freedom of speech Flashcards

1
Q

what is freedom of speech ?

A

While no official or legal definition of freedom of speech exists, it is generally considered to be the right to communicate and express one’s views and ideas without fear of state control or punishment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define article 10 ECHR

A

provides the right to freedom of expression and information, subject to certain restrictions that are “in accordance with law” and “necessary in a democratic society”. This right includes the freedom to hold opinions, and to receive and impart information and ideas.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

justifications for freedom of speech may be roughly divided into three categories

A

1) the importance of discovering the truth
2) self-fulfilment
3) democratic participation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

importance of discovering the truth

A

This justification for free speech is usually associated with the liberal theorist John Stuart Mill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is Mills truth argument based on?

A

Mill’s truth argument is based on the premise that restriction of free speech will prevent society from ascertaining accurate facts and hearing worthwhile opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what example does Barendt provide >

A

Barendt provides the example of pre-war Germany where the Nazis came to power in 1933 despite relatively free political discourse during the Weimar Republic during the 1920s. Implicit in this example is the assertion that despite the freedom to challenge Nazi views on the inferiority of certain races, such views became prevalent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is a contemporary example of the limitation of free speech as means of discovering the ‘truth’?

A

so-called ‘fake news’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

is ‘fake news’ a new phenomenon ?

A

no, during the time of the Roman Empire, Octavian used a campaign of disinformation to facilitate his victory over Marc Anthony in the final war of the Roman Republic. In its aftermath, he changed his name to Augustus, and distributed a flattering and youthful image of himself throughout the Empire, continuing its use in his old age.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

whats a modern analysis of ‘fake news’ ?

A

In modern times, fake news is closely associated with social media. For example, A BuzzFeed News analysis found that three big right-wing Facebook pages published false or misleading information 38% of the time during the period analysed, and three large left-wing pages did so in nearly 20% of posts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

whats the consequence of fake news on political debate ?

A

during the US 2016 presidential campaign, a conspiracy theory spread online that influential members of the Democratic party were involved in a paedophile ring which operated from a pizza restaurant in Washington DC (the owner had close links to the party). This eventually resulted in the arrest of a man who had visited the pizza restaurant to ‘self-investigate’ and opened fire with a rifle.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is a concept closely associated with the mill’s truth argument ?

A

the so-called ‘market place in ideas’. This idea isbased on ananalogyto the concept of afree market and asserts that thetruthwill emerge from the competition of ideas in free and open public discussion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

does social media undermine the market place ?

A

The algorithms used in platforms like Facebook will provide users with news stories, posts etc which reflect their pre-existing beliefs, thus preventing or hindering exposure to competing ideas and view-points.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is self-fulfilment ?

A

As a justification for freedom of speech, arguments based on self-fulfilment assert that any restrictions on what one can say (and hear) inhibit our personal development and intellectual growth. In essence, a right to freedom of speech reflects what it is to be human.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

whats the obvious problem with this justification ?

A

As a justification for freedom of speech, arguments based on self-fulfilment assert that any restrictions on what one can say (and hear) inhibit our personal development and intellectual growth. In essence, a right to freedom of speech reflects what it is to be human.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is democratic participation ?

A

This justification maintains that the freedom of speech is essential to the functioning and promotion of democracy. In a truly democratic process political views may be freely promoted to the electorate and individuals should be free to criticise government action and policies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

in essence what does this mean ?

A

In essence, without freedom of speech there can be no real competition for votes, nor accountability of government. The importance of freedom of speech for the flourishing of democracy is illustrated by the restriction of free speech in dictatorships and totalitarian states.

17
Q

what is an argument in favour of freedom of speech ?

A

democratic participation is also based, to a large extent, on the previously discussed justifications: a free and frank exchange of ideas is essential to democracy and the right of all people to engage in public discourse is important to human dignity and self-fulfilment.

18
Q

why should freedom of speech be restricted ?

A

Stanley Fish’s book: There’s No Such Thing as Free Speech and it’s a Good Thing Too (1993, OUP).

19
Q

example of restricting freedom of speech?

A

Oliver Wendell Holmes J in Schenck v. United States

shouting “fire” in a crowded theatre.

20
Q

what are the legal mechanisms for restricting freedom of speech ?

A

1) defamation
2) protection of privacy
3) contempt of court

21
Q

what does article 10 guarantee to legitimately restrict ?

A

national security, prevention of disorder and crime, protection of health or morals, preventing the disclosure of confidential information, protection of reputation and maintaining the impartiality of the judiciary

22
Q

what is an important thing to consider ?

A

the state cannot actually remove one’s ability to say or write anything we chose

23
Q

what is the harm principle ?

A

essentially dictates that the only justifiable basis for restricting the rights of individuals is the prevention of harm to other individuals, was first conceptualised by John Stuart Mill in his book,On Liberty.

24
Q

under the harm principle what is the basis for suppressing free speech ?

A

there must be reasonable ground to fear that serious evil will result if free speech is practiced. There must be reasonable ground to believe that the danger apprehended is imminent. There must be reasonable ground to believe that the evil to be prevented is a serious one.” Whitney v. California.

25
Q

what is the offence principle ?

A

the offence principle was bought forward by Joel Feinberg Offence to Others: The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law, OUP, 1985), as there was a view that the harm principle is too narrow.

26
Q

what is a practical problem of using the offence principle ?

A

that some people take offence because of an unusually sensitive temperament or because of prejudice and bigotry

27
Q

what is a Paternalistic justification ?

A

usually emphasises the prevention of harm to the speaker on the basis that he/she might not fully comprehend the consequences of the expression involved

28
Q

what is paternalism ?

A

based on the implicit assumption that the state knows better than the individual what is his or hers best interests, is a concept that many liberals are uncomfortable with.

29
Q

summary of justifications for restricting freedom of speech

A

namely the harm principle, offense principle and to a lesser extent paternalism, may be summarised as liberal (in the broad sense of the word) justifications for the curtailment of freedom of speech

30
Q

prior restraints

A

in England and Wales, licensing of the press was abolished in 1694 when the annual legislation under which the Stationers’ Company controlled the publication of newspapers and pamphlets was not renewed