Full Set Flashcards
subject matter jur basics
can’t be waived
objection at any time by anyone
federal question or diversity
personal jur
Has particular basis for exercising personal j over an out-of-state D been authorized by statute or by rule of court?
Is the particular basis for exercising personal j permitted by the Constitution (minimum contact - purposeful availment)
in personam
in rem
quasi in rem
can be waived
venue
district where any D resides if all in the same state;
where claim arose;
where property subject to action is located
if neither - then any Fed
federal question
obvi
diversity jur
- CITIZENSHIP (not availment) different states (complete, all Ps from all Ds)
- > 75,000 from 1 P (can be aggregated thru multiple claims, only needs to be one P for supplemental jur, andcounterclaims don’t need to be that much)
- at time filed
minimal diversity
at least one P different than D then, federal interpleader act or class actions >5,000,00 or interstate mass torts
corporation’s citizenship
HQ/principle place of business
place of incorporation
supplemental jur - fed q
same transactional occurrence
discretionary
same requirements for pendent JX over claims involving joinder or intervention of additional parties
supplemental jur - diversity
same transactional occurrence
- compulsory counterclaims (one that arrises out of the same occurrence, does not need to meet >75k)
- permissive counterclaim must independently reach >75,000
- cross-claims (doesn’t need to reach min $)
- multiple P/permissive joinder (doesn’t need to reach min $, can’t violate complete diversity)
- cross claims if same trans
when NO supplemental jur - diversity
- impleaded 3rd parties under R14
- claims against additional Ds under R19 and 20
- claims by P interveanors under R24
- claims by Ps involuntarily joined under R19
removal
state –> fed
only if could have orig been brought in fed
removal based on diversity needs to meet complete at original filing and at time of notice of removal; 75k
filed in fed and copy to state court
transfer
fed –> fed
fed q requirements
- well-pleaded complaint
2. fed claim
improper removal
P can file petition for remand
in personam personal j
physical presence
domicile
consent
corporations (doing business, incorporated)
specific in personam j
long-arm long list of acts and omissions and claims
basically, almost everything is covered by a state’s long-arm statute, so long as the claim arises out of the transaction involving that state
Choice of Law: The Erie Doctrine
In general
- FQ—federal substantive and procedural law controls
2. DJ—state substantive law and applicable federal procedural law
special pleading required for
fraud and special damages
Twombly
complaint allegations must be sufficiently plausible
defense motions against the complaint
MTD
MJ on the pleadings
M for more definite statement
M to strike
answer
3 things to memorize
admission/denial
affirmative defenses
timing
reply
P’s answer to a counterclaim
must be made w/in 21 days of D’s answer or order to reply
amendments to pleadings
once at any time w/in 21 days of service or w/ 21 days of D’s response/12(b)
during/after trial okay if conforms to evidence and opposing party can prepare
leave of court (freely granted to amend the pleading if no undue justice to opposing party)
certifying pleadings
pleadings, docs, motions, discovery requests
appropriate legal and; factual basis
best of attorney’s knowledge after reasonable inquiry
no improper purpose
warranted by existing law or by non-frivolous argument for change in law
factual allegations have evidentiary support
R11 sanctions
permissive joinder of parties
joinder by Ps
any number of them if out of same trans (same with Ds)
still need complete diversity
and need independ 75k
compulsory joinder of parties
joinder by Ds necessary party - someone whose participation in lawsuit is necessary for just adj must be joined if possible still need complete diversity ct can assert personal j (bulge)
otherwise court may decide to dismiss
necessary party
- absent that party complete relief cannot be accorded to existing parties
- necessary party has an interest in the lit, which will be 3. impeded if the lit goes forward w/o that party
there is a substantial risk of double or inconsistent liabiltiy
intervention as of right
may be had when outsider claims an interest in the subject matter of the lawsuit that as practical matter may be compromised by the disposition of the pending action
reasonable promptness
no supplemental and can’t destroy complete diversity
permissive intervention
may be allowed whenever there is a common question of law or fact between the intervenor’s claim and the main claim
reasonable promptness
no supplemental and can’t destroy complete diversity
general interpleader info
policy - resolve competing claims on same property and avoid inconsistent obligations or multiple claims
stake
property at issue
stakeholder
person holding property
stakeholder-plaintiff is possible
needs to be diverse from claimants
claimant
person claiming the property
rule interpleader
FRCP22 - remedy available in suit otherwise within the court’s jur
statutory interpleader
Federal Interpleader Act
special features:
- more than $500
- nation wide service of process
- venue proper where any claimant resides
- SMJ based on minimal diversity
compulsory counterclaim
- lost if not pleaded
- same transaction
- no independent j required - if SMJ over main claim, then SMJ over this claim
- filing tolls SOL for main claim and compulsory claims
permissive counterclaims
- now or later
- not same trans
- requires its own SMJ
- barred by SOL, you’re SOL
cross-claims
need to arise out of same trans
impleading party names
impleaded party = 3rd party D
original D = D and 3rd party P
impleading SMJ
by definition court will have SupJ so don’t need independent SMJ from original claim, but if original claim is based only on DJ, claims by P against 3rd party D must meet DJ or FQ JX requirements on its own
PJ - may be served w/in 100 mi of courthouse, needs PJ
Class action elements
- numerousness
- common question of law or fact
- typicality of claims by class reps
- adequacy by the rep’s lawyer
dismissing class action
requires judicial approval
diversity in class action
at least one named P must be diverse from D and has a claim of >75k
Class Action Fairness Act 2005
100+ members w/ >$5,000,000 (aggregate) at stake + minimal diversity
mandatory disclosure (discovery) types
- initial disclosures (names and addresses, docs, damages, insurance agreements)
- expert witnesses
- pretrial disclosures (30 days before trial - any objections w/in 14 days after disclosure or waived, unless good cause)
scope of discover
relevance as general rule, not limited to admissibility