Formulation Flashcards

1
Q

REASONS FOR CHOOSING A DELAYED RELEASE FORMULATION

A

 Drug release in stomach undesirable:
* Drug insoluble or unstable at low pH
* Stomach lining damaged by prolonged contact with drug
* Concentrated drug release needed lower in GI tract
 Achieved by application of an ‘enteric’ coat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

ENTERIC COATING FOR DELAYED DRUG RELEASE
Pharmacopoeial requirements:

A

 Dosage form must remain intact in pH 1.2 simulated gastric fluid in the disintegration apparatus for 30 minutes at 37C (United States Pharmacopoeia)
 Dosage form must remain intact in 0.1M HCl in the disintegration apparatus for 2 hours at 37C (British Pharmacopoeia)
 Dosage form must disintegrate within 1 hour in BP mixed phosphate buffer at pH 6.8
 Diluents (fillers) – increase the volume of the material to accommodate easier processing of the drug and to make suitable size for patient
* Lactose
* Sucrose
* Calcium phosphate
 Binders – cement the active and inert components of tablets together to maintain cohesive and discrete portions
* Polyvinyl pyrollidone (PVP)
* Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC)
* Starch paste
Disintegrant – assist tablets to break up in the GI tract (they swell when wet)
* Starch and derivatives e.g. sodium starch glycollate
* Crosspovidone
* Microcrystalline cellulose
NB: Microcrystalline cellulose can act as filler, binder and disintegrant
Glidants (flow enhancers) – added to powdered materials used in tablet/pill production to aid their movement through tabletting machinery
* Silicon dioxide
 Lubricants – ease the release of compressed tablets from their dies, improving the efficiency of manufacturing
* Metal stearates (e.g. magnesium stearate)
* Fatty acids and alcohols
* Talcum powder
 Added (by blending) as a last step just prior to compressing. Can cause problems with dissolution. If granules get coated with too much they become insoluble Film formers/coatings – used to protect against premature physical break‐up and to prevent unwanted environmental interactions. They can mask bad taste and allow pills to be swallowed easily:
* Polymers and plasticizer
* Shellac
* Sugars
 Printing inks – biologically safe dyes used for printing information or company logos on the surface of tablets or capsules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

WET GRANULATION END POINT CONTROL

A

 High Shear mixers
* Rapid and reproducible moment to switch off
* Viscosity of the mixture is proportional to mixing blade force. Similarly torque on paddle blade or shaft or property of granule
 Controls:
* Time
* Mechanical monitors (torque, rotation, speed)
* Electrical monitors (current, power)
* Sound, conductance, reflectance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

FLUID BED DRYING

A

 At pre-set intervals the drying is stopped and the bag filters are shaken to release product stuck to the fabric
 End Point is by product ΔT (Differential Temp.) on the granule or by exhaust temperature
* PAT using NIR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Common Compression Problems

A
  • Weight control
  • Tablet strength
  • Disintegration time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Weight Control

A
  • Bulk density of granulation
    ➢ Review granulation history
  • Poor flowing
    ➢ Review sizing history
    ➢ Confirm environmental conditions are appropriate
    ➢ Check moisture content
  • Machine issues
    ➢ Appropriate fill cam
    ➢ Proper feed frame set up and operation
  • Erratic weights
    ➢ Check for uniform discharge from feed hopper
    ➢ Evaluate for possible flooding of feed frame
    ➢ Confirm tooling has met specifications and is clean
    ➢ Confirm weight control features on press are working properly
    N.B. Always establish acceptable weight control throughout the batch, especially at Run Out.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Tablet Strength

A
  • Adjust compression force
    ➢ Remember – tablets with low breaking strength may have been over‐compressed.
    Strength may  with compression force 
  • Study how the tablet fractures during hardness testing
    ➢ If the tablet laminates, suspect low moisture, over‐compression, over‐blending, excessive lubricant, etc
  • Is tablet strength being compromised during ejection?
    ➢ Check for ‘rub marks’ on tablet side band
    ➢ Tablet lamination may reflect tooling issues
    ➢ Damaged (hooked) punch tips
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Disintegration

A

Check compression force. Normally too much but sometimes the opposite
* Check lubricant mix times
* Check lubricant quantities
* Double check particle size distribution of granulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

WEIGHT CONTROL – ‘CAN’T GET WEIGHT?’

