Fundamentals of Assurance Services Flashcards
Assurance vs Non Assurance
- # of parties
- requirement of independence
Assurance
- 3-party
- required
Non Assurance
- 2-party
- not required
ASATAU
Assurance > Attestation > Audit
Attestation vs Direct Reporting
- wordings
- responsible for SM, SMI, Report
ATTESTATION ENGAGEMENT
- “In our opinion the responsible party’s assertion that internal control is effective, in all material respects, based on XYZ criteria, is fairly stated”
- SM → Responsible Party
- SMI → Responsible Party
- Report → Practitioner
DIRECT REPORTING ENGAGEMENT
- “In our opinion internal control is effective, in all material respects, based on XYZ criteria”
- SM → Responsible Party
- SMI → Practitioner (more responsibility)
- Report → Practitioner
ELEMENTS OF ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS (3 RECS)
3-party Relationship
Report
Evidence
Criteria
Subject Matter
3-Party Relationship (RIP)
What to remember for R? for P?
Responsible party: Management
- may be one of the intended users, but not the only 1
Intended users: Users of financial statements
Practitioner: Independent auditor
- Broader than the term “auditor”
Appropriate Subject Matter
Audit Assertions (TAP)
- TOCCAC
- ACREV
- POCAC
Classes of Transactions
- Occurrence
- Completeness
- Cut off
- Accuracy
- Classification
Account Balance
- Completeness
- Rights and Obligations
- Existence
- Valuation
Presentation and Disclosure
- Occurrence
- Completeness
- Accuracy
- Classification
Suitable Criteria (RUNCR)
benchmarks used to evaluate evidence
- Reliability
- Understandability
- Neutrality
- Completeness
- Relevance
Sufficient Appropriate Evidence
- component of appropriateness
- relationship of materiality with evidence
- more evidence can compensate for poor quality. True or False?
- Appropriateness (relevance and reliability)
- Inverse
- False
Assurance Engagement Risk
IR x CR x DR
Inherent Limitations of Audit
- sampling
- persuasive (not conclusive) evidence
- inherent limitation of IC
Composition of Assurance Engagement Standards
- PSA
- PSRE
- PSAE
Audit vs Review vs Agreed-upon vs Compilation
- requirements
Audit and Review
- independence + COBID
Agreed-upon and Compilation
- COBID
Audit vs Review vs Agreed-upon vs Compilation
- level of assurance
Audit
- high, not absolute
Review
- moderate
Agreed-upon and Compilation
- none
Audit vs Review vs Agreed-upon vs Compilation
- report
Audit
- positive form
Review
- negative form
Agreed-upon
- report on factual findings
Compilation
- compilation report
Audit vs Review vs Agreed-upon vs Compilation
- availability
all users
- XPN : Agree-upon → limited