Friedland Flashcards
4 Stakeholders of Reinsurers that Require Sound Estimates of Unpaid Losses
IIRR
- Reinsurer internal management
– requires sounds reserves b/c they impact
- pricing, UW , strategic planning, and financial decision making -
Investors
– require sound reserves in order to appropriately evaluate a reinsurer’s
- B/S and I/S when making investment decisions -
Regulators
– require sound reserves in order to appropriately evaluate a reinsurer’s
- financial health when supervising the reinsurance market -
Rating agencies
– require sound reserves in order to issue strong financial ratings.
- If a reinsurer experiences significant adverse development,
=> it risks a rating downgrade.
=> This may make the reinsurer look less attractive to primary insurers
Bordereau
- A detailed report of insurance premiums or losses affected by reinsurance.
- Reinsurers often receive data by bordereau from cedants or the brokers of their cedants.
5 Reasons that Cedants Purchase Reinsurance
SEC^3
- Promote stability
– reinsurance stabilizes the loss experience of ceding companies from year to year by
- retaining smaller, more predictable claims and
- ceding larger, more unpredictable claims - Increase capacity
– reinsurance allows ceding companies to assume more risk by
- ceding a portion of all of their policies or by ceding their larger policies - Protect against catastrophe
– reinsurance protects ceding companies from
- a single catastrophic loss event (ex. single hurricane) as well as
- multiple large loss events (ex. multiple hurricanes within a single year) - Manage capital and solvency margin
– reinsurance passes risk from the cedant to the reinsurer.
- When less risk is present, less capital is needed - Access technical expertise
– reinsurers can lend their expertise in the areas of
- underwriting, marketing, claims, and pricing
- to insurers seeking to enter new lines of business or new regions
Define treaty reinsurance and facultative reinsurance.
Contrast treaty reinsurance and facultative reinsurance in terms of underwriting risk for the reinsurer.
Treaty reinsurance
– cedant enters into a contract with one or more reinsurers
- to cede all business from certain lines of business,
- subject to the retentions and attachment points specified in the treaty.
Facultative reinsurance
– a submission, acceptance, and agreement are required
- for each individual risk or group of risks that the cedant wants to reinsure.
- Facultative reinsurance is meant to increase a cedant’s capacity by ceding large risks.
Underwriting risk
- is reduced for the reinsurer under facultative reinsurance vs. treaty reinsurance
- (all else being equal)
- since the reinsurer can conduct its own underwriting.
Two Examples of Hybrid Contracts
- Facultative automatic
– a bordereau of risks ceded is submitted to the reinsurer,
- which has limited rights to decline individual risks - Facultative obligatory treaty
– a treaty under which the cedant has the option to cede or not cede individual risks. -
- The reinsurer must accept any risks that are ceded
Briefly describe proportional reinsurance and non-proportional reinsurance.
- Proportional reinsurance
– the reinsurer typically pays a ceding commission to the cedant
- to reimburse for acquisition and underwriting expenses associated with issuing the underlying policies - Non-proportional reinsurance
– the reinsurer or reinsurers pay for all losses above a specified retention,
- subject to any specified limits.
- The premium paid to the reinsurer is not proportional to the limits of coverage
Two Types of Proportional Reinsurance
- Quota share
– the gross premiums and losses of the cedant are ceded to reinsurer uniformly based on a cession percentage - Surplus share
– surplus share does not have a uniform cession percentage across risks.
- Instead, the cedant cedes the surplus amount of risk
- above its retained line subject
- to a maximum ceded percentage and limit
Formula for Proportion Ceded Under Surplus Share Reinsurance
Three Reasons Why a Cedant Might Purchase Proportional Reinsurance
CCC
1. To manage capital and solvency margins
2. To increase capacity
3. To protect against catastrophes
which type of proportional reinsurance increase capacity more effectively? why?
surplus share
b/c it allows the ceding co to cede a smaller portion of smaller risks and a larger portion of larger risks
Five Types of Non-Proportional Reinsurance
- Excess per risk reinsurance
– indemnifies the cedant against the amount of loss in excess of a specified retention subject to specified limits on a per risk basis - Excess per occurrence reinsurance
– protects a cedant from an accumulation of losses due to a single occurrence. The subject loss under excess per occurrence reinsurance is the sum of all losses arising from an insured event for all subject policies - Catastrophe reinsurance
– indemnifies the cedant for the accumulation of losses in excess of a specified retention arising from a single catastrophic event or a series of events, subject to a specified limit - Annual aggregate excess of loss reinsurance
– the total losses to the cedant cannot exceed a specified annual threshold (expressed as either a percent of premium or fixed dollar amount) - Clash reinsurance
– attaches above all other policy limits and is meant to cover exceptional events where traditional reinsurance contracts will not fully reimburse a cedant’s claims. This can occur when a cedant receives multiple claims from multiple insureds arising out of the same catastrophe
Explain when a cedant might want to purchase excess per risk reinsurance.
To protect property exposures and increase capacity.
Explain why ceding commissions might provide less surplus relief for nonproportional reinsurance vs. proportional reinsurance.
- Ceding commissions are stated as a percentage of premium.
