Fundamental Rights Flashcards
To remember all the important articles within Part III of Constitution
Fundamental Rights
The Fundamental Rights are defined as basic human freedoms where every Indian citizen has the right to enjoy for a proper and harmonious development of personality and life (physical, mental, emotional, spiritual, & overall development). These rights apply universally to all citizens of India, irrespective of their race, place of birth, religion, caste or gender.
It is included in Part III of the Indian Constitution from Art. 12-35. It was inspired from the USA’s “Bill of Rights”.
Difference b/w Fundamental Rights & Ordinary Rights
FRs are given and taken back (in case of a national emergency) only by the Constitution, which, when breached, a citizen can appeal in court (SC or HC).
ORs are given and taken back by the will of the law-making body(s), as the provision in the law states. The citizen may or may not appeal in court when rights are breached.
Features of Fundamental Rights
- Some are given only to the citizen on India, while others are given to all the citizens, including foreigners, and legal persons like companies and corporations
- Impose restriction on arbitrary functioning of State.
- Constitutionalism is present where FR is present.
- Limits the scope of the state’s functioning area.
- Citizen can directly appeal in higher court when their FR is breached.
- FRs impose negative obligation on the state (Nature of FR).
- The democracy of the country will be strong and smooth functioning where FRs are established.
- FRs allow citizens and legal persons to file grievances against private entities and individuals in cases of breach.
- Ensures political democracy.
Classification of Fundamental Rights
- Right to Equality (A14-18)
- Right to Freedom (A19-22)
- Right against Exploitation (A23-24)
- Right to Freedom of Religion (A25-28)
- Cultural and Educational Rights (A29-30)
- Right to Property (A31)
- Right to Constitutional Remedies (A32)
*Right to Property (A31) was abolished in the 44th Amendment Act, 1977.
Article 12
It defines “State” for the purpose of Part III of the Constitution.
Define State according to Article 12
The State includes Parliament and the Union Govt., State Assembly and State Govt., all local authorities (Municipalities, Panchayats, District boards, etc.), Statutory & Non-Statutory Authorities (LIC, ONGC, SAIL, etc.), and private bodies/agencies that work as an instrument of the State.
Article 13
It has 3 parts.
A13(1): All laws (pre- & post-constitutional) that are inconsistent with or in derogation of any of the fundamental rights shall be unconstitutional and become “Null & Void”.
A13(2): If State makes laws (in future or present) that breach Part III of the constitution then that particular will be stated unconstitutional.
A13(3): It defines the term “law” in the context of Part III.
Principal in A13 and related cases
Doctrine of Eclipse (DoE):
Any law that is inconsistent with fundamental rights is not invalid. It is not totally dead but overshadowed by the fundamental right. The inconsistency (conflict) can be removed by a constitutional amendment.
Case 1: Bhikaji Narayan Case, 1955
It highlighted DoE that if pre-constitutional laws are violating Part III, then they are not totally abolished but kept inactive, except where FR are not applicable and can be reinstated under any future amendment act in Part III if applicable.
Case 2: Deepchand Case, 1959
DoE is applicable for only pre-constitutional laws because post-constitutional laws are made according to Part III. Even if the law violates Part III, it will be designated as null & void from the beginning.
Case 3: Ambika Mills Case
DoE is applicable for both pre- and post-constitutional laws if that particular law is important.
1st Constitutional Amendment Act
It was done in the year 1951.
Case: Shankari Prasad Case, 1951
Case reason: The 1st Amendment Act is unconstitutional.
Changes brought: A15(4), A19, Schedule IX
Act was sought against: A13(2) & A13(3)
Overview:
Parliament has 2 powers in the law-making process:
a. Making ordinary law under A365, which is in accordance with A13(3), otherwise stated as unconstitutional.
b. Making law through constitutional amendments under A368, which is not under the premise of A13(3); hence, laws made under A368 are constitutional.
Concluding verdict:
The 1st Constitutional Amendment Act, 1951, was made under A368, hence the act is constitutional.
Cases related to amendment acts
Golaknath Case, 1967
Defines A368; under which Parliament does amendments, defines the process of amendment, but it does not defines the belonginess of the amendment power.
25th Amendment Act, 1971
A368 was redefined. both its process and ownership of power (i.e. Parliament)
Kesavananda Case, 1973
Under A368, re-highlighted that Parliament can make amendments without changing the basis structure of the constitution.
*The basis structure was never clearly defined in the constitution.
Article 14
The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India. This provision confers rights on all persons, whether citizens or foreigners. Moreover, the word ‘person’ includes legal persons, viz., statutory corporations, companies, registered societies, or any other type of legal person.
Concepts of Article 14
- Equality before Law: Originating from British constitution
- Equal Protection of Law: Originating from American constitution
Exceptions:
> President and Governor (under A361)
> Member of Parliament (under A105)
> MLAs (under A194)
> Foreign rulers, ambassadors, and UNO
> Any person working for news publication from the parliament & assembly.
Equality Before Law
(a) The absence of any special privileges in favour of any person.
(b) The equal subjection of all persons to the ordinary law of the land administered by ordinary law courts.
(c) No person (whether rich or poor, high or low, official
or non-official) is above the law.
It is a negative concept.
Equal Protection of Law
(a) The equality of treatment under equal circumstances, both in the privileges conferred and liabilities imposed by the laws.
(b) The similar application of the same laws to all persons who are similarly situated.
(c) The like should be treated alike without any discrimination.
It is a positive concept.
Rule of Law
The concept of ‘equality before law’ is an element of the
concept of ‘Rule of Law’ from British constitution.
It has 3 principles (3rd one modified in accordance to Indian constitution):
1) No one shall be punished without committing a crime.
2) Whether the crime has taken place or not will be decided by judiciary.
3) The Constitution is the basis of all laws in the country.
Article 15
Prohibition of Discrimination on Certain Grounds.
Defines discrimination as making an adverse distinction with regard to or to distinguish unfavourably from others.
It has 6 provisions in it, A15(1) to A15(6).
Provisions 3 to 6 are the exceptions to the 1st and 2nd provisions.
Article 15(1)
The state shall not discriminate between individuals ONLY on the grounds of religion, caste, gender, place of birth, and race.
Article 15(2)
The state or a private individual or both shall not forbid any individual from entering a public place on the basis of religion, caste, gender, place of birth, and race.
Public places: gardens, wells, shopping malls, etc.