Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Mind, Knowledge and Ethics > Freedom of will > Flashcards

Freedom of will Flashcards

1
Q

Question philosophers have about our actions

A

Can we act freely?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What types of restrictions may there be to our actions?

A

Physical, political, social and cultural restrictions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Question philosophers have about our willings

A

Are our willings free from constraint?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Examples of when willings are constrained

A

Phobias, addictions, neurosis, ‘brainwashing’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Question philosophers have about free will

A

Could free will be just an illusion?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

If the freedom of our will could be an illusion…

A

Why think that we are free?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why do we think that we have free will?

A

We know so from introspection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Argument from introspection

A
  1. If I have an immediate/direct awareness of my will as free, my will is free
  2. I have a immediate/direct awareness of my will as free
    Therefore 3. My will is free
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Challenge to premise 1 of the argument from introspection

A

Just because man is unaware of the causes of his action, does not follow that these causes don’t exist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why think that we have free will?

A

Free will is a necessary condition of our being morally responsible for our actions, and we know that we are morally responsible for our actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Free will as a necessary condition of moral responsibility: premise 1

A

When an agent is morally responsible for doing something wrong, he is blameworthy, he deserves hard treatment for said action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Free will as a necessary condition of moral responsibility: premise 2

A

It would seem unfair to treat agents in these ways unless their actions were up-to-them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Free will as a necessary condition of moral responsibility: conclusion

A

Therefore agents are deserving of praise or blame only if their actions are up-to-them, only if they have free will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The argument from moral responsibility

A
  1. If we are morally responsible then we have free will
  2. We are morally responsible
    Therefore 3. We have free will
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a morally responsible agent?

A

A person who is both able to do moral right/wrong and is accountable for her morally significant conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the two main conceptions of what it means to have free will?

A
  1. The garden of forking paths model

2. The source model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

The garden of forking paths model

A

Free will is the ability of persons to exercise control over their conduct, the ability to choose between the relevant courses of action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

If we imagine an agent’s future as a garden path…

A

The path may be straight leading from a single past into a single future but at a given point the path will fork

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

In the garden of forking paths model, when does free will become possible?

A

When the present offers from the agent’s singular past, more than one path into the future and the agent is able to choose between them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

The source model

A

Free will is the ability of a persons to exercise control over their conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

How to understand control in the source model?

A

As the agent playing a crucial role in the production of their actions

22
Q

Two ways an agent may act in the source model

A
  1. An agents actions may be a mere ‘bodily happening’

2. An agents actions may be a product of their own agency

23
Q

When does free will become possible in the source model?

A

When a person is the ultimate source of their actions

24
Q

What are possible explanations for our actions?

A

Determined by God, brought about by chance, casually determined

25
Q

When is something divinely ordained/predetermined?

A

When it occurs by virtue of an initial ordering of events by God

26
Q

If an action is a free and responsible action then…

A

It must be under the control of the agent

27
Q

Are actions which are divinely predetermined under the control of the agent?

A

No

28
Q

Are actions which have been divinely predetermined free and responsible actions?

A

No

29
Q

When is an action brought about by chance?

A

An action occurs by chance when there is no variable which can explain its happening

30
Q

Are actions which occur by chance under the control of anything?

A

No

31
Q

Is whatever happens by chance a free and responsible action?

A

No

32
Q

When is an action casually determined?

A

An action is casually determined when the occurrence is casually necessitated by a set of antecedent events prior to it

33
Q

In casual determinism what combines to entail every truth about the future?

A

The facts of the past and the laws of nature

34
Q

If casual determinism is true, given the actual past and the fixed laws of nature…

A

Only one future is possible at any moment in time

35
Q

Why do casual determinism and the garden of forking paths model conflict?

A

Casual determinism asserts that there is only one path, whereas the garden of forking paths allows for the path to fork

36
Q

Incompatibilist argument

A
  1. If a person acts of her own free will, then she could have done otherwise
  2. If determinism is true, no one can do otherwise than one actually does
    Therefore
  3. If determinism is true, no one acts of her own free will
37
Q

What belief do incompatibilists hold?

A

If determinism is true, no one acts of their own free will

38
Q

Hard determinist position

A

Determinism is true so no-one does act of their own free will

39
Q

Libertarian position

A

Some people do act of their own free will, so determinism is false

40
Q

Cases of constraint

A

Where conditions of constraint do obtain, I wouldn’t have acted otherwise, even if I had so chosen

41
Q

Cases of freedom

A

Where conditions of constraint do not obtain, I would have acted otherwise if I had so chosen

42
Q

What do compatibilists use to falsify premise 2 of the incompatibilists argument?

A

Conditional analysis on the ability to do otherwise

43
Q

How to tell whether someone could have acted otherwise

A

Ask could they be said to have been able to do otherwise

44
Q

Can i) my actions are completely causally determined and ii) I would have acted otherwise if I had chosen to do so, both be true?

A

Yes, because determinism is about what will happen in the future given the actual past, so can also be how the future would be different given a different past

45
Q

Even when actions are casually determined…

A

It may still be true that I would have acted otherwise in the possible world where that had been my chosen path

46
Q

Do actions that are casually determined therefore threaten freedom?

A

No what threatens freedom are circumstances in which we are constrained to choose something when we wanted to choose something else instead

47
Q

What do compatibilists conclude with the conditional analysis?

A

Determinism doesn’t entail that no one can do otherwise. Premise 2 of the incompatibilist argument is false and free will is compatible with determinism

48
Q

What do some argue is better than a conditional analysis?

A

Categorical analysis

49
Q

What does the consequence argument argue one would need to do in a deterministic world?

A

In order to alter how their own future would unfold they would need to have the power to alter the facts of the past or the laws of nature

50
Q

What does the consequence argument show?

A

Seeing as no one can alter the facts of the past or the laws of nature, if determinism is true, no person has the power to alter how their future will unfold

51
Q

What does the consequence argument support?

A

Premise 2 of the incompatibilist argument

Mind, Knowledge and Ethics (10 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions