Functionalism And Crime Flashcards
Crime definition
Illegal act e.g. Murder
Deviant definition
Actions that differ from group norms it can be non-serious crimes e.g. Assault/ graffiti
Socialisation
Instilling shared cultures into its members which makes sure individuals internalise the same norms/values
Social control
Rewards for conformity, punishment for deviance, ensuring individuals behave in the way society expects
Inevitability of crime
Functionalists see too much crime as destabilising society, however crime is inevitable and universal. A crime free society is a contradiction
-Durkheim,” crime is normal… An integral part of all healthy societies”.
2 reasons crime/deviance is found in all societies
- Not everyone’s properly socialised into shared norms/ values
2.in complex modern societies, there is diversity of lifestyle and values. Different groups develop their own subcultures with different norms and values
Durkheim- modern societies
- Modern societies are normlessness, or anomie the rules governing behaviour becomes weaker
- this is because modern societies have complex, specialised division of labour, so individuals become more different from each other, weakening shared culture or collective consciousness and results in increased deviances
-e.g. Durkheim sees anomie as a cause of suicide - increase in secularisation decreases value consensus
Positive functions of crime
- Boundary maintenance, the purpose of society is to reaffirm society’s shared rules and reinforce social solidarity
-e.g. Courtrooms, which dramatise public shame and stigmatise the offender
- Cohen— media’s “ dramatisation of evil”. He says media coverage of crime creates ‘folk devils’
- Adaption and change
-All change starts with deviance, individuals with with new ideas, norms and values cannot be stifled by social control. It takes defiance to change existing norms, which takes the form as ‘deviance’. However their values give rise to new culture and morality
-if these peoples views are suppressed then society will be unable to make adaptive change
Too much or too little crime is not desirable because it creates malfunctioning of the social system:
- Too much- threatens to tear the bonds of society apart
- Too little- society is controlling its members too much and prevents freedom and change
Other functions of crime- Davis
Prostitution acts as a safety valve for the release of men’s sexual frustration without threatening of monogamous nuclear family
Polsky
Pornography safely ‘channels’ a variety of sexual desires away from alternatives such as adultery so the family is not in danger
Cohen- institution deviance
- deviance in institutions indicates its not functioning properly
- e.g. high rates of truancy means the education system does have policy makers that are making a appropriate changes
Erickson- developed on inevitable of crime
- when deviance performs positive social functions then society is organised so as to promote deviance
- the true function of agencies of social control ( police) is to sustain a certain level of crime rather than to cease it entirely
- agencies of social control produce crime rather than prevent it
Societies regulate and manage crime rather than eliminate it
-For example carnivals or festivals all license misbehaviour that In other contexts might be punished
- this shows how deviance is integral to society and not that everything is bad for society
Criticisms/ evaluation
-doesn’t offer to say how much deviance is fine
- crime does not always exist for these things, social solidarity
- ignore how crime affects different groups or individuals within society, e.g. the ‘safety valve’ isn’t functional for illegal trafficked sex workers, so crime isn’t ’functional’ for everyone
- crime doesn’t always promote social solidarity, it may lead to isolation like women staying indoors out of fear
Robert K. Mertons strain theory
People engage in deviant behaviours because they can’t achieve socially approved goals by legitimate means.
Structural factors
Societies unequal opportunity structure
Cultural factors
The strong emphasis on success goals and the weaker emphasis on using legitimate means to achieve them
Deviance is the result of strain between two things
- the goals that a culture encourages individuals to achieve
-what the institutional structure of society allows them to achieve legitimately, e.g. American culture values ‘money success’ ( individual material wealth and high status )
The American Dream
Pressure to deviate, the strain to anomie
The resulting strain between the cultural goal of money success and lack of legitimate opportunities to achieve it produces frustration and this causes pressure which results in illegitimate means of achieving it like crime