Fragmentation Flashcards

1
Q

From integration to fragmentation, Drivers for change ?

A
  • Belief power of the market to allocate resources and encourage economic development
  • Privatization of state owned enterprises e.g. national rail
  • De-regulation of economy – particularly labour markets
  • Exteriorization of relationships that were previously internal to the structure of the company
  • Technological advances capacity to overcome spatial dimensions e.g. call centres
  • Aim to reduce cost, improve service quality, enhance competitiveness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Elements of Fragmented Work (Rubery et al 2003 )

A
  • Multi-Employer site
  • Out-sourced, sub-contracted labour
  • Public sector provision / Recasting of state provision
  • Temporary employment agencies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Implications for Work and Employment of fragmentation?

A
  • the changing relationships/power dynamics between organisations
  • Implications for understanding the employment relationship
  • Impact of these inter-firm relations on work and employment
  • Implications for job quality and decent work
  • Growing commodification and standardisation of work? (Huws and Podro 2012)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Subcontracted Capitalism (Wills 2007) 4

A
  • Pressure on wages and the conditions of work
  • Short-term contracts
  • No employment contract with ‘direct employer’
  • Breaks mutual dependency
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Ambiguity in Multi-Employer Organisation Forms (Rubery et al 2000)

A
  • Supervision and Control
  • Performance issues
  • Grievance and conflict
  • Terms and conditions – working-time / working hours
  • Health and Safety – (Lloyd and James 2010)
  • Commitment
  • Trade Union Recognition/The challenge to labour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Labour outcomes of fragmentation

A
  • Further attempts to render more visible the ‘commodity’ status of labour
  • Pressure on labour costs
  • Intensification of work
  • Tight draconian performance management regimes (see also Newsome and Thompson 2013)
  • Technological capacity to integrate the fragmented systems as well as monitor work performance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Employee Representation across boundaries

A
  • Disenfranchised voice/fragmented
  • Difficult to generate shared interests across workers with different employers or contracts.
  • Decision re recognition may be out of ‘immediate’ employer’s hands
  • Ghost at the ‘bargaining table’
  • Legal framework on trade union organizing efforts focused on single workplace
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Subcontracted Employment and its challenge to Labour

A
  • Growing disconnect between decision making and control by employers and responsibility and accountability for employees on the other (Huws and Podro 2012)
  • Protecting Labour Rights
  • Organising for improvements – priced out of the market ?
  • The living wage campaign in the UK public sector ?
  • The living wage campaign across the global supply chain ?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Definition of fragmentation

Albin and Prassl 2016

A

-The notion of ‘fragmentation’ draws upon a perception of dissolution, and implicitly also decay, of the institutional framework
of employment relations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Zero-hours work and mutuality of obligation

A

The requirement of ‘mutuality of obligation’ consists of a dual promise from both
sides to the contract—from the employer to provide future work and from the
individual to perform that work.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Standard employment relationship (SER) (Rubery, 2016)

A
  • guaranteed wage income
  • adequate and maintainance of ‘real’ wage
  • stability
  • income during non-work periods
  • division of work and non-work times
  • skill upgrading
  • adjustments to the needs of the individual i.e. doctors appts
  • opportunities for voice
  • access to employment protection
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Fragmented time employment relationship (Rubery, 2016)

A
  • no guaranteed hours or income
  • less than adequate subsistence, high travel time costs just for a few hours work
  • high risk of reduced demand on employee
  • unpaid breaks, days off waiting for work, limited entitlements
  • blurring of divide - 24/7 culture of contact
  • limited skill investment
  • employees bare cost of adjustment or risk job loss long term
  • voice limited when no guarantee of work & only one employer (have to always be available for work)
  • may not reach threshold for benefits
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Fragmented time in Domiciliary social care - possible solutions

A
  • reimbursement of travel costs for short hors/notice work

- guaranteed hours based on past work history

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The fissured workplace

A

David Weil

  • more and more organiations taking part in the employment relationship
  • partly due to increased capital market pressures and increased focus on core competencies over anything therefore a desire to shed employment (OS)
  • no firm wants to take on costs
  • OS the cost-cutting function as well as the responsibility and blame e.g. Apple and Foxconn
  • temporary contracts - reduces employees ability to resist & little opportunity to negotiate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

liberalisation and privatisation of service markets

A
  • neo-liberal policies and anti-monopoly pressure have led to privatisation of service providers such as BT
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

BT - privatised telecommunications

A
  • denationalised - 51% shares sold privately
  • monopoly opened up to competition
  • aim to reduce price, increase quality
17
Q

CASE STUDY

A
  • liberalisation and privatisation
  • advances in tech - allowed for mobilisation
  • restructuring - OS functions away from value creation
  • OS vs. IH
    OS - lower pay, temp contracts, high turnover and dismissal, low autonomy, low training (Gallie, 2007)
  • FROM intense pressure to cut costs, scapegoat OS - shift responsibility
18
Q

Fragmentation in OS

A

little/no collective bargaining - exacerbates power relationship & includes another firm
- little autonomy and intense monitoring
- lower OS JQ = lower IH JQ
bench marked pay and conditions are set in the subcontractor - threatens IH
- commodification of labour - race to the bottom

19
Q

precarious employment problem

A

ALTHOUGH precarious employment alright for some e.g. students - the existence creates a degradation of conditions and power for others
- as long as ‘some’ will accept conditions, all will be expected to accept or face threat of dismissal/OS

20
Q

Grady (2016)

A
  • state has been key agent in providing employment regulation that has allowed low paid and insecure employment to increase e.g. the increased dominance of financialization that deregulated in favour of big business/ deregulation permitting active labour market policies and ZHC their role in the low wage environment
  • disconnection of wages from productivity growth has led to wage stagnantion, widening income inequality - demanding more productivity w/ less wage
  • neoliberal policy - deficit reduction, flexible labour markets and partial dismantling of the welfare state
  • DISPARITY EVIDENT in the squeeze on working conditions and pay within a firm is not universal bcos executive pay does not change/ increases
  • disproportionately affects women - 55% of ZHC are women - care sector