Freehold Covenant Flashcards
Benefit to pass at common law
Intention for covenant to run implied
S78 LPA 1925
Burden to pass at common law
Cannot pass
Austerberry v Oldham
Burden to pass at common law
Exception: mutual benefit and burden - successor in title will not be able to take the benefit without the corresponding burden
Halsall v Brizell
Benefit to pass in equity
Express annexation - words in the covenant must not be merely personal to future owners but must refer to passing to the benefitted land of future owners
Rogers v Hosgood
Benefit to pass in equity
Statutory annexation
S78 LPA 1925
Benefit to pass in equity
A covenant that touches and concerns the land will automatically pass, so long as the benefitted land is clearly identified in the covenant and s78 has not been expressly excluded.
Federated Homes v Mill Lodge
Benefit to pass in Equity
Building scheme requirements
- Claimant and defendant purchased land from common vendor
- common vendor sets out plots of land in advance of sale, with common restrictions to be imposed
- common restrictions were to be imposed and for the benefit of all lots intended to be sold or retained
- Claimant and defendant purchased plots knowing common restrictions were to endure through their purchases
Elliston v Reacher
Burden to pass in equity
Must comply with requirements below:
- negative in nature (pocket test)
- benefitted and burdened land must exist
- covenant must touch and concern the land
- intention for burden to run (s79 implies unless contrary wording)
- protection by registration - class D2 land charge if unregistered or by notice if registered
Tulk v Moxhay