Fraud Prevention Flashcards
Which of the following controls can help minimize the pressures that might lead an employee to commit fraud?
A. Open-door management policies
B. Fair personnel policies and procedures
C. Employee support programs
D. All of the above
D. All of the above
See pages 4.616-4.618 in the Fraud Examiner’s Manual
While most internal controls are designed to reduce the opportunity to commit and conceal fraud, organizations should also be mindful of the pressures, such as financial hardships or family problems, that can lead to fraud. Unfortunately, such pressures can be difficult to detect in employees. However, companies should take steps to increase managers’ awareness of such potential problems, as well as to assist an employee who might be experiencing difficult times.
Examples of mechanisms that help alleviate the pressures to commit fraud include:
- Open-door management policies
- Fair and equitably applied personnel policies and procedures
- Measures to boost employee morale, such as career development opportunities, special events for employees, and recognition for jobs well done
- Employee support programs, such as counseling for addiction, family and marital problems, and financial difficulties
Managers should be instructed to observe employees’ lifestyles for warning signs of fraud, and employees should know that supervisors are watching for unexplained or suspicious anomalies of this nature.
A. True
B. False
A. True
See pages 4.608-4.609 in the Fraud Examiner’s Manual
It is common for employees who steal to use the proceeds for lifestyle improvements. Some examples include more expensive cars, extravagant vacations, expensive clothing, new or remodeled homes, expensive recreational property, and outside investments. Managers should be educated to be observant of these signs. To further increase the deterrent effect, employees should know that supervisors are watching for unexplained or suspicious anomalies of this nature.
To protect against third-party fraud risks, organizations should perform the same level of due diligence on each potential customer before entering into a transaction with them.
A. True
B. False
B. False
See pages 4.810-4.811 in the Fraud Examiner’s Manual
Customer due diligence (CDD) is a necessary element in effectively managing risk and protecting organizations from becoming involved in illegal activity. CDD procedures, also referred to as know your customer (KYC) in some industries, involve performing background checks based on the level of risk presented by the customer. In general, there are three levels of CDD procedures:
- Simplified CDD
- Standard CDD
- Enhanced CDD
Organizations can determine the level of risk the customer presents—and the appropriate level of due diligence—by evaluating the specifics of the transaction and the initial information provided about the customer. If the organization later receives additional information that suggests the customer might be a higher risk, a higher level of CDD procedures should be performed at that time.
Which of the following is FALSE regarding the communication of the fraud risk assessment process?
A. The communication should be in the form of a message from the assessment sponsor.
B. The communication should be limited to management and the board.
C. The communication should be personalized to make it more effective in encouraging employees to participate in the process.
D. The communication should be visibly disseminated throughout the business.
B. The communication should be limited to management and the board.
See pages 4.714 in the Fraud Examiner’s Manual
The fraud risk assessment process should be visible and communicated throughout the business. Employees will be more inclined to participate in the process if they understand why it is being done and what the expected outcomes will be. To that end, sponsors should be strongly encouraged to openly promote the process. The more personalized the communication from the sponsor, the more effective it will be in encouraging employees to participate in the process. Whether it is a video, town-hall meeting, or company-wide email, the communication should be aimed at eliminating any reluctance employees have about participating in the fraud risk assessment process.
Which of the following is TRUE regarding a fraud risk assessment?
A. It can be used to improve fraud awareness among employees
B. The results should be used to develop plans to mitigate fraud risk
C. It can help management identify individuals who put the organization at the greatest risk of fraud
D. All of the above
D. All of the above
See pages 4.704 in the Fraud Examiner’s Manual
Every organization should conduct a fraud risk assessment and create processes to keep the assessment current and relevant. It is not only a necessary part of effective corporate governance but also makes good business sense. The benefits of conducting a fraud risk assessment include enabling the organization to:
- Improve communication and awareness about fraud.
- Identify where it is most vulnerable to fraud and what activities put the company at the greatest risk.
- Know who puts the organization at the greatest risk.
- Develop plans to mitigate risk.
- Develop techniques to investigate and determine if fraud has occurred in areas of high risk.
- Assess anti-fraud controls.
- Comply with regulations and professional standards.
______________ is a process aimed at proactively identifying and addressing an organization’s vulnerabilities to internal and external fraud.
A. A fraud examination
B. A management ethics assessment
C. A fraud risk assessment
D. An internal control audit
C. A fraud risk assessment
See pages 4.703 in the Fraud Examiner’s Manual
Fraud risk assessment is a process aimed at proactively identifying and addressing an organization’s vulnerabilities to internal and external fraud. A fraud risk assessment starts with an identification and prioritization of fraud risks that exist in the business. The process evolves as the results of that identification and prioritization begin to drive education, communication, organizational alignment, and action around effectively managing fraud risk and identifying new fraud risks as they emerge.
During a fraud risk assessment, the assessment team should consider:
A. Opportunities for collusion
B. The inherent limitations of anti-fraud controls
C. Internal controls that might have been eliminated due to restructuring efforts
D. All of the above
D. All of the above
See pages 4.705-4.706 in the Fraud Examiner’s Manual
Many organizations rely heavily on their internal control system to prevent and detect fraud. Although an effective internal control system, including targeted anti-fraud controls, is critical in fraud prevention and detection, it is a dynamic system that requires constant reevaluation of its weaknesses. Performing a fraud risk assessment provides management the opportunity to review the effectiveness of the company’s anti-fraud controls, with consideration of the following factors:
- Controls that might have been eliminated due to restructuring efforts (e.g., elimination of separation of duties due to downsizing)
- Controls that might have eroded over time due to reengineering of business processes
- New opportunities for collusion
- Lack of anti-fraud controls in a vulnerable area
- Nonperformance of control procedures (e.g., control procedures compromised for the sake of expediency)
- Inherent limitations of anti-fraud controls, including opportunities for those responsible for a control to commit and conceal fraud (e.g., through management and system overrides)
The fraud risk assessment team might include:
A. External consultants
B. The general counsel
C. Accounting and finance personnel
D. All of the above
D. All of the above
See pages 4.711 in the Fraud Examiner’s Manual
The fraud risk assessment team members might include internal and external sources, such as:
- Accounting and finance personnel who are familiar with the financial reporting processes and anti-fraud controls
- Nonfinancial business unit and operations personnel who have knowledge of daily operations, customer and vendor interactions, and issues within the industry
- Risk management personnel who can ensure that the fraud risk assessment process integrates with the organization’s enterprise risk management program
- The general counsel or other members of the legal department
- Members of any ethics or compliance functions within the organization
- Internal auditors
- Internal security or investigative personnel who are familiar with investigations of past fraud incidents
- External consultants with fraud and risk expertise
- Any business leader with direct accountability for the effectiveness of the organization’s fraud risk management efforts
When establishing a whistleblower policy, organizations should emphasize that it applies to all employees, regardless of their positions or seniority.
A. True
B. False
A. True
See pages 4.611-4.612 in the Fraud Examiner’s Manual
Organizations can empower employees who wish to disclose information without the fear of negative consequences by creating a safe environment for them to voice their concerns. This can be accomplished by implementing a clear whistleblower policy that details standard reporting protocols and the consequences for retaliating against whistleblowers. This policy can stand alone or be part of the anti-fraud policy.
It is important for management to establish and publicize the organization’s whistleblower procedures so that individuals both inside and outside the organization are aware of the appropriate channels for reporting misconduct. The whistleblower policy should emphasize that it applies to all employees, regardless of their positions or seniority, as well as to anyone external to the organization who has knowledge of potential wrongdoing by any employees or on the company’s part.
When a customer presents a higher risk for engaging in illegal activity, which of the following customer due diligence (CDD) activities would be MOST APPROPRIATE for an organization to engage in?
A. Analyzing the customer’s overall net worth
B. Scrutinizing the customer’s method of payment
C. Quantifying the customer’s expected purchasing pattern
D. All of the above
D. All of the above
See pages 4.811-4.812 in the Fraud Examiner’s Manual
When certain customers present higher risks for engaging in illegal activity, organizations should undertake enhanced due diligence procedures. Factors that might prompt enhanced customer due diligence (CDD) include high-profile customers, large-value transactions, or foreign business dealings in countries known for corruption. While these enhanced due diligence procedures depend on the nature and severity of the risk presented by the customer, organizations should gather additional information to reduce their potential risk. Specifically, organizations should gather and analyze data to ensure that they are dealing with a customer who has good intentions.
Under enhanced due diligence procedures, the following customer elements should be examined with a greater level of scrutiny to ensure legitimacy and that the risk has been responded to appropriately:
- Identity (i.e., Is the customer who they claim to be?)
- Source of income and overall net worth (i.e., Can the customer pay for the transaction, especially if they are requesting to pay on credit?)
- Expected pattern of purchasing (i.e., Is this a onetime transaction or a series of transactions?)
- Expected value (i.e., How large is the cumulative financial risk?)
- Expected method of payment (i.e., Is the customer requesting to use a higher-risk payment method, such as a personal check or line of credit?)
When gathering information as part of a fraud risk assessment, both surveys and anonymous feedback mechanisms provide an effective way to conduct candid one-on-one conversations with employees.
A. True
B. False
B. False
See pages 4.712-4.713 in the Fraud Examiner’s Manual
Several techniques can be used to gather information successfully as part of a fraud risk assessment. These include:
- Interviews, which can be an effective way to conduct candid one-on-one conversations with employees
- Focus groups, which can enable the assessor to observe the interactions among a group of employees as they collectively discuss a question or issue
- Surveys, which are electronic or paper questionnaires that can be either anonymous or directly attributable to the individual participants
- Anonymous feedback mechanisms, which can include means for anonymous employee suggestions or responses to questions posed
Which of the following customer due diligence (CDD) procedures would be MOST APPROPRIATE for an organization to perform if it determines that a potential customer has little opportunity to commit fraud and therefore presents a minimal risk of engaging in illegal activity?
A. Identifying the customer
B. Analyzing the customer’s net worth
C. Contacting the customer’s bank
D. Verifying the customer’s identity
A. Identifying the customer
See pages 4.811 in the Fraud Examiner’s Manual
Simplified due diligence is the lowest level of due diligence that can be performed on a potential customer. Conducting simplified due diligence procedures would be most appropriate in situations where there is little opportunity or risk of a customer engaging in illegal activity. The only requirement for simplified due diligence is to identify the customer.
Organizations can determine the level of risk the customer presents—and the appropriate level of due diligence—by evaluating the specifics of the transaction and the initial information provided about the customer. If the organization later receives additional information that suggests the customer might be a higher risk, a higher level of customer due diligence (CDD) procedures should be performed at that time.
In response to a risk identified during a fraud risk assessment, management decides to implement appropriate countermeasures, such as prevention and detection controls. This response is known as:
A. Transferring the risk
B. Avoiding the risk
C. Mitigating the risk
D. Assuming the risk
C. Mitigating the risk
See pages 4.734 in the Fraud Examiner’s Manual
When responding to the organization’s residual fraud risks, management can help mitigate a risk by implementing appropriate countermeasures, such as prevention and detection controls. The fraud risk assessment team should evaluate each countermeasure to determine if it is cost effective and reasonable given the probability of occurrence and impact of loss.
What is the objective of a fraud risk assessment?
A. To establish the guilt or innocence of an employee suspected of committing fraud
B. To help an organization identify what makes it most vulnerable to fraud
C. To provide an estimate of an organization’s fraud losses
D. To assess the design and effectiveness of an organization’s internal controls over financial reporting
B. To help an organization identify what makes it most vulnerable to fraud
See pages 4.703-4.704 in the Fraud Examiner’s Manual
The objective of a fraud risk assessment is to help an organization identify what makes it most vulnerable to fraud. Through a fraud risk assessment, the organization can identify where fraud is most likely to occur, enabling proactive measures to be considered and implemented to reduce the chance that it could happen.
Fraudulent customer payments, collusion between contractors, corporate espionage, and hacking schemes are all fraud risks pertaining to which of the following categories?
A. Reputational risk
B. Regulatory and legal misconduct
C. External fraud
D. Asset misappropriation
C. External fraud
See pages 4.718 in the Fraud Examiner’s Manual
External fraud risks include:
- Fraud committed by customers (e.g., fraudulent customer payments)
- Fraud committed by vendors (e.g., overbilling by a vendor or collusion between bidding contractors to inflate contract price)
- Fraud committed by competitors (e.g., corporate espionage)
- Fraud committed by unrelated third parties (e.g., hacking)
_____________ controls are designed to stop something bad from happening before it occurs, and _____________ controls are designed to identify something bad that has already occurred.
