Frei.RskTrans Flashcards
benefit to cedant when contract qualifies as reinsurance
cedant may use reinsurance accounting treatment on the contract
describe 2 conditions for a contract to receive reinsurance accounting treatment / requirements of risk transfer
- significant insurance risk is assumed by reinsurer under the reinsured portion of contract
- a significant loss to the reinsurer is reasonably possible
identify the components of ‘insurance risk’
- uw risk
- timing risk
identify items requiring CEO and CFO confirmation regarding transfer of risk
- there are no separate oral/written agreements between cedant and reinsurer
- detailed docs available for review when risk transfer is not self evident
- SAP (Statutory Accounting Principles) compliance by cedant
- controls
list 4 methods for assessing the existence of risk transfer and state whether each is qualitative or quantitative
1) self-evident?: qualitative
2) “substantially all” exception: qualitative
3) ERD rule (Expected Reinsurer Deficit): quantitative
4) 10-10 rule: quantitative
describe the “self-evident” method for assessing the existence of risk transfer
- when it is obvious that cedant’s financial interest are protected by the reinsurance contract
- may apply if reinsurance premium is low and/or the potential loss is high
describe the “substantially all” exception method for assessing the existence of risk transfer
if significant loss is not reasonably possible, but reinsurer assumes substantially all risk, then risk transfer may still exist
what is the reason for the substantially all exception in testing risk transfer?
to maintain access to reinsurance for profitable books of business
2 common examples for “substantially all”
- quota share contracts with high % ceded
- individual risk contracts without LR caps, other risk limiting features
describe ERD method for assessing the existence of risk transfer
ERD = P(NPV loss) * NPV(avg severity of loss as a % of premium)
if ERD >1%, then risk transfer has occurred
ERD is basically frequency * severity as a % of premium
describe the 10-10 rule for assessing the existence of risk transfer
if reinsurer has a 10% chance of suffering a 10% loss, then the contract is deemed to have transferred risk
if there is a 5% probability of 25% loss, does risk transfer exist?
- by 10 10 rule, no
- by ERD, ERD = 5% * 25% = 1.25% >1%, yes
F2017 Q17
F2016 Q16
steps of analyzing risk transfer
1) understand reinsurance contract terms and conditions
2) determine reporting and premium due dates
3) analysis completed using monte carlo simulation
3) calculate ERD
describe the pitfalls in a risk transfer test
PRICE-P
- Profit Commission (N)
- Reinsurance Expense (N)
- Interest Rate (donot vary with scenario, only consider insurance risk)
- Commutation timing: (donot use prescribed payment pattern)
- Evaluation Date: test based on circumstances at evaluation date
- Premiums: use PV(present value) of gross premiums, apply premium adjustments to undiscounted premiums