Foreign Policy Flashcards

1
Q

Understanding Hitler as a person

A

His foreign policy and actions varied widely - tell one set of people he wanted to make a diplomatic deal over a piece of territory like Poland, whilst telling others there was no option to go to war. This can be intepreted as:
- An inability to make up his mind
- Cunning diplomacy (manipulating them by giving different impression of his aims).
- Shifts dpeending on the political situation and which country would benefit or is a danger to Germany.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Other causes of WWII, other than the invasion of Poland

Economic

A
  • The world just came out of the economic struggle.
  • The world-wide depression of the early 1930s helped the rise of dictators.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Other causes of WWII, other than the invasion of Poland

International

A

Problems within the League of Nations - invasion from Japan and Italy.
The desire of for peace from many countries (including Britain and France) - took territories from Germany, cost money and didn’t have the stomach for war to maintain their large empire).

  • Russia becoming communist - fear spreading.
  • WII was still in living memory - people didn’t want more war.
  • USA policy of isolationism.
  • Rise of dictatorships in Germany, Italy, Japan and Russia
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Other causes of WWII, other than the invasion of Poland

Social

A

Expectations of groups within Germany: industrialists, Nazis, ordinary Germans - Hitler made promises to build the Third Reich in order to get into power.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Other causes of the war, beside the Invasion of Poland

Nazi Foreign Policy

A

Labersbraum = living space for Germans
Expansionism.
Racial purity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Other causes of the war, beside the Invasion of Poland

Treaty of Versailles

A
  • Fed German resentment.
  • Created an unstable international situation (setting up a number of small, new states that argued over their new borders).
  • Made other nations more tolerant of German expansionism.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Other causes of the war, beside the Invasion of Poland

Other country’s foreign policy

A
  • British and French appeasement policies.
  • Western attitudes to Russia.
  • US foreign policy (isolationism).
  • Japanese foreign policy (imperialistic).
  • Russian foreign policy and the build up of the Red Army.
  • Italian foreign policy (imperialistic) - recreate the Holy Roman Empire.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

German History

Aryan Racial Theory

A
  • Believed that true Germans were Aryan, although other countries in Northern Europe, inc. Britain had Aryan roots. Aryans were a race superior to other ethnic groups like black, asian, slavs in Russia in Eastern Europe, and especially Jews.
  • Wanted Germany to be a great Aryan empire and used the idea of Pan-Germanism to excuse it - clearing the land of inferior people for ‘pure Germans’ to live on.
  • Affected FP policy as Nazis favoured alliances with racially acceptable countries (Britain). Favoured German expansion eastwards to take land from racially inferior countries. However, forming alliances with racially inferior countries were a necessary evil to gain a temporary advantage.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

German History

The First and Second Reich

A
  • Unlike Weimar politicans, Nazis wanted to overturn TOV but didn’t wish to return to 1914 - aimed to expand further, esp the East.
  • Focused on two earlier German Empires: First Reich (Holy Roman Empire of Charlemagne 800-1806) and Second Reich (German Empire of 1871, founded by von Bismark).
  • Both Empires gained land, maintained by war and military strength, but they worked hard diplomatically for the acceptence of other nations - the 2nd Reich had a series of carefully created alliances.
  • Arguable that the Nazi propaganda focused on these Empire’s glory - gave the Nazis credibility as people wanted a political party with a history. Nazis could stress they were ‘continuing’ and ‘restoring’ Germany in the Third Reich, using successful German rulers in their propaganda - especially if they enlarged Germany.
  • Hitler constantly said, the glorious past of Germany that made the loss of WW1 and the humiliating treaty that followed all the worse.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

World War One

A
  • Ending of WWI was a bad beginning for peace and the new Govt = there was no public surrender, so many thought the war was still going and the army and the public believed they could have won (stab in the back theory), so the new govt was unpopular.
  • Whilst recovering, Hitler felt the suffering of the war was in vain and despised the politicans in charge. He became a politican, joined DAP (renamed the NSDAP) and was one of the leaders, writing the 25 point programme with his ideas on race and German Expansionism.
  • Two failed attempts to overthrow the govt (Kapp 1920 and Munich 1923) showed Hitler to not resort to violence, w/o enough force or public support. Imprisoned but wrote Mein Kampf and decided his take over would be parliamentary not military.
  • Hitler outlined in his book, Mein Kampf, his political theories, his experiences in WWI as a soldier, the armistice, abdication and replacing the empire with a republic.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Treaty of Versailles

What was the main reason why the Germans resented the TOV

A
  • Resented it because they lost status in Europe, unable to defend itself.
  • Lost land with 6.4M outside its border - Danzig and the creation of the Polish Corridor were the most resented as they cut off E. Prussia from Germany.
  • Forced disarmament = limited army of 100K which couldn’t leave - always was apart of the political system and a defensive force.
  • Unable to enter the Rhineland - became a demilitarised buffer zone for France.
  • Reparations of 132 million gold in 1921.
  • Accepted the war guilt clause - disallowed from joining the League of Nations and not treated like an equal European Power.
  • Diktat = a dictated peace treaty.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Treaty of Versailles

Which term was secretly being disobeyed before the Nazis came to power

A
  • Worked secretly to break the term about the requirement to disarm and the limitations placed on the size of the army.
  • Secret rearmament agreements were made with the USSR, which allowed for German armaments to be made on Soviet soil, by Soviet companies.
  • In 1926, a Russian tank-training school near Kazan trained German soldiers and by 1928, tanks were built and tested in Russia.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Treaty of Versailles

How did the ending of WWI contribute to German resentment of the TOV

A
  • Created problems that could be blamed on the Treaty, rather than the war itself.
  • Economic disruption in Europe and the inability to recover quickly enough to deal with the reparation payments.
  • Some Allies felt the treaty was too harsh (guilty). Many nations wanted peace, affected their reaction to the Nazi and Weimar Foreign policy.
  • Also, there was political disruption - no part of Central and Eastern Europe in 1918 had the same government as in 1914.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Treaty of Versailles

How might self-determination policy create a situation that affected FP

A
  • There were small, self-determining states created by the Treaty that were weak which often had ethnic divisions that made governing among them difficult. Many had a sizable German population - squabbling over the borders given to them.
  • Unintended consequences of these states’ reaction is that their weaknesses made them desirable targets for the USSR, Germany, Italy and Poland.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why was Hitler able to smash the Versailles settlement

Aquisition of the Rhineland

A
  • In Britain, public opinion was hostile to military action and in January 1933 the British government had decided that the Rhineland was not vital.
  • French govt cut military expenditure by 17% between 1930 and 1934 so it was too weak for offensive action.
  • In 1936, Hitler entered the Rhineland after realising European countries were reluctant to start another war.
  • Dissolved the Reichstag on the 7th March and held a plebiscite on the 29th March to gain approval of his remilitarisation of the Rhineland = 99.8% of the electorate voted in favour of Hitler’s actions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why was Hitler able to smash the Versailles settlement

Anschluss - union of Austria and Germany

A
  • After the Rhineland success, Hitler saw opportunities to increase influence in Austria.
  • The majority of Austrians favoured Anschluss when Versailles had banned it, however, when the Nazis came to power, it became more possible but less attractive to many Austrians.
  • July 1936 = an Austro-German agreement saw Germany agreeing to respect Austrian independence, while Austria agreed to have a policy based on the ‘always principle that Austria acknowledges herself to be a German state’.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Why was Hitler able to smash the Versailles settlement

Nazi-Soviet Pact

A
  • Germany’s pact with the USSR left Poland isolated, ruining Western attempts to bring the USSR into a formal alliance against Germany.
  • Avoided the danger of war on two major fronts. Germany gained vital new raw materials from the Soviet Union that relieved her domestic economic problems and helped her rearmament drive.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Why was Hitler able to smash the Versailles settlement

Invasion of Poland

A

Despite negotiating a non-aggression pact in 1934 with Poland, it was still his next target. In March 1939, Germany demanded that Lithuania return Memel (lost in 1919).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Ideological aims

Hitler’s aim of the Treaty of Versailles (FP)

A
  • Had to be overturned.
  • Aimed to rearm, regain lost land, reoccupy the Rhineland and leave reparations unpaid.
  • Didn’t want a return to 1914 - wanted to expand beyond pre-war borders in Europe and didn’t want the problems of managing colonies until Germany was fully established in Europe.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Ideological similarities to Hitler’s Foreign Policy regarding the TOV

The Kaiser

A
  • Had to be overturned.
  • Government collapsed after the war, held no view on the Treaty of Versailles.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Ideological aims

Ideological similarities to Hitler’s Foreign Policy regarding the TOV

Weimar

A
  • Had to be overturned.
  • Revisionist view - wanted to overturn the Treaty and return Germany back to its state in 1914, including the colonies it had lost.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Ideological aims

Nazi’s aim over the Reich being a large and powerful world power

A
  • Create a large German empire in Europe via achieved by alliances where possible, and war if necessary. - Alliances should be ethically acceptable countries, like Britain, but he was prepared to make short-term alliances with countries that would benefit Germany. For example, Russia despite being racially inferior and communist.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Ideological similarities over the Nazi’s aim of imperalism

Kaiser

A
  • Wished to extend its power in the world and saw war as the best way to do so - taking Germany to war in 1914.
  • However, it didn’t care for the ethnicity of its allies, or of the people in the lands it conquered.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Ideological similarities over the Nazi’s aim of imperalism

Weimar

A

Didn’t openly discuss expansion beyond the borders of 1914, although it did want Germany to be a world power again (shown by Streseman’s policies, seeking European integration).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Ideological aims

Nazi aims of lebenscraum in FP

A
  • Expansion necessary to improve and meet needs of the people, for Hitler believed Germany had a shortage of raw materials and farmland.
  • Believed the much-needed living space should come from countries of the East with a high Slavic population and a significant German-speaking population.
  • Land should be cleared of inferiors to allow pure Germans to breed and flourish.
  • Ideas repeated often and publicly said.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Ideological similarities to Nazi’s FP on Lebensraum

Kaiser

A
  • Possibly shared similar ideas about race but they were never integrated into government policy.
  • Very similar ideas about the need to expand and the direction in which to expand, although, unlike Hitler, it also wanted to acquire a large number of colonies.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Ideological similarities to Nazi’s FP on Lebensraum

Weimar

A

Might have shared similar ideas about race but were never integrated into government policy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Ideological aims

Nazi aims to prevent the threat of world Jewry and Bolshevism in FP

A
  • Regularly repeated conspiracy of Jews were controlling govt - had to be stopped. Felt Jews wanted to stir up anti-German feelings in other countries, especially USA/UK.
  • Anti-communist - believed two groups were in the same league. Believed Germany would have to go to war with Eastern Europe - at least to take land and defeat Communism.
  • Aimed to delay war as long as possible to make useful alliances, make policies to convince Western powers that Germany wanted peace and return German lands rightfully.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Ideological similarities to Nazi’s FP on Jewry and anti-Communist threat

Weimar

A
  • Jews legally were protected from anti-semitism under the Constitution, however, this protection was always theoretical, rather than practical as they still faced racism.
  • However, Jews, and also to an extent Communists, were not legally targeted as ‘unpure’, or exterminated.
  • Unlike Nazism, Weimar Ffrmed the Kellogg-Briand Pact ensured USSR-German cooperation - criticised by the West.
30
Q

Nazi FP aims and evidence from Hitler’s writings

Lebenstraum and invasion of Russia

A
  • ’The acquisition of new soil for the settlement of excess population’ – referencing the need for living space and ‘Lebensraum’ for the German people.
  • ’If land was desired in Europe, it could be obtained by and large only at the expense of Russia’.
  • Writing in Mein Kampf in jail before becoming a politican suggests that Hitler set his eyes on expansionism and knew to achieve lebensraum, they had to invade Russia to ensure Germany’s survival.
31
Q

Nazi FP aims and evidence from Hitler’s writings

Alliances with Britain

A
  • Mein Kampf detailed Hitler’s desire to forge an alliance with England and protect Germany’s rear.
  • Hitler was an Anglophile (admired Britain’s legacy and the empire), seeing British people - beside the Celts - as Aryans.
  • Saw Britain as a natural ally before WWII.
  • Believed an alliance was possible as they both disliked Bolshevism - possible that he believed England would help Germany invade the USSR for living space.
32
Q

Nazi FP aims and evidence from Hitler’s writings

Imperalism

A
  • In his secret book, he wrote ‘for this earth is not allocated to anyone nor… presented…as a gift. It is awarded by the providence to people who have it in their hearts to conquer it, strength to preserve it and the industry to put it to the plough…Hence…a vigorous nation will always find ways of adapting its territory to its population size.’
  • Makes clear his imperialistic ambitions and justifies his reason for expansionism. He believes to do this Germany needs to arm herself (relates to ‘rearmament of Germany’). Acknowledges this is only possible with the ‘employment of force’.
33
Q

Why did Germany invade Poland?

History of enmity before WWII

Impact of TOV and how was Poland in a weak position?

A
  • TOV gave land and 800K Germans to Poland. Created the Polish border with the ‘free port’ of Danzig on the coast, giving free access to the sea, which was bitterely resented.
  • Poland was in a difficult position = dismembered and rebuilt, had various minority groups and inefficent communication and railways systems. Polish Govt was aware both Germany and USSR wanted some, if not all land - therefore, unable to trust its neighbours as allies.
  • Growing Nazi military forces made Western powers weak.
  • Poland had a mutual assistance pact with France (Locano Pact 1925) - France made a similar pact with Czechoslovkia but hadn’t gone to war because LON didn’t support it. Additionally, Western powers were badly geographically place to help if Poland was invaded.
  • BUT! Not a weak country. Faced difficulties, but it was fiercely independent and seeking to take land. Warred with USSR over land in Ukraine (1920) and took Teschen from Czechoslovkia (1938).
  • Large army but not very mechanimised = most heavy artillery was still horse drawn and it still had cavalry regiments. In 1939, it had just begun to build and train crews for light tanks.
34
Q

Five reasons why invading Poland might have appealed to the Nazis

A
  • 800, 000 Germans - wanted Pan-germanism ruled under one Reich.
  • Unmechanised army - easy to take over.
  • Knew Allied powers would struggle to support Poland due to geographical locations.
  • Wished to regain Danzig and the Polish Corridor - lost in Treaty of Versailles.
  • Germany and Poland had a history of enmity - natural enemies.
35
Q

Evidence supporting the fact Hitler was always going to invade and Germanise Poland

A
  • Continued negotiations with Poland, rather than attacking it. Poland went as far as to make an agreement to guarantee Germans in Poland’s rights in the guarantee for Poles in German-controlled territories. But, it was unwilling to become an obedient satellite state of Germany - German patience was running out.
  • Germany and the USSR signed the Non-Aggression Pact.
  • Rome-Berlin Axis between Italy and Germany promises mutual support short of war.
  • Germany and Italy signed the Pact of Steel for war support.
36
Q

Evidence that the Nazis were not always going to invade and Germanise Poland

A
  • Nazis presented themselves to the Poles to want to sort out the problems of the Polish Corridor and Danzig by diplomacy.
  • Aimed to be an ally to Poland - the biggest threat since Poland was in the way of the USSR.
  • Germany and Poland signed the Non-Aggression Agreement Pact.
37
Q

To what extend did other Nations contribute to the outbreak of war?

Situation in the 1930s and how did it help Hitler?

Tensions and distrust among the three major powers

A
  • France felt Britain was no longer powerful enough to stand up to Germany and Italy.
  • The American’s didn’t think the French were a major power anymore and felt they were bankrupt.
  • Britain felt France was not a trustworthy ally and that their government was unstable.
38
Q

To what extend did other Nations contribute to the outbreak of war?

Situation in the 1930s and how did it help Hitler?

General situation

A
  • World trade slump broke apart international solidarity and fostered nationalistic attitudes.
  • Memories of the horrors of WWI still raw, people and politicians were desperate to avoid another war = possibly caused their appeasement policy and unwillingness to engage or stop Hitler’s rise to popularity.
39
Q

To what extend did other Nations contribute to the outbreak of war?

Situation in the 1930s and how did it help Hitler?

France

A
  • Its poor treatment of Germany after 1919 only increased France’s own sense of insecurity.
  • Aimed to develop links with countries on Germany’s Eastern border - alliances with Poland, Czechoslovakia, Romania and Yugoslavia.
  • Developed a cautious attitude towards their old ally Russia.
  • Politically divided with several weak govts.
  • Suffered major economic problems during the 1930s.
  • Hitler could take advantage of France’s political instability.
40
Q

To what extend did other Nations contribute to the outbreak of war?

Situation in the 1930s and how did it help Hitler?

Britain

A
  • Largest Empire but the resources of the country were outstretched;
  • Afraid of expansionist Japan in the East and was concerned about Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy.
  • Some British felt that Eastern Europe should be Germany’s real priority, diverting Germany’s attention from British imperial concerns.
  • More like to appease Germany to avoid war, because political and public opinion was fuelled by a strong determination to avoid another war. There was also some sympathy towards Germany following Versailles - felt it was unfair and supported the ‘Redress of Legitimate Grievances’. Furthermore, Britain was more concerned with their Empire.
41
Q

To what extend did other Nations contribute to the outbreak of war?

Situation in the 1930s and how did it help Hitler?

Italy

A
  • Fascist government, initially Mussolini (the leader) didn’t have a good relationship with Hitler.
  • IWanted to defend Austrian independence from Germany.
  • Expansionism into the Mediterranian, invading Abyssinia despite British and French complaints and the lack of a response from the League of Nations.
  • Showed Hitler that he could also be expansionist and invade other countries without much intervention from the weak League of Nations.
42
Q

To what extend did other Nations contribute to the outbreak of war?

Situation in the 1930s and how did it help Hitler?

Poland

A
  • A newly recreated state wedged between potential enemies of Germany and Russia. Contained large German minorities.
  • Developed a strong army by 1933 and ruled by a dictatorial, nationalist government.
  • Geographical location makes it very vulnerable, there is potential for Hitler to gain a powerful alliance with the USSR over Poland.
  • Contained large pockets of Germans, he could argue he is uniting the Germans if he was to invad
43
Q

To what extend did other Nations contribute to the outbreak of war?

Situation in the 1930s and how did it help Hitler?

Japan

A
  • Expansionist government, and a possible threat to the USSR and British and French Empires and a potential ally of fascist regimes.
  • Invaded Manchuria in China in 1931, the League of Nations took no action, and invaded the rest of China in 1937.
  • League of Nations was ineffective when it came to presenting expansionism and invasion - encouraging Hitler.
44
Q

To what extend did other Nations contribute to the outbreak of war?

Situation in the 1930s and how did it help Hitler?

