formation of contract: consideration Flashcards

1
Q

what does valid contract contain?

A

contains consideration
means that both parties give something
case of currie v most defined consideration as ‘some right interest profit or benefit’ which is given to one party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate, what does this mean?

A

courts will ensure both parties have exchanged something of value courts will not interfere if one party has made a bad bargain
consideration must be real

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what was held in Thomas v Thomas?

A

though amount was nominal, this was valid consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

will courts find consideration if whats being exchanged has some value?

A

yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what was held in chappel v nestle

A

wrappers were valid consideration as they had economic value.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what was held in white v bluett

A

stopping complaining isn’t consideration isn’t consideration, son had to pay his debt fathers natural love and affection wasn’t valid consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what was held in ward v Bytham

A

valid consideration between mother and father, mother provided consideration by providing natural love and affection for children so father has to pay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is past consideration?

A

past consideration isn’t valid consideration
consideration has no value if it has occurred before agreement is made

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is held in re Mcardle

A

past consideration has no value, money couldn’t be recovered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the exceptions under past consideration

A

when there is an implied promise to pay (re Caseys patent) or when matter is important (lampleigh v braithwait)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what was held in Re Caseys patent

A

it was implied from when he began the work he would receive some kind of payment, was an exception to the rule of past consideration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what was held in lampleigh v braithwait

A

matter important fair for lampleigh to presume he would be paid, wasn’t past consideration, braithwait had to pay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is performing a pre existing duty

A

if theres already a pre existing requirement to be done, will not be valid consideration (collins v godefroy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what was held in stilk v myrick

A

no consideration was provided by crew members agreed to act in emergencies so this was a pre - existing duty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

whats the rule around extra element

A

if theres an extra element is required, theres valid consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what was held in hartelty v Ponsonby

A

was an extra amount of work done due to reduction in crew members was valid consideration members paid extra wage

17
Q

what did the courts clarify one party allowing the other to avoid a detriment

A

courts have since clarified that id one party allows the other to avoid a detriment, likely have provided and extra element
mean that consideration has been provided (Williams v roffey)

18
Q

what was held in Williams v roffey

A

Williams consideration was completing the work an time allowing roffey to avoid detriment of fine