation would be stricture. Inflammation and scarring of the esophagus result in stenosis of the esophagus most often at the site of junction to the stomach. Resolution of GERD symptoms supports the diagnosis: when the stricture develops, the amount of acid reflux is decreased.
Option A: Esophageal cancer is another important differential diagnosis that has to be excluded, but not the most likely diagnosis given the absence of other symptoms such as significant weight loss, anemia, etc.
Option B: Achalasia causes dysphagia to both solids and liquids. Dysphagia to solids, but not to liquids is against out achalasia as a probability diagnosis.
Option D: Para-esophageal hernias may present with GERD and GERD, over time, may result in this clinical picture. The stricture, however, is caused by the GERD, not directly by the hernia.
Option E: Ulcerative esophagitis is very rarely complicated by strictures, especially in patients with HIV; hence, an unlikely diagnosis in this HIV negative patient.
Esophageal Stricture
A 66-year-old man presents with intermittent right upper quadrant pain. An ultrasound, performed for revealing the cause gallstones, reveals a lesion in the liver. Triple phase CT scan is performed for more evaluation showing a 35 mm subcortical lesion with early prominent dense enhancement, which spreads through the lesion in the late portal venous phase. Which one of the following conditions would fit this description best?
A. Isolated metastatic lesion.
B. Hemangioma.
C. Hepatocellular carcinoma.
D. Hepatic cyst.
E. Hydatid cyst.
B. Hemangioma.
The patient has the provisional diagnosis of the biliary colic, most likely due to biliary stones. The ultrasound scan – as the best initial diagnostic tool –has been used to confirm the diagnosis. Furthermore, any associated inflammation would be evaluated. Inflammation of the gallbladder manifests as the thickening of the wall of the gallbladder and the presence of pericholecystic fluid. Stones might be seen in the common bile duct as well; however, the sensitivity of ultrasound for detection of ductal stones is low (30%-50%).
As a routine procedure, when scanning for biliary problems, the sonographer will scan the liver as well. In this case the sonographer has encountered an incidental finding, irrelevant to the presenting symptoms, for which a triphasic CT scan of the liver has been performed.
Early prominent dense enhancement of the lesion during the arterial phase is characteristic of liver hemangioma (the most common benign liver tumor). Hemangiomas are seen in approximately 20% of the general population. They may be solitary or multiple. The lesions typically show intense enhancement during the arterial phase of triphasic CT scan and retain a blush of contrast during the portal venous phase.
Option A and C: Most malignant liver tumours (primary or metastatic) are hypovascular and will not have the early enhancement during the arterial phase; rather, they become more pronounced during the portal venous phase.
Option D: Cystic lesions in the liver may be simple, multiple (polycystic liver disease), neoplastic or infective (hydatid cysts). Simple cysts are extremely common and usually asymptomatic. On imaging, these cysts have a low-density homogenous appearance. With polycystic disease, the number and size of the cysts often lead to symptoms.
Option E: Hydatid cysts have a characteristic septate appearance and heterogenous appearance if they contain daughter cysts. Liver abscesses are usually symptomatic and more likely to have a heterogenous appearance.
You are about to perform a femoral venepuncture and you should take precaution not to damage the adjacent structures. Which one of the following is the order of structures in the groin under the inguinal ligament from medial to lateral?
A. Lacunar ligament, femoral artery, femoral vein, femoral nerve.
B. Lacunar ligament, femoral vein, femoral nerve, femoral artery.
C. Lacunar ligament, femoral vein, femoral artery, femoral nerve.
D. Femoral vein, femoral artery, femoral nerve, lacunar ligament.
E. Femoral vein. Femoral artery, lacunar ligament, femoral nerve.
C. Lacunar ligament, femoral vein, femoral artery, femoral nerve.
Femoral triangle consists of three borders:
- Upper border: inguinal ligament
- Medial border: lateral border of adductor longus
- Lateral border: medial border of sartorius
The contents of the femoral triangle from medial to lateral are:
1. Lacunar ligament and deep femoral lymph nodes
2. Femoral vein
3. Femoral artery
4. Femoral nerve
Remember LEVAN: Lymph node chain / lacunar ligament, Empty space, Vein, Artery and Nerve for the order of contents from medial to lateral.
The lacunar ligament is a ligament in the inguinal region that connects the inguinal ligament to the pectineal ligament near the point where they both insert on the pubic tubercle. This ligament comprises the medial border of the femoral canal.
Which one of the following is the most common early complication of hemorrhagic pancreatitis?
A. Pseudocyst.
B. Infection.
C. Obstructive jaundice.
D. Pancreatic fistula.
E. Renal failure.
E. Renal failure.
Acute pancreatitis can be classified into acute interstitial (most common) and acute hemorrhagic (least common). In the first type, the gland architecture is preserved but is edematous. Inflammatory cells and interstitial edema are prominent within the parenchyma. In hemorrhagic type, there is marked necrosis, hemorrhage, and fat necrosis. There is marked pancreatic necrosis along with vascular inflammation and thrombosis.
Hemorrhagic pancreatitis can rapidly result in severe hemorrhage, hypovolemia, shock and acute renal failure. Other options are also potential complications of acute pancreatitis but often do not occur as early as acute renal failure.
A 57-year-old man presents to your practice complaining of abdominal discomfort and pain for the past 6 months. The pain is predominantly felt in the epigastric area. He does not smoke but admits to chronic alcohol use. On examination, no abdominal tenderness is elicited. The remainder of the exam is inconclusive. An abdominal ultrasound scan is arranged that reveals the presence of a 10 cm cystic lesion in the epigastric area. Which one the following is the most appropriate management option?
A. Endoscopic gastrostomy.
B. Laparotomy.
C. Percutaneous drainage.
D. Drainage through ERCP.
E. Conservative management and re-evaluation in 6 months.
D. Drainage through ERCP.
A pancreatic pseudocyst is a collection of pancreatic juice encased by reactive granulation tissue (not epithelial tissue) in or around the pancreas. Pseudocysts can be single or multiple, small or large, and can be located either within or outside the pancreas. Most pseudocysts communicate with the pancreatic ductal system and contain high concentrations of digestive enzymes such as amylase and lipase.
The walls of pseudocysts are formed by adjacent structures such as the stomach, transverse mesocolon, gastrocolic omentum, and pancreas. The lining of pancreatic pseudocysts consists of fibrous and granulation tissue; the lack of an epithelial lining distinguishes pseudocysts from true pancreatic cysts.
The mechanism by which a pseudocyst is formed is necrosis and liquefaction of the pancreatic necrosis of pancreatic or peripancreatic tissue.
Pseudocyst can be seen in the following situations:
- After an episode of acute pancreatitis (in 10% of patients) - necrosis of peripancreatic tissue progresses to liquefaction and pseudocyst formation. Alternatively, a pseudocyst may result from parenchymal necrosis leading to the complete ductal disruption, and gross leakage of pancreatic juice.
- In patients with chronic pancreatitis – pseudocysts may develop after acute attacks of pancreatitis or after the pancreatic duct is obstructed. The latter causes increased intraductal pressure and leakage of pancreatic juice.
- After blunt or penetrating abdominal trauma (including iatrogenic injuries) - The injury can directly disrupt the duct and causes leakage.
Clinical manifestations and complications of pancreatic pseudocysts include:
- Expansion of the pseudocyst can produce abdominal pain, duodenal or biliary obstruction, vascular occlusion, or fistula formation into adjacent viscera, the pleural space, or pericardium.
- Spontaneous infection.
- Digestion of an adjacent vessel can result in a pseudoaneurysm, which can produce a sudden, painful expansion of the cyst or gastrointestinal bleeding due to bleeding into the pancreatic duct.
- Pancreatic pleural effusion -can result from disruption of the pancreatic duct with fistulization into the chest.
- Pancreatic peritonitis - can be caused by disruption of the pancreatic duct with fistulisation to the abdomen.
NOTE - up to 40% of pseudocysts resolve without intervention; however, they can produce a wide range of clinical problems depending on the location and extent of the fluid collection and the presence of infection.