A

Bulk density of granulation
* Review granulation history
 Poor flowing
* Review sizing history
* Confirm environmental conditions are appropriate
* Check moisture content
 Machine issues
* Appropriate fill cam
* Proper feed frame set up and operation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Erratic weights

A
  • Check for uniform discharge from feed hopper
  • Evaluate for possible flooding of feed frame
  • Confirm tooling has met specifications and is clean
  • Confirm weight control features on press are working properly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

TABLET STRENGTH/HARDNESS – ‘TOO MUCH OR TOO LITTLE?’

A

Adjust compression force
* Remember: Tablets with low breaking strength may have been over-compressed. Strength may  with compression force 
 Study how the tablet fractures during hardness testing
* If the tablet laminates, suspect low moisture, over compression, over-blending, excessive lubricant etc.
 Is tablet strength being compromised during ejection?
* Check for ‘rub marks’ on tablet side band
 Tablet lamination may reflect tooling issues:
* Damaged (hooked) punch tips

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

DISINTEGRATION – ‘TIMES ARE TOO LONG?’

A

Check compression force. Normally too much but sometimes the opposite
 Check lubricant mix times
 Check lubricant quantities
 Double check particle size distribution of granulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Common compression defects

A

 Chipping
 Lamination
 Capping
 Cracking
 Sticking/picking
 Mottled/discoloured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Facility controls:
Warehouse

A

 Access control
* Warehouse personnel
* Other company personnel
* Wagon drivers
 Goods receipt and dispatch areas
 Storage locations
* Groupings by material type
* Returns and rejects
 Pest control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Production facility controls

A

Materials
* Clear flow – IN/OUT
* Use of airlocks

People
* Changing rooms
* Gowning
* Access control
* Handwash

Cross contamination risk
Cross-contamination should be prevented by appropriate design and operation of manufacturing facilities
 The measures should be commensurate with the risks
 Use Quality Risk Management principles to assess and control the risks
 It may be necessary to dedicate premises and equipment for manufacturing and/or packaging operations

Dedicated facilities
Dedicated facilities are required for manufacturing when a medicinal product presents a risk because:
 The risk cannot be adequately controlled by operational and/or technical measures
 Scientific data from the toxicological evaluation does not support a controllable risk
 Relevant residue limits, derived from the toxicological evaluation, cannot be satisfactorily determined by a
validated analytical method

High risk categories
Other antibiotics
 Cytotoxics; particularly low dose materials
 Hormones and certain steroids
 Radio isotopes; health and safety requirements for staff usually mean completely separate facilities
 Narcotics; subject to strict control, e.g. by Home Office in UK
 Other potent or sensitising materials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

GELATINE CAPSULE SUMMARY

A

 Variety of colours, sizes
 Simpler formulations
 Acceptable to patients and easy to use
 Can modify release
 Hard gelatin capsules
* Common dosage form
* Simpler manufacturing process
* Look out for defects
 Soft gelatin capsules
* Used extensively for poorly soluble drugs and oils/lipids
* Specialised manufacturing equipment – longer processing times

17
Q

Tablet coating

A

Sugar coating
 Historically first coating process
 Not used as much today
 Relatively thick coat; >25% tablet weight
 Film coating
 Most common process
 Thin coat; ca. 2% tablet weight

18
Q

Film Coating Materials

A

 Polymer
 Cellulose ethers (HPMC, HPC, MC)
 PVP
 PEGs (high mol weight)
 Plasticiser
 PEGs, glycerine, triethyl citrate
 Glycerol, mineral and vegetable oils
 Colour
 Soluble dyes, pigments (Al lakes, TiO2, iron oxides)
 Natural dyes (riboflavine, carotenoids)
 Solvent
 Water, ethanol, methanol, acetone
 (Methylene chloride)
 Plus?
 Wetting agents
 Flavours
Note: Film coating solutions are a source of microbial growth. They should be freshly prepared (and typically used for up to a maximum of 24 hours as proven by verification/monitoring).

