Forensic Psychology 🕵️‍♂️ Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

A01 for defining & measuring crime

A

Problem with defining crime:
CULTURAL : what may be crime in one culture may not be in another
HISTORICAL: Legal system changes overtime

[WAYS OF MEASURING CRIME]
1) Office for national statistics
-crimes reported to police in official figures
-see crimes around the country
-develop crime prevention strategies
DARK FIGURE
-victims may not report crime
-under recorded by feds

2) VICTIM SURVEY
-50,000 households randomly chosen to report crime they’ve been victim for
-details of crime not reported to feds

3)OFFENDER SURVEY
-Individuals self report on crimes they’ve committed
-provides insight into how many ppl responsible for offences
-may be unreliable as offenders may conceal some of the more serious crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

A03 for defining & measuring crime
ONS

A

-Unreliable as not consistent enough in showing crime data
-underestimate true extent of crime
-only 25% included in official stats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A01 for Top Down approach

A

Offender profiling- behavioural &analytical tool intended to help investigators predict profile offender

approach developed by FBI
CONSTRUCTING FBI PROFILE
1) Data assimilation- profiler reviews evidence
2) Crime scene classification- organised or disorganised
3) Crime reconstruction- sequence of events
4) Profile Generation- hypothesis related to likely offender

ORGANISED CRIMINAL
-planned
-destroy evidence
-Offender unknowns to victim

DISORGANISED CRIMINAL
-unplanned
-leaves evidence
-offender knows to victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

One Limitation of TDA
(organised and disorganised)

A

-Too simplistic
-any n.o of combination can occur in crime scene
-Godwin questions how someone with high intelligence commits spontaneous murder & leaving body at crime scene would be classified
-Holmes suggest there are 4 types of serial killers
-This is an issue because killer may not fit into one of the two types

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Strength of TDA profiling

A

Can be adapted to other types of crime
-Critics of TD profiling have claimed technique applies to limited number of crimes e.g sexual
-However a researcher reports that TD profiling has been applied to burgualry
-Leads to 85% rise in solved cases
-suggest TD profiling has wider application

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

A01 for Bottom up approach

A

-Aims to build picture of offender

[How does it work]
-David Canter made offender profiling more scientific
-smallest space analysis contains data about many crime scenes

[Geographical Profiling]
-ppl consistent in crime are consistent in location
-psychologist use crime mapping to link locations of various crimes
-Marauder: operate in close proximity to close base
-Commuter- ppl who travel a distance to usual residence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Strength of BUA

A

-research support for investigative psychology
-Canter conducted content analysis of 66 sexual assault cases
-found each individual displayed characteristic pattern of such behvs
-This can help establish whether two or more offences committed by same person
-real life evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Limitation of BUA
Geographical profiling

A

-It is not a sufficient method alone
-e.g in cases of GP it’s often reliant on police data lead to inaccuracy
-crime data are not accurate & vary
-This is a weakness as it suggest GP as a method becomes over reliant on potential inaccurate data
-leads to incorrect profile generation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

A01 for Biological Explanation

A

Lombrosso
-stated that offenders possessed similar characteristics to lower primates
-Offenders lack evolutionary development

[Characteristic of offender]
-prominent jaw. -Dark skin -extra toes
-Fraudsters : thin lips
-Murderers :Curly hair

[Lombrosso Research]
-used PM examinations of criminals & studies faces
-made measurements of skills
-examined 50,000 bodies
-Found 40% of criminal acts carried out by atavistic characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Strength of Historical/ atiavistic approach

A

-Lombrosso has been praised for his contributions to criminology
-shifted crime research towards a scientific and credible realm
-Lombrosso led to onset of offender profiling
-as he stated particular type of ppls likely to commit particular crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Limitation of Lombrosso atiavistic form

A

-Contradictory evidence
-Goring investigated if there were any physical or mental abnormalities amongst criminals
-compared 3000 crims to 3000 non
-Found no evidence of offenders having unusual facial and cranium characteristics
-however found that crims have lower average intelligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A01 for biological explanation

A

[Twin Studies]
-one twin in each pair spent time in prison
-Found 10 of the MZ twins but only 2 of DZ twins has a co twin who spent time in prison
-suggest genetic factors may take a part

[NEURAL EXPLANATIONS]
-evidence that there are neural differences in brains of criminals & non criminals
PREFRONTAL CORTEX
-Raine conducted studies of antisocial personality disorder in the brain
-found brain imaging studies demonstrating individuals with APD have reduced activity in PFC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

LIMITATION OF TWIN STUDIES

A

-Issues with sample
-twin studies by lange were poorly controlled
-judgements based on appearance rather than DNA testing
-shows how classification may be inaccurate
-Leading the theory that genetic similarity increases chance of criminal behv

