FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS Flashcards
15.1 FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
What is the primary evidentiary exhibit under the FDIC?
Report of Examination (ROE)
15.1 FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
What are the primary corrective tools that the FDIC uses?
The use of reason and moral suasion.
15.1 FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
What are the guidelines that should be observed in the preparation of a report where the examiner believes Section 8 action is or may be warranted?
• Only the FDIC’s Board of Directors is authorized to make a finding of “unsafe or unsound”. Examiners must only use the synonyms and other descriptive terms such as “undesirable, unacceptable and objectionable practices.”
• In a separate memo to the RD, aside from the ROE, examiners should detail each specific “Undesirable and Objectionable Practice” regarded as unsafe or unsound, the facts which conclusion is based, listed and discussed in order of importance under subheadings and captions. Violations of law or regulations should be discussed under a separate subheading. Relevant facts should be addressed, with reference to specific schedules within the report where full details are presented. The memo should include statements made by the bank’s directors/officers either supporting any charge made by the examiner or showing any corrective action. Quote the facts and circumstances from previous examination reports, Supervisory Authority letters to the bank, and letters of inquiry regarding correction of criticisms from the RD, so that examiners can call attention to incomplete corrective promises of management. Examiners should also comment when the “Undesirable and Objectionable Practices” violate the provisions of the bank’s board established formal policies.
• Examiners should detail in the RD memo their suggested measures to correct the “Undesirable and Objectionable Practices”. Such measures should be tailored to the situation with the possibility of performing them within the given time frame. Ensure that recommended corrective actions are detailed for each “Undesirable or Objectionable Practice” reflected in the memo. Corrective measures not relating to the specific “Undesirable or Objectionable Practice” should not be recommended for inclusion in a corrective order.
• The RD memo should contain specific comments and recommendations relative to the existing management situation. Existing management may be considered adequate to solve the problems facing the institution, although a redirection or a clarification of authority may be necessary. If present management is not considered satisfactory, the examiner should comment upon such matters as:
»_space; The addition of independent outside directors and a chief executive officer, senior lending officer, or other appropriate senior officer with defined authority;
»_space; The establishment of appropriate lines of authority, suitable board committees with outside director representation, and additional board policies for guidance of bank management;
»_space; The implementation of board follow-up procedures to assure compliance with directives and established policies;
»_space; The restriction of particular authorities of specific officers;
»_space; The potential need for the directorate or an outside consultant to assess active management and/or the board; or
»_space; Any other managerial situations particular to the institution’s circumstances.
• The RD memo should include the names and home addresses of any individuals the examiner believes should be named in a formal action to facilitate service on such individuals. The facts supporting the examiner’s opinion should be provided in the RD memo as well as the ROE.
• If information required to fully support the examiner’s recommendations cannot be obtained through customary examination techniques, the Regional Office should be apprised of the situation as soon as possible; if the matter remains unresolved, the examiner should so indicate in the RD memo, and the RD may consider possible use of the more formal investigative procedures under Section 10(c) of the FDI Act.
• Examiners recommending Section 8 actions should realize that these proceedings are within the purview of the Equal Access to Justice Act. The Act provides that certain parties who prevail in contested administrative or judicial proceedings against an agency of the Federal government may be able to recover their litigation expenses from the agency if the position of the agency in the proceeding was not substantially justified. Comments and observations in the memorandum must be well supported by substantial evidence and be able to stand up under cross examination in a hearing.
• The ROE generally serves as the FDIC’s primary evidentiary exhibit in Section 8 proceedings. It should be both factually and statistically correct, free of inconsistencies, and should not contain inflammatory remarks nor personal comments or observations not pertinent to evaluation of the bank or its management. Gratuitous remarks are to be avoided. Criticisms and comments set forth in Examination Conclusions and Comments should be realistic and must be well supported. Classifications should be reasonable, not arbitrary, and likewise well supported. Classifications of related lines or lines dependent upon the same source of repayment or strength should be consistent. The same is true where action is recommended against related banks with participations in the same loans. ROE’s containing the basis for Section 8 recommendations should receive special priority in terms of field examination work and Regional and Washington Office processing.
