Free Movement of Workers Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Key legislation

A

Regulation 492/2011 (workers)

Directive 2004/38/FC (persons)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Hoekstra

A
  • definition of a ‘worker’ is to be decided by the EU law, not domestic law (obviously necessary to ensure there is equality)

Worker = all those covered by the different national systems of social security

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  • definition of a ‘worker’ is to be decided by the EU law, not domestic law (obviously necessary to ensure there is equality)

Worker = all those covered by the different national systems of social security

A

Hoekstra

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Levin

A

MSs cannot unilaterally restrict the definition of workers!

AG Slynn: “the right enjoyed by workers is ‘dependent on its being shown that the work in the Member State is a GENUINE and SUBSTANTIAL purpose although it need not be the chief purpose.”

HELD:
- right to FMW covers ‘effective and GENUINE activity’, except which are on “such a small scale as to be regarded as purely marginal and ancillary”

When defining worker, one cannot look at the motivation. It can’t be argued that someone’s not a worker just because they work part time and don’t meet the minimum amount to subsist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

MSs cannot unilaterally restrict the definition of workers!

AG Slynn: “the right enjoyed by workers is ‘dependent on its being shown that the work in the Member State is a GENUINE and SUBSTANTIAL purpose although it need not be the chief purpose.”

HELD:
- right to FMW covers ‘effective and GENUINE activity’, except which are on “such a small scale as to be regarded as purely marginal and ancillary”

When defining worker, one cannot look at the motivation. It can’t be argued that someone’s not a worker just because they work part time and don’t meet the minimum amount to subsist.

A

Levin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Kempf

A

Sufficient means of subsistence:
Music teacher, 12h/week

-> Dutch gvt: the minimum means of subsistence cannot be regarded as genuine and effective work where the person is dependent on public funds

HELD: Provided that the employment is genuine and effective, it doesn’t matter how the person meets the minimum standard of subsistence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sufficient means of subsistence:
Music teacher, 12h/week

-> Dutch gvt: the minimum means of subsistence cannot be regarded as genuine and effective work where the person is dependent on public funds

HELD: Provided that the employment is genuine and effective, it doesn’t matter how the person meets the minimum standard of subsistence

A

Kempf

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Lawrie-Blum

A

Definition of worker:

A person who

  • performs services
  • for and under the direction of another person
  • receives remuneration for it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Definition of worker:

A person who

  • performs services
  • for and under the direction of another person
  • receives remuneration for it
A

Lawrie-Blum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Steymann

A

Broad definition of remuneration:
Includes an “indirect quid pro quo”
Participation in a community based on religion or another form of philosophy (such as Bhagwan as with Steymann) falls within the field of EU law as long as it can be regarded as an economic activity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Broad definition of remuneration:
Includes an “indirect quid pro quo”
Participation in a community based on religion or another form of philosophy (such as Bhagwan as with Steymann) falls within the field of EU law as long as it can be regarded as an economic activity

A

Steymann

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Brown v Secretary of State for Scotland (1988)

A

1) A national of another MS who enters into an employment relationship in the host State with a view to subsequently undertaking university studies there in the same field of activity, and who would not have been employed by his employer if he hadn’t already been accepted for admission to university, is regarded to be a worker
2) distinguishment between payment of fees and maintenance grants - only the former is covered by Treaties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

1) A national of another MS who enters into an employment relationship in the host State with a view to subsequently undertaking university studies there in the same field of activity, and who would not have been employed by his employer if he hadn’t already been accepted for admission to university, is regarded to be a worker
2) distinguishment between payment of fees and maintenance grants - only the former is covered by Treaties

A

Brown v Secretary of State for Scotland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Raulin

A
  1. On call contract falls within the scope of a ‘worker’
  2. It is for national court to determine the marginality of work - limited number of hours might indicate that the work was marginal and ancillary.
  3. Course undertaken to obtain new skills (to further their career) must be relevant to previous employment in order to continue holding the status of a worker, unless the person becomes unemployed involuntarily
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
  1. On call contract falls within the scope of a ‘worker’
  2. It is for national court to determine the marginality of work - limited number of hours might indicate that the work was marginal and ancillary.
  3. Course undertaken to obtain new skills (to further their career) must be relevant to previous employment in order to continue holding the status of a worker, unless the person becomes unemployed involuntarily
A

Raulin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Antonissen

A

PURPOSEFUL APPROACH: looks at its intended effect!!

