Free Movement of Goods Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is a quantitative restriction?

A

A set limit on number of things which come in to a country, in effect restricts imports on trade.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are measures having equivalent effect to QR?

A
  • Making it difficult, in practice, to bring goods into a country.
  • Exampe being excessive border checks at spain-gibraltar border border
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does Article 30 of the TFEU prohibit?

A

Custom duties on imports and exports and charges having equivalent effect shall be prohibited between Member States
- Fundamental idea of the EU, as a Member cannot charge customs duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Can EU countries determine their own customs tariff?

A

NO

  • There is a common customs tariff that is fixed by the Council on proposal from the Commission as per Article 31 of TFEU.
  • Member States individually do not decide the tariff, it it done collectively by whole EU
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was established in the ‘Van Gend & Loos’ case?

A

The abolition of customs duties
- National Court must protect rights of individual importer/exporter not to pay charges imposed in breach of the provision set out in the case NOW ART 30

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did the case of ‘Commission v Italy [1969]’ highlight?

A
  • That ANY pecuniary charge, which is imposed unilaterally on domestic or foreign goods BY REASON OF THE FACT THAT THEY CROSS A FRONTIER, and which is not a customs duty per say, constitutes an MEQR EVEN IF NOT FOR BENEFIT OF THE STATE
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did the ‘Rewe-Zentralfinanz GmbH’ establish?

A

That the size of charge and what it is called in unimportant
- An examination was conducted to check health of animals
- Charge was due to experts being consulted
HELD - unlawful breach of art 30. Two different changing schemes, does not matter it was an inspection charge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What may be recognised as the four main ‘charges having equivalent effect’ to customs duty?

A

(1) Size of charge and what it is called immaterial
(2) Use of money raised immaterial
(3) Charge must be based on fact that frontier crossed, not on transport (which may involve crossing frontier
(4) Prohibition also applies to charges on crossing internal boundary between parts of the same state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did the ‘Sociaal Fonds voor de Diamantarbeiders’ case determine?

A

Use of money raised is unimportant
- In this case there was a charge for importing diamonds to the Netherlands - not a tax
- money went into a social fund for the welfare of workers
HELD - breach of Article 30, it was a charge on import, an extra obstacle in the eyes of the TFEU.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was held in the case of ‘Air Liquide Industries Belgium SA’?

A

That a charge must be based on the fact a frontier is crossed, not on transport (which may involve crossing a frontier)
- There was a tax on motors pumping gas
- Argued that this was a charge having equivalent effect
HELD - it was not, tax did not rise because of import but because they were using the motors
- not triggered by crossing a boundary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did the case of ‘Commission v Italy’ say about services rendered?

A

that in circumstances where you may be providing a service the a charge may be imposed, if for the cost of the service which you are providing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Name the two contrasting cases in which a permissible charge was allowed in one and not the other.

A
  • Commission v Germany [1988] - charge allowed for veterans inspection which was required by European Law
  • Commission v Italy (1989) - charge NOT allowed as the chargee= imposed was for opening customs post during business hours.
  • not accepted as this was no special service just normal practice.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does Article 31 of TFEU state?

A

Common Customs Tariff duties shall be fixed by the Council on a proposal from the Commission.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Once tariff is paid and goods enter EU, can an additional charge be placed on them?

A

NO

Once goods from Non-EU Countries are in and have paid the EU tariff, they have right of free circulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does Article 110 prohibit?

A

Prohibits discrimination in taxes between domestic and imported products
- direct or indirect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does Article 34 prohibit?

A

Quantitative restrictions on imports and all measures having equivalent effect shall be prohibited between Member States

17
Q

What does Article 35 prohibit?

A

Quantitative restrictions on exports, and all measures having equivalent effect, shall be prohibited between Member States

18
Q

Article 36 allows restriction on trade under what circumstances?

A
  • Public morality
  • Public Policy or Public security
  • the protection of health and life of humans, animals or plants
  • the protection of national treasures possessing artistic, historic or archaeological value
  • protection of industrial and commercial property
19
Q

What is the ‘harmonisation’ process?

A

Used to established common rules

  • on product standards (toy safety, vehicle emissions etc..)
  • Labelling
20
Q

What are the facts of ‘R v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1998]’?

A

UK prohibited export of calves to Spain due to animal welfare concerns

  • The EU held that the UK had acted unlawfully Spain were not breaching EU animal welfare standards
  • EU rule must be upheld
21
Q

Describe the unusual case of ‘Commission v France (Spanish strawberries) [1997].

A

French government failed to prevent violent protests blocking imports

  • French farmers took direct action to prevent imports
  • Commission took action against the French Government for not preventing this
22
Q

What definition was derived from ‘Procureur du Roi v Dassonville [1974]?

A

All trading rules enacted by Member States which are capable of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, intra-Community trade are to be considered as MEQR’s to quantitative restrictions

23
Q

What are the differences between;

(a) Distinctly applicable MEQRs
(b) Indistinctly Applicable MEQRs

A

(a) Distinctly - rules that treat imports differently

(b) Indistinctly - rules that are of general application but have an adverse effect on imports

24
Q

What was held in Commission v Ireland 1982?

A

Distinctly applicable MEQR

- Official campaign to encourage buying domestic over imported products