Fourth Amendment Flashcards

1
Q

What type of conduct does the 4th amendment apply to?

A

Applies ONLY to government conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What triggers the 4th amendment?

A

Triggering the Fourth Amendment: Identifying a Seizure or Search

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

4th amendment: What is a Seizure of a person?

A

Seizure of Persons: When, due to government action, a reasonable person in the defendant’s position would not feel free to leave or terminate a police encounter

 (1) Police need to use physical force OR a showing of authority followed by submission
 (2) Terry Stop: A brief investigatory seizure. The difference with arrest is duration and purpose. The permissible duration is the time necessary to confirm a REASONABLE SUSPICION that a crime has occurred; if so, police now have probable cause (PC). If suspicion is denied, seizure must stop
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

4th amendment: What is a Seizure of property?

A

Seizure of Property: Police take action that results in a meaningful interference with a possessory interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

4th amendment: What is a search?

A

Any government investigatory trespass against a Fourth Amendment interest OR intrusion into a reasonable expectation of privacy (REP)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

4th amendment: Search

Investigatory trespass

A

Intrusion upon target’s person, home (including curtilage), papers, or effects for the purpose of finding or gathering evidence of a crime. Police need an investigatory motive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

4th amendment: Search

Reasonable Expectation of Privacy (REP)

A

This requires that:
(1) the defendant manifests a subjective expectation of privacy by making an effort to shield the thing or activity from the public; AND

(2) the expectation is objectionably reasonable because it is an expectation society is willing to recognize
(a) No REP if objects are held out to the public (i.e., handwriting, voice, bank records, email headings, open fields, or discarded property)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Key Point

A

a trespass on an “open field” (private property beyond the curtilage of the home) does not qualify as an investigatory trespass-type search because the open field is not considered part of the home

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Key Point

A

unlike the trespass search, the REP approach is not limited to the places/things enumerated in the text of the 4th amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Exam tip!

A

the SC has held that even though cell site location information is shared with the cell phone provider, it nonetheless falls within a REP because there is no genuine voluntary choice to share such information

this means police access to cell site location information is a search

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Police use of Animals to Enhance senses

A

normally, the use of sensory enhancements does not transform something that is not a search into a search

when police use dogs to detect odor of narcotics, this is not a search because a dog sniff is considered capable of exposing only the presence of contraband, and therefore does not intrude on a legitimate expectation of privacy

HOWEVER, if police bring the dog onto the curtilage of the home and allow it to explore for a scent, this physical trespass of the home qualifies as a search

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Police use of Devices to enhance senses

A

Use of commonly available equipment to enhance the natural senses of sight, hearing, or smell will not qualify as a search unless:
• police enter upon the curtilage of the home to utilize the device; or
• police use a device (like a thermal imager) that enables them to see “through the walls” of a home.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Exam tip!

A

Using binoculars while sitting in a police car on the street to enhance the view of a suspect’s property or activities on his curtilage is not a search. However, using a thermal or x-ray imaging device that reveals the location of property or activities the suspect sought to conceal inside their home is a search.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A search or seizure must be?

A

REASONABLE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

A warrant creates a presumption of….?

A

REASONABLENESS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The D bears the burden of?

A

Rebutting this presumption of reasonableness by proving:

i) the warrant was not based on valid probable cause;
ii) the magistrate was not neutral or detached;
iii) the warrant failed to describe with particularity the thing to be seized or place to be searched; or
iv) the affidavit

Any search or seizure without a warrant is presumptively unreasonable; the government bears the burden of proving that it falls within an established exception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Key Point

A

When police act within the scope of a valid warrant, they may seize any item they observe so long as what they see, smell, or feel provides probable cause that the item is contraband, even if it is not listed in the warrant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is Probable Cause?

A
Probable Cause (PC): “Fair probability.” Facts and circumstances that would make a reasonable person conclude that the individual in question has committed a crime (for an arrest) or that specific items related to criminal activity can be found at a particular location
i)	Always required for full-scale intrusion (search to find evidence or an arrest)

ii) Can be based on a tip from a confidential or anonymous informant. The totality of the circumstances test used for the reliability of tips considers:
(1) the veracity of the informant (normally predictive information);
(2) the basis of their knowledge (how does the informant know the activities of the suspect?); and
(3) a police investigation that corroborates the facts in the tip and validates the accuracy of the informant’s predictions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is Reasonable Suspicion?

A

A belief based upon articulable information (more than a mere hunch) used by a reasonable person or cop that the suspect has or is about to engage in illegal or criminal activity
i) Reasonable suspicion is a level of certainty that will justify only a brief investigatory seizure (Terry stop) or cursory protective search (Terry frisk)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are the exceptions to the warrant requirement for SEIZURES? (3)

A
  • arrests
  • Terry Stops
  • Seizures of property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What are the exceptions to the warrant requirement for SEARCHES? (10)

A
  • Exigency
  • SITLA
  • Automobile SITLA
  • Automobile Exception to the warrant requirement
  • Inventory Exception
  • Consent
  • Special Needs Doctrine
  • Border Exception
  • Administrative Searches
  • Terry Frisk/ Search
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Exception to the warrant requirement for seizures

Terry Stops

A

Reasonable suspicion that a crime is in progress or has just been committed justifies a brief investigatory seizure (Terry stop) to confirm or rule out suspicion

 i) Established by:
      (1) police observations and eyewitness reports;
      (2) flight from police in high-crime areas; and
      (3) an informant’s tip plus police investigation that corroborates the tip (don’t need insider access)
ii) Scope: Time required, acting in due diligence to confirm or deny suspicion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Exception to the warrant requirement for seizures

Seizures of Property

A

A warrant (based on PC) is presumptively, but not always, required to justify seizure of property

 i) No warrant is required if the property is in plain view, which requires:
      (1) the police are in a lawful vantage point to observe the item;
     (2) it is immediately apparent that the item is contraband; and
      (3) the officer has lawful access to the point of seizure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Warrant Execution

A

o Even when police act pursuant to a valid warrant, how they execute it may render their action unreasonable.
-Warrant execution that “shocks the conscience” is unreasonable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Knock-and-announce Rule

A

 Police must “knock and announce” their identity before entering the home to execute the warrant.
 Knock and announce is NOT required if the police have a reasonable suspicion that doing so will endanger the officers, lead to destruction of evidence, or cause the flight of the suspect.
 Violation of the knock-and-announce requirement will not result in exclusion of evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What do you need to issue a warrant?

A

o The Fourth Amendment requires that probable cause to support issuance of a valid search or arrest warrant be given to any neutral magistrate.
o Probable cause (PC) means a “fair probability,” and exists when there are facts and circumstances that lead a reasonable officer (objective standard) to conclude that the individual committed a crime (for an arrest) or that specific items related to criminal activity can be found at a particular location (for a search).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What do you need to issue a warrant?

A

o The Fourth Amendment requires that probable cause to support issuance of a valid search or arrest warrant be given to any neutral magistrate.
o Probable cause (PC) means a “fair probability,” and exists when there are facts and circumstances that lead a reasonable officer (objective standard) to conclude that the individual committed a crime (for an arrest) or that specific items related to criminal activity can be found at a particular location (for a search).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

How is probable cause tested?

A

PC is tested objectively based on facts and circumstances; a police officer’s subjective motive, even if improper, will not invalidate PC.
 PC may be established in many ways, including eyewitness observations, forensic evidence, or a suspect’s own admissions.
 When police rely on an informant’s tip to establish PC, a totality of circumstances test is used to determine whether the tip is sufficiently reliable.
• The tip may serve as a basis for a valid probable cause arrest if reliability is established by:
o the informant’s tip containing specific details; and
o the reliability of both the details and the informant being confirmed prior to the moment of arrest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Exam tip!

A

Corroborating a prediction that any neighbor with an “axe to grind” could make to the police (like the car someone drives, the route they take to work, or the time they normally leave every day) does not indicate that the informant really knows anything about the suspect’s criminal activities, and therefore normally will not establish probable cause.

30
Q

Exam tip!

A

Remember that any search or seizure without a warrant is presumptively unreasonable, meaning the government bears the burden of proving that it falls within an established exception. Therefore, if the fact pattern indicates a search or seizure without a warrant, you must determine whether an established exception is indicated by the facts.

31
Q

Exam tip!

A

Reasonable suspicion (RS) is a quantum of individualized suspicion that is not as strong as probable cause (PC), but which is more than a hunch or instinct. RS requires that the officer be able to articulate an objective fact that supports their experience-based instinct or suspicion. Because this is a standard of cause lower than PC, it justifies only a much more limited police action: a brief investigatory seizure (Terry stop) or cursory protective search (Terry frisk).

32
Q

Exam tip!

A

Reasonable suspicion is best remembered as the addition of an objective fact to the police officer’s subjective instinct-based suspicion that corroborates that suspicion. Doing so permits a reviewing court to assess whether the police officer has a “particularized and objective basis” for suspecting legal wrongdoing.

33
Q

Exam tip!

A

Remember, if the RS that led to the Terry stop grows into PC during the stop, the suspect may then be arrested.

34
Q

Routine Police encounter

A

o If a police encounter in no way restrains the freedom of the individual (i.e., there is no use of force or show of authority followed by submission), it does not trigger the Fourth Amendment and requires no cause.

35
Q

Plain View

A

o A warrant based on PC is presumptively required to authorize a seizure of property.
o However, it is common for police to seize property based on the plain view exception to the warrant requirement.
o The plain view exception allows police to seize property they observe in public or while acting within the scope of an otherwise lawful search.
 In such situations, it is not “reasonable” to require the officer to stop and secure a warrant in order to seize the property.

36
Q

Exam tip!

A

Remember, plain view never authorizes a search. If the officer must search to find the item, the search must be lawful based on a warrant or some other exception (like exigency or consent).

37
Q

Searches Pursuant to a Warrant

A

A warrant gives police authority to search only the named places or people

i) Contraband not named can be seized if in plain view
ii) Police have the right to detain occupants during the search (but not the right to search them)

38
Q

Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement for Searches

Warrantless Searches: Exigency

A

i) Exigent Circumstances: A warrantless search is permissible when waiting to obtain a warrant would result in the imminent destruction of evidence, escape of the accused, or risk to police or others in the area
(1) This justifies a warrantless search and seizure of evidence in or on a suspect’s body if police have PC to believe that the nature of evidence renders it easily destroyed or likely to disappear before a warrant can be obtained
(a) Needs to be reasonable and not shock the conscious

 (2)	An exigency justifies a warrantless crime scene search to seek other victims, remaining killers, or violent felons

 (3) Hot Pursuit: Police may enter and search a private dwelling while in hot pursuit of a fleeing suspect
      (a) They may execute a warrantless arrest of the suspect on the premises and seize any contraband observed in plain view pursuant to the hot pursuit
39
Q

Exam tip!

A

Remember that if the police are lawfully in a location, they may seize any evidence they observe if they have PC that it is contraband pursuant to the plain view doctrine.

40
Q

Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement for Searches

Warrantless Searches:

SITLA

A

Upon a lawful arrest (based on PC), police can automatically search the arrestee AND the area within their immediate control (wingspan or lunging distance)
(1) Search must be contemporaneous

(2) If arrested at home, the search is limited to the area within lunging distance, and police have no authority to search the entire house
      (a) If police have RS that other people are home, and may put the police at risk, they can conduct a cursory protective sweep, but ONLY where people could fit

 (3) If arrested in or right out of a car, police can automatically search the person
       (a) If the arrestee has genuine access to the interior of the car after arrest, police can search the car interior and all containers within the interior
      (b) If the arrestee has no genuine access to the interior of the car, police can only check the car if they have a reasonable belief that evidence related to the crime of arrest may be found there
41
Q

Exam tip!

A

This means a law or policy that allows police to automatically conduct a warrantless blood draw to preserve blood-alcohol evidence is overbroad and violates the Fourth Amendment; exigency requires a case-by-case assessment.

42
Q

Exam tip!

A

Any contraband discovered while searching within the permissible scope of the SITLA (or protective sweep) may be seized and used as evidence, even if it is completely unrelated to the arrest.

43
Q

Exam tip!

A

Remember, an officer may have PC, but may also make a reasonable mistake. If an officer conducts an arrest based on PC and discovers evidence during the SITLA, and it later turns out they arrested the wrong suspect, the search is still reasonable so long as the mistake was “objectively reasonable.”

However, if a reviewing court concludes there was no PC to support the arrest, any contraband seized during the SITLA will be excluded.

44
Q

Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement for Searches

Warrantless Searches:

Automobile Exception

A

(1) Justified by the inherent mobility and reduced expectation of privacy
(2) Applies to all containers within the vehicle where the item could be found for which probable cause exists
(3) Police can also impound the car and search it later

45
Q

Exam tip!

A

Do not confuse this “automobile” exception with the SITLA of an automobile. Both the trigger and the scope for each is very different.

46
Q

Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement for Searches

Warrantless Searches:

Inventory Exception

A

o administrative inspection of an impounded vehicle and/or an arrestee’s property once it is taken into police custody, with no requirement for a warrant or probable cause.
o normally reasonable so long as the police comply with their inventory regulation(s).
 justification is to protect arrestee’s property from theft or destruction, protect the government from false claims, and prevent contraband from entering the prison or impound lot.
o Police may inventory the arrestee’s possessions.
o Police may inventory the contents of an impounded automobile if authorized by regulation.

47
Q

Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement for Searches

Warrantless Searches:

Consent

A

If the individual waives their right to privacy by consenting to the search, the search is reasonable even if the police have no suspicion

(1) Must be voluntary (based on the totality of the circumstances)
(a) Consent is invalid if obtained:
(i) by asserting a fake warrant;
(ii) fraudulently;
(iii) under duress; or
(iv) pursuant to an unlawful police threat

 (b)	If the consent is obtained following an unlawful seizure, it is tainted, and the consent and any evidence obtained from the search are invalid
48
Q

Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement for Searches

Warrantless Searches:

3rd Party Consent

A

Any person who has joint control or use of shared premises may consent to a valid search, and any evidence obtained may be used against all residents

 (a) Applies to common areas, but not where the defendant has exclusive control
 (b) Police reliance on consent is reasonable if the person has actual authority or a reasonable officer would believe that the person had authority
      (i) Cannot rely on third-party consent when the other party is present and objecting
49
Q

Exam tip!

A

Remember, the reason police often ask for consent is so that they can get plain view!

50
Q

Exam tip!

A

Denying an officer consent may make the officer suspicious, but it does NOT provides probable cause or even reasonable suspicion to seize or search the individual.

51
Q

Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement for Searches

Warrantless Searches:

Special Needs Doctrine

A

Police can use checkpoints to conduct brief seizures or limited searches without any individualized suspicion or warrant because of a danger to the public safety that cannot be addressed by complying with warrant requirements

(1) Primary purpose must be need to search or seize to protect public from immediate danger
(2) The stops or seizures must be:
(a) based on a fixed formula that deprives individual officers of discretion to select subjects;
(b) narrowly tailored in scope to address the specific threat; and
(c) conducted in a location and manner that minimizes citizen anxiety
(3) Can seize contraband that comes into plain view even if unrelated to public safety concern

52
Q

Exam tip!

A

A present and objecting co-tenant prevails over another co-tenant who gives police consent to search. However, that objection has no “lingering” effect; if the objecting co-tenant leaves or is removed by police for a lawful reason (like being arrested), the subsequent consent to search by the other co-tenant is valid.

53
Q

Exam tip!

A

If the facts indicate that the police are just hoping to find evidence, they may not use a special needs program to do so, as the goal is indistinguishable from general crime control. If the facts indicate that they seek to rule out danger to the public, then they may.

54
Q

Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement for Searches

Warrantless Searches:

Terry Search (Frisk)

A

Police may conduct a cursory protective search for weapons or some other instrumentality that creates imminent danger to the officer or others in close proximity

(1) Justified only by RS that the suspect is armed and dangerous
(a) It is a protective search, not a generalized search for evidence

(2) Limited to the suspect’s outer clothing to confirm or deny that the suspect is armed

(3) If the frisk / pat down results in the officer feeling something he knows immediately is a weapon or other contraband, the officer may seize it without a warrant pursuant to “plain touch” (a variant of plain view)
(a) If the officer knows it is not a weapon and has to manipulate it to establish PC to seize it, this exceeds the scope and is unreasonable

(4) Cars: A brief, cursory look in a car where police have RS that the person stopped will have immediate access to a weapon after getting back in car is permitted
(5) Home: A cursory sweep of a home is permitted based on a RS that others may be present and endanger the officer

55
Q

Exam tip!

A

Because a special needs stop is a seizure, if it is unreasonable (that is, not based on a valid special needs justification), any evidence it leads to will be tainted by the stop. However, if it is reasonable, any subsequent search or seizure will be unaffected by the stop, even if the evidence is unrelated to the special need.

56
Q

Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement for Searches

Warrantless Searches:

Administrative Searches

A

These searches are conducted for non-criminal purpose and so justify a lower standard of cause
(1) These are often agency compliance inspections, and so justified by RS

57
Q

Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement for Searches

Warrantless Searches:

Administrative Searches: Airport Screenings

A

In order to protect airline passengers from weapons and explosives, screenings are permitted based on individualized suspicion.
• There is no constitutional right to travel by commercial air. As a result, travelers implicitly consent to these screenings.

58
Q

Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement for Searches

Warrantless Searches:

Border Searches

A

Customs and immigration officers may stop people and vehicles at permanent checkpoints at or near border (up to 100 miles inland) and conduct routine searches of people and property with no individualized suspicion (randomly). Applies to all international ports of entry, including international airports.