• When Section 8(b) cease and desist actions against a bank is to be recommended, the examiner should consult with the Regional Office prior to discussing the possibility with the bank’s board. Documentation of notification to the bank’s board of directors should be included in the RD memo.
• When a Section 8(e) removal action may be taken, the examiner should consult with the Regional Office, including Regional Counsel, as directed. It is especially important that the report or other documentary evidence support the charges issuing the Notice, particularly as they pertain to actions of the respondents.
15.1 FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
What are considered Unsafe & Unsound practices. What are the actionable items - “operating with”? (ISHELP)
Operating with:
• Inadequate Capital (< 2% Tier 1 Leverage Capital)
• Speculative or hazardous investment activities
• Hazardous lending
• Excessive dividend payments
• Low Liquidity
• Poor Internal Routines & Controls
15.1 FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
What can be considered Unsafe and Unsound conditions?
- Maintenance of unduly low NIM
- Excessive overhead expenses
- Excessive adverse classifications
- Excessive net loan losses
- Excessive volume of overdue loans
- Excessive volume of nonearning assets
- Excessive large liability dependence
15.1 FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
Possible responses to an Unsafe and Unsound practices, conditions caused by lack of actions or actions. (2)
• Memorandum of Understanding is prepared by an examiner and submitted to the Regional Director to address the Unsafe and Unsound actions or conditions • Generally used to prepare for a Cease-and-Desist.
15.1 FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
What are considered Unsafe & Unsound practices. What are the non-actionable items - “operating without”? (ATAASAP)
Operating without: • Adequate Board Supervision • Timely general ledger entries • Adequate ALLL • Accurate books and records • Sufficient collection practices • Accurate accounting applications • Perfecting liens
15.1 FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
According the Manual of Examination, the lack of actions by the bank are identified by the FDIC Board of Directors as Unsafe & Unsound Practices. What are some actions that the bank may lack? (ATAASAP)
Operating without: • Adequate Board Supervision • Timely general ledger entries • Adequate ALLL • Accurate books and records • Sufficient collection practices • Accurate accounting applications • Perfecting liens
15.1 FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
What is the principal objective of Section 8(a)?
To secure necessary corrections and not to terminate a bank’s deposit insurance.
15.1 FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
If based on specific facts, the decision is made to terminate FDIC insurance, what must the FDIC give the institution?
Not less than 30 days written notice of its intention to terminate the institution’s insured status and fixes a time and place for a hearing.
15.1 FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
What is the basis for Section 8(a) Action - Termination of Insurance?
- The institution or its directors or trustees have committed unsafe or unsound practices;
- The institution or its directors or trustees have violated a law or regulation to which the bank was subject, a written condition imposed by the FDIC in connection with the granting of an application or other request of bank, or any written agreement entered into with the FDIC;
- The institution is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations.
15.1 FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
What does the severity of the ultimate penalty implicit in any Section 8(a) action limit?
The severity of the ultimate penalty implicit in any 8(a) action limits its use as a remedial supervisory instrument.
15.1 FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
What are the reasons why a Section 8(b) can be served?
- The bank is engaging, or has engaged, in unsafe or unsound practices;
- The bank is violating, or has violated, a law, rule, or regulation, or any condition imposed in writing by the FDIC with regard to the approval of a request or application, or a written agreement entered into with the FDIC; or
- There is reasonable cause to believe the bank is about to do either of the above.
15.1 FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
Since the time frame can be lengthy in obtaining a Consent Cease and Desist Order that may allow additional damage to be suffered by the bank, what provides the FDIC power to act swiftly if necessary?
Section 8(c) of the FDI Act, provides the FDIC with the power to act with the utmost speed when the facts so dictate by issuing a Temporary Cease and Desist Order whenever the FDIC determines the violations or threatened violations or unsafe or unsound practices specified in the Notice of Charges are likely to cause insolvency or substantial dissipation of assets or earnings of the bank, or otherwise seriously prejudice the interests of the depositors prior to the completion of action under Section 8(b).
15.1 FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
What is Section 8(e) and what power does it give to the FDIC?
Section 8(e) gives the FDIC the power to order the removal of an institution-affiliated party (director, officer, employee, controlling stockholder, independent contractor, etc.) from office.