From company to project valuation Flashcards
What are the 5 different discount rates that we can choose?
- The risk-free rate = rf
- The cost of Debt = rD
- The cost of Equity = rE
- The cost of an all-equity firm = rA
- WACC
What is the APV-approach?
Compute a base-case NPV and add it to the NPV of the financing deciscion ensuing from project acceptance.
APV = BAse-case NPV + NPV (Financing Deciscions)
What is the Adjusted Cost of Capital Approach?
Adjust the discount rate to account for the financing deciscions.
What three ways do we have to value a company?
- Using the WACC (use unlevered FCF)
- Using the APV
- Using the Flow to Equity (which is levered)
What are some pros with the APV-approach?
- Easy to analyze the precise impact of different actions
- Unbundling of each factor
- Easy to communicate
- Easy when amount of debt is known
What are some cons with the APV-approach?
- Difficult to determine proper discount rate
- When we have a targeted leverage ratio: Necessary to solve for debt and project value
- Difficult to implement when D/E-ratio is variable
There is an relationship in the APV-approach that can causes problems, which one?
First of, we know that the value of a firm depends on the unlevered value of the firm + the PV of the Tax Shield.
Secondly, we also know that the PV of Tax Shield depends on Debt.
Thirdly, debt however depends on the levered value of the firm….
slide 12
What is the formula for WACC that can always be used?
WACC = rE(E/V) + rD(1-Tc)*(D/V)
If we use the same WACC for the company as for the project, what are 2 traps one could end up in?
1) Assuming that the risk of the project is the same as the risk for the company - this might differ
2) The financing of the project might be the same as the company, that means that they have the same capital structure - this might differ as well.
What are the 3 methods of using WACC and what do they assume?
1) Modligiani & Miller - Assumes Debt is constant over time - tax shield doesn’t change
2) Miles & Ezzel - Assumes that the Leverage ratio is constant over time - but Debt and Company Value can change - we know the tax shield for the first period but rest is uncertain - tax shield changes
3) Harris & Pringles - Assumes that the Leverage ratio is constant over time - but Debt and Company Value can change - tax shield is uncertain - tax shield changes
Under the M&M assumption, I.e Debt is constant, how can we derive the WACC?
WACC = rA(1-TcL) where L = D/VL
Under the Miles & Ezzel assumption, I.e Leverage ratio is constant but unknown TS after year 1, how can we derive the WACC?
WACC = rA - L * Tc * rD [ (1+rA) / (1+rD) ]
Under the Harris & Pringle assumption, I.e Leverage ratio is constant but unknown TS, how can we derive the WACC?
WACC = rA - rD*Tc*L L = D/VL
If we want to discount Unlevered FCF, which discount rate should be used to calculate the PV of the Unlevered Value of the Firm?
Cost of assets = rA
If we want to discount Unlevered FCF, which discount rate should be used to calculate the PV of the Levered Value of the Firm?
Weighted Average Cost of Capital = WACC