A. Preventive; detective
B. Detective; investigative
C. Investigative; deterrent
D. Investigative; detective
A. Preventive; detective
See pages 4.702 in the Fraud Examiner’s Manual
Preventive controls are manual or automated processes that stop something bad from happening before it occurs. Detective controls can also be manual or automated, but their purpose is to identify something bad that has already occurred. With the right balance of preventive and detective controls, a good system of anti-fraud controls can greatly reduce an organization’s vulnerability to fraud.
Which of the following is FALSE regarding employee anti-fraud education?
A. Fraud awareness training efforts should be restricted to formal educational mechanisms.
B. Fraud awareness training should be required for employees both at time of hire and periodically thereafter.
C. All anti-fraud training should be based on the organization’s specific operations and fraud risks.
D. Mid-level managers should be tasked with assisting in training their teams about fraud.
A. Fraud awareness training efforts should be restricted to formal educational mechanisms.
See pages 4.605 in the Fraud Examiner’s Manual
Like any educational efforts, frequent exposure to anti-fraud topics is crucial to ensuring that employees absorb—and apply—the information provided. Formal fraud awareness training should be an ongoing process that begins at the time of hire. Employees should also participate in refresher training at least annually to help keep the program active and engrained in their minds.
Formal anti-fraud training can take many forms, including live, in-class instruction; recorded video or animated courses; or interactive self-study programs. In addition, the organization should use other informal means, such as periodic newsletters or notices in break rooms, to reinforce its anti-fraud stance on a more constant basis.
Perhaps most important, however, is that the training be based on the realities of the organization, rather than on generic anti-fraud messages. While providing general information is good and necessary, doing so without addressing the company’s specific concerns or providing employees with practical knowledge and ideas on how to apply it will render the training program ineffective.
As messages from an employee’s direct supervisor are often the most significant and impressionable to an employee, the concept of cascading training can be an especially effective means of anti-fraud education. In cascading training, managers are tasked with and specifically educated on how to provide anti-fraud training to their own staff. This allows training to be customized to each team’s own needs, as well as for the message to come directly from the team’s own leader.
Which of the following is among the audit committee’s responsibilities for fraud risk management?
A. Monitoring and proactively improving the fraud risk management program
B. Receiving regular reports on the status of reported or alleged fraud
C. Performing and regularly updating the fraud risk assessment
D. All of the above
B. Receiving regular reports on the status of reported or alleged fraud
See pages 4.816 in the Fraud Examiner’s Manual
As a sub-group of the board of directors, the audit committee is often assigned oversight of the organization’s financial, accounting, and audit matters and reports to the full board. As part of this responsibility, the committee must take an active role in overseeing the assessment and monitoring of the organization’s fraud risks. This involves:
- Receiving regular reports on the status of reported or alleged fraud
- Being aware of fraud risks that are common in the organization’s industry
- Meeting regularly with key internal parties (e.g., the chief audit executive [CAE] or other senior financial persons) to discuss identified fraud risks and the steps being taken to prevent and detect fraud
- Understanding how internal and external audit strategies address fraud risk
- Providing external auditors with evidence that the audit committee is dedicated to effective fraud risk management
- Engaging in open conversations with external auditors about any known or suspected fraud
- Seeking advice of legal counsel whenever it deals with allegations of fraud
Monitoring and improving the fraud risk management program and performing and maintaining the fraud risk assessment are both part of senior management’s responsibilities for addressing fraud risk.
In response to a risk identified during a fraud risk assessment, management decides to eliminate an asset or discontinue an activity because the control measures required to protect the organization against the identified threat are too expensive. This response is known as:
A. Transferring the risk
B. Assuming the risk
C. Avoiding the risk
D. Mitigating the risk
C. Avoiding the risk
See pages 4.734 in the Fraud Examiner’s Manual
When responding to the organization’s residual fraud risks, management may decide to avoid a risk by eliminating an asset or discontinuing an activity if the control measures required to protect the organization against an identified threat are too expensive. This approach requires the fraud risk assessment team to complete a cost-benefit analysis of the value of the asset or activity to the organization compared to the cost of implementing measures to protect the asset or activity.
