Forgetting: Interference Flashcards
When does interference occur
When 2 pieces of info conflict with each other - causes forgetting of one or both OR in some DISTORTION of memory
Interference theory (further explained)
Once info has reached LTM it is more or less PERMANENT.
Any forgetting of LTMs = because we can’t access them even though AVAILABLE
Interference occurs
What are 2 types of interference
Proactive and Retroactive
Proactive interference
occurs when older memory interferes with a newer one. eg: teacher learnt so many names in past she finds it hard to remember names of new class
Retroactive interference
happens when a newer memory interferes with an older memory. eg: teacher has learned so many new names this year she can’t remember names of ppl in past
What did McGeoch and McDonald discover in 1931
interference = worse when the memories (learning) are SIMILAR
What was McGeoch and McDonald’s procedure
- changed the amount of similarity between 2 sets of materials
- P’s had to learn a list of 10 words until they could remember them 100% accurately
- then they learnt a new list
- 6 groups of P’s who learnt different types of lists
What were McGeoch and McDonald’s groups
Group 1 = synonyms Group 2 = antonyms Group 3 = words unrelated to OG ones Group 4 = consonant syllables Group 5 = 3-digit numbers Group 6 = no new list, P's rested
What were the findings of McGeoch et al.’s study
- when P’s recalled OG list of words - performance depended on nature of 2nd list
- synonyms produced WORST recall
SHOWS THAT: interference = strongest when memories = SIMILAR
Who conducted research called ‘Forgetting adverts’? and what was procedure & findings
Burke and Skrull (1988)
- showed P’s a series of magazine adverts
- P’s had to recall details of what they saw (eg brand names)
- sometimes they found it harder to recall EARLIER adverts
- other times they had problems remembering LATER ones
- effect = greater when ads were SIMILAR
- phenomenon called COMPETITIVE INTERFERENCE
Who wanted to find out if INTERFERENCE was a better explanation for forgetting than the passage of time in 1977
Baddeley and Hitch
- asked rugby players to try and remember names of teams they had played so far in that season week by week
- because some players had missed games, for some they played 2/3 weeks ago or more
- RESULTS: accurate recall didn’t depend on how long ago matches happened but the number of games they played in meantime
- players recall of matches 3 weeks ago = BETTER if they had played NO matches since then
SHOWS THAT: interference explanations can apply to at least some everyday situations