French Constitutional law Flashcards
What are the characteristics of the First Constitution in France?
September 1781
A reflection of revolutionary ideas
Goal to establish a Constitutional Monarchy
King was the head of the executive
Legislative function conferred to one assembly - One chamber only (Monochamberal)
National sovereignty - sovereignty belongs to the nation, not the king anymore
The right to vote was restrictive and considered a function rather than a right. In order to vote you needed to pay. Distinction between active and passive citizen
What are the characteristics of the Second Constitution in France?
June 1793
Never really enforced because problems were solved before they could apply it
Powerful source of inspiration
Based on Popular sovereigny and the ideas of Rousseau
Less restriction on voting, no passive vs active citizen, but still limited for women.
A collective body of 24 members elected by legislative body with goal to devide executive power - they were called agents, tools of the Assembly
Assembly leading power - inspired by democratic ideals
What are the characteristics of the Third Constitution in France?
1795
Le Dictoire - name of the regim
Goal to restore order after mess, terror, revolution. A reaction to the previous situation.
–> Declaration of the Rights and Duties of the Men and Citizen
Two assemblies, and executive power conferred to directors
How can one see that there is instability during history of French Constitutions?
The first three were very different from each other.
There has been 15 Constitutions in less than 250 years, compared to US where they only have had one.
Which Constitution is the longest?
Third Republic 1870-1940. But the Fifth is about to overcome the third.
What is the definition of a Constitution?
The supreme law of the state
It represents the fundamental choices made by a country and its people in order to establish the basis for political and social life
Establishes system of the government, distribute and constrain powers, guarantees rights to individuals
To change it you go through a special procedure
Judge Barnet: Fundamental rights need to be protected from majority decisions
Why is there a tension between French and EU law?
French Constitution say it is supreme to other laws. But EU law say treaties are superior to national law including the Constitution.
Are Constitutions true norms or merely symbolic?
They are now considered as true norms, but for a long time they were considered as merely symbolic.
What is Legicentrism?
To perceive laws with a special status - law is at the center of the legal system
Inspiration from Rousseau
Art 6 of the Declaration of the Rights and Duties of the Men and Citizen: “The law is the expression of the general will” - General law cannot go wrong, infalliable.
Against judicial review - to review the legislation
This view lasted for a long time in France, and still exists.
Tension because of the fact that Constitution is the supreme law, and parliaments can violate the Constitution.
What is better, a long or short Constitution?
There needs to be a balance. Important to protect important values. But needs to be clear for everyone and read by the people.
What is the difference between a Formal and Substancial Approach?
Different state’s Constitutions can be divided as such:
Formal Constitution: Constitutional norms are produced by a specific procedure, entity.
Substancial Constitution: Analysis of norms of Constitutional matters
The Miller-Case: Although the UK does not have a single document entitled the Constitution, it nevertheless posseses a Constitution - Because history of Common law, Statues, Conventions, Practises.
- UK does not have a formal Constitution, but a substancial one.
What is the difference between Flexible and Regit Constitution?
Flexible Constitution is easy to change
Regit Constitution is hard to change
Example of a regit is UK because no form in its Constitution.
What are the advantages and disadvantages with Flexible and Regit Constitutions?
Advantage: Our values change. Must respond to new needs, public domains and evolving conception of rights
Inconvience: It can be risky if it is easy to change it when it protects fundamental principles. It can undermine the intergrity and coherence of the Constitution. Risk to loose its relevance.
This can depend on the content.
What is Original Constitutional Power and Derive Constitutional Power?
One can distinguish between:
Original Constitutional Power: That establishes first Constitution)
Derive Constitutional Power: Authority that can change, modify the Constitution
What are the ways to protect the Constitution?
Have special procedures to change the Constitution, and Judicial Review
What is Judicial Review?
Idea that a Court will review a legislative act, the laws, and they will check weather these laws are in conformity with the Constitution
Was first recognized in Case from US 1803 Marbury vs Madison
In France there was reluctance (Ideas of Rousseau)
Was introduced in Third Constitution
Raises a tension with democracy
Think of story with Mermaid: We can be seduced by politicians and the law can make mistakes
What are the Three elements (or five) of Constitutional Block?
- Constitution of 1958
Consisting of Declaration of Rights of man and Citizen of 1789,
and Preamble of the Constitution of 1946 - The Fundamental Principles recognized in the law of the Republic
- Charter for the Environment
Consists of Preamble, 16 titles, 89 Articles
How was the Constitutional Block created?
By a very important Decision of the Constitutional Counsel in 1971 on July 16th called Freedom of Association.
The judges had a creative interpretation because they chose to include the Declaration of rights of man and Citizen and the Preamble of 1946, just from a reference in Preamble of Constitution of 1958.
Why did the 4th Republic fall?
There were two main reasons:
- The Algerian crisis
- The Governmental Instability
What happened during the Algerian crisis?
On May 13th 1958, there was a coup in Algeria, and the president of France, Couti, appointed a new head of government, Pifminnin, who was in favor of negotiating with LFN (Le front Nationale in Algeria), which provoked high ranking military officers. Pifminnin resigned and Charles De Gauille took the role.
Why was there governmental instability?
Governmental Instability: The executive power was weak (called Assembly regime). Governance lasted only for 6 month, and one only lasted for 10 days.
How did Charles de Gauille solve the problems of the 4th Republic?
Important laws were adopted on June 7th.
1. One gave the Government special powers to Algeria
2. Full legislative powers given to the Government
3. The Constitutional Act of June 3rd - Gives permission to the Government to write a new Constitution
What is the Constitutional Act of June 3rd?
The Goal with the Constitutional Act of June 3rd was to change and establish a fast procedure to modify the Constitution of 4th Republic.
Provides basic conditions that must be respected/Fundemental principles in new Constituion:
1. Democracy: Universal suffrage is only source of power
2. Separation of Powers: Executive and legislative range has to be separed
3. Accountability of the Government to the Parliament: Key element of a parliamentary regim.
4. Judicial Authority must be independent
5. Relation between France and the Former Collectives
It also establihses the procedure for the Liberation of the Constitution. The government must consult Advisory Committe (Commitée Consultative Constitutionelle)
How was the 5th Republic drafted?
Insolved two teams:
- A committe of experts (mostly lawyers) and interministorial commité (mixed of ministers, lawyers, chadelours)
They made a Preliminary Draft
–> which was sent to the Advisory Committe (39 members, 16 from National Assembly, 10 from Counsil of the Republic, 13 from government, head was Paul Renault).
They issued its opinion on August 14th 1958, and they agreed with basic structure but had points.
–> Text was sent to Counsil of State for an opinion. Michel Debré who was apart of the drafting held a Speach August 24th about the intention of the drafters.
The goal of the drafters, according to Michel Debré, was to establish a Rationalised Parlamentary System and to restore the powers of the president, for more stability.
So to constrain the parliament but keep the parliamentary regime.