functionalists persepective of crimes Flashcards
what is crime
something that breaks the law. set out by the criminal justice system of a society
social constuction of crime and deviance
- contextual
- cultural
- historical
- generational
contextual
behaviours are acceptable in certain situations.
- e.g - wearing a bikini on a beach is okay however, wearing a bikini in a classroom is unacceptable
cultural
varies through differant culture. for example, okay hand sign in brazil it is a vulga signal
- so what is considered rude and deviant varied throughout differant cuktures
historical
criminal and deviant behaviour change over time what once was acceptable can now be classed as deviant or illgal
Victorian era - same sex marriages divorce, sex before marrige
-
generational
some behaviours are acceptable for certain age groups, and some acctivis are illgal/devint forolder ge foups
- foe example, age restriction on drinking alchool. also seen as deviant if a 80 year d women went clubbing.
applying materisl from theitem, analyse two ways that crime and deviance is considered a social construction.
social consturction - an idea that has been created an accepted in society
point - another way that crime and deviance, can be seen as a social construction is through generational variance.
explain - this means, some behaviours are classed as deviant and illegal for certain age groups.
example - One example of this is age restricttion on driking. ue to children being vunerable theese age restrictions are placed upon certain activities.
link - there fore this shows that crime snd deviance is a social construction due to generation differences.
functionalist explanation on crime.
emile durkheim - was the first person to study crime. he felt an understanding in crime and deviance was essential to understand how society functions.
- durkheim saw crime as a particular problem of modernity - society built on free will
- Durkheim developed the term anomie - to explain why some people become dysfunctional and turn to crime,
what is anomie
lack of usual social,ethical standard in an individual
- cause people to look after themselves not for the community.
societies past norms and values dissapear - which leads to cause people to feel a lack of belonging
how might modernity cause crime
in pre-industrial society, crime was rarer due to powerful institution which enforced social control - powerful bodies like police, religion nuclear family
- people brought into value consensus of the community more than they do into modern society
functionalists also belive what about seculrisation
there is now a lesser sense of community due to secularisation people are more likely to experience anomieand therefor commit crimes.
Durkheim suggested tat crime can not be avoided - inevitable - and a certain amount is needed for society to function.
in society where there is little crime, they can get stagnant - they do not adopt to change to to meet evloving needs.
- However, if there is to much crime it is a sign anomie - confusion on acceptable behaviour.
durkehims argued crime cannot be escaped because not every member can be equally commited to the value consensus due to bing socialised differantly
- “society of saints”
would still encounter deviance - general standard of behaviour would be high so the slightest slip up would be seen as a major offence.
durkheim 3 positive functions of crime
- boundary maintance
- social cohesion
- adapion and change
boundary maintance
crime and deviance acts to remind people of what is and not acceptable in society
- throufh naming and shaming peole - it deters from them commiting crimes. - durkheim refers to this as boundary maintance
riot for the sothport girls - disapproval of those who are deviant and criminal
this then leads to strenghthen of collective value - social solidarity
those who looted where alos named and shame by the press alongside with other charges.
- namig and shaming people remind society this is not normal behaviour.