Forgetting Flashcards
Gould v Vaggelas
Test bullock and Sanderson Test is interdependence of claims against successful and unsuccessful defendants – whether unsuccessful defendant contributed to joinder of successful defendant
Cardile v LED Builders
“Good arguable case” means less than prima facia case, only requires “reasonably arguable on factual and legal matters”
Reinehr Industrial Lease & Finance v Jordan
t st set aside DJ – Discretionary – “balance the competing interests” and determine if “interests of justice” require set aside – application is determined not as to underlying merits but whether triable issue raised)
RRodgerRegularity RRamjetReasons for default DDecapitatesDelay (c.f. CPA, s 58) PPeterPrejudice to P PPiperProspects of success
Herning v GWS Machinery
– Must be “real and genuine attempt to settle”
Jones v Bradly
Failure of formalities under r 20.26, court may still take offer into account – Calderbank will rarely warrant indemnity costs unless rejection unreasonable
Barton v Minister for Foreign Affairs –
Satisfaction of r 42.21 does not require order for security
Johnson Tiles v Esso
– No rigid rules governing leave to appeal, but leave should be granted where there are “substantial reasons”
Fox v Percy
– Task of CoA is determine whether decision below correct taking into account advantages of trial judge
SCA s 75A
Appeal to COA by way of rehearing
Appeals from DC
s 127, DCA – Appeal as of right to SC, except in case of interlocutory, costs, summary judgment, consent, small matters (< $100,000) for which leave is required
s 48, SCA – Appeals from DC assigned to CoA
s 128, DCA – DC may order stay where appeal pending, but not automatic
Appeals from LC
s 39, LCA – Appeal as of right from GD of LC to SC on pure question of law
s 40, LCA – Leave required to appeal from GD of LC to SC on mixed question of law and fact, interlocutory matter, consent, or costs
s 49, SCA – Appeal from the GD of the LC is to the SC (not the CoA)
s 39, LCA Appeal lies as of right from SCD of LC to DC only where lack of jurisdiction or denial of procedural fairness
s 40, LCA – On appeal, appellate court may vary, set-aside, or dismiss
Appeal procedure
r 51.51 Application for leave to adduce further evidence on appeal by notice of motion
r 51.4 Each person who is directly affected by relief sought or interested in maintaining decision below must be joined as a respondent.
r 51.8 Notice of intention to appeal (or seek leave to appeal) to be filed within 28 days of the material date (generally judgment date)
r 51.9 Filing notice of intention to appeal extends time to appeal or seek leave to 3 months
r 51.10 Application for leave to appeal is by summons filed and served within 28 days of material date, or within 3 months where notice of intention to appeal filed
r 51.12 White folder must be filed and served with summons seeking leave to appeal
r 51.16 Notice of appeal to be filed within 7 days of leave, 3 months of notice of intention or 28 days of material date
r 51.40 Party successful below may file notice of contention with 28 days of notice to appeal
r 51.41 Respondent may make application to dismiss the appeal on grounds of incompetence under r 51.41
r 51.44 Does not automatically stay decision or order below, but may order stay
FC appeals
s 24, FCA FC has appellate jurisdiction over appeals from single judge – no appeal from interlocutory matter, consent judgment or summary judgement except with leave
s 25, FCA Appellate jurisdiction generally exercised by Full Federal Court
s 27, FCA May have regard to evidence in proceedings below and admit new evidence on leave
s 28, FCA Broad powers to affirm, vary or dismiss
s 29, FCA Does not automatically stay proceedings, but FFC may grant a stay