Formation of a Contract- Consideration Flashcards

1
Q

What is consideration and what case defined it?

A

Defined in Currie v Misa (1875)
“A valuable consideration…may consist either in some right, interest, profit, or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss, or responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Give a simplistic definition.

A

What is provided by way of consideration, whether it be a promise or an act, should benefit the person receiving it, or being a detriment to the person giving it.
Sometimes both will be present.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd v Selfridge & Co. [1915] say?

A

“an act or forbearance of one party, or the promise thereof, is the price for which the promise of the other is bought.”
It is the price one party pays for the other party’s promise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a contract without consideration?

A

Not a contract but a bare gift.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is executed consideration?

A

Executed – when a party performs his or her part of the contract at the time of entering into the contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is executory consideration?

A

Executory – when the parties exchange promises to do something in the future.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is consideration under executory and executed?

A

It is the promises themselves which form the consideration and the agreement is binding once they have been exchanged.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What happens if one party fails to carry out their promise?

A

If one of the parties fails to carry out their promise, the other can sue for breach of contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is past consideration?

A

Performance was prior to the agreement so invalid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the rules around consideration?

A

Consideration must move from the promisee;
Consideration must not be past;
Consideration need not be adequate; and
Consideration must be sufficient.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain Consideration Must Move From the Promisee?

A

In order to sue, and enforce a promise, a claimant must usually show that they supplied consideration for that promise.
They generally cannot sue if the consideration was provided by another person, even if the promise was intended for their own benefit.
Central to the concept of Privity to Contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Give cases for consideration must move from the promise.

A

Dunlop v Selfridge – Dunlop could not sue Selfridge because Dunlop had not provided any consideration for the contract between Selfridge and the wholesaler.
See Tweddle v Atkinson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is consideration must not be past? What is the test?

A

Generally, promises in a valid contract are made in exchange for each other and this is not the case if one is made after the event.

For example, if A promises to pay B for something that B has already done (without prior agreement), this is not valid consideration and there is no obligation to pay.
Past consideration is not the same as executed consideration, where a promise is made in return for an Act.

The test for deciding if something is ‘past’ is whether the act occurs before the promise is made.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Give a case for past consideration.

A

Re McArdle [1951]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the exception to the past consideration rule?

A

Doctrine of Implied Assumpsit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Give a case for the doctrine of implied assumpsit.

A

Lampleigh v Braithwait (1615)