freedom of contract Flashcards
definition (2)
refers to right of individuals and businesses to freely negotiate and establish terms of their agreements without interference from government
fundamental basis of contract law is the issue of voluntariness
freedom of contract associated with (3)
concept of laissez faire,
this is a french term that translates to “let it be”. Refers to policy or attitude of minimal government intervention in economic affairs of individuals and businesses
what does freedom of contract allow parties to do (3)
with whom to contract,
whether to enter into a contract
and the specific terms of a contract
Sir george jessel
a prominent 19th century judge, jessel strongly advocates for the principle of freedom of contract
arguing individuals should have the upmost liberty to enter into agreements and that such contracts should be upheld by the courts
Robert Nozick
modern libertarian philosopher
viewed freedom of contract as an expression of individual autonomy and a fundamental aspect of a minimal state
patrick atiyah
an english law professor
traced the rise and fall of the concept of freedom, noting its prominence in the 18th and 19th centuries
and its decline in the face of increasing regulation
3examples of freedom to contact
employment contracts, employees and employers have freedom to negotiate terms like salary working hours and job responsibilities
commercial contracts, businesses can negotiate terms for the sale of goods or services
consumer contracts agreements between businesses and consumers such as purchasing products or services
example of freedom in contract law
contract starts with agreement which involves offer and acceptance
offer is terms by which you are prepared to be bound must be certain and communicated(gibson) and acceptance is agreement to terms of offer
this is the basis of freedom, two parties freely enter an agreement they have full knowledge of
law avoids getting involved unless something goes wrong as law wants to leave people to be free
Arguments against freedom in contract
parties may have too much freedom and may insert bias within contract
may be beneficial to one party and detrimental to another
in this case the court can imply terms into contract
this goes away from freedom as courts are protecting weaker party from being exploited