Gap Fillers and Warranties Flashcards
Where do gap fillers come from?
1) Courts - Restatement 204
2) Statute - UCC 2-305 through 2-311
3) Warranties - UCC 2-312 - 316
Restatement 200- Interpretation of Promise or Agreement
Interpretation of a promise or agreement or a term thereof is the ascertainment of its meaning.
Restatement 201- Whose Meaning prevails
(1) Where the parties have attached the same meaning to a promise or agreement, or term thereof, it is interpreted in accordance with taht meaning.
(2) Where the parties have attached different meanings to a promise or agreement or a term thereof, it is interpreted in accordance with the meaning attached by one of them if at the time the agreement was made:
(a) that party did not know of any different meaning attached by the other, and the other knew the meaning attached by the first party; or
(b) that party had no reason to know of any different meaning attached by the other, and the other had reason to know the meaning attached by the first party.
(3) Except as stated in this Section, neither party is bound by the meaning attached by the other, even though the result may be a failure of mutual assent.
Restatement 202- Rules in Aid of Interpretation
Words and other conduct are interpreted in the light of all the circumstances, and if the principal purpose of the parties is ascertainable it is given great weight.
(2) A writing is interpreted as a whole, and all writings that are par of that same transaction are interpreted together.
(3) Unless a different intention is manifested,
(a) where language has a generally prevailing meaning, it is interpreted in accordance with that meaning;
(b) technical terms and words of art are given their technical meaning when used in a transaction within their technical field.
(4) Where an agreement involves repeated occasions for performance by either party with knowledge of the nature of the performance and opportunity for objection to it by the other, any course of performance accepted or acquiesced in without objection is given great weight in the interpretation of the agreement.
(5) Where ever reasonable, the manifestations of intention of the parties to a promise or agreement are interpreted as consistent with each other and with any relevant course of performance, course of dealing or usage of trade.
Restatement 203- Standards of Preference in Interpretation
In the interpretation of a promise or agreement or a term thereof, the following standards of preference are generally applicable:
(a) an interpretation which gives a reasonable, lawful, and effective meaning to all the terms is preferred to an interpretation which leaves unreasonable, unlawful, or of no effect;
(b) Express terms are given greater weight than course of performance, course of dealing, and usage of trade.
Express terms > Course of performance > Course of dealing > usage of trade.
(c) Specific terms and exact terms are given greater weight than general language;
(d) separately negotiated or added terms are given greater weight than standardized terms or other terms not separately negotiated.
Restatement 204- Supplying an Omitted Essential Term
When the parties to a bargain sufficiently defined to be a contract have no agreed with respect to a term which is essential to a determination of their rights and duties, a term which is reasonable in the circumstances is supplied by the court.
Restatement 205- Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing
Every contract imposes upon each party a duty of good faith and fair dealing in its performance and its enforcement
Restatement 206- Interpretation against the Draftsman
In choosing among the reasonable meaning of a promise or agreement or a term thereof, that meaning is generally preferred which operates against the party who supplies the words or from whom a writing otherwise proceeds.
Define: Patent Ambiguity-
A term or phrase that is ambiguous on its face.
Define: Latent Ambiguity
Parties cannot realize that there is an ambiguity until later on in the contract.
How are 1) patent ambiguities solved and 2) latent ambiguities solved
1) patent ambiguities are solved by deciding interpretation through the reasonable person standard
2) Latent ambiguities are solved by rescinding the contract
Can there be mutual assent to a contract with a mistake?
There can be mutual assent in a contract made even with a mistake.
Can there be mutual assent to a contract with a misunderstanding?
No there is no mutual assent because the parties had different ideas as to the meaning of the contract.
Will parol evidence be allowed to prove:
1) Mistake?
2) Misunderstanding?
1) Yes, extrinsic will be allowed to prove a mistake
2) yes, extrinsic evidence will be allowed to prove a misunderstanding..
UCC 2-312 - Warranty of Title and Against Infringement; Buyers Obligation Against Infringement
(1) There is a contract for sale a warranty by the seller that:
(a) the title conveyed shall be good, and its transfer rightful; and
(b) the goods shall be delivered free from any security interest or other lien or encumbrance of which the buyer at the time of contracting has no knowledge.
(2) Unless specifically stated in the contract, this warranty is always present.