Pancreatitis pseudocysts are diagnoses with CT or ultrasound scan. Where the diagnosis is in doubt, the content can be aspirated (under endoscopic ultrasonography or CT scan) and examined.
The old rule mentioning that intervention is needed if the cysts are larger than 6 cm or persist beyond 6 weeks is no longer in use, and surgical intervention should be considered if any of the following is present:
- Compression of large vessels (clinical symptoms or seen on CT scan)
- Gastric or duodenal outlet obstruction
- Stenosis of the common bile duct due to compression
- Infected pancreatic pseudocysts
- Hemorrhage into pancreatic pseudocyst
- Pancreatico-pleural fistula
- Pancreatic pseudocysts and symptoms:
— Early satiety
— Nausea and vomiting
— Pain
— Upper gastrointestinal bleeding - Asymptomatic pancreatic pseudocyst AND either of the following:
— Pseudocysts > 5cm, unchanged in size and morphology for more than 6 weeks
— Diameter > 4cm and extrapancreatic complications in patients with chronic alcoholic pancreatitis
— Suspected malignancy
Surgical drainage is the criterion standard against which all other interventions are measured in terms of success rate, mortality and recurrence rate. In recent years, however, endoscopic drainage has been introduced and can be applied provided that the cyst is near the stomach or duodenal wall:
There are two main types of endoscopic drainage:
- Transmural drainage: in this method, using endoscopy, a small incision is made in the stomach (endoscopic cystgastrostomy [ECG]) or in duodenum (endoscopic cystduodenostomy [ECD]) to let the pseudocyst drain into the stomach or duodenum. ECD is preferred over ECG.
NOTE - pseudocysts should have a mature capsule (wall thickness>3mm and < 1cm), bulge the lumen and have minimum size of 5-6 cm to become eligible for endoscopic drainage.
- Transpapillary drainage: this method is safer and more effective than transmural drainage, but requires that the cyst communicates with the pancreatic duct because this method includes entering the pancreatic duct by ERCP, and from there, into the pseudocyst. Stents may be left in place to facilitate drainage.
Generally, endoscopic drainage methods are preferred over open surgical treatment if eligibility is met and there is no contraindication because these methods are less invasive and associated with fewer complications.
Laparotomy with cyst excision and internal and external drainage is still the gold standard management option; however it is ONLY considered first-line therapy for surgical intervention in the following conditions:
- Complicated pseudocysts i.e. infected or necrotic
- Pseudocysts associated with pancreatic duct stricture and a dilated pancreatic duct
- Suspected cystic neoplasia
- Presence of pseudoaneurysm, unless it has been embolised before the procedure
- Coexistence pseudocysts and bile duct stenosis
- Complications such as compression of the stomach or the duodenum, perforation or pseudoaneursyms
NOTE - pseudoaneurysm is an absolute contraindication to endoscopic drainage unless it is embolized prior to the procedure.
Generally, patients with symptomatic pseudocysts should undergo interventional measures for pseudocyst drainage. The procedure of choice is endoscopic drainage. This cyst is 10 cm in size (>5cm) and amenable to endoscopic drainage either by endoscopic transmural or transpapillary drainage. Transpapillary drainage has the lowest complication rate of all the mentioned procedures and is the method of choice if the pseudocyst communicates with the pancreatic duct. Fortunately, 80% of pseudocysts communicate with the pancreatic duct.
Option A: Endoscopic cystgastrostomy (ECG) or duodenostomy (ECD) are methods of choice if the pseudocyst is not communicating with the pancreatic duct.
Option B: Laparotomy and surgical removal of the cyst is considered if endoscopic methods fail or there is a contraindication.
Option C: Percutaneous catheter drainage has low success rate and high recurrent rates. It is never considered for treatment of a pancreatic pseudocyst. However, in infected pseudocysts it is the procedure of choice for sampling and examining the material as the most appropriate initial step.
Option E: Conservative management is not an appropriate option for symptomatic pseudocysts.
Pancreatic Pseudocysts
A 34-year-old alcoholic man, who survived an episode of acute pancreatitis 4 weeks ago, has presented with mild discomfort in the epigastrium for the past few days. He is concerned that the disease might have recurred. He denies nausea and vomiting and describes the pain as constant and nagging. Physical examination is unremarkable. A contrast abdominal CT scan is performed showing a 4-cm pancreatic pseudocyst. Which one of the following is the next best step in management?