 (1) RS is required for:
      (a) “non-routine” border searches (i.e., unusually intrusive searches, like body cavity search) or a search that results in permanent destruction of property; and
      (b) Roving border stops on U.S. roads.
59
Q

Fourth Amendment Remedies—Standing and the Exclusionary Rule- 3 requirements for Exclusion of Evidence

A

Three requirements for exclusion of evidence:

i) an unreasonable search or seizure must trigger the remedy exclusion;
ii) the defendant claiming the remedy (seeking exclusion) must have standing; and
iii) the facts do not support applying an exception to the exclusionary rule

60
Q

Fourth Amendment Remedies:

Standing

A

The defendant must show that an unreasonable search or seizure intruded on their personal constitutional rights. Cannot assert someone else’s constitutional rights

i) A defendant has standing to invoke the exclusionary rule when:
(1) they have an ownership or possessory interest in the place searched or item seized;
(a) The owner of a car, or person in possession of a car, has standing to seek exclusion of evidence obtained as the result of an unreasonable search of the car
(2) they are unreasonably seized by police; or
(3) they are an overnight (or longer) social guest at someone else’s house

61
Q

Exam tip!

A

Only where the facts indicate that the government illegality intruded upon the defendant’s Fourth Amendment protection (i.e., it was a trespass of their home, papers, or effects; a search violating their REP; or a seizure of their property) will the court allow the defendant to invoke the exclusionary rule. So, be careful not to make the mistake of choosing an answer that applies the exclusionary rule to evidence that the police obtained in violation of a third party’s Fourth Amendment rights.

62
Q

Fourth Amendment Remedies:

Exclusionary Rule

A

If all three requirements are met, a defendant can invoke the exclusionary rule to prohibit the government from introducing evidence obtained as a direct or derivative result of an unreasonable search and seizure

63
Q

Fourth Amendment Remedies:

Exclusionary Rule: Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine

A

Any additional evidence derived from initial illegality, including oral statements and physical objects, falls within the scope of the exclusionary rule and is tainted fruit of the poisonous tree

64
Q

Fourth Amendment Remedies:

Exclusionary Rule: Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine EXCEPTIONS

A

(1) EXCEPTIONS: Although inadmissible as fruit of the poisonous tree, the taint can be purged and evidence admitted if one of the following exceptions applies:
(a) Independent Source: Evidence is obtained from a lawful source independent of the original illegality

 (b)	Inevitable Discovery: Evidence that is obtained through a poisonous tree will still be admissible if the police establish that they would have inevitably discovered the evidence through a different independent source

 (c) Attenuation: Evidence so distant from the initial illegality that the poisonous taint is purged and the evidence is admissible. Factors to consider include:
      (i) whether it was obtained from a different location;
      (ii) the passage of time;
      (iii) different officers obtained the evidence; and
     (iv) there was a valid Miranda waiver
65
Q

Exam tip!

A

Remember that if the facts indicate an individual was seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment, any evidence that seizure leads to is presumptively inadmissible as fruit of a poisonous tree.

66
Q

Exam tip!

A

Ask whether the “poisonous tree” (constitutional violation) was planted in the defendant’s constitutional turf (so that they have standing to object). In other words, think of this as fruit of HIS or HER poisonous tree.

67
Q

Exam tip!

-inevitable discovery

A

Think of this exception as an “almost” independent source. The police would have inevitably found the evidence independently, but did so through the poisonous tree.

68
Q

Exam tip!

-attenuation

A

It is easier to attenuate the taint of an arrest that is unlawful because the police failed to obtain a required warrant even though they had probable cause (like an in-home arrest without a warrant) than it is to attenuate the taint from an arrest where the police did not even have probable cause. This is because the “poison” from the first violation is less potent than the “poison” from the second violation.

69
Q

Other limitations to the exclusionary rule:

Impeachment

A

The exclusionary rule does not apply to the use of tainted evidence to impeach the defendant’s testimony

70
Q

Other limitations to the exclusionary rule:

Good-Faith Exception

A

When police act in good faith on a warrant that is later ruled invalid, the evidence is not excluded

71
Q

Exam tip!

A

Warrants are usually issued by magistrates based on their conclusion of whether the evidence presented is sufficient to establish probable cause. Motions to exclude that evidence are presented to the trial court, which then reviews the warrant application in order to determine whether the magistrate made a proper determination of probable cause. Sometimes, the trial court determines that the magistrate made a mistake in issuing the warrant because of a lack of probable cause. However, so long as a reasonable officer would have still relied on the warrant, then evidence will be admissible.