USA

A
  • Isolationist (separating itself from Europe and other conflicts, it is easier for the USA to do this because of the physical distance between them and the rest of the world and because they were not as invested in WWI as other countries).
  • one of the stronger global economies, because of their policy of isolationism they are unlikely to intervene if Germany were to invade other countries, reducing their threat level.
45
Q

To what extend did other Nations contribute to the outbreak of war?

Situation in the 1930s and how did it help Hitler?

League of Nations

A
  • IGO meant to preserve peace, it had the power to call economic sanctions (e.g trade bans) and military actions by members of the League.
  • Members were meant to submit disputes to the League of Nations before taking up arms.
  • USA and USSR joined in 1934. Germany had been a member since 1926.
  • Had the power to be a threat to Hitler as Hitler had to follow the rules of the League of Nations as Germany was a member, however the League of Nations had proved ineffective when other leaders invaded countries.
46
Q

How FP could only achieved if countries shared such aims

Example of his interaction with bRITAIN AND ussr

A
  • During his early years in power, for example, Hitler tried to form an alliance with Britain, which he saw as a racially acceptable ally.
  • Various British politicians visited Germany in the early 1930s and some spoke hopefully of his peaceful intentions. However, despite signing the 1935 Naval Agreement, Britain never made the alliance the Nazis wanted.
  • International relations are also complicated by ideologies and past histories. For instance = hard for the Western powers to accept the idea of an alliance with the USSR because it was governed by a communist regime.
47
Q

How did international politics influence the move towards war?

What state was Europe in after WWI and why?

A
  • Very unstable states as borders, rulers and government systems had changed in most countries since 1914.
  • Policy of self-determination set up in the treaties that ended the war had created new, small independent states (Estonia and Lithuania) that were economically, politically and militarily weak. Many disputed their borders, for example in the 1920s.
48
Q

How did international politics influence the move towards war?

State of Europe and how this influenced international politics?

A
  • Uneasy political atmosphere most likely an offset by a genuine desire for peace among countries and no more war - reflected in established Western policies.
  • Other international influences were the way that the LON behaved and the way other countries behaved towards it, as well as the ideologies of individual countries and the ways in which these affected countries’ interactions.
49
Q

Ideological differences and how it contributed to war outbreak

Communism and anti-communism

A
  • USSR set up Comintern (an organisation to spread the idea of communism worldwide).
  • Significant post-war unrest - membership of Communist parties rose in the west and governments saw communism as a real threat.
  • Affected international relations because Western powers helped the ‘Whites’ to fight the communist ‘Reds’ in the Russian Civil War - no alliance made with Russia.
50
Q

Ideological differences and how it contributed to war outbreak

Dictatorships and democracies

A
  • Three dictatorships: Germany, Italy and Japan.
    Different but united by anti-communist beliefs, a resentment of the Treaty of Versailles, a rejection of democracy and the belief in the importance of a strong military that could impose the regime’s will by force.
  • Originally, anti-communists beliefs appealed to B/F to help to destroy the USSR as dictatorships grew more powerful and aggressive, Western democracies saw them as dangerous.
  • USSR’s leader, Stalin, ruled more like a dictator and built up a significant Red Army - believed to make a good ally against Germany, but Lloyd George (British politician) summed up the problem with an alliance in 1939, saying that Britain needed the USSR but did not want it.
51
Q

The League of Nations

Why was it created?

A
  • Strong desire for international co-operation and to avoid war - of which all countries who signed the peace treaty ending the war had to join the League.
  • Helped take disputes between the countries to accept their ruling rather than go to war. Could act against a country which didn’t accept its ruling, economically or at a last resort militarily. It also ran disarmament conferences.
  • There were several weaknesses:
52
Q

The League of Nations

Weaknesses regarding membership

A
  • Not all nations were members - weak as an IGO - for countries that fought the Allies weren’t allowed to join (Russia and Germany only allowed in 1925).
  • US Congress refused to join, despite P. Wilson being the driving force behind the League’s creation.
53
Q