A. Endoscopic decompression.
B. Open surface decompression.
C. Observation.
D. Percutaneous catheter drainage.
E. Urgently take him to the operating room.
C. Observation.
A pancreatic pseudocyst is a collection of pancreatic juice encased by reactive granulation tissue (and not epithelial tissue) in or around the pancreas. Pseudocysts can be single or multiple, small or large, and can be located either within or outside of the pancreas. Most pseudocysts communicate with the pancreatic ductal system and contain high concentrations of digestive enzymes such as amylase and lipase.
The walls of pseudocysts are formed by adjacent structures such as the stomach, transverse mesocolon, gastrocolic omentum, and pancreas. The lining of a pancreatic pseudocysts consists of fibrous and granulation tissue. Lack of an epithelial lining distinguishes pseudocysts from true pancreatic cysts.
The mechanism by which a pseudocyst is formed is necrosis and liquefaction of the pancreatic necrosis of pancreatic or peripancreatic tissue.
Pseudocyst can be seen in the following situations:
- After an episode of acute pancreatitis (in 10% of patients) - necrosis of peripancreatic tissue progresses to liquefaction and pseudocyst formation. Alternatively, a pseudocyst may result from parenchymal necrosis leading to the complete ductal disruption, and gross leakage of pancreatic juice.
- In patients with chronic pancreatitis - pseudocysts may develop after acute attacks of pancreatitis or after the pancreatic duct is obstructed. The latter causes increased Intraductal pressure and leakage of pancreatic juice.
- After abdominal blunt or penetrating trauma (including iatrogenic injuries such as pancreatic surgery - injury can directly disrupt the duct and causes leakage.
Clinical manifestations and complications of pancreatic pseudocysts include:
- Expansion of the pseudocyst can produce abdominal pain, duodenal or biliary obstruction, vascular occlusion, or fistula formation into adjacent viscera, the pleural space, or pericardium.
- Spontaneous infection.
- Digestion of an adjacent vessel can result in a pseudoaneurysm, which can produce a sudden, painful expansion of the cyst or gastrointestinal bleeding due to bleeding into the pancreatic duct.
- Pancreatic pleural effusion -can result from disruption of the pancreatic duct with fistulization to the chest.
- Pancreatic pleural effusion: can be caused by disruption of the pancreatic duct with fistulization to the abdomen.
NOTE - up to 40% of pseudocysts resolve without intervention; however, they can produce a wide range of clinical problems depending on the location and extent of the fluid collection and the presence of infection.
Pancreatitis pseudocysts are diagnoses with CT or ultrasound scan. If the diagnosis is in doubt, contents can be aspirated and examined.
The dictum mentioning that intervention is needed if the cysts are larger than 6 cm or persist beyond 6 weeks is no longer in use, and surgical intervention should be considered in (even one criterion is sufficient):
- Compression of large vessels (clinical symptoms or seen on CT scan)
- Gastric or duodenal outlet obstruction
- Stenosis of the common bile duct due to compression
- Infected pancreatic pseudocysts
- Hemorrhage into pancreatic pseudocyst
- Pancreatico-pleural fistula
- Pancreatic pseudocysts and symptoms:
— Early satiety
— Nausea and vomiting
— Pain
— Upper gastrointestinal bleeding - Asymptomatic pancreatic pseudocyst AND either of the following:
— Pseudocysts > 5cm, unchanged in size and morphology for more than 6 weeks
— Diameter > 4cm and extrapancreatic complications in patients with chronic alcoholic pancreatitis
— Suspected malignancy
Surgical drainage (laparotomy and internal and external drainage) is the criterion standard against which all other interventions are measured in terms of success rate, mortality and recurrence rate. In recent years however endoscopic drainage has been introduced and can be applied provided that the cyst is near the stomach or duodenal wall:
There are two main types of endoscopic drainage:
- Transmural drainage: in this method, using endoscopy, a small incision is made in the stomach (endoscopic cystgastrostomy [ECG]) or in duodenum (endoscopic cystduodenostomy [ECD]) to let the pseudocyst drain into the stomach or duodenum. ECD is preferred over ECG.
