Fourth Amendment - What is a search? Flashcards

1
Q

What does the Fourth Amendment apply to?

A

Government Action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

How was the Fourth Amendment originally triggered?

A

If the government trespassed on an individual’s property rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Justice Harlan’s Concurrence in Katz indicated what?

A

A Fourth Amendment search occurs when the government violates (1) a subjective expectation of privacy that (2) society recognizes as reasonable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What were the facts of Katz?

A

Katz (defendant) was convicted of violating federal gambling laws. Recordings were obtained after the FBI placed a wire-tap on the outside of the public phone booth where Katz placed the call and placed into evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Is a pen register (phone numbers dialed) a search?

A

No. Smith v. Maryland. A person has no reasonable expectation of privacy in info he voluntarily turns over to third parties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Ariel Surveillance of private homes and surrounding areas a search?

A

No. Ciraolo (flying over yard at 1,000 foot).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Is using a thermal gun a search?

A

Yes! Kyllo. Obtaining (1) by sense-enhancing technology (2) any info re: the interior of the home (3) that could not otherwise have been obtained without physical intrusion into a constitutionally protected area (4) at least where the technology in question is not in general public use.

SIPG- Sure, if p good.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

(dog sniff) luggage?

A

OK. Place case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

(dog sniff) Sniff of trunk during a lawful traffic stop.

A

OK. IL. v. Caballes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Curtilage. 4 Dunn factors.

A

(1) the proximity of the area to the home; (2) whether the area is included within an enclosure surrounding the home; (3) the nature of the uses to which the area is put; and (4) the steps taken to protect the area from observation by people passing by.”

PENS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Exclusionary rule

A

when the 4th Amendment is violated evidence is excluded.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Mapp v. Ohio

A

Evidence collected in violation of constitutional rights must be thrown out.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Jones case. Does the government installation of a GPS device on the target’s vehicle to monitor the vehicle’s movements constitute a search?

A

Yes. Answered using the traditional trespass doctrine. When the government physically invades personal property to gather information a search has occurred.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Does the length of time matter for Katz reasonableness?

A

Yes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Knotts case (beeper in chloroform) a search?

A

No. Public roads.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Karo (beeper in ethanol a search?)

A

Yes bc went to private residence, reasonable expectation of privacy.

16
Q

Open fields doctrine

A

Oliver. No search.

17
Q

(trash) Ca v. Greenwood

A

No reasonable expectation of privacy for trash at the curb. Some states have different versions of privacy.

18
Q

The 2 ways to classify a search?

A

Trespass - physical intrusion on personal property.
Justice Harlan’s Katz concurrence - subjective expectation of privacy that society recognizes as reasonable.

19
Q

Cell phone pings, constitute a search?

A

Carpenter v. United States, Yes. An individual maintains a legit expectation of privacy in the record of his physical movements as captured. NOT extending third party doctrine.

Society - law enforcement would/could not secretly monitor and catalogue every single movement of an individual’s care for a long period. “Privacy of life.”

Factors: (1) The revealing nature of the data @ issue
(2) the amount of data collected
(3) the automatic nature of the data disclosure.

RAN

20
Q

Third Party Doctrine

A

The third-party doctrine is a legal doctrine that holds that people who voluntarily give information to third parties have no reasonable expectation of privacy in that info.

21
Q

Smith & Miller

A

Held that a bank account holder enjoys no reasonable expectation of privacy in the bank’s records of his account activity.

22
Q

Florida v. Jardines

A

Police do not have to shield their eyes, although it is a search/physical intrusion by using a drug dog by the front door (traditional property based approach).

23
Q

T/F Curtilage is a part of the home itself for 4th Amendment purposes

24
What is curtilage
The area immediately surrounding and associated with the home.
25
(T/F) A license may not be implied from the habits of the country.
F
26
Typical license to knock?
Permits visitor to visit the home by the front path, knock briefly, wait briefly, and then leave absent invite.
27
Searches & seizures must be supported by what?
Probable cause.
28
Definition of PC:
exits where the facts & circumstances within [the officers'] knowledge and of which they [have] reasonably trustworthy info [are] sufficient in themselves to warrant a man of reasonable caution in the belief that [an offense has been or is being committed" by the person to be arrested. Brinegar v. United States.
29
PC for search.
Evidence subject to seizure will be found in the place to be searched. Otherwise same as PC normally. Reasonable suspicion of danger
30
Aguilar
If the affidavit rests on hearsay, the informant must declare either that (1) he himself saw or perceived the fact or facts asserted; or (2) that his information is hearsay, but there is good reason for believing it--perhaps one of the usual grounds for crediting hearasay information.
31
Aguliar-Spinelli
Magistrate must (1) assess the credibility of the source & (veracity & credibility) (2) then weigh the info furnished if he believes it to be true (basis of knowledge) BOTH PRONGS! VCB
32
Illinois v. Gates
totality of circumstances analysis. do not have to have both prongs satisfied entirely. Traveling to FL--there was PC ans warrant was proper. Enough facts here.
33
Probable cause standard
circumstances which warrant suspicion.