19
Q

Common Coating Faults

A

Colour Variation or Mottling
 Uneven colour
Caused by…
 Too little coating applied
 Inadequate mixing of tablets
 Pan speed too low
 Wrong baffle position
 Poor opacity of solution
 Too few spray guns
 Too many tablets in pan

Roughness or ‘Orange Peel’
 Non‐gloss or dimpled appearance
Caused by…
 Poor atomisation of solution
 Solution viscosity too high
 Solution solids content too high
 Drying temperature too high
 Over‐wetting of tablets
 Too high spray rate

Bridging
 Logo or text debossed on core unreadable
Caused by…
 Design of debossing
 Surface characteristics of tablet
 Lack of porosity
 Hydrophobic ingredients
 Coating solution
 Applied too quickly
 Air in solution
 Viscosity too low

Blistering, Cracking, Splitting and Peeling
 Local detachment of coat
Cracking caused by…
 Expansion of core due to overheating
 Lack of relaxation time following compression
 Poor solution formulation
 Inadequate plasticiser
 Mineral fillers
 Core has different thermal expansion properties to coating solution

Peeling caused by…
 Poor adhesion of coat to tablet core
 Too high spray rate
 Over heating of tablet cores
 Typically above 65°C
 Low mechanical strength of coating

Picking
 Film broken because of adherence to another tablet
Sticking
 Tablets stuck together
Picking and sticking caused by…
 Solution spray rate too high
 Pan speed too low
 Low bed temperature
 Atomisation air pressure too low, leading to poor distribution of coating solution
 Coating of baffles and walls, leading to flaking

Twinning
 Tablets stuck together along edge
Caused by…
 Tablet shape
 Particularly ‘capsule’ shaped tablets
Edge Chipping or Splitting
 Edges chipped, or film broken at tablet edges
Caused by…
 Soft tablet cores
 High friability
 Sharp edges on tablets
 Use punches with deeper concave
 Worn tablet punches
 Pan speed too high
 Spray rate too low
 Coating solution solids content too low

Core Erosion
 Tablet core partially dissolved or eroded
Caused by…
 Soft cores
 High friability
 Core sensitive to moisture
 Pan speed too high
 Spray rate too low
 Try pre‐heating cores
 Start with low rate and then increase

20
Q

COATING PROCESS END POINT

A

 Set quantity of film coating solution/suspension used
 Overall tablet weight gain (%)
 Appearance of film coated tablets

21
Q

Oral solid does finished product testing

A

 Uniformity of Dosage Units
 Uniformity of Content (Assay)
 Uniformity of Mass (weight)
 Disintegration
 Dissolution
 Hardness
 Friability

22
Q

Uniformity of dosage

A

Two Methods
* Content Uniformity
* Calculate Acceptance Value for each from individual assay result
* Mass Variation
* Calculate Acceptance Value from Individual weights using single assay value from the assay test on a composite representative sample

23
Q

Uniformity of content

A

Ph. Eur, USP<905> and JP mostly harmonised
* Applies if content less than 25mg or 25% of tablet weight
* USP also specifies Mass Variation may be used if assay validation has RSD <2%
 Assay individually 10 tablets
 Limits 85 – 115% on 10 tablets but retesting possible if values obtained between 75 – 125%

24
Q

Uniformity of dose

A

Weight of individual 20 tablets
 NMT 2 deviate from average weight by 5, 7.5 or 10% depending on tablet weight
 None deviate by twice percentage

25
Q

Disintegration parameters

A

Crude measure of ‘availability’ of drug
* Raise and lower in water at 37°
* Normally 15 minutes for uncoated tablets

26
Q

Dissolution test

A

May give better link to bioavailability
* Controls batch variability?
* Required in all USP monographs
* Limited in Ph. Eur.
* Enteric coated tablets
* But expected in registration dossiers
Amount dissolved (Q) in time (T) using specified apparatus and conditions
 Calibration and control important
* Physical parameters
* Temperature and composition of media
* Degassing!
* Speed, position, wobble etc. of basket or paddle
* Performance verification
* Mechanical tests
* USP calibrator tablets
* Prednisone, Salicylic Acid
Test carried out on at least 6 tablets
* USP → multi stage acceptable criteria up to 24 tablets
* Ph. Eur. → Q = 75%, T = 45 min. Retest possible if 1 tablet fails
* For enteric coated tablets → 2 stage test
* Acid resistance (0.1M HCL)
* Higher pH buffer