- Transpapillary drainage: this method is safer and more effective than transmural drainage, but requires that the cyst communicates with pancreatic duct. Using ERCP and through the pancreatic duct, the cyst is reached and poked so that its content can drain into the pancreatic duct. Stents may be used to facilitate drainage.
NOTE - pseudocysts should have a mature capsule (wall thickness>3mm and <1cm), bulge the lumen and have minimum size of 5-6 cm to become eligible for endoscopic drainage.
Generally, endoscopic drainage methods are preferred over open surgical treatment if eligibility is met and there is no contraindication, because these methods are less invasive and associated with fewer complications.
Laparotomy with cyst excision and internal and external drainage is still the gold standard management option; however it is considered first-line therapy for surgical intervention if:
- Complicated pseudocysts i.e. infected and necrotic pseudocysts
- Pseudocysts associated with pancreatic duct stricture and a dilated pancreatic duct
- Suspected cystic neoplasia
- Presence of pseudoaneurysm unless it has been embolized before the procedure
- Coexistence pseudocysts and bile duct stenosis
- Complications such as compression of the stomach or the duodenum, perforation or pseudoaneursyms
NOTE - pseudoaneurysm is an absolute contraindication to endoscopic drainage unless it is embolized prior to the procedure.
Generally, patients with symptomatic pseudocysts should undergo interventional measures for pseudocyst drainage. The procedure of choice is endoscopic drainage, but as mentioned before, for a pseudocyst to be amenable to this procedure, it has to be at least 5-6 in size as well as bulging into the lumen
. This cyst with 4 cm in size is unlikely to be drained by endoscopic measures; therefore, open decompression (surgical drainage) should be considered; however, since the pain is mild, a watchful observation would be best management here in an attempt to avoid the high rates complications associated with surgical drainage. If the symptoms were more pronounce, intolerable or indicative of more serious complications, surgical drainage (open surface drainage) would have been the option of choice.
Percutaneous catheter drainage has low success rate and high recurrent rates. It is never considered for treatment of a pancreatic pseudocyst. However, in infected pseudocysts it is the procedure of choice for sampling and examining the material as the most appropriate initial step.
A 51-year-old Aboriginal male with history of acute pancreatitis presents with persistent abdominal pain and loss of appetite. On examination, an abdominal mass is found. A contrast abdominal CT scan is performed one cut of which shown in the following photograph. Which one of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
A. Chronic pancreatitis.
B. Acute pancreatitis.
C. Pancreatic pseudocyst.
D. Gastric adenocarcinoma.
E. Gastric lymphoma.
C. Pancreatic pseudocyst.
The round lesion with hypodense homogenous content and the thin smooth wall in the vicinity of and obliterating the pancreas is highly suggestive of a pancreatic cyst or pseudocyst. With the history of previous acute pancreatitis, a pseudocyst would be the most likely diagnosis.
A pancreatic pseudocyst is a collection of pancreatic juice encased by reactive granulation tissue (and not epithelial tissue) in or around the pancreas. Pseudocysts can be single or multiple, small or large, and can be located either within or outside of the pancreas. Most pseudocysts communicate with the pancreatic ductal system and contain high concentrations of digestive enzymes such as amylase and lipase.
The walls of pseudocysts are formed by adjacent structures such as the stomach, transverse mesocolon, gastrocolic omentum, and the pancreas. The lining of pancreatic pseudocysts consists of fibrous and granulation tissue. Lack of an epithelial lining distinguishes pseudocysts from true pancreatic cysts.
The mechanism by which a pseudocyst is formed is necrosis and liquefaction of the pancreatic necrosis of pancreatic or peripancreatic tissue.
Pseudocyst can be seen in the following situations:
- After an episode of acute pancreatitis (in 10% of patients) - necrosis of peripancreatic tissue progresses to liquefaction and pseudocyst formation. Alternatively, a pseudocyst may result from parenchymal necrosis leading to the complete ductal disruption, and gross leakage of pancreatic juice.