FURTHERMORE
twins are small sample
cannot represent rest of population
TWINS REARED IN SAME ENVIRONMENT
difficuilt to separate genetics from environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

STRENGTH OF NEURAL EXPLANATIONS

A

-support for the link between crime & frontal lobe
-landed viewed evidence of frontal lobe damage & antisocial beh
-ppl with damage tended to show impulsive behv & inability to learn from mistakes
-Frontal lobe associated with planning behv
-supports ideas that brain damage may play impact in offending behv

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

One limitation of Neural Explanations

A

One limitation of neural explanation is that it is reductionist as the link between neural differences & APD is more complex than explained. Farrington et al conducted a studied a group of adult males who scored high on psychopathy. T He found that these individuals had experienced various risic factors during childhood. For example being raised by convicted parents & being physically neglected. This auld be because early childhood experiences caused APA 8 also some of the neural differences associated with it may be due to trauma.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

A01 for psychological explanations of offending behaviour

A

Eysnecks personality theory
-extroverts have under active NS
-they seek excitement

criminal personality is neurotic extroverts psychotic
-these ppl are difficuilt to condition due to under active NS

[SOCIALISATION]
Eyesneck linked personality to offending behaviour through socialisation
-criminal behv is selfish & get immediate gratification
-criminals impatient & cannot wait

17
Q

Strength of Eyesneck theory
psychological explanation

A

-There is research support for criminal activity
-Eyesneck compared 2070 prisoner scores on EPI questionnaires
-found prisoners recorded higher scores on extroversion neuroticism and psychotism compared to the 2422 controls
-therefore providing support for the 3 personality types

18
Q

Limitation of eyesnecks theory
reductionist

A

-it’s reductionist
-assumes criminality can be explained by personality traits alone
-e.g Moffit distinguished between offending behv which occurred in adolescence and continued to adulthood.
-Concluded that there was difference in offending behv & this was result of reciprocal process between personality traits

19
Q

A01 for COGNITIVE EXPLANATIONS

A

two cognitive explanations
1) kholberg claims that crimes may be committed by individuals who have a low level of moral reasoning than non criminals
2) criminal behaviour is the result of faulty information processing

-Many studies have suggested that offenders tend to show a lower level of moral reasoning than non offenders

Offenders classes as pre conventional level
-characterised by need to avoid punishment & gain rewards

non offenders - conventional level

20
Q

Cognitive distortion A01

A

-these are errors in ppls information processing system

[2 examples of CD]
1) Hostile attribution bias
-misinterpreting actions of others
-assuming others are confrontational

2) Minimilisation
-when person down plays seriousness of events
-reduces person sense of guilt

21
Q

Strength of Kohlbergs level of moral reasoning

A

-there is cross cultural research
-researcher found in a study of 128 male juveniles that 38% did not consider the concequence of actions
-36% were confident they won’t be caught
-suggest they were in kohlbergs pre conventional level of moral reasoning

22
Q

LIMITATION TO COGNITIVE APPROACH

A

It is descriptive rather than explanatory
-cognitive approach is good at describing the criminal mind but it does not explain it
-CE are useful in predicting reoffending behaviour
-cannot tell us why people commit a crime in first place
-limitation as it does not allow us to fully understand intentions for committing crime

23
Q

A01 for psychological explanation

A

[DIFFERENTIAL ASSOCIATION THEORY]
-criminal behv explained in terms of social learning
-criminal behv is leaned
-when pro-criminal attitudes learned they outweigh anti crime ones
-involved operant conditioning

people reoffend they learn criminal techniques inside prison

24
Q

LIMITATION ON DAT

A

-Theory lacks scientific credibility
-sunderland claims to have a mathematical framwork which predict criminality
-many concepts not testable as they cannot be operationalised

The theory assumes that offending behv will occur when pro crime >anti crime
-However is unmeasurable
-difficuilt to know which point people build urge to offend

25
Q

Strength of DAT

A

A strength of the DAT is its ability to account for any type of crime is to any socoscanemic background. For example, individuais of middle class background are, expured to middle class values, and leart to commit middle class crime, such as fraud. Whereas individuals from disadvantage /working class backgrounds might learn burgulary. This, is because they all sel, a Bet of deviant norms & values. This shows that its, not just lower class that commits crime and the principles of DAT can be used to explain all offences.
Furthermore this theory led to a shift in focus in the explanation of offending behavlour. Sutherland helped to focus the understendina d Criminal behr on deviant social circumstances rather than the eugenics of the biological explanation or immorclity. Therefire this approcich offers a more realistic, Solution to the problem of crime.