Frustration Flashcards
What is the general rule regarding contractual obligations? Case.
Contractual obligations are absolute. Non-performance will be a breach, regardless of circumstances. Paradine v Jane.
What is the definition of frustration? Case.
Davis Contractors v Fareham UDC:
Frustration occurs where there is:
1. A supervening event.
2. Outside the parties’ control and unforeseen.
3. Which renders the contract impossible (Taylor v Caldwell) or radically different (Davis Contractors v Fareham UDC) to perform.
Give 4 examples of events which will induce frustration. Cases.
- Essential person unavailable - Condor v Barron Knights.
- Essential thing unavailable - Taylor v Caldwell.
- Non-occurrence of fundamental event - Krell v Henry.
- Delay, if long enough to radically alter contract - Met Water Board v Dick Kerr.
Give 6 examples of events which will not induce frustration. 4 cases.
- Where force majeure clause in contract.
- Delay or unavailability of thing/person which is not essential.
- Event is induced by one of the parties, therefore not out of their control - Maritime Fish v Ocean Trawlers/Super Servant.
- Event was foreseen/foreseeable - Davis Contractors v Fareham UDC.
- Contract merely more difficult/expensive to perform, rather than impossible/radically different - Davis Contractors v Fareham UDC.
- Non-occurence of non-fundamental event - Herne Bay Steamboat v Hutton.
Can frustration occur in relation to leases? Case.
Yes - Panalpina.
What is the effect of frustration? 3 things.
- Contract automatically terminated.
- Both parties released from future obligations.
- Neither party will be in breach.
When reimbursing expenses under s1(2) LR(FC)A 1943, the court has discretion. What is the court’s task in using its discretion? Case.
To redress the harshness caused by the losses lying where they fall, and not simply to awarded the full possible amount - Gamerco v ICM.
What approach will the courts take to calculating the sum to be paid for a ‘valuable benefit’ under s1(3) LR(FC)A 1943? Case.
The court will calculate a maximum figure, and then deduct expenses. It is possible this will reduce the sum to 0 - BP Exploration v Hunt.
What is the effect if there is no frustration?
The contract continues, and neither party will have a remedy, unless one can be shown to be in breach of contract.