- In patients with chronic pancreatitis - pseudocysts may develop after acute attacks of pancreatitis or after the pancreatic duct is obstructed. The latter causes increased Intraductal pressure and leakage of pancreatic juice.
- After abdominal blunt or penetrating trauma (including iatrogenic injuries such as pancreatic surgery - injury can directly disrupt the duct and causes leakage.
Clinical manifestations and complications of pancreatic pseudocysts include:
- Expansion of the pseudocyst can produce abdominal pain, duodenal or biliary obstruction, vascular occlusion, or fistula formation into adjacent viscera, the pleural space, or pericardium
- Spontaneous infection
- Digestion of an adjacent vessel can result in a pseudoaneurysm, which can produce a sudden, painful expansion of the cyst or gastrointestinal bleeding due to bleeding into the pancreatic duct
- Pancreatic pleural effusion -can result from disruption of the pancreatic duct with fistulisation to the chest
- Pancreatic peritonitis - can be caused by disruption of the pancreatic duct with fistulisation to the abdomen
A 45-year-old man presents with signs and symptoms of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and is started on a course of omeprazole 20 mg BID for 6 weeks with complete resolution of the symptoms. Because of long-standing symptoms, an upper endoscopy is performed. The endoscopic view of the distal esophagus is shown in the following photograph. Histopathology shows intestinal metaplasia, but no dysplasia. Which one of the following is most appropriate next step in management?
A. Pneumatic dilation.
B. Continue PPIs with doubled dose.
C. Endoscopy after 24 months.
D. Endoscopy after 6 months.
E. No intervention is needed.
C. Endoscopy after 24 months.
The photograph shows Barrett’s esophagus. Barrett’s esophagus refers to metaplasia of the squamous epithelium of the distal esophagus to columnar epithelium of the intestinal type. The metaplasia is believed to be due to GERD in a susceptible individual.
Barrett’s esophagus is often associate with severe reflux disease, esophagitis, or strictures, but is also seen in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients.
Barrett’s esophagus is a premalignant condition with a 40- to 125-fold increase in the incidence of adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus; however, the absolute risk is relatively small and approximately 0.5% per year.
Every patient with the alarming symptoms of weight loss, anemia, heme-positive stool, and dysphagia, or GERD for more than 5 years should undergo endoscopy and biopsy. Further management depends on the histological findings and is summarized in the following:ENDOSCOPIC FINDINGS - MANAGEMENT
- Barrett’s esophagus (metaplasia) - Repeat endoscopy every 2-3 years for lesions ≥ 3cm and every 3-5 years for lesions < 3 cm.
- Low-grade dysplasia - Repeat endoscopy in 6 months.
- High grade dysplasia - Distal esophagetomy.
This patient has metaplastic changes involving an area of more than 3cm; therefore, the next step in management would be repeating the endoscopy in 2-3 years.
Option A: Pneumatic dilation is not a management option for GERD or Barrett’s esophagus.
Option B: Although proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may be associated with the appearance of squamous islands and possibly some degree of regression, there is no evidence that PPIs reduce the incidence of esophageal cancer in patient’s with Barrett’s esophagus.
Option D: Endoscopy after 3-6 months (current recommendations: every 6 months) was the choice of management if low-grade dysplasia (not metaplasia) would be found on histological studies.
Option E: This patient needs close surveillance and follow-up and action should be taken for early detection of esophageal malignancies.
A 39-year-old Aboriginal man presents to your practice with a 6-week history of abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and bowel motions that are difficult to flush down the toilet. The abdominal pain is described as a constant and disabling radiating to back. The pain is neither brought up, nor alleviated by eating. He is a chronic alcoholic and continues to drink alcohol in large amounts. Which one of the following investigations is most likely to reveal the underlying cause of his symptoms?