When performing a fraud risk assessment, the fraud examiner should only designate an area as high-risk if the assessment has conclusively revealed that fraud is occurring there.
A. True
B. False
B. False
See pages 4.705 in the Fraud Examiner’s Manual
Assessing an area as having a high level of fraud risk does not conclusively mean that fraud is occurring there. However, the fraud risk assessment is useful in identifying areas that should be proactively investigated to determine whether fraud has occurred. In addition, putting activity in high-risk areas under increased scrutiny can deter potential fraudsters by increasing their perception of detection.
Which of the following is TRUE regarding an organization’s ethics policy?
A. In developing the policy, management should consider how various members of the organization define success.
B. The policy should be limited to external parties only.
C. In developing the policy, management should not consider the existing ethical tone set by leadership.
D. The policy should only be accessible to company employees.
A. In developing the policy, management should consider how various members of the organization define success.
See pages 4.623-4.624 in the Fraud Examiner’s Manual
A written ethics policy enables management to objectively communicate its ethical philosophy and provides a foundation for a successful ethics program. The policy should be shared among both new and old employees. Additionally, some companies have found it effective to share the ethics policy with their vendors, and many organizations make their ethics policies available for the public by posting them on the company’s website or on their social media platforms. Such exposure helps reinforce the importance the organization places on ethics and provides parties outside the organization with a tool to help identify and report breaches of expected employee conduct.
Identifying key organizational characteristics and issues is a start to the development of an ethics program. These considerations include:
- Understanding why good people can commit unethical acts
- Defining current—as well as desired—organizational values
- Determining if organizational values have been properly communicated
- Determining if ethics is currently a leadership issue in the organization
- Ascertaining how board members, stockholders, management, employees, and any other important members of the organization define success
- Producing written ethics policies, procedures, or structures
Of the following parties, who is responsible for the oversight of the organization’s financial, accounting, and audit matters?
A. The external auditors
B. The chief financial officer
C. The audit committee
D. The internal auditors
C. The audit committee
See pages 4.816 in the Fraud Examiner’s Manual
As a sub-group of the board of directors, the audit committee is often assigned oversight of the organization’s financial, accounting, and audit matters and reports to the full board. As part of this responsibility, the committee must take an active role in overseeing the assessment and monitoring of the organization’s fraud risks. This involves:
- Receiving regular reports on the status of reported or alleged fraud
- Being aware of fraud risks that are common in the organization’s industry
- Meeting regularly with key internal parties (e.g., the chief audit executive [CAE] or other senior financial persons) to discuss identified fraud risks and the steps being taken to prevent and detect fraud
- Understanding how internal and external audit strategies address fraud risk
- Providing external auditors with evidence that the audit committee is dedicated to effective fraud risk management
- Engaging in open conversations with external auditors about any known or suspected fraud
- Seeking advice of legal counsel whenever it deals with allegations of fraud
The fraud risk assessment team should include:
A. Individuals with experience in gathering and eliciting information
B. Individuals in a variety of roles, including finance, operations, and legal
C. Individuals with diverse knowledge, skills, and perspectives
D. All of the above
D. All of the above
See pages 4.711 in the Fraud Examiner’s Manual
Before conducting the fraud risk assessment, the organization should build a fraud risk assessment team consisting of individuals with diverse knowledge, skills, and perspectives that will lead and conduct the fraud risk assessment. The size of the team will depend on the size of the organization and the methods used to conduct the assessment. The team should have individuals who are credible and have experience in gathering and eliciting information. The team members might include internal and external sources, such as accounting and finance personnel, operations personnel, members of the legal department, internal auditors, internal security or investigative personnel, external consultants with fraud and risk expertise, and any business leader with direct accountability for the effectiveness of the organization’s fraud risk management efforts.
In response to a risk identified during a fraud risk assessment, management chooses to accept the risk rather than implement any responsive measures. This approach is known as:
A. Assuming the risk
B. Transferring the risk
C. Mitigating the risk
D. Avoiding the risk
A. Assuming the risk
See pages 4.735 in the Fraud Examiner’s Manual
Management may choose to assume the risk if it determines that the probability of occurrence and impact of loss are low. Management may decide that it is more cost effective to assume the risk than it is to eliminate the asset or discontinue the activity, buy insurance to transfer the risk, or implement countermeasures to mitigate the risk.