The League of Nations

Weaknesses regarding bureacracy

A
  • Slow decision-makers.
  • Members rarely agreed to economic sanctions, let alone military force.
  • Needed the agreement of a significant majority to act.
54
Q

The League of Nations

Weaknesses regarding enforcement

A
  • No army so member countries had to agree to supply troops - many were reluctant.
  • Failure to act quickly and use force made it seem weak.
  • When it was clear the LON couldn’t enforce decisions, most nations felt there was less need to obey a ruling that was not in their self-interest.
55
Q

Issues regarding the LON

A
  • Countries increasingly negotiated independently of the LON.
  • Some successes in the dispute between Germany and Poland over Upper Silesia in 1921. With, some failures, for example when Poland took Vilna by force in 1920.
  • As more members ignored it (France taking over the Ruhr), the weaker it seemed and more nations acted without reference to it. So, the Nazis didn’t see it as a force to contend with in FP - withdrew Germany and its disarmament conferences in 1933.
  • Showed it cannot protect its members, or get them to act against their interests e.g on disarmament. While the UK and France did disarm, along with the USA, most other states didn’t feel secure enough to do so.
56
Q

How also did the LON play in the outbreak of war?

A
  • Japanese takeover of Manchuria, which ran as a satellite state called Manchukuo from 1932. However, it was ineffective as Japan ignored its protests and, instead, withdrew from the League in March 1933.
  • Demanding countries left the League (Italy invasion of Abyssina) and if they didn’t, they imposed partial economic sanctions. Unsuccessful and it was leaked that Italy, Britain and France met privately and signed a treaty to sign ⅔ of Abyssinia to Italy.
  • USSR invasion of Finland - intervened and urged USSR to withdraw from membership. The USSR didn’t and was expelled.
57
Q

Significant Alliances made in the 1930s

Anti-Comitern Pact

A
  • Aimed to ensure no alliances with the USSR and a consultation on aid amount if a USSR attack seems likely.
  • In 1936 - Germany and Japan. In 1937 - Germany, Italy and Japan.
58
Q

Signifcant Alliances made in the 1930s

Pact of Steel between Italy and Germany

A

Formalized the 1936 Rome-Berlin Axis agreement, linking the two countries politically and militarily.

59
Q

Signifcant Alliances made in the 1930s

Example of Non-Aggression Pacts to remember

A

1934 - Germany and Poland.
1935 - Czechoslovakia and Germany.
1939 - Denmark and Germany.

60
Q

Signifcant Alliances made in the 1930s

Vaugley friendly agreements

A

April 1935 at Stresa; Italy, France and Britain.
June 1935 Britain and Germany Naval Agreement.
November 1936 Rome-Berlin Axis.
Italian Foreign policy.

61
Q

Attitude of Britain to Germany, the reason why and how it contributed to war?

A

1) Until 1939 - Britain avoided an alliance and an appeasement policy to keep the peace and preserve the situation in Europe set up by the Treaty of Versailles.
2) Genuine desire by politicians + public to avoid war again, causing problems with the colonies and the trade. Doubtful govt that, after the WW1 losses, its colonies would want to join another war (South Africa and Australia in 1938) and more pressure for independence from their India and Egypt.
3) Aappeasement contributed to the war because it encouraged Germany, Italy and Japan to seize more territory.

62
Q

Attitude of France to Germany, the reason why and how it contributed to war?

A

1) Resentment and anger - reimposing its will on Germany by force, invasion of the Ruhr in 1923, failed. turned to appeasement and allied with new European states like Czechoslovakia. Made binding agreements with the USSR, such as the 1935 Pact and pushed Britain to join it.
2) Failure to meet the terms of the Treaty of Versailles and feared German invasion. Felt isolated due to Britain cooling and Russia communist.
3) As with Britain, its appeasement policy increased Hitler’s confidence in his Eastern European aggression.

63
Q

Attitude of Italy to Germany, the reason why and how it contributed to war?