A. Investigations for exocrine function of pancreas.
B. Stools exam.
C. Transabdominal ultrasound.
D. ERCP.
E. Plain abdominal X-ray.
C. Transabdominal ultrasound.
The clinical picture and history of excessive alcohol use makes chronic pancreatitis the most likely diagnosis. Chronic pancreatitis presents with epigastric pain as the most dominant feature. The natural history of pain in chronic pancreatitis is highly variable. Most patients experience intermittent attacks of pain at unpredictable intervals, while a minority of patients have chronic pain. In most patients, pain severity either decreases or resolves over 5-25 years. In alcohol-induced disease, alcohol cessation may reduce the severity of pain.
The pain is constant, often radiates to back and may be associated with nauseas and vomiting. It is often felt in the epigastric area but may be felt on the left side or even right side. The pain may or may not be related to eating. If related, there may be weight loss due to fear of eating. At times of pain patients bend forward to the so-called “pancreatic position” or lie in the knee-chest position on their right or left side to decrease the pain intensity.
Patients with severe pancreatic exocrine dysfunction cannot properly digest complex foods and absorb partially digested breakdown products. Nonetheless, clinical significant protein and fat deficiencies does not develop until more than 90% of the pancreatic function is lost. However, fear of eating due to pain brought up by eating, can result in early weight loss. With severe chronic pancreatitis, insulin deficiency and diabetes mellitus may also develop.
Abdominal CT scan, MRI, ultrasound, plain X-ray films and ERCP can be used for diagnosis, but CT scan is the best initial test used for imaging studies when chronic pancreatitis is suspected. CT scans are 75-90% sensitive and 85% specific. Ultrasound is the second-line initial imaging study with a sensitivity of 60-70% and specificity of 80-90% and the best among option in the absence of CT scan.
Calcifications within the pancreatic duct are present on plain films in approximately 30% of cases, making palne films a less desirable option.
The characteristic finding on imaging is pancreatic duct calcifications, ductal dilation, enlargement of the pancreas and fluid collection.
Calcium deposition is most commonly seen in alcoholic pancreatitis, but is also present hereditary and tropical forms of the disorder. It is rare in idiopathic pancreatitis.
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is becoming the diagnostic test of choice since it can show calcification, without any radiation risks, but is expensive and not readily available. For this reason, it is not an ideal option for initial assessment.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is reserved for situations where non-invasive modalities are not available, are equivocal and for intervention.
A 45-year-old man presents to the emergency department with acute onset epigastric and right upper quadrant abdominal pain that he describes as constant and severe. He is nauseous and has vomited 3 times since the pain started. He admits to chronic heavy alcohol consumption. On examination, he has a blood pressure of 140/90mmHg, pulse rate of 110bpm and temperature of 38.4°C. The epigastric area is mildly tender to palpation. Which one of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
A. Acute cholecystitis.
B. Acute pancreatitis.
C. Acute gastritis.
D. Acute gastro-esophageal reflux disease.
E. Alcohol intoxication.
B. Acute pancreatitis.
The clinical picture and the history of heavy alcohol use suggest acute pancreatitis as the most likely diagnosis.
The cardinal symptom of acute pancreatitis is abdominal pain. The pain is characteristically described as dull, boring and constant. The pain is often sudden-onset and gradually becomes worse. Most often, the pain is felt in the upper abdomen usually in the epigastric region, but sometimes is perceived more on the right or left side, depending on which part of the pancreas is involved. In about 50% of the patients, the pain directly radiates through the abdomen to the back. The duration of pain is variable but typically lasts more than 1 day.
Restless and agitation may be noted. At times of pain patients bend forward to the so-called “pancreatic position” or lie in the knee-chest position. Anorexia, nausea and vomiting, and diarrhea are other likely symptoms. Acute pancreatitis secondary to alcohol, frequently occurs 1 to 3 days after a binge drinking.It can also occur after cessation of drinking.
The patient should be asked about recent operative or other invasive procedures such as ERCP, family history of hypertriglyceridemia, previous biliary colic and binge alcohol drinking as the major causes of acute pancreatitis.
Option A: Acute cholecystitis causes pain in right upper quadrant, fever and leukocytosis. Murphy’s sign is usually positive: the patient is asked to inspire deeply while the right subcostal area is palpated. The Murphy sign is cessation of inspiration due to pain. Patients with acute cholecystitis may experience increased discomfort and hold in mid-inspiration. Abdominal examination may show voluntary and involuntary guarding.
