Freedom of Speech Flashcards
Content Based Restrictions
Strict Scrutiny
Subject matter restriction (topic of the message)
Viewpoint restrictions (ideology of the message)
Content Neutral Restrictions
Intermediate Scrutiny:
Important government interests + must not burden substantially more speech than necessary
Regulations that are vague or overbroad
Regulations are invalid if they are vague or overbroad
o Vague if a reasonable person cannot tell what speech is prohibited
o Overbroad if it regulates substantially more speech than the constitution allows to be regulated
Regulation of Symbolic Speech
Gov can regulate expressive conduct if:
o It serves an important government interest independent of the speech aspects of the conduct
* E.g., flag burning cannot be banned, but burning draft cards can be banned because the government needs them for the draft (a valid, independent reason)
The means are not greater than necessary to achieve that purpose
The Right Not to Speak
People cannot be compelled to speak
Anonymous speech is protected
Regulation of Government Speech
CANNOT violate the free speech clause of 1A (which applies to gov regulation of PRIVATE speech)
Generally, government speech and government funding of speech will be upheld if it is rationally related to a legitimate state interest
Regulation Preventing Speech Before it Occurs
Strict Scrutiny Applies
Gov must show that some special societal harm would result without the restraint
Unprotected/Less Protected Speech
Speech that has a substantial likelihood of imminent illegal activity or speech that is directed at causing imminent illegality
Example: Fighting words (e.g., cross burning done with intent to intimidate)
Speech that is Obscene. Obscene if it describes or depicts sexual conduct that:
* Appeals to the prurient interest in sex (community standard)
* Is patently offensive (community standard)
* Lacks serious expressive value (national reasonable person standard)
Regulating Adult Entertainment Establishments
Can limit size or locations of adult entertainment establishments to reduce the secondary effects of those businesses (e.g., increased crime rates or lower property values)
BUT cannot ban them altogether.
Gov can ban visual depictions of child porn, but not if it does not involve children (e.g., small adults pretending to be children is not obscene)
Regulation of Commercial Speech
Gets 1A protection if it is TRUTHFUL
Gov can prohibit speech that:
* Proposes unlawful activity
* Is inherently misleading or fraudulent
* Inherently RISKS deception
Other commercial speech can be regulated if intermediate scrutiny is met:
* Substantial government interest
* Directly advances that interest
* Narrowly tailored to serve that interest
Public Forums
Places that have historically been open to speech related activities (streets, sidewalks, public parks)
Strict scrutiny applies
* Must be content neutral
* Must be a TPM restriction that serves important gov purpose
* Must leave open alternative channels of communication
* Narrowly tailored to serve that important interest (but does not need to be the least restrictive means of achieving it)
Designated Public Forums
Public property not historically used for speech-related activities, but has been opened to such activities by the government
Same test as for public forum:
Strict scrutiny applies
* Must be content neutral
* Must be a TPM restriction that serves important gov purpose
* Must leave open alternative channels of communication
* Narrowly tailored to serve that important interest (but does not need to be the least restrictive means of achieving it)
Limited Public Forum
Public property not historically used for speech-related activities BUT is opened for specific speech activity (like designated public forum with a specific topic of speech in mind, like a debate)
Gov can regulate speech here if:
* Viewpoint neutral (NOT subject matter)
* Reasonably related to a legitimate government interest
Non-Public Forums
Public property not historically used for speech-related activities and not held open for such activities (military bases, government workplaces)
Regulations need to be reasonable and viewpoint neutral
Defamation of a Public Official/ Person running for office
They can recover for defamation by proving:
- Falsity of the statement
- Actual malice