Fungal Infections Flashcards
Fungal infections: explain the cellular mechanisms of antifungal defence, and explain how immune status determines risk of fungal infection
- Complex mechanism govern fungal immunity
- A wide range of pattern recognition receptors are implicated in fungal immunity
- Mutations in Dectin-1 TLR 4 and plasminogen confer increased susceptibility to fungal disease
- Better understanding of fungal immunogenetics will enable the development of personalised medicine
Cellular Immunity to Fungal Infection
- Fungi are opsonised by pentraxin-3 and mannose-binding lectin (MBL).
- Cells involved:
- Phagocytes – are the first line of defence.
- NK cells – provide early INF-gamma.
- Dendritic cells – influence T-cell differentiation.
- Th1 and Th17 cells.
- Virulence of fungal spores:
- Candida – dimorphism allows tissue invasion.
- Cryptococcus – capsule evades phagocytosis.
- Aspergillus – inhaled as conidia, invade as hyphae.
- Flies – Toll is an innate PRR (Pattern Recognition Receptor) required for fungal immunity.
Human Deficiencies Leading to Fungal Infections
- Dectin 1 (a fungal PRR) deficiency leads to mucocutaneous fungal infections – e.g. vulvovaginitis & onychomycosis.
- This leads to impaired macrophage IL-6 production and binding in response to fungal infections.
- Also leads to increased susceptibility to invasive aspergillosis in stem cell transplants.
- CARD-9 deficiency leads to chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis.
- CARD-9 is required for:
- TNFa production in response to b-glucan stimulation.
- T-cell Th17 differentiation.
- CARD-9 is required for:
- TLR4 polymorphisms lead to an increased risk of Invasive Aspergillosis (IA) in transplantation (i.e. haematopoietic stem cell transplants).
- There are many major SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) associated with increased susceptibility to invasive fungal infections and disease – i.e. CXCL10, IL1-R, IL-23R, TLR-2/4/6/9.
CONCLUSION 1
- Mutations on Dectin-1, TLR4 and plasminogen confer increased susceptibility to fungal disease.
Defenses against fungal infections
Cellular and Innate Defences
- Cellular defences:
- Neutrophil are very important in fungal defence:
- Neutrophil NETS – neutrophils throw out chromatin “nets” to capture pathogens.
- These chromatin molecules outside the nucleus act as “danger signals” and recruit’s effector cells to the area as well.
- Neutrophil NETS – neutrophils throw out chromatin “nets” to capture pathogens.
- Fungal morphogenesis – fungi can transition between yeast, candida and hyphae forms (multicellular) and this can drive a modulation of Dendritic cell response and can be bad for the immune response (as it gets confused).
- Neutrophil are very important in fungal defence:
- Innate defences:
- Mucosal immunity governs fungal tolerance and resistance.
Conclusion
- Macrophages and neutrophils contribute to fungal immunity.
- For Aspergillus, neutrophils are of a primary importance.
- Dendritic cells modulate adaptive immune responses.
- Adaptive T-cell INF-gamma responses augment host immunity to fungi.
Outline the treatment of fungal infections
Treatment:
- Adoptive immunotherapy – generate lots of antifungal T-cells in a sample and then give these to the patients that need to fight a fungal infection.
- It can be used in stem cell transplant - give back antifungal T-cells post-chemotherapy
- Gene therapy – e.g. restore gp91 function (make reactive oxidative species to fight fungal spores) to treat chronic granulomatous disorder. E.g. restore neutrophil NET formation.
Conclusion
- New treatments:
- INF-gamma or adoptive T-cell therapy could be new treatments.
- Gene therapy for primary immunodeficiencies could be a new treatment.
Discuss fungal allergies
- Many fungal spores are inhaled daily.
- Host response may be normal, ineffective or exaggerated (allergy).
- This leads to either an allergic or invasive fungal disease.
- Aspergillus is a primary driver – other fungi may contribute.
- Aspergilli – Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus fumigatus (pretty one).
- Other supporting fungi – Alternaria, Cladosporium, Penicillum.
- Important fungal reactions include type 1, 3, 4 hypersensitivity reactions.
- T1 – IgE-driven, involves histamine and leukotrienes, in minutes.
- T2 – IgG-, IgM-driven, involves complement, in 1-24 hours.
- T3 – IgG-, IgM-driven, involves complement, in 1-24 hours.
- T4 – T-cell-driven, involves lymphokines, in 2-3 days.
ABPA – Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis:
Aberrant TH1 responses of the lung
Abnormal IgE responses
ABPA – Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis:
- Criteria for diagnosis:
- Predisposing condition – asthma or cystic fibrosis.
- Obligatory criteria – high baseline serum IgE, +ve T1 hypersensitivity (immediate response) skin test OR Aspergillus-specific IgE.
- Supportive criteria (more than 2) – eosinophilia, IgG AB to Aspergillus fumigatus, consistent radiologic abnormalities.
- Radiologic abnormalities – also have hyper-dense mucus:
- Dilated bronchi, thick walls.
- Upper/central predilection.
- Lobar collapse.
- Ring or linear opacities.
- Proximal bronchiectasis.
- Fibrotic scarring.
- Radiologic abnormalities – also have hyper-dense mucus:
Conclusion
- Variety of pulmonary allergies to fungi exist.
- ABPA is the best recognised.
- Severe asthma with fungal sensitisation is controversial.
- There is evidence for fungal sensitisation in hypersensitivity pneumonitis.
Diagnosis of these is driven by – skin tests, IgE and IgM in clinically relevant populations
Outline the management of ABPA
– Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis:
- Management:
- Corticosteroids.
- Itraconazole (steroid-sparing agent) – benefit past 16 weeks is unclear however.
- Indicated if not responding to steroids or if steroid-dependency.
- Omalizumab – recombinant IgE monoclonal ABs may be useful.