Formalities Flashcards
What did Maitland say in regard to trust formalities?
A trust can be created ‘without deed, witout writing, without formality of any kind’.
What does s9 Wills Act 1837 require?
- In writing and signed by testator
- Signature must be made or acknowledged in te presence of two witnesses present at the time.
- Must be attested to
What is the main exception to the rule that there are no formalities in creating a life time trust?
s53 LPA 1925
What does s53(1)(b), law of property act 1925 state?
The creation of a trust of land must be in writing.
What is te repercussion of a trust of property with no written evidence?
The trust is unenforceable
What are the exceptions to s53(1)(1b)?
If you can establish an implied trust, e.g. a resulting or a constructive trust, then s53(1)(b) need not be complied with
What is the authority for s53(2) LPA 1925?
Hodgson v Marks - Nephew didn’t like lodger, lodger got on wit landlord. Landlord persuaded to give the trust to lodger, so nephew couldn’t kick him out. Then sold property to Marks. Issue; whether there was a trust? yes resulting trust, as never intended to give full benefit to lodger. Therefore Marks bought property subject to Hodgson’s interest.
What does s53(1)(c) state?
A disposition of a subsisting equitable interest must be made in writing
How does s53(1)(b) and s53(1)(c) differ?
s53(1)(c) makes no provision for oral transfer, which is later evidenced in writing. The disposition of a subsisting equitable interest must be made from the beginning in writing.
What is the repercussion of violating s53(1)(c)
The trust will be void, not just unenforceable
What type of property does s53(1)(c) relate to?
Any
What is the case for the 4 types of disposition?
Timpson’s executors v Yerbury;
- Assign it directly to 3p
- Direct trustee to hold for a third party
- Contract for valuable consideration
- Declare himself trustee for it, for 3rd party.
Must an instance where the beneficiary directs the trustee to hold property on trust for third party be in writing? What is the authority?
Yes - Grey v IRC
What are the facts of Vandervell v IRC ?
Vandervell had a trust with him as the sole beneficiary. Orally instructed his trustee to transfer the legal title to the royal college of surgeons. When transfer of legal title occurs with intention to transfer equitable title, equitable title also moves. When this occurs s53(1)(c) does not apply, so avoiding tax. Here as both E and L title are transferred s53(1)(c) does not apply.
What is the ratio of Vandervell?
When the absolute beneficiary instructs trustee to transfer legal title, and intends equitable title to transfer as well ,s53(1)(c) is avoided, as both equitable and legal title are passing, rater than just equitable, which is what S53(1)(c) caters for.