Future interests Flashcards
6 categories of future interests, based on whether they are retained by grantor or a transferee
retained by grantor: 1) possibility of reverter (POR), 2) right of entry (or power of termination), 3) reversion
held by a transferee: 1) vested remainder, 2) contingent remainder, 3) executory interest (either shifting or springing)
future interest capable of creation in grantor (3)
possibility of reverter (POR)
right of entry (power of termination) (ROE)
reversion
future interest capable of creation in grantor
possibility of reverter (POR)
Accompanies ONLY fee simple determinable (FSD)
FSD/POR
future interest capable of creation in grantor
right of entry (power of termination) (ROE)
Accompanies ONLY FS SCS
Bobby Brown/Brittany Spears - It’s My Perogative
future interest capable of creation in grantor
reversion
Reversion is the future interest that arises in a grantor who transfers an estate less all she started with, other than FSD or FS SCS.
future interest in transferee
If future interest is held by someone other than the grantor, it has to be either: 1) vested remainder (3 species), 2) contingent remainder, or 3) executory interest (2 species)
future interest in transferee
vested remainder - 3 species
- indefeasibly vested remainder
- vested remainder subject to complete defeasance (aka vested remainder subject to total divestment)
- vested remainder subject to open
future interest in transferee
executory interest - 2 species
- shifting executory interest
2. springing executory interest
future interest in transferee
3 tasks in assessing future interests in transferees
- distinguish vested remainders (3 kinds) from contingent remainders
- distinguish 3 kinds of vested remainders from each other
- distinguish all remainders from executory interests
future interest in transferee
3 tasks in assessing future interests in transferees
remainder definition and 3 actions of remainderman
remainder - a future interest in a grantee that is capable of becoming a possessory upon the expiration of a prior possessory estate created in the same conveyance in which the remainder is created.
Remainderman always accompanies a preceding estate of fixed duration (usually life estate or term of years)
Remainderman never follows a defeasible fee.
Remainderman cannot cut short or divest a prior transferee.
(If the present estate is a defeasible fee, and if the future interest is held by someone other than the grantor, the future interest has to be an executory interest, not a remainder.)
future interest in transferee
3 tasks in assessing future interests in transferees
distinguish vested remainders from contingent remainders
Remainder is vested if it is BOTH 1) created in an ascertained person AND 2) is not subject to any condition precedent.
Remainder is contingent if it is created in an unascertained person OR is subject to a condition precedent
future interest in transferee
3 tasks in assessing future interests in transferees
distinguish vested remainders from contingent remainders
features of contingent remainders - unborn or unascertained persons
The remainder can be contingent because is it is created in as yet unborn or unascertained persons.
Examples:
If To A for life, then to B’s first child. A is alive and B has no children yet.
If To A for life, then to B’s heirs. A is alive and B is alive BUT a living person has no heirs. (While alive, his heirs are unknown.)
If To A for life, then to those children of B who survive A. A is alive (We don’t know which of B’s children will survive A)
future interest in transferee
3 tasks in assessing future interests in transferees
distinguish vested remainders from contingent remainders
features of contingent remainders - subject condition precedent
The remainder can be contingent because it is subject to a condition precedent.
A condition is a condition precedent when it appears BEFORE the language creating the remainder or is woven into the grant to remainderman.
future interest in transferee
contingent remainder rules (3)
Rule of Destructibility of Contingent Remainders
Rule in Shelley’s case
Doctrine of Worthier Title
future interest in transferee
contingent remainder rules
Rule of Destructibility of Contingent Remainders
At common law, a contingent remainder was destroyed if it was still contingent at the time the preceding estate ended.
(i.e., To A for life, and if B has reached 21 yo, to B. B is only 19)
Historically at common law, B’s contingent remainder was destroyed, and O or O’s heirs would take FSA.
Today, the destructibility rule is abolished. If still contingent at the time the preceding estate ends, O or O’s heirs will hold the estate subject to B’s springing executory interest. Once B reaches 21, B takes.