from essays Flashcards
getting out of spousal agreements
statutory defense is only remedy (no common law)
- did not sign voluntarily OR
- agreement unconscionable when signed AND
- -not provided fair disclosure
- -didn’t waive disclosure
- -reasonably couldn’t have known
voluntary: intentional act
unconscionable: case by case
pre-nups have to be signed by both parties
can’t do child support or who gets kids
common law marriage
agree to be married
living together as husband and wife
representing themselves to be married
in the state of texas
if actin to prove common law marriage is not brought w/in 2 years of when they stopped living together, presume they didn’t agree to be married
retroactive child support
court will gen only order 4 years of past payment (considered fair and in best interest of kid)
but can be rebutted by showing obligor
- knew/should have of the kid
- sought to avoid est. support obligation
non/under employment
when the actual income of the obligor is significantly less than what he could earn b/c of intentional under/non employment
court may apply child support guidelines to the earning potential instead of actual earnings
don’t need proof he’s doing it to avoid child support but can consider it
so the obligor will offer proof of current wages. Obligee must prove that he is under/non employed intentionally (req sufficient evidence)
then the obligor must show she’s wrong
how much for child support?
1 kid: 20% up to 7500
2 kids: 25% up to 7500
stat and considered best interest of the child so to overcome there must be specific circumstances like:
- age/needs
- ability of parent to support
- finical issues (under/non employment)
kid getting benefit of disability pay
the court will apply the standard support guidelines but subtract the amount the kids get from their disability benefits
must include findings with child support
must state the net resources of both parents, the application of the guidelines and how much should be paid or that the application wouldn’t be just, the reason and what the court actually went with
when to stop paying child support
kid is 18 or graduates/stops going to HS, whichever is later
court retains jurisdiction to confirm amount of support arrearages/render judgment for past due child support if motion for enforcement requesting money judgment is filed not later than 10 years after:
- kid becomes adult
- child support obligation terminates
how to change child support order
can’t change it just b/c he’s making more money
to get modification must show circumstances of child/affected party have materially and substantially changed
what money is subject to child support
everything that is the obligors, including any new CP he has with his new wife (so everything except her SP or sole management)
new spouse can file suit to determine the extent, if any, of her interest in the real/personal property that is subject to the lien for child support
the court can release the lien if it would be fair to the new spouse
who is the dad
presumed if married to mother during marriage
lives w/kid first 2 years of life and holds out to others he is the dad
voluntarily signs birth certificate
acknowledges
through paternity/probate
if he doesn’t want to be the dad
must bring action to disprove father relationship no later than kids 4th bday unless
- -presumed father didn’t live with family/have sex with woman at time relevant
- -he didn’t bring it b/c of the mistaken believe it was his kid b/c of misreps made to him
if the dad can go ahead with his ‘im not the dad suit’ then the court can order DNA testing
why wouldn’t the court order DNA testing
conduct of mother/presumed father estops party from denying parentage
it would be inequitable to disprove the father/child relationship between kid and dad
- -length of time from notice, proceeding
- -length of time he’s been the dad
- -facts surrounding how he found out
- -relationship and kids age
if ppl want to modify a managing conservatorship
modification must be in the best interest of the kid
AND
material and substantial change of circumstances since rendition of the last order
(abuse can be prima facie material and substantial change in circumstances if there is a conviction or oder of deferred adjudication)
involuntarily removing a kid
involuntary termination of parent/child relationship based on conduct of parent that is harmful to kid
only if it it on one of the 21 grounds provided for in the code and it is established termination is in kids best interest
- -both by cc evidence
- -ex: parent used controlled substance in way that endanger the kid
appellate court must determine if the fact-finder could reasonably found cc evidence