Funding of Political Parties Flashcards
what is the issue surrounding funding?
In the UK there is resistance to the state funding of parties
how are MPs paid in the UK?
MPs are paid from general taxation (the basic annual salary in April 2017 with £76,000)
They are also allowed to claim expenses to cover the costs of running an office living in Westminster and their constituency and travelling between the two
how are parties funded in the UK?
Parties are funded a little by the state but mostly by voluntary subscriptions from their members, donations and fundraising events in the MPs’ constituencies
Short money = special state provision to support the opposition in parliament
arguments for state funding of political parties
Parties play an important role in representative democracy and so deserve public funding
Public funding would remove the huge difference in financial resources available to different sized parties, Which encourages equal financial footing and reduces the huge financial advantage that large parties have, giving smaller parties chances to progress
Parties such as the Liberal Democrats could compete on an equal financial footing because funding would be based entirely on membership or electoral performance
Would encourage public participation, engagement and recruitment to parties as it is their tax that is funding them
Would reduce the corrupt influence of private bankers, private donations and wealthy individuals on party policy And the idea that influence and power can be purchased
Would allow parties and politicians to focus solely on representing their constituents rather than courting potential donors
would end possibilities of hidden forms of influence through funding, party funding would be more transparent — If parties are not funded by taxpayers they will be funded by wealthy individuals and interest groups
arguments against state funding of political parties
Could lead to calls for greater state regulation, possibly reducing parties’ independence, parties will lose some of their independence and see themselves as being controlled by the state as state funding may lead to excessive party regulations
Could isolate parties from the wishes of voters as they no longer have to rely on them for subscriptions and donations, Parties could become isolated from real-world issues if they are not allowed to be funded or accessed by interest groups they could also become isolated from voters wishes as they are no longer reliant on their funding
There should not be more burden placed on the taxpayer, which is a reason why the 2007 report on funding reform failed and action was not taken
Taxpayers should not be expected to fund and bankroll parties that they oppose
Parties will still have unequal resources, Even if state funding is introduced because state funding will be based on membership past electoral performance et cetera And there will always be differences in membership levels And human and material resources
Will be difficult to know how to distribute funding — based on past performance which would retain the large party advantages or based on future aspirations which is vague and uncertain, there is also the issue of how much membership a party would need to qualify for funding
what have large parties been accused of?
Large parties have been accused of offering political honours such as a place in the House of Lords to their most generous benefactors
Funding is a controversial area due to suspicions that powerful people offering financial support can gain political influence in return
Decreases democracy and openness
Example = Tony Blair and the Ecclestone affair
who is the least well funded political party?
The Liberal Democrats are the least well funded party of the three main parties
And often criticise their opponents for being bankrolled by the wealthy
how are the main parties mostly funded?
Conservatives are mainly funded by businesses and corporations
Labour is mainly funded by trade unions
However during the new Labour years this was to some extent replaced by donations from wealthy individuals as labour became friendlier to the business community
Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act (2000): why was it passed?
Passed by the Blair government to overcome the idea that party funding had become undemocratic
Aimed to regulate the funding of parties And sought to make parties less reliant on wealthy individual backers
However it did not put the funding issue to rest — the cash for peerages scandal (2006) in which several wealthy individuals who had loaned money to labour had been nominated for honours
Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act (2000): what is included in the act?
The amount that a party could spend In general election campaigns was capped at £30,000 per constituency
People not on the UK electoral roll can no longer make donations, thus reducing foreign influence
all Donations over £5000 nationally or £1000 to a constituency party must be declared To the electoral commission
Donations over £7500 must be placed on an electoral register
Parties have to publish details of donations regularly (To increase transparency)
An independent electoral commission set up to supervise party spending on election campaigns — E.g. the Conservatives have been in trouble for overspending before
problems with the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act (2000)
It stressed transparency rather than any serious limits on the amounts being donated
State funding was rejected as a solution at the time and election spending controls were still extremely generous
Political Parties and Elections Act (2009)
Built upon the regulations established in the political parties elections and referendums act 2000
Imposed tighter regulations on spending by candidates in elections
Allowed the electoral commission to investigate cases and impose fines
Further restrictions on donations from non-UK residents
Reduced the thresholds for the declaration of donations
CASE STUDY: Tony Blair and the Ecclestone Affair
Within months of becoming prime minister in 1997 Blair faced criticism after Bernie Ecclestone the chief executive of Formula One donated £1 million to labour
There was then a delay in implementing a ban on tobacco advertising in Formula One, allegedly this was linked to the donation
It made it seem that influence over policy could be purchased and that large donations would be rewarded with favourable legislation
Blair was forced to justify himself in an interview and the money was later returned
why is it difficult to find agreement on reform to party funding?
It is very difficult to find agreement on reform to party funding because all parties are funded very differently
Difficult to find agreement on party funding as they all receive funding from various different areas so it’s hard to regulate everything fairly
As seen in the 2015 reforms to funding proposals
potential funding reforms: the 2007 Phillips Report
A report titled ‘Strengthening Democracy’ by a former civil servant named Sir Hayden Phillips proposed moving towards a system where parties are funded from taxpayers’ money
Concluded that one way forward might be greater state funding for UK political parties perhaps through some form of ‘pence per voter’ or ‘pence per member’ funding formula
Attempted to address the problem of private donations but no government has acted upon this report
Pressure to make public spending cuts under the coalition government meant it was not an appropriate time to place additional burden on the taxpayer
potential funding reforms: 2015
A suggestion supported by Labour and the Lib Dems was to impose limits on individual donations to parties
This was complicated as the Conservatives would be placed at a disadvantage and would lose the most as they are mostly funded by private donations so they proposed placing restrictions on trade union donations too
The 2016 trade union act obliges new trade union members to choose whether to opt in to making payments towards the political levy — Expected to result in a drop in funding received by Labour from the unions
examples of current state funding of political parties
there is already some state funding of parties in the UK…
- PDGs
- Short money
- Cranborne money
Parties also receive subsidies in respect of the television broadcasts and help with the postage costs during election campaigns
state funding of parties: PDGs
Policy Development Grants (PDGs) from the electoral commission can be used to hire policy advisors
£2 million is available for this purpose every year
Established under section 12 of the PPERA
Available not only to the main opposition parties But also to any party that has two or more sitting MPs taking the oath of allegiance
PDGs (2015-16)
Conservatives, Labour, LibDems and UKIP— Just over £359,000 each
Democratic Unionist party — just over £137,000
SNP — Just over £153,000
Plaid Cymru — Just over £132,000
state funding of parties: short money
Funds distributed to opposition parties to fund their Parliamentary work And administrative costs in order to improve democracy and political funding equality As well as provide for proper scrutiny of the government
Available to all opposition parties that win at least two seats OR a single seat while also securing over 150,000 votes nationally at a general election
Depends on how many seats and votes the party won at the previous election
In 2014 to 15 the Labour Party received over £6.6 million in short money which included over £700,000 to support the work of the leader of the opposition