27
Q

Hardness

A

Balance required to give robustness and disintegration
 Electromechanical test equipment
 Calibrate directly or by ‘mechanical tablets’
Multiple designs of tester
* Schleuniger
* Erweka
* CI
 Non destructive by NIR
 Combination instrument
* Hardness
* Thickness
* Diameter
Breaking strength or hardness refers to the force necessary to cause failure of the tablet under load

28
Q

Thickness

A

Important in packaging
* But beware if you register a specification!

29
Q

Friability

A

This is a measure of resistance to abrasion
* Measure of robustness during coating, packaging and use
* Performed on uncoated tablets
For uncoated tablets
* 10 – 20 tablets
* 25±1 rpm for 4 minutes
* NGT 1% mass loss
Measures resistance to abrasion. Perhaps the most important parameter to consider for
forward processing.
Tablets with friabilities approaching 0.5% will be very difficult to coat.

30
Q

Liquid formulations

A

Solution
* Single phase liquid system
* Solvent and solute(s)
 Suspension
* Liquid continuous phase, second suspended solid phase
 Emulsion
* Liquid continuous phase, second emulsified liquid phase

Solution
Solvent
* Aqueous/Non aqueous
 Solute
* Solubility enhancement
 Excipients
* Taste masking

Solvent
Aqueous (water)
* Most common
* Correct quality grade employed
* Purified water
* Chemical and microbiological quality
 Non-aqueous
* Alcohol, glycols,
* Unusual
* Quality important e.g. potable alcohol (ethanol)

Solute
Anything dissolved in solvent
 Solubility enhancement
* pH adjustment
* Co-solvent
* Surfactant solubilisation
* Complexation
 Other excipients
* Buffers
* Tonicity
* Viscosity

Sweeteners
Sucrose
* Oldest, best, simplest
* Additional benefits
* Antimicrobial
* Disadvantages
* Calorific (diabetics), cariogenic
 Other Sugars
* Lower sweetening potential
 Artificial Agents
* Saccharin, aspartame, acesulfame, cyclamate
* Low concentrations required
* Distinctive taste – mask low sucrose concentrations

Flavours
Enhance taste masking effect of sweetening agents
 Smell and taste e.g. peppermint
 Concentrated alcoholic solutions requiring dilution for manufacturing
 Natural or synthetic
* Synthetic
* Cheaper, consistent, stable
* Natural
* Microbiological quality
 Traditional tastes
* Antacids – minty

Colour
Final portion of organoleptic disguise
 Match product colour to flavour
* e.g. red for strawberry flavour
 Requires additives
* Not consumer friendly

Suspension
Three components
* Solvent(s)
* Continuous liquid phase
* Solute(s)
* Dissolved in solvent to modify behaviour
* Solid phase
* Non-dissolved material, discrete particles

Ideal suspension
Sediment – easily resuspended
 Re-suspension – stable
* Dose withdrawal
 Particle size – uniform
* Non-gritty (< 5 μm)

Emulsion
Three components
* Solvent(s)
* Continuous liquid phase
* Solute(s)
* Dissolved in solvent to modify behaviour
* Disperse phase
* Non-dissolved liquid, discrete particles

Disperse phase - common in Topical creams
Oil in water
* Oil – disperse phase (not more than 60% v/v)
* Active ingredient – cod liver oil
* Water – continuous phase
* Usual system
 Water in Oil
* Water – disperse phase
* Oil – continuous phase
* Difficult to process oil into the water phase
Emulsifying agent
* Surfactant
* Polymeric agents
 Viscosity enhancers
 Density modifiers
 Antioxidants
 Masking fragrance

