Fourth Amendment-Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement Flashcards
What are the exceptions to the warrant requirement?
All warrantless searches conducted by law enforcement officers are unconstitutional unless they fit into one of six recognized exceptions to the warrant requirement.
What is a search incident to constitutional arrest?
Incident to a constitutional arrest (that is, one based on probable cause to believe a law has been violated and that meets other constitutional requirements), the police may search the person and areas into which they might reach to obtain weapons or destroy evidence. The police may also make a protective sweep of the area if they believe accomplices may be present. The search must be contemporaneous in time and place with the arrest, but, at least with respect to searches of automobiles, the term “contemporaneous” does not necessarily mean “simultaneous.” Thus, for example, the police may search the interior of an automobile after securing a recent occupant of the automobile in a squad car if they have reason to believe that the vehicle contains evidence of the crime for which the recent occupant was arrested. (See below.)
What is the constitutional arrest requirement?
If an arrest is unconstitutional, any search incident to that arrest is also unconstitutional.
What is the geographic scope?
What can be searched? The person and the areas within the person’s wingspan.
What is the automobile search incident to a constitutional arrest?
The police may conduct a search of the passenger compartment of an automobile incident to arrest only if at the time of the search:
• The arrestee is unsecured and still may gain access to the interior of the vehicle; or
• The police reasonably believe that evidence of the offense for which the person was arrested may be found in the vehicle.
What are technological searches?
In assessing the validity of a search incident to arrest involving things that did not exist when the Fourth Amendment was adopted (for example, cell phones, blood alcohol tests), the court will balance the degree to which the search incident to arrest intrudes upon a person’s privacy against the degree to which the search is needed to promote legitimate governmental interests.
a. DUI Arrest Justifies Breath (But Not Blood) Test
Contemporaneous with an arrest for intoxicated driving, police officers may administer a warrantless breath test to determine the arrestee’s alcohol levels but may not administer a warrantless blood test. Rationale: A breath test is not very intrusive and leaves no lasting sample with the government, while a blood test requires piercing the skin and leaves the government with a genetic sample. As a corollary, violation of an implied consent law (that is, a law providing that by driving on the roads a driver impliedly consents to a blood test if stopped for intoxicated driving) can be punished civilly (for example, suspension of license) but not criminally.
b. Physical Attributes of Cell Phone May Be Searched But Not Data
Because of their strong interest in assuring that arrestees do not have weapons or contraband, police officers my examine the physical attributes of a person’s cell phone upon arrest. However, officers may not examine the data on a cell phone without a warrant since it cannot be used as a weapon.
What is a search incident to incarceration or impoundment?
At the police station, the police may make an inventory search of the arrestee’s belongings pursuant to established department procedure. Similarly, the police may make an inventory search of an impounded vehicle.
What is the automobile exception?
If the police have probable cause to believe that a vehicle contains fruits, instrumentalities, or evidence of a crime, they may search the whole vehicle and any container that might reasonably contain the item for which they had probable cause to search. If a warrantless search of a vehicle is valid, the police may tow the vehicle to the station and search it later. However, if the vehicle is parked within the curtilage (for example, the driveway) of a suspect’s home, the police may not search the vehicle without a warrant.
Note: If the police have probable cause to believe that an automobile itself is contraband, they may seize it from a public place without a warrant.
What happens to a passengers belongings?
The search may extend to packages belonging to a passenger; it is not limited to the driver’s belongings.
What happens to containers placed in a vehicle?
If the police have probable cause only to search a container in a vehicle (for example, luggage recently placed in the trunk), they may search only the container, not other parts of the vehicle.
What is the probable cause needed to search a car?
The probable cause necessary to justify the warrantless search of an auto under the automobile exception can arise after the car is stopped, but the probable cause must arise before anything or anybody is searched.
What is plain view?
The police may make a warrantless seizure when they:
• Are legitimately on the premises
• Discover evidence, fruits or instrumentalities of crime, or contraband
• See such evidence in plain view; and
• Have probable cause to believe (that is, it must be immediately apparent) that the item is evidence, contraband, or a fruit or instrumentality of crime
What is consent?
A warrantless search is valid if the police have a voluntary consent. Knowledge of the right to withhold consent is not a prerequisite to establishing a voluntary consent. The scope of the search may be limited by the scope of the consent, but generally extends to all areas to which a reasonable person under the circumstances would believe it extends.
Who has the authority to give consent?
Any person with an apparent equal right to use or occupy the property may consent to a search, and any evidence found may be used against the other owners or occupants. However, an occupant cannot give valid consent to a search when a co-occupant is present and objects to the search and the search is directed against the co-occupant. If a co-occupant has objected to a search and is removed for a reason unrelated to the refusal (for example, a lawful arrest), the police may act on consent of the remaining occupant, even if the removed co-occupant had refused consent.
What is stop and frisk?
A Terry stop is a brief detention for the purpose of investigating suspicious conduct. A Terry frisk is a patdown of the outer clothing and body to check for weapons.