A

1) Allied with G in the Rome-Berlin Axis agreement. However, distrust between leaders. Pact of Steel, an agreement to provide instant military support BUT Mussolini couldn’t join the war until 1942 - joined after France’s fall on G side.
2) Dissatisfied with the TOV and shared an anti-communist outlook. But mutual interest in the land on the Austrian border was an issue. Made the Austrian Nazis back down in 1934 - H gave up on all claims on the South Tyrol area to encourage an alliance.
3) While Hitler never fully trusted Mussolini, the Pact of Steel was an encouragement for him to go to war.

64
Q

Attitude of USSR to Germany, the reason why and how it contributed to war?

A

1) Opposed I/G - reacted to Nazi Polish non-aggression pact by joining the LON and supporting the existing spanish governments, against fascists supported by G and I.
2) Stalin wanted to build up the USSR industry, agriculture and army to the point where the country was self-sufficient and safe from an attack; wanted to avoid war.
3) Made the USSR more likely to reach an agreement with Germany, otherwise it might have to fight Germany and Japan on two fronts - splitting its troops.

65
Q

Attitude of USA to Germany, the reason why and how it contributed to war?

A

1) Isolationism and disarmament. Neutral attitude - supplied arms to Italy and Germany, who were supplying arms to Franco.
2) No intention of going to war due to geographical separation from Europe. They do not feel directly involved, performing a policy of isolationism and focusing on their economy instead.
3) Open statement of not going to war in Europe and producing a permanent Neutrality Act in 1937 to underline it, encouraged Hitler to go to war. Especially if the USA was considered a big superpower.

66
Q

Attitude of Japan to Germany, the reason why and how it contributed to war?

A

1) When LON ruled against Japan in 1933, Japan left and formed uneasy alliances with Italy and Germany. Not enthusiastic allies Germany was encouraged by the alliance in its aggressive alliances as Japan was an enemy of the USSR. The Nazi-Soviet Pact shocked to Japan but by that time, Italy and Germany were the only allies it had.
2) Imperialism Japan that aims to expand. Dissatisfied with the results of the treaties that ended the war and its mistreatment in the LON. Germany and Italy were the only states that recognised Manchuko - taken over land from China.

67
Q

Politicans reaction to Hitler’s foreign policy

A
  • UK PM Baldwin stated if there is to be fighting in Europe, it should be between the Nazis and Bolsheviks, suggesting Britain wants no involvement in fighting the Nazis.
  • Britain and France could not do anything to stop Czechoslovakia being overrun by Germany - David Lowe expressed that Czechoslovakia meant nothing to Britain.
  • Chamberlain broadcasted to the nation believing it would be a horrible idea to start war against people they know nothing of.
68
Q

What was the Hossbach Memorandum

A

Summary of a meeting in Berlin on 5 Nov 1937, attended by Hitler and his military and foreign policy leadership in which Hitler outlined his expansionist policies. The meeting marked the beginning of Hitler’s foreign policies becoming radicalized.

69
Q

Two different views on the Hossbach Memorandum

A

+ It was Hitler’s blueprint for world war, the Reich’s inner circle and leaders of the military were all present. A critical conference and a turning point for the Third Reich foreign policy. Intention to go to war as early as 1937 – used as key evidence at the Nuremberg trials to convict Nazi’s for war crimes.

+ Rearmament discusses Hitler to isolate Schact, from the other Conservatives, and to force programmes of increased armaments. Hitler was just day-dreaming out loud. AJP Taylor questions the validity and reliability of the memorandum as being inauthentic, inaccurate as an official record of the meeting.

70
Q

Two views over whether H wanted to go twar

A

1) Hitler always intended to go to war in order to build a German empire.
2) Hitler didn’t have a master plan, nor did he necessarily intend to go to war in 1939. Rather, he was opportunistic and reacted to events at home and abroad.