Forensic Flashcards
State research on genetics leading to crime
Popma & Raine (2006) suggest criminality is heritable
Brunner (1996) MAOA deficit in Dutch family leading to aggression
What are the 3 main theories which affect criminality?
Neuropsychology
Cognition
Family/social
How can neuropsychology affect criminality?
Abnormal brains - there are links between deficits in the amygdala and hippocampus and criminal behaviour
Brain injury - frontal lobe damage (Turkstra, 2003) and case of Phineas Gage
Physiology - antisocial people have a low resting heart beat (Raine, 1997)
Neurobiology - increased testosterone is associated with violent behaviour (Scerba, 1994)
State extra reading research for theories of crime
Freud’s theory states that if an individual’s superego is weak or undeveloped due to not being able to identify with the same sex parent in the phalic stage, then the individual will have a lack of control of antisocial behaviour
How can cognition affect criminality?
Executive functioning - executive dysfunction is found within criminal populations (Hancock, 2010) - but white collar criminals have better executive functioning
Empathy - cognitive empathy is strongly negatively associated with delinquency
Kohlberg - moral development better in non-violent youths
How can family/social factors affect criminality?
Parenting - Poor parenting supervision is the strongest predictor of later criminality (Hoghughi & Speight, 1998)
Social learning Theory (Bandura, 1977)
Family size - larger family size may be a predictor
Criminal parents - 63% of offenders had criminal parents (Farrington, 2009)
SES and parental conflict - Wilkstrom (2016) shows that low SES may not necessarily be a predictor, but does increase the likeliness of exposure to criminal activity
What are protective factors
Hobbies
A good job
Relationship/marriage
What is Moffit’s (1993) theory?
Suggests that criminality is either adolescent limited of life-course persistent
State 2 studies on the unreliability of EWT
Buckhout (1980) did a study which recorded crime on TV – in this, 2000 people rang in and 1800 made incorrect ID – only 14.1% gave the correct answer
Loftus & Palmer (1972) smashed and hit, with broken glass
State a study on the persuasiveness of EWT
EWT results in 78% of guilty votes, compared to fingerprints (70% guilty votes), polygraph (53%) and handwriting (34%)
Mean % of guilty verdicts is much higher (72%) with a credible witness, compared to a discredited witness (44%) or no eyewitness (28%) – (Kennedy & Haygood, 1992)
What are factors affecting EWT?
System variables: ones that can be controlled by the system e.g. line up construction, cognitive interviewing
Estimator variables: ones that cannot be controlled e.g. intoxication, proximity from the scene, emotional state
How does the retention interval affect EWT?
There is a reduction in correctly recalled events when interviewed immediately vs 4 week interval (Ebbesen & Reinick, 1998)
State research on line ups
Building face composites can harm the line up identification performance (Wells, Charman & Olson, 2005)
When too highly similar it is problematic, but when it is moderately similar, there is higher identification and fewer false positives (Fitzgerald, 2015)
How did the ‘old’ approach to interviewing suspects create problems
Often lead to false confessions as it was coercive and intimidating (Leo, 2008)
Often use false evidence (Kassin, 2007)
How do the adolescent limited and life-course persistent pathways differ?
Life-course persistent likely to be more violent crimes through life compared to less serious crimes from adolescent offenders
Adolescent limited likely to desist after 25, other to be throughout life time
Adolescent limited delays delinquency to young adulthood, life-course begins in childhood
Adolescent limited gap between biological and social maturity, life-course neuropsychological and family deficits