Free Movement of Establishments / Services Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

How to begin?

A

Can it rely on Services Directive?
2(1) - Scope
4(1) - Definition
2(2) and 2(3) for Exceptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Establishment or Service

A

Directives; lay out 49 and 56; Gebhard, stable and continuous

Treaty; relates to self-employed, Gebhard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Introduce Treaty Articles

A

49

  • Prevents restrictions for freedoms of establishment
  • Can be relied on in home MS (Halsey)
  • On same grounds as nationals
  • Available to individuals, companies (54), businesses w temp services (56)
  • Direct effect (Reyner)

56

  • Prevents restrictions for freedoms of services
  • Can be relied in home MS (Alpine Investment)
  • Same grounds as nationals
  • Direct effect (Van Binsbergen)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Is there a restriction (Directives)

A

49

  • ALL prohibited reqs. not justifiable
  • Authorisation schemes ok
  • All others must be NECESSARY, justified on grounds of policy, health, security, PROPORTIONATE

56

  • ALL prohibited reqs. not justifiable
  • All others must be NECESSARY, justified on grounds of policy, health, security, PROPORTIONATE
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Is there discrimination? (Directives)

A

Both disallow all requirements that are directly, indirectly and non discriminatory.

Gebhard - National measures which are liable to prevent or make less attractive the exercise of rights guaranteed by treaties.

49
D - Reyner
ID - Commission v Italy
ND - Sodemare

56
D - Reyner
ID - Binsbergen
ND - Sagre

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How to justify direct discrimination?

A

Through treaty exceptions only!

51:
- Policy (must be serious and in strong public interest - Omega)
- Security
- Health

52 - related to exercise of state authority (again narrowly interpreted) Reyner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Justify indirect?

A

Cassis as applied in Gebhard (49) or Alpine Investments (56)

  • Non-discriminatory
  • Imperitave requirement of general interest
  • Suitable to fulfill objective
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Proportional?

A
  • Necessary
  • Proportional
  • Not beyond what is necessary
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly