Forum Selection Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is personal jurisdiction?

A

The ability of a court to exercise its power over a particular defendant or piece of property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the two step personal jurisdiction analysis?

A

(1) the forum state’s statute must be satisfied

(2) the Constitutional (due process) requirements must be satisfied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the five situations under which state statutes usually grant their courts personal jurisdiction?

A

(1) defendant is voluntarily present in the forum state and is personally served
(2) defendant is domiciled in the forum state
(3) defendant is a citizen of the United States (unclear extent of this)
(4) defendant consents to jurisdiction
(5) defendant comes within the long-arm statute of the forum state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How do you handle the state statutory personal jurisdiction element on the MBE/MEE?

A

Because each state is free to have its own personal jurisdiction statute, they are not testable on the MBE (usually are the same as the Constitutional test anyway). On the MEE, all that is necessary is to mention the requirement of a state statute before moving on to the Constitutional analysis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the Constitutional personal jurisdiction analysis?

A

Does the defendant have “such minimum contacts with the forum so jurisdiction does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice”? This is determined by application of three factors: contact, relatedness, and fairness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the contacts requirement for personal jurisdiction?

A

There must be relevant contact between the defendant and the forum state based on two factors:

(1) purposeful availment – the contacts are not accidental, but rather the defendant purposefully availed themselves of the privilege of conducting activity in the state
(2) foreseeability – defendant must know or reasonably anticipate that their activities in the forum render it foreseeable that they be brought into court there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How is purposeful availment determined in stream of commerce cases?

A

Generally, persona jurisdiction over a defendant if the defendant, in addition to placing a product in the stream of commerce, knows or hopes a product will wind up in a particular forum and does some other act to show intent to serve a particular state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How is purposeful availment determined in internet cases?

A

The maintenance of a passive website, without further activity in the forum state, is insufficient for general jurisdiction, but may be sufficient for specific jurisdiction where the defendant targets readers within the forum.

The maintenance of an active website may be sufficient if the forum has general jurisdiction over the defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the relatedness factor?

A

Where the plaintiff’s claim is related to the defendant’s contacts with the forum, then the court is more likely to find jurisdiction fair. If this is not the case, jurisdiction will only be fair if there is general jurisdiction (defendant could be sued in that forum for anything they did anywhere/they are “at home” in the forum).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the difference between specific and general jurisdiction?

A

Specific: plaintiff’s claim is related to the defendant’s contacts with the forum,

General: defendant is “at home” in the jurisdiction and can be sued there about anything they do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Where is a person “at home”/subject to general personal jurisdiction?

A

A human is “at home” in the forum where they are domiciled – where they maintain their permanent home

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Where is a corporation subject to general personal jurisdiction?

A

Corporations are subject to general jurisdiction in the state where they are incorporated and the state in which they have their principal place of business

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When and how are fairness factors analyzed in personal jurisdiction analysis?

A

Fairness is only analyzed in specific jurisdiction cases, and uses three factors:

(1) the burden on the defendant and witnesses (does not need to be the most convenient forum for the defendant – constitutionally acceptable unless defendant can show a severe disadvantage in the litigation)
(2) the state’s interest (if the plaintiff is a citizen, the forum state has a strong interest in providing a courtroom for citizens harmed by out-of-staters)
(3) the plaintiff’s interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is in rem jurisdiction?

A

Presence of property in state is constitutionally sufficient
(applicable to distribution of estate assets, condemnation proceedings, etc)
No in rem where property is out of state or brought in state by force
Notice required to interested parties whose addresses are known

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is quasi in rem jurisdiction?

A

Two types:

(1) disputes between parties over their rights to property in the state: apply minimum contacts and connection between litigation and contact is sufficient
(2) Disputes unrelated to property: apply minimum contacts but mere presence of property in state not enough, there must be more – e.g., sufficient contacts such that personal jurisdiction over defendant would be proper

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is defendant entitled to in addition to personal jurisdiction?

A

Notice – as a Constitutional matter, must be “reasonably calculated under all circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the action”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What does notice consist of in a typical lawsuit?

A

Service of process: (1) a summons (formal court notice and time for response) and (2) a copy of the complaint

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Who can serve process?

A

Any nonparty who as at least 18 years old

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

When should process be served?

A

For parties in US, no more than 90 days after filing. Can only be extended for good cause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

How can process be served on an individual in the United States?

A

(1) Personal service – process server personally delivers to the defendant at any location
(2) Substituted service – process server serves it at the defendant’s usual abode on someone of suitable age and discretion who resides there
(3) Service on agent – process server can deliver the process to the defendant’s agent if receiving service is in the scope of their agency
(4) By any other means of serving process permitted by either the state law in which the federal court sits or where service is made (e.g., if state law allows for service by mail)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

How can process be served on a business or organization in the United States?

A

(1) delivery to an officer, managing or general agent

(2) any methods permissible by state law in which federal court sits or where service is made

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

How can process be served on a minor or incompetent in the United States?

A

Any method permitted by the state law where the service is to be made

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

How can process be served in a foreign country?

A

As directed by the American court, or, where reasonably calculated to give notice:

(1) method allowed under the law of the foreign country
(2) method directed by a foreign official in response to a letter of request by the American court
(3) personal service in the foreign country unless prohibited by its law
(4) mail sent by the clerk of the American court requiring signed receipt unless prohibited by its law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

When/how is service of process waived?

A

Plaintiff can mail the defendant a notice and request to waive formal service including a copy of the complaint and 2 copies of a waiver and a prepaid return envelope. If the defendant executes and returns the waiver in 30 days (60 if outside US), then formal service of process is waived. P files the waiver in court and it becomes effective. This does not waive a subsequent defense of lack of personal jurisdiction.

If defendant does not return the waiver form, they must pay the cost of subsequent formal service of process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

How is service of process proved?

A

The process server files a report with court. Civilian servers file by affidavit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Does failure to file an affidavit of service affect the validity of service?

A

no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

When is a party immune from service of process?

A

If defendant’s presence in the state of service is as a party, witness, or attorney in a different civil case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What is the geographic reach of service of process?

A

Process may be served in the state in which the federal court sits and outside the state to the extent state law allows

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

How are other documents besides process served?

A

Other pleadings, motions and discovery get served but do not require formal service or summons. Usually done by delivery or mail to the party or attorney. Can be by mail if the party agrees. Service by mail is deemed complete when mailed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

How much time does a party have to respond to served documents (other than process) if response is necessary?

A

30 days. Plus an extra 3 if the requests were mailed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What if a defendant’s agent is served but fails to notify the defendant?

A

if the agent was appointed by plaintiff under a contractual right benefiting the plaintiff or if the appointment is by operation of law, then failure to notify prohibits jurisdiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What is the notice requirement for cases involving multiple or unknown parties?

A

best practical means available
if certified mail used and returned unopened, then plaintiff cannot proceed where other practical means of notification exist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

What is subject-matter jurisdiction and what are the two types in federal court?

A

The court’s jurisdiction over the case (not the parties)

(1) Diversity of citizenship
(2) Federal question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Can parties consent to subject matter jurisdiction?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

What are the requirements for diversity of citizenship jurisdiction?

A

(1) Complete diversity at the time of filing (every plaintiff must be from a different state than every defendant)
(2) amount in controversy exceeds 75,000 exclusive of interest and costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

When is diversity of citizenship determined?

A

at the time of filing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

What is alienage jurisdiction?

A

A form of diversity jurisdiction: a suit between a U.S. citizen and an alien (no federal jurisdiction for suits between aliens though they may appear as additional parties on both sides of a controversy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Is alienage permitted if a green card holder is domiciled in the same state as a litigant on the other side of the case?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

How is a natural person’s citizenship determined?

A

The permanent home to which they intend to return/domicile (child has same citizenship as parents)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

How do you establish new domicile?

A

(1) physical presence in a new place

(2) intent to make it your home for the foreseeable future

41
Q

Are DC, Guam and Puerto Rico states for the purpose of diversity jurisdiction?

A

yes

42
Q

How is a corporation’s citizenship established?

A

a citizen of:

(1) every US state and foreign country where incorporated and
(2) the one state or country where it has its principal place of business (this is its “nerve center” or the place from which its high level officers direct, control and coordinate activities - usually HQ)

43
Q

In a suit between a corporation that is simultaneously an alien and a US citizen and another alien, is there alienage jurisdiction?

A

No, even if the corporation is also a US citizen

44
Q

How is a partnership’s citizenship determined?

A

The partnership is a citizen of every state in which a partner (either general or limited) is a citizen

45
Q

How is an LLC or other non-incorporated business association’s citizenship determined?

A

A citizen of each state in which a member is a citizen

46
Q

How is the citizenship of a decedent, a minor, or an incompetent determined?

A

The citizenship used is of the minor, decedent, or incompetent, not their legal representative

47
Q

How is the citizenship diversity of a class action determined?

A

Diversity determined on the basis of the named plaintiffs

48
Q

Can parties use devices like assignment to establish diversity jurisdiction?

A

no – sham transactions will be looked through and diversity will not exist (can create diversity through proper selection of named plaintiffs in a class action)

49
Q

What is the effect of realignment of interests on diversity?

A

In determining whether diversity exists, the court looks beyond nominal designations of parties in the pleadings and realigns them according to true interest. Can create or destroy diversity.

50
Q

How does the court align shareholder derivative actions in determining diversity?

A

Court realigns corporation as a defendant for diversity purposes.

51
Q

How is the amount in controversy determined?

A

It must exceed 75K exclusive of costs and interest. Plaintiff’s good faith claim is sufficient unless it is clear to a legal certainty that they could not recover in excess of 75K

52
Q

May a plaintiff aggregate their claims against a single defendant to achieve the amount in controversy?

A

Yes, 2+ claims may be aggregated to meet the amount requirement, even if factually unrelated

53
Q

How is the amount in controversy element determined in seeking equitable relief?

A

Two tests - if either is met, usually okay:

  • Does the harm decrease the value of plaintiff’s property by more than $75,000?
  • Would it cost defendant more than $75,000 to comply with the injunction?
54
Q

What categories of case will courts not hear even if diversity/alienage requirements are correctly met?

A

Divorce, alimony, child custody or probate proceedings

55
Q

What is federal question jurisdiction?

A

Federal courts have jurisdiction over all actions arising under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the US

56
Q

What is the well-pleaded complaint rule?

A

The federal question must appear as part of the cause of action in the plaintiff’s well-pleaded complaint (the claim itself must “arise under” federal law. The possibility of an anticipated federal law or Constitutional defense is not sufficient to confer federal question jurisdiction

57
Q

Does the fact that an incorporated party was incorporated by an act of Congress confer federal question jurisdiction?

A

No unless the US owns more than 1/2 of the corporation’s capital stock

58
Q

Is it essential to federal question jurisdiction that there be an express civil cause of action in the federal statute?

A

no, it can be implied

59
Q

What is removal?

A

Defendants sued in state court may remove the case to federal trial court. It is removable if the case could originally have been filed in federal court (jurisdiction determined as of date of removal). If removal improper., the district court must remand.

60
Q

Who may remove a case?

A

Only a defendant. If there is more than one, all properly joined and served defendants must joint in the petition. Separate notices are sufficient. but they all must do it
(Plaintiff can never remove, even if D has filed a counterclaim)

61
Q

To what court does defendant remove?

A

To the federal district “embracing” the state court where the case was filed

62
Q

When may a case be removed by a defendant to federal court?

A

Must remove no later than 30 days from service of the first paper showing that the case is removable (usually service of process)

63
Q

May a defendant remove a separate and independent federal question claim?

A

If a case filed in state court contains a federal question claim and a separate state law claim not covered by diversity or supplemental jurisdiction, then the entire case can be removed to federal court. The federal court must then sever and remand the state law claims. Only the defendants subject to the federal law claims need join in the removal.

64
Q

May diversity for removal purposes be achieved by dismissing a non diverse party?

A

yes

65
Q

What are the limitations on removal in diversity cases?

A

(1) When one of the defendants in a removed diversity case is a citizen of the state in which the state action was brought, the action is not removable.
(2) In a diversity case, there is no available removal more than a year after the case is filed in state court.

66
Q

How do defendants remove cases?

A

No permission needed.

(1) File a notice of removal in federal court stating the grounds of removal (the subject-matter jurisdiction) and attaching all documents served on them in the state action.
(2) Prompt service on adverse parties
(3) Notice of removal in state court

67
Q

What should plaintiff do if they wish to contest removal?

A

If removal was improper for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, plaintiff can move to remand to state court at any point.

If removal was improper for other reasons (procedural failures), plaintiff must move to remand no later than 30 days after the notice of removal is filed in federal court or waive the right to remand.

68
Q

What is supplemental jurisdiction?

A

A form of federal subject matter jurisdiction allowing some claims into federal court absent diversity or federal question as pendent claims attached to claims over which the court does have federal question or diversity jurisdiction

69
Q

What is the test for asserting supplemental jurisdiction?

A

RULE/TEST: If you have a case with subject-matter jurisdiction, an additional claim lacking diversity or federal question jurisdiction can get into federal court anyway if it shares a “common nucleus of operative fact” with the claim invoking subject-matter jurisdiction. If the claim arises from the same transaction or occurrence as the underlying case, that will always be sufficient.

EXCEPTION – A huge limitation on this is that, by statute, in a diversity case, claims by plaintiffs can never invoke supplemental jurisdiction. UNLESS – in a multiple plaintiff suit, one party’s claim does not meet the amount in controversy requirement.

70
Q

What is the effect on diversity jurisdiction of a substitution of parties?

A

The citizenship of the substituted party is disregarded and that of the original party controls (e.g., public official substitutes for predecessor officeholder). If the party is replaced because the plaintiff sued the wrong party, this does not apply and the citizenship of the replaced party holds.

71
Q

If the requirements for supplemental jurisdiction are met, does the court have to hear the claim?

A

No, it is discretionary. Can deny on grounds that state law is complex, state law issues would predominate, or the federal claim is dismissed early in the case.

72
Q

What is the Erie doctrine in brief?

A

In diversity cases, the federal judge needs to determine when to rely on state law instead of federal law in determining matters. Erie basically dictates that federal court applies federal procedural law and state substantive law.

73
Q

What are the steps of analysis for the Erie doctrine?

A

(1) Is there federal law on point that directly conflicts with the state law? If yes and valid, the Supremacy Clause dictates that it will be applied.
(2) If there is no on point federal statute or rule, the federal judge must apply state law if it is substantive but may disregard it if it is procedural.
(3) If not clear whether substantive or procedural, the court weighs 3 factors: (1) outcome determinativeness, (2) balance of interests, and (3) avoidance of forum shopping.

74
Q

What matters are clearly substantive for Erie purposes?

A

(1) the elements of a claim or defense
(2) the statute of limitations
(3) rules for tolling statutes of limitations
(4) conflict of laws or choice of laws rules
(5) the standard for whether to grant a new trial based on jury determination of excessive or inadequate damages

**on these three issues, the federal court applies state law

75
Q

What if the state statute to be applied in a diversity case contains both substantive and procedural elements?

A

Apply the state substantive provisions and any federal procedural provisions.

76
Q

What substantive state law is the federal court bound to apply?

A

the substantive state law that would be applied by the highest court of the state

77
Q

On appeal, what standard of review does the federal appellate court apply to the trial court’s decision as to state law?

A

de novo

78
Q

If the highest state court renders a decision on an issue after the federal trial court has made a determination on state law grounds, what may happen?

A

The decision may be changed to conform to the new decision up until disposition of the final appeal

79
Q

What factors determine whether an issue is substantive?

A

(1) outcome determinative test: an issue is substantive if it would substantially affect the outcome of the case if applied or ignored?
(2) balance of interests test: does either the state or federal system have a strong interest in having its rule applied? (state = substantive)
(3) forum shopping deterrence: if the federal court ignores state law, will it cause parties to flock to federal court

80
Q

When do federal courts create substantive rules of federal law (federal common law)?

A

Erie means that there is no general federal common law (torts, contracts, and property are all governed by state law). But federal courts can make their own common law in certain areas where there is no role for state law, like international relations, admiralty, interstate disputes, suits against federal officers to vindicate federal rights, the preclusive effect of a federal judgment.

Can do so when interpreting meaning of statutes and Constitution or where congress has authorized expressly or impliedly for the courts to act as gap-fillers

81
Q

How do courts recognize implied federal rights of action based on a federal statute?

A

Several factors – does the plaintiff belong to a class for whose special benefit the statute was enacted, evidence of legislative intent, whether the remedy would be consistent with underlying purposes, whether the cause of action is traditionally relegated to state law. courts increasingly require affirmative evidence o f legislative intent

82
Q

How do courts recognize implied federal rights of action based on the Constitution?

A

has recognized in many cases – 4A searches/seizures, equal protection, 8A prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. has declined where alternate federal statutory remedies exist

83
Q

What is the Multiparty, Multiforum Trial Jurisdiction Act and what does it require?

A

Applies to accidents in which 75 or more people died from a single accident at a discrete location.These cases require minimal diversity (one plaintiff diverse from one defendant). 1 of 3 conditions must be met:

    • defendant lives in different state from the state where a substantial part of the accident occurred
    • any 2 defendants must reside in different states
  • -substantial parts of the accident must have taken place in different states

LIMITS
– fed courts must abstain even if it meets the criteria above if the substantial majority of all plaintiffs are citizens of the same state of which primary defendants are also citizens and their claims will be governed by the laws of that state

84
Q

When is jurisdiction of the federal courts exclusive of state courts?

A
bankruptcy
patent/copyright
US is a party
actins against foreign states
postal matters
IRS cases
33/34 act cases
85
Q

What is the effect of dismissal of a federal claim on a pendent state claim in a federal question action?

A

may continue to exercise pendent jurisdiction over the state claim even if the federal claim is dismissed on the merits but the state the state claim should probably be dismissed without prejudice if the federal claim was dismissed before trial

86
Q

What is pendent party jurisdiction?

A

can arise where p sues more than 1 defendant and Supp jd required over one of the defendants or where multiple plaintiffs assert a claim against 1 defendant and one of the plaintiffs requires Supp jd

87
Q

What is venue and how is it different from subject matter jurisdiction?

A

SMJ just determines whether the case can be heard in the federal system. Venue determines which federal court is the proper district.

88
Q

Where is venue proper generally?

A

Plaintiff may lay venue in any district where:

(1) any defendant resides if they all live in the same state
(2) a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred or where a substantial amount of the property that is the subject of the action is situation
(3) if neither 1 or 2, then a judicial district in which any defendant is subject to personal jurisdiction

does not matter where the plaintiff lives

89
Q

Where individual defendants reside for the purposes of venue?

A

In any district where domiciled – including alien residents

90
Q

Where do corporate/business defendants reside for the purposes of venue?

A

Resides in any judicial district in which it is subject to personal jurisdiction for this case

91
Q

Where to nonresident defendants reside for purposes of venue?

A

may be sued in any judicial district (disregarded for venue determination purposes if there are other resident defendants)

92
Q

Can improper venue be waived?

A

Yes, if timely objection is not made to improper venue

93
Q

When may proper venue be transferred?

A
    • If venue is proper, it may still be transferred by the original court to any court where it could originally have been filed (SMJ, PJ, and venue) for the convenience of the parties. Usually done by defendant, who by statute bears the burden of showing that public and private factors show that the transferee is the center of gravity
  • *Public - applicable law, what community should be burdened by jury service, desire to keep a local controversy in a local court
  • *Private - convenience (e.g., witness and evidence location)/may be established by valid forum selection clause
94
Q

What if venue is improper?

A

– If venue is improper, a court must dismiss or transfer the case to a proper venue in the interests of justice. Transfer usually more appropriate than dismissal.

95
Q

Can the parties agree to venue transfer?

A

The court can transfer to any district, even an improper venue, if all parties consent and the court finds cause for transfer.

96
Q

What is the effect of a forum selection clause?

A

A provision by which parties agreed to litigate any disputes in a particular forum will be enforced by means of a motion to transfer “in the interests of justice” unless exceptional public interest factors dictate otherwise. Federal law governs transfer, so the court may enforce a valid forum selection clause even if state law would not

97
Q

What law is applicable on transfer?

A

If original venue was proper, apply the law of the transferor state
If original venue was improper, apply the law of the transferee state
If to enforce a forum selection clause, apply the law of the transferee state

98
Q

What is forum non conveniens?

A

The court dismisses or stays the case because a court outside the judicial system is the center of gravity (cannot transfer outside of the judicial system). Use same public/private factors as for transfer
Other court must be available and adequate (plaintiff must be able to get a remedy in that system).