Fraudulent cases Flashcards

1
Q

Year - Boy of Burton Fraudulent case

A

1597

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Year - Demon Drummer of Tedworth Case

A

1662

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Year - The Jane Wenham Case

A

1712

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Year - Pendle Swindle case

A

1634

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what was the impact of the Boy of Burton fraudulent case?

A
  • Darrells reputation shown to be fraudulent.
  • 1604 - Canon forbidding exorcisms without a licence.
  • Showed unreliability of witness testimonies eg. children
  • However - Pendle Trial 1612 - 9 yo Jennet Device used
  • Publish - ‘Discovery of the fraudulent practices of John Darrel’ 1599 - more widespread knowledge and lead to pamphlet war.
  • Theological debate over the power of the devil and reliability of exorcisms
  • Viewed as 1 off discovery - 1604 - 3rd Witchcraft Act - increased legal severity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the impact of the Pendle swindle fraudulent case?

A
  • Privy council and king involved - gained relevance
  • evidence-based approach shows more sceptical - involve surgeons
  • However - East Anglia used sleep deprivation - walking
  • John Webster met Robinson and published sceptical 1677
  • Robinson went on to be professional witch hunter
  • 11 years later - role and significance of Hopkins in East Anglia
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the impact of the demon drummer of Tedworth Fraudulent case?

A
  • Continually revisted and used as argument for scepticism
  • Webster and Bekker publication based on case
  • Royal Society elevated case
  • Provoked debate on reality of supernatural forces
  • Empirical approach - Francis Bacon - used case as example
  • Overall consensus was to blame supernatural forces - 74 years until Witchcraft Act repealed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the impact of the fraudulent case of Jane Wenham?

A
  • Dispite guilty verdict Judge released her - reason in the face of mob hysteria
  • Publication - Francis Hutchinson 1718 - Historical Essay Concerning Witchcraft
  • The jury still condemned Wenham
  • Several writers still showing support for witchcraft
  • Prosecutions have already been declining since 1660 - case not turning point
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did the Boy of Burton Case in 1597 result in?

A
  • Resulted in the accused dying in prison before the accusers: Darling & Darrel confessed that the case was fraudulent and were imprisoned.
  • This happened again in 1662, during the Demon Drummer of Tedworth case and the last ever witchcraft case: Jane Wenham in 1712.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Boy of Burton

What happened to Thomas Darling - the accuser?

A
  • 17 year old with a career of lying
  • After hunting he felt ill
  • Next dau experienced fits
  • Said to hallucinate and see green angels and a green cat
  • Said he had met a witch when he had lost his Uncle in the forest.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Boy of Burton

Why was Alice Goodridge an easy target? (Accused)

A
  • 60 year old neighbour
  • With a reputation of white magic
  • When she came to confront Darling he started to fit
  • She admitted to meeting him in the woods.
  • Found a witch-mark
  • Admitted in prison under sleep deprivation and starvation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Boy of Burton

What was the role of John Darrell?

A
  • Exocist - seemly successfully
  • History of false accusations
  • Recommended prayer, fasting and reading the Bible
  • Later his accomplice William Somers admitted to fraudulence
  • Darrell never admitted to fraudulence - he was imprisoned and after release, he disappeared
  • Samuel Harsnett wrote Pamplet ‘A Discovery of the Fraudulent Practices of John Darrel’ in 1599
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Pendle Swindle

What did Edmund Robinson claim? (Accuser)

A
  • 10 year old
  • Aware of Jennett Device’s reputation
  • Blamed after he neglected to look after his fathers cattle
  • To detract from punishment he claimed he was in the woods and was approached by 2 Greyhounds who turned into Frances Dickinson and an unknown boy
  • Dickinson offered a shilling to keep quite but he refused
  • The boy turned into a horse and rode Robinson to a feast of witches where he was able to escape.
  • Later at trial he accused 25 - 17 found guilty.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Pendle Swindle

What was suspicious about the case?

A
  • Edmund went to Local Magistrates 3 months after event
  • Magistrate sceptical and sent the trial to Privy Council in London.
  • Doubted written evidence and spoken testimony.
  • Edmund had become a witchfinder
  • Edmund to London where father and son were interrogated - Edmund confessed
  • 4 accused were searched and even questioned by King Charles - no devil marks found
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Demon Drummer of Tedworth

Explain the haunting of Tedworth

A
  • Mompesson intervened of a case of a drummer and ex-solider (William Drury) who were fraudulently raising alms for the poor with a forged pass.
  • Drummer arrested then freed drum eventually sent to mompesson house which experienced a series of disturbances
  • Thumping heard, drum playing military marches, scratching and dog panting sounds
  • Happened for months even representatives of King Charles 2 sent to investigate.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Demon Drummer of Tedworth

How was Joseph Glanvill involved?

A
  • Case in newspapers eg. Mercurius Publicus and The Kingdom’s Intelligencer.
  • Glanvill visited the house, heard noises and spoke to eyewitnesses - who claimed Drury was responsible
  • Wrote that when Drury was deported for theft the disturbances stopped - Drury escaped the book by raising storms - recaptured and trialled but was acquitted.
  • Disturbances restarted
  • All written about in ‘A blow at modern sadducism, in some philosophical considerations about witchcraft’
17
Q

Demon Drummer of Tedworth

Why was there scepticism about the Glanwills account?

A
  • Glanvill attempted to convince Royal Society that the study of witchcraft should be carried out - to prove cases in a rational and scientific way.
  • John Webster sceptical and wrote about in The Discovery of supposed witchcraft 1677. - said he had been informed the whole case was fraudulent.
  • Attacked again by Balthasar Bekker in The world bewitched
18
Q

Jane Wenham 1712

Why was Jane accused and what was she accused of?

A
  • Long-term reputation as wise women/witch
  • Bewitch Matthew Gilson - refused to give her straw
  • Gilson ran down the road begging everyone for straw and stuffing manure down his shirt.
  • Wenham reported him and GIlson find a shilling - Jane promised to get justice - Farmers daughter, livestock ill
  • Also bewitching Anne Thorne (16 years) - suffered fits, hallucinations of demons with cat face and vomiting pins
  • No mark found but full confession made
  • Stumbled over some words in Lords Prayer
  • 16 witnesses called - inc 3 clergymen
  • Judge Powell secured Royal pardon
19
Q

Jane Wenham 1712

Why was Wenham found guilty and then acquitted?

A
  • Judge Sir John Powell Sceptical and an outsider able to approach in ration and objective way - secured her a Royal Pardon
  • Attitudes had already shifted and convictions were uncommon
  • She was a dissenter so CofE power needed to be shown
  • Very poor - Town of Walkern unable to provide for poor
  • Witness’ (16) personal grudges
  • The case mentioned in Hutchinsons‘A historical essay concerning witchcraft’ reporting she was not guilty