A strict interpretation of Art 45(3) TFEU would jeopardise the actual chances that a national of a MS who is seeking unemployment will find it in another MS

  • MS can decide that a person should be deported after 6 months of job seeking, unless one can prove that they’re still actively seeking work with reasonable prospects
  • Art 45(3) rights are non-exhaustive!
  • Job seekers as “second class workers”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

PURPOSEFUL APPROACH: looks at its intended effect!!

A strict interpretation of Art 45(3) TFEU would jeopardise the actual chances that a national of a MS who is seeking unemployment will find it in another MS

  • MS can decide that a person should be deported after 6 months of job seeking, unless one can prove that they’re still actively seeking work with reasonable prospects
  • Art 45(3) rights are non-exhaustive!
  • Job seekers as “second class workers”
A

Antonissen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Lebon

A

Minimex payment

The right to equal treatment with respect to social and tax advantages only applies to workers, NOT jobseekers!

19
Q

Minimex payment

The right to equal treatment with respect to social and tax advantages only applies to workers, NOT jobseekers!

A

Lebon

20
Q

Summary of a definition of a worker

A
  • EU defines it (Hoekstra)
  • GENUINE economic activity (Levin)
  • doesn’t have to be monetary payment (Steymann)
  • doesn’t have to be full-time or guaranteed work (Raulin)
  • may be related to training (Lawrie-Blum/Brown)
  • applies also to jobseekers (Antonissen)
21
Q

Commission v France (Bridge Workers)

A

Employment in the bridge and various other key parts of merchant vessels was limited to French nationals

-> DIRECT DISCRIMINATION
prohibited by Art 45 TFEU

22
Q

Employment in the bridge and various other key parts of merchant vessels was limited to French nationals

-> DIRECT DISCRIMINATION
prohibited by Art 45 TFEU

A

Commission v France (Bridge Workers)

23
Q

Example of direct discrimination

A

Commission v France (Bridge Workers):
Employment in the bridge and various other key parts of merchant vessels was limited to French nationals

-> DIRECT DISCRIMINATION
prohibited by Art 45 TFEU

24
Q

Examples of indirect discrimination

A

Groener: permitted

Roman Angonese: not permitted

25
Q

Commission v Belgium (1982)

A

Article 45(4) not intended to include menial or generic jobs that simply happened to be in the public service

Employment in public service requires:

  • direct or indirect participation in the powers conferred by public law
  • safeguard the general interests of the state
26
Q

Article 45(4) not intended to include menial or generic jobs that simply happened to be in the public service

Employment in public service requires:

  • direct or indirect participation in the powers conferred by public law
  • safeguard the general interests of the state
A

Commission v Belgium (1982)

27
Q

Sotgiu

A

Italian national, works for German postal service
-> refused “separation payment” for workers working away from home

Should the allowances apply to workers who travel from another MS for work?
HELD: if the scheme relating to such an allowance takes account of objective differences in the situations of workers according to whether their residence at the time when they take up their employment is within the territory of the state concerned or abroad

28
Q

Italian national, works for German postal service
-> refused “separation payment” for workers working away from home

Should the allowances apply to workers who travel from another MS for work?
HELD: if the scheme relating to such an allowance takes account of objective differences in the situations of workers according to whether their residence at the time when they take up their employment is within the territory of the state concerned or abroad

A

Sotgiu

29
Q

R v Saunders

A

Purely internal situations:
Situation has to have some connection to EU law, ie you have to move to take advantage of your rights

-> bizarre results: reverse discrimination

30
Q

Purely internal situations:
Situation has to have some connection to EU law, ie you have to move to take advantage of your rights

-> bizarre results: reverse discrimination

A

R v Saunders

31
Q

Groener

A

Dutch national, worked part time in an Art College in Dublin
-> sought appointment to a full-time post which was subject to passing an Irish exam

HELD: EU law does not prohibit the adoption of a policy for the protection and promotion of a language of a MS.

