Free Movement of Goods - Art 110 Flashcards
Article 110 TFEU
Discriminatory Internal Taxation - Fiscal
What does Art 110 say (roughly)?
“no Member State shall impose directly/ indirectly, internal taxation on similar domestic products of other Member States”
Case 90/79 EC v France
A genuine internal tax is a general system of internal dues applied systematically to categories of products in accordance with objective criteria irrespective of the origin of the products.
If internal tax does not comply, it will be prohibited
Case 27/67 Fink-Frucht
ECJ provided goods would be ‘similar’ if they came within the same tax classification, but they do not need to be the ‘same’ product
Case 170/78 Commission v UK
Appropriate test = whether or not a consumer might substitute one product for the purpose he had in might
Case 168/78 Commission v France
Characteristics for the test were considered to be things such as composition, physical characteristics and consumer usage
Article 110(1)
Discrimination against similar foreign goods - there cannot be discriminatory taxation of similar products
Commission v France [2002]
Art 110(1) looks at the criteria of necessity and proportionality. - here, petroleum products were of fundamental importance to French existence and the survival of inhabitants heavily depended upon them
Commission v Italy (Bananas) 184/85
Art 110(1)
- CJ had to determine whether bananas were ‘similar’ fruit
- took into account the objective characteristics of bananas and other fruit
- looked at extent to which they could satisfy the sane consumer need
- not similar
Michel Humblot 112/84
Art 110(1)
- different car tax levels due to the power of the vehicle
- if went over 16CV then would be a 5000£ charge but no French car produced power over this level
- this would therefore only happen to imported cars
- indirectly discriminatory
Article 110(2)
Discrimination against competing foreign goods - outlaws internal taxes that grant indirect protection to domestic goods
2 part test for Article 110(2) to apply
1) relevant products must be in a competitive relationship - concerns substitutability
2) if products compete with each other, the tax may not protect the domestic product
Case 170/78 Commission v UK - pt 1
concerning 110(2) pt 1:
- tax imposed on wine was more than 4 x higher than tax on beer
- wine and beer not similar enough to fall under 110(1), but were SUBSTITUTABLE enough for consumers to be in competition with each other in the meaning of Art 110(2) as consumers can switch from beer to wine
Case 170/78 Commission v UK - pt 2
concerning 110(2) pt 2: - the much higher taxes on wine did protect the domestic beer, and was therefore prohibited under 110(2) as tax difference was so high that it affected consumer choices and the tax difference could not be objectively justified on any ground
For Art 110(2) to apply
a real protective effect must be shown, the mere existence of a difference in tax rate is not enough as M/S can differentiate their taxes on different products with an objective criteria