Option B: Acute gastritis usually can present with pain in epigastrium associated with nauseas and vomiting and epigastric tenderness but fever would not be a feature.
Option D: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) presents with heartburn, chronic cough, a metalic taste in the mouth. The given clinical picture is completely different from that of GERD.
Option E: Patients with alcohol intoxication presents with slurred speech, nystagmus, disinhibited behavior, incoordination, unsteady gate, memory impairment, stupor, or coma depending on the severity of intoxication.
The following photograph is one cut from an abdominal CT scan in a 68-year-old man. Which one of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
A. Gastric outlet obstruction.
B. Cancer of the stomach.
C. Simple hepatic cyst.
D. Pancreatic pseudocyst.
E. Hepatic hemangioma.
A. Gastric outlet obstruction.
The picture shows a contrast CT scan of the abdomen. On the right side of the picture (left side of the patient) a distended contrast-filled stomach is seen. Duodenum is on the left side of the picture. It also contains contrast media.
The right kidney is another structure seen on the CT scan. In front of the vertebral body and slightly to the left, the aorta (containing contrast material) is noticed. Other structures seen on this cut of the CT scan are lower part of the right hepatic lobe, left hepatic lobe, spleen and parts of the pancreas.
The distended and fluid filled stomach is suggestive of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). The distended duodenum indicates that the obstruction has occurred at the duodenum level.
Clinical entities that can result in GOO generally are categorized into two groups – benign and malignant. In the past, peptic ulcer disease (PUD) was the most common cause of GOO, but currently, 50-80% of GOOs are due to malignancies such as pylorus adenocarcinoma, lymphoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST).
Benign causes of GOO include pancreatic pseudocysts, gastric varices, infections such as tuberculosis, and rarely gall stones.
At this level no pancreatic or hepatic lesion is seen. Cancer of the stomach would have given an obstruction in upper parts if it involves the pylorus. Besides, this might be the underlying cause of the CT scan findings not the interpretation.
A 35-year-old woman presents with a 4-month history of dysphagia to both solid and liquid foods. A barium study is done demonstrating dilated esophagus with tapering at the lower end. Based on the history and radiological findings, achalasia is the diagnosis. Which one of the following is the most appropriate management in this patient?
A. Pyloromyotomy.
B. Pneumatic dilation.
C. Botulinum toxin injection.
D. Calcium channel blockers.
E. Nitrates.
B. Pneumatic dilation.
Achalasia is a primary esophageal motility disorder characterized by the absence of esophageal peristalsis and impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) in response to swallowing. These abnormalities cause a functional obstruction
at the gastroesophageal junction.
The goal of treatment is to reduce the resistance of the LES and overcome the obstruction.
Currently, standard of care for achalasia is based on guidelines from the American College of Gastroenterology and is as follows:
- Initial therapy should be either graded pneumatic dilation (PD) or laparoscopic surgical myotomy in patients who are fit for such surgeries.
- Botulinum toxin injection into the LES is considered for patients who are not appropriate candidates for surgery.
- Pharmacologic therapy can be used for patients not undergoing PD or myotomy and who have failed botulinum toxin therapy (nitrates and calcium channel blockers most common)
For this patient, either pneumatic dilation or endoscopic myotomy (not an option) is the most appropriate initial management option.
Option A: Pyloromyotomy is the procedure used for treatment of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis or obstruction.
Option C: In patients with mild symptoms or in those who are not appropriate candidates for pneumatic balloon dilation or surgery, injection of botulinum toxin is considered the next most appropriate treatment. Botulinum toxin injection has been associated with symptoms improvement, but may need to be repeated at intervals of 3-12 months.
Option D and E: Pharmacological therapy can be used for those patients not undergoing pneumatic dilation or myotomy, and who have failed botulinum toxin therapy. These medications, however, may not be desirably effective. First-line medical treatment is with glyceryl trinitrate (oral or sublingual spray). If the episodes are associated with spasms or are frequent or disabling, a trial of diltiazem, nifedipine, or isosorbide dinitrate can be considered.
Achalasia