32
Q

Dutch national, worked part time in an Art College in Dublin
-> sought appointment to a full-time post which was subject to passing an Irish exam

HELD: EU law does not prohibit the adoption of a policy for the protection and promotion of a language of a MS.

A

Groener

33
Q

Roman Angonese

A

Language certificate issued by Bolzano were the only ones accepted

Held: Principle of non-discrimination doesn’t require that the linguistic knowledge in question must have been acquired within the national territory.

34
Q

Language certificate issued by Bolzano were the only ones accepted

Held: Principle of non-discrimination doesn’t require that the linguistic knowledge in question must have been acquired within the national territory.

A

Roman Angonese

35
Q

Walrave and Koch

A
  • Dutch cyclists serving ss pacesetters
  • a requiremebt that pacesetters in World Championship must be of same nationality as the cyclists who ride in their lee

HELD:

1) sport is only subject to the Treaties where it constitutes economic activity
2) Art 45 TFEU can’t affect the composition of sporting teams, which will be solely decided on sporting rather than economic grounds

36
Q
  • Dutch cyclists serving ss pacesetters
  • a requiremebt that pacesetters in World Championship must be of same nationality as the cyclists who ride in their lee

HELD:

1) sport is only subject to the Treaties where it constitutes economic activity
2) Art 45 TFEU can’t affect the composition of sporting teams, which will be solely decided on sporting rather than economic grounds

A

Walrave and Koch

37
Q

Bosman

A

Belgian national footballer who sought transfer to another football team at the expiration of his contract
-> retained by Liege because the other team couldn’t meet his transfer fee

HELD:

1) Application of transfer fees after the expiry of contractual term is prohibited
2) Nationality requirements against Art 45

38
Q

Belgian national footballer who sought transfer to another football team at the expiration of his contract
-> retained by Liege because the other team couldn’t meet his transfer fee

HELD:

1) Application of transfer fees after the expiry of contractual term is prohibited
2) Nationality requirements against Art 45

A

Bosman

39
Q

Gravier

A

French national moved to Liege to commence a course in comic strip art
-> required to pay a registration fee that wasn’t applicable to Belgian nationals

HELD:

  • Art 45 applies to vocational training as it is in particular likely to promote FMP throughout the Community, by enabling them to obtain a qualification in the MS where they intend to work and by enabling them to complete their training and develop particular talents in the MS whose vocational training programmes include the special subject desired
  • Imposition of a registration fee upon non-nationals constitutes discrimination
40
Q

French national moved to Liege to commence a course in comic strip art
-> required to pay a registration fee that wasn’t applicable to Belgian nationals

HELD:

  • Art 45 applies to vocational training as it is in particular likely to promote FMP throughout the Community, by enabling them to obtain a qualification in the MS where they intend to work and by enabling them to complete their training and develop particular talents in the MS whose vocational training programmes include the special subject desired
  • Imposition of a registration fee upon non-nationals constitutes discrimination
A

Gravier

41
Q

Blaizot

A

Blaizot with 16 other French plaintiffs study Vet Med in Belgium

HELD: some university degrees are vocational

“In so far as the studies in question provide specific training and skills, that is to say where a student needs the knowledge acquired for the pursuit of a profession, trade or employment”

42
Q

X with 16 other French plaintiffs study Vet Med in Belgium

HELD: some university degrees are vocational

“In so far as the studies in question provide specific training and skills, that is to say where a student needs the knowledge acquired for the pursuit of a profession, trade or employment”

A

Blaizot

43
Q

Lair

A

French national in G sought maintenance grant for uni studies; previously employed in G with patches on her employment record

HELD: because of her past employment, she was a worker and entitled to maintenance grant

= entitled to maintenance grant owing to her past economic activity

44
Q

French national in G sought maintenance grant for uni studies; previously employed in G with patches on her employment record

HELD: because of her past employment, she was a worker and entitled to maintenance grant

= entitled to maintenance grant owing to her past economic activity

A

Lair