31
Q

Liquid manufacture

A

 Product ingredients
* Risk – water, excipients, containers
 Manufacturing
* Equipment
* Closed vessels, distribution, cleaning, filling
 Distribution
* Storage
* Validated hold times
* Ref Annex 9 EudraLex Vol. 4
* Consider Contamination Control Strategy

Preservative
* To deal with “in use” contamination
* Not manufacture based contamination
 Preservation
* Complex area
* Product
* Suspension/emulsion
* Container interaction

32
Q

Inhalation products - Inhalation products – DPI and MDI DPI Dry powder inhalers Breath actuated

A

 Delivers drug as powder into lungs
 May need to ‘load’ the drug
 Reservoir or single dose
 Need to consider moisture protection

Formulation Ingredients
 Drug and diluent
 Micronisation of API
 Particle size of API and excipients
 Interactions between drug and diluent
 Mixing and segregation
 Potential for moisture uptake

Actuation Device
 Use of capsules, blister strips or chamber system
 Mechanical disruption of powder
 Moisture risk
 Patient use impacts

33
Q

Inhalation production - MDI Metered dose inhalers/aerosol pMDI – pressurised metered dose inhaler

A

 Used inverted (valve down)
 Meters a dose, rather than sprays continuously
 Drug and propellants inhaled into the lungs

Formulation Ingredients
 Particle size of API
 Micronisation of API
 Solubility characteristics of API – may need adjuvants
 Surfactants aid suspension of drug substance
 Surfactants aid valve lubrication
 Propellants – CFC and HFA

34
Q

Inhalation formulation issues

A

 Crystals
 Creaming and sedimentation
 Agglomeration – fused aggregates that have broken away from their surface of origin to become entrained in the formulation with risk of occluding small atomisation orifices
* Causing increased variability and/or OOS results in medication delivery data
* Causing changes in the aerodynamic profile of the emitted dose
How can we eliminate agglomerates or minimise their effect?
 Avoiding creaming formulations
 Use a bulking agent to minimise the risk of dose variability impact of agglomerates by co-aggregating with the active
 Reduce exposure to moisture that helps to fuse the particles in agglomerates – e.g. pouching and / or use of nylon as a desiccant can have a positive impact

Valve
 Metal or plastic components
 Elastomer components
 Passivation of metal components
 Cleaning
 Design process e.g. tail off

Canister
 Coating

Actuators/Spacers/BAIs/Dose Counters
 Press and breathe actuators
 Spacers – pros and cons
 Breath Actuated Inhaler (BAIs) – design and complexity
 Dose counters – FDA perspective

Active Drug Substance
 Particle size – Micronisation
 Impurities and Degradation Products

Surfactants
 Concentrate manufacture
Propellants and Adjuvants
 Filtration and refrigeration

Valve
 Pressure filling/cold filling
 Crimping process
 Valve function testing

Canister
 ‘O’ ring
 Canister marking and cleaning

Filtration of all fluids to 0.2 micron – Annex 10
 Cold filling
 Pressure filling – single and two-stage
 100% check weighing (Annex 10)
 Optimisation/scale-up/validation – matrixing

35
Q

Inhalation manufacture controls

A

Facilities
 Air classification – minimum Grade D at point of exposure of product or clean components (Annex 10)
 Moisture control
 Water bath or Heat tunnel

Actuator
 Stem location
 Critical dimension control in moulding
 BAI Function testing

Documentation
 Complex process
 Well designed documentation
 Many similarities to MDIs

Active Drug Substance
 Moisture control
 Freeze drying

Diluent
 Particle size
 Powder flow characteristics
 Many similarities to MDIs

Active Drug Substance
 Moisture control
 Freeze drying

Diluent
 Particle size
 Powder flow characteristics

36
Q

Inhalation release testing

A

 Identification – drug, propellants, adjuvants
 Fill weight/number of doses
 Moisture content
 Drug content
 Adjuvant content
 Leakage
 Suspension particle size – Malvern and Microscopy

Release Testing
 Valve delivery
 Dose delivered – ex valve or ex actuator (through life)
 Respirable dose – Andersen or New Generation Impactor
 Impurity and Degradation Products
 Foreign particulates
 Microbial