- It’s often the case that non-proportional reinsurance premiums are less than proportional reinsurance premiums.
- The ceding commissions are smaller as a result.
Explain when a cedant might want to purchase annual aggregate excess of
loss reinsurance.
To protect net results and an insurer’s capital base.
Briefly describe policy limit restatements and reinstatement premiums.
Restatement – in the event of a full limit loss or some other amount specified
in the reinsurance contract, cedants can obtain a restatement of the
reinsurance policy limit
Reinstatement premium – if a restatement requires an additional premium
to be paid by the cedant to the reinsurer, it is known as a reinstatement
premium
notes on reinstatement premium
- the reinstatement premium is immediately earned premium by the reinsurer
- reinstatement premium can distort the historical premium and loss data and should be recognized when the actuary calculates expected loss ratios for the catastrophe reinsurance
Explain what is meant by “reinsurance contract A inures to the benefit of
reinsurance contract B.”
In this case, reinsurance contract A is applied first and reduces the loss subject
to reinsurance contract B.
Briefly describe an issue with securing aggregate excess of loss reinsurance.
It is often unavailable or very expensive.
Three Components of a Clash Events
- The loss must arise out of multiple policies held by one insured or similar policies held by multiple insureds
- All damages must be traceable to a specific event
- The event must take place in its entirety within a specific timeframe
Briefly describe finite risk reinsurance.
Describe four features of finite risk reinsurance.
Multi-year contracts that spread risk over time and take into account the investment
income generated over the period.
Four features are as follows:
1. Risk transfer and risk financing combined in a multi-year contract
2. Emphasis on the time value of money with investment income explicitly included in the contract
3. Limited assumption of risk by the reinsurer
4. Sharing of the results with the cedant
Describe a loss portfolio transfer.
Describe an adverse development cover.
LPT
- An LPT is a form of reinsurance that transfers all or a portion of a cedant’s loss reserves present at a specific accounting date to a reinsurer.
- LPTs are often used by cedants to withdraw from a specific line of business while meeting their obligations to policies they already wrote.
Adverse Development Cover
- This is an alternative to an LPT where the cedant receives reimbursement from the
reinsurer for losses in excess of a pre-agreed retention level.
- Reserves are not transferred under these covers.
- These covers are often used for Mergers & Acquisitions to transfer the risks of timing and adverse reserve development
Business covered clause: Two Ways in Which Reinsurance Covers Claims
- Losses-occurring-during coverage – provides reinsurance coverage for all losses that occur between the contract inception and expiration date regardless of when the cedant issued the underlying policy that resulted in the loss
- Risks-attaching coverage – provides reinsurance coverage only for those policies that began during the reinsurance contract effective period
Briefly describe a subscription policy.
A subscription policy is a policy in which multiple reinsurers share a risk
subject to corresponding subscription percentages.
ceded loss with subscription % formula
Briefly describe a commutation and a commutation clause.
Under a commutation, the reinsurer pays the present value of reinsurance
recoveries not yet due to the cedant in exchange for full termination of all
future obligations related to the reinsurance contract.
The commutation clause lays out the terms and conditions for the
estimation, payment, and discharge of all obligations of the parties to a
reinsurance contract for the purposes of a commutation.
Four Reasons Why a Cedant Might Pursue a Commutation
RECC
- To exit a line of business or geographic region
- To manage reserves for transfer or sale
- To avoid the credit risk associated with its reinsurer, especially if the reinsurer has experienced a ratings downgrade
- To better manage claims and claims-related expenses
Three Reasons Why a Reinsurer Might Pursue a Commutation
DIE
- To end a relationship with a cedant that is in run-off or one with which
it no longer conducts business - To protect itself from the potential insolvency of the cedant
- To avoid disputes when there are significant differences of opinion with
respect to future loss development of subject losses
Four Reasons Why Understanding Commutations is Important for the
Reserving Actuary
LAPU
- Actuaries are often involved in the analysis of reinsurance contracts that
are subject to commutation - Commutations affect the estimation of unpaid ceded losses. Thus, a
ceding company’s actuary should be aware of commuted contracts - Commutations eliminate the corresponding liability to the reinsurer.
Thus, a reinsurer’s actuary should also be aware of commuted contracts - Loss development patterns for commuted contracts could be different
from contracts that remain in-force
Define “sufficient data.”
Explain why ensuring “sufficient” data for projecting ultimate losses using
the development method can be challenging for reinsurers.
Data are sufficient if they include the needed information for the work.
When projecting ultimate losses using the development method, consistent
historical data is key. Consistency might not be present for the following
reasons:
1. Contract terms can differ from one cedant to another and from year
to year
2. Operational and strategic changes implemented at the cedant and the
reinsurer can cause significant changes in mix of business, attachment
points, policy limits, and claims processing
Define “reliable data.”
Data are reliable if they are sufficiently complete, consistent, and accurate for
the purposes of the work.
Four Steps for Data Validation
RIPE
-
Reconcile data against audited financial statements, trial balances, or
other relevant records (if available) - Test the data for reasonableness against external or independent data
- Test the data for internal consistency and consistency with other relevant
information - Compare the data to those for a prior period or periods