G2: Settlement change Flashcards
What functions/services does a farm offer?
Negligible
What size is a farm?
1 or 2 buildings, a family
Size of a hamlet?
Less than 100 people
Functions/services in a hamlet
May have a pub/church
Size of a village
100-1000 people
Functions/services of a village
Services increase, often a primary school and small independent shops
Example of a village
Cwmcarn
Size of a town
1000-10000 people
Functions/services of a town
Further increase Two or more primary schools One high school Several shops Doctor's surgery
Examples of a town
Risca/Cwmbran
Three types of cities and corresponding sizes
Smaller city (100000-300000) Larger city (300000-1000000) Million cities (1000000-3000000)
Functions/services in a city
Services higher order, universities, hospitals, high street brands, banks, regional offices
Size of a conurbation
3m-10m people
10m+ is a Megalopolis
Functions/services of a conurbation
Services are of the highest order, national/international HQs, flagship stores, no, of universities/hospitals
Example of a conurbation
San-San (San Francisco - San Diego)
Settlement hierarchy in order of decreasing sphere of influence
Conurbation City Large town Small town Village Hamlet Isolated dwelling/farm
Example of a hamlet
Mamhilad
Why are urban models developed
To simplify morphology and land-use of cities
Makes generalisations and shows patterns that are comparable to any city
Explain the Burgess Model
Based on Chicago, 1920s
Pattern of concentric circles
Only based on Chicago
Doesn’t show recent changes
Explain the Hoyt Model
Developed in the 1940s
Based on Burgess but adds sectors of similar land use
Still uses concentric circles
Cities/settlements grow on main roads and railways
Explain the Mann model
Developed in 1960s
Considered the most useful and relevant in comparison to the modern British City
Combines Burgess/Hoyt models but more descriptive in depicting zone
Factors aren’t dominated with socio-economic grouping
Strengths of urban models
Comparison is a useful analytical tool
Based on real cities (e.g. Chicago, not just theoretical) - Actual trends have been observed
Simplifies complex ideas of land use
Visually stimulating colours of concentric circles are easy to absorb in comparison to text
Groups of land use simplify things
Drawbacks of urban models
Only work if you assume every country has the same land use characteristics as America (this is not the case) Models are out of date (40s and 60s) and don't take regeneration (gentrification), out of town retail and industry in to consideration Physical features (e.g. Rivers) aren't considered - different areas have different physical features and so land use would vary accordingly Based on large urban areas